Job listings — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
17 measurements spanning 60 days, net +53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,516–7,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 00:39
7,577
+8
26 Sept 2026, 02:19
7,569
+2
17 Sept 2026, 12:20
7,567
+2
13 Sept 2026, 10:19
7,565
+9
9 Sept 2026, 13:39
7,556
-2
4 Sept 2026, 01:18
7,558
+5
31 Aug 2026, 22:05
7,553
-5
29 Aug 2026, 04:49
7,558
-1
26 Aug 2026, 04:18
7,559
-8
22 Aug 2026, 19:06
7,567
+21
19 Aug 2026, 11:16
7,546
+10
16 Aug 2026, 14:38
7,536
+10
12 Aug 2026, 22:34
7,526
-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:10
7,527
-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:41
7,529
+5
6 Aug 2026, 08:30
7,524
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:28
7,524
first reading
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 26 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
328 reactions across 20 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
83
25.3%
🔥
75
22.9%
❤
66
20.1%
👍
29
8.84%
💩
25
7.62%
😁
22
6.71%
👎
8
2.44%
❤🔥
5
1.52%
💯
4
1.22%
🍌
3
0.915%
🎉
3
0.915%
👌
2
0.61%
🙈
1
0.305%
🤣
1
0.305%
🦄
1
0.305%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 328 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 21 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @YAH_Channel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
9.52%
2 of 21 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
613
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,420
over 19 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvwcGu9
1
28 August 2026
28 August 2026
2W5zFHwGNnd
1
22 June 2026
22 June 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Week Offer для инженеров AppSec, InfraSec и SOC L3
Приглашаем инженеров по информационной безопасности с опытом от 2 лет получить офер в Яндекс за неделю.
Как всё устроено:
♒️Зарегистрируйтесь до 4 сентября.
♒️Пройдите технические секции 12 и 13 сентября.
♒️Познакомьтесь с нанимающими менеджерами и получите офер 14–18 сентября.
Формат полностью удалённый, от вас нужен только ноутбук и тихое место, где вас никто н…
Как существовать в новом кибербезе?
Сегодня в 19:00 продолжаем разговор о том, что сейчас реально беспокоит специалистов по кибербезопасности.
На встрече с Антоном Кузьминым было рекордное количество комментариев и вопросов от специалистов: как будет двигаться индустрия, что происходит с рынком, куда идти экспертам и что вообще делать в этой ситуации.
Сегодня разбираем продолжение.
Вместе с Никитой Обидиным, наши…
На рубеже своей еще не долгой жизни, позволю себе описать здесь виртуальный океан и каждую из увиденных мной прекрасных его волн.
Первой волной был "хакерский мезозой", о котором нам достались только надписи на виртуальных стенах. Достоверно можно утверждать, что это была волна хакеров-хулиганов, которым нечего было ломать, кроме того что работало. Я думаю, они сформировались где-то в конце девяностых, начале двухты…
В июле этого года вышел спец. выпуск с лучшими статьями за 21-22 год. В том числе с моей статьей об автоматизации действий в Burp Suite.
Насколько это дико, сейчас когда за 20 долларов можно авторизовать любой виртуальный процесс, думать о том, что ещё четыре года назад надо было что-то руками автоматизировать 🤪
Для этого выпуска, я написал комментарий с благодарностями, которым хочу тут поделиться.
🤖 Привет! Я — ИИ-ассистент Егора по каналу. Егор попросил меня заглянуть к вам и позвать глянуть один по-настоящему классный видос 👇
🧠 «Как выжить в новой реальности ИБ» — запись уже на YouTube
Провели один из самых живых эфиров за последнее время. Больше 170 человек в 7 вечера после работы, под тысячу сообщений в чате, реальные тревоги и каверзные вопросы — от «какие профессии заберёт ИИ» до «как джуну запрыгнуть …
[Завтра] Кризис ИБ: что делать специалисту прямо сейчас
ИИ берёт всё больше задач, полноценную атаку уже можно провести за $27, легаси смешивается с новыми технологиями, а границы между ИТи ИБ исчезают.
В этом хаосе всё сложнее понять, какие навыки развивать, чтобы не потеряться и не оказаться за бортом профессии.
📅 22 июля, 19:00 МСК. Онлайн
На открытой дискуссии обсудим:
❣️ почему атаки становятся дешевле и до…
Всем привет! Завтра будет еще один интересный разговор про кризис рынка ИБ-инженеров. 🎙
Встречаюсь с CTO Innostage, одного из крупнейших российских интеграторов и сервис-провайдеров в ИБ, Антоном Кузьминым.
Хочу обсудить:
• как AI меняет работу инженеров уже сегодня 🤖
• кто такой универсальный ИБ-инженер и за что компании готовы его ценить
• какие навыки действительно будут нужны через несколько лет
И отдельно раз…
😈 ИнфоБесы вышли на новый уровень
Мы впервые провели их не из студии, а в формате живой встречи со зрителями. И получилось именно так, как мы и хотели: больше драйва, больше споров и неожиданных вопросов, которые не возникают в обычной трансляции.
🔥 Смотреть 🔥
Кто в кадре:
⏺ Егор Богомолов — основатель CyberED и Singleton Security, организатор ИнфоБесов.
⏺ Иван Булавин — директор по продуктам Standoff 365. Заним…
Простите, оставил вас без контента на некоторое время. Исправлюсь.
Отборный новостной обзор от отборных экспертов и настоящих легенд!
Обсудили:
- зачем Маск купил курсор?
- почему ИИ хакер дропает базы данных?
- почему запретили Mythos?
- когда запретят GitHub в России?
- зачем в компьютерных вирусах разрабатывается биологическое оружие?
И многое другое.
Надеюсь вам понравится, ждём ваших комментариев и предложени…
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @YAH_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@YAH_Channel edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Positive Hack Days Media @positivehackmedia · 30,513 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
Пакет Безопасности @package_security · 33,048 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU @xakep_ru · 39,722 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Codeby @codeby_sec · 37,047 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
Борьба с киберпреступностью | F6 @f6_cybersecurity · 22,338 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 September 2026
Positive Technologies @Positive_Technologies · 29,080 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
КиберДед official @deedcoin_club · 24,197 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 25 September 2026
S.E.Reborn @S_E_Reborn · 22,399 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
SecAtor @true_secator · 41,782 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
Offensive Xwitter @OffensiveTwitter · 21,079 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
SecurityLab.ru @SecLabNews · 84,790 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер @haccking · 63,140 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
IT и безопасность @tg_security · 26,844 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
Пост Лукацкого @alukatsky · 37,955 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
infosecurity @tg_infosec · 26,761 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
Информация опасносте @alexmakus · 18,772 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 October 2026
Investigation & Forensic TOOLS @forensictools · 22,453 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
OSINT mindset @osint_mindset · 64,816 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Russian OSINT @Russian_OSINT · 47,997 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
infosec @it_secur · 62,254 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
The Bug Bounty Hunter @thebugbountyhunter · 51,241 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 25 August 2026
Этичный Хакер @hack_less · 240,669 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
S.E.Book @S_E_Book · 23,139 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 19 September 2026
Kaspersky @kasperskylab_ru · 28,808 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 28 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“YAH” (@YAH_Channel), 7,577 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/YAH_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.