Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PWN AI

Channel

PWN AI

@pwnai

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,283subscribers

+355 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001960794330
TypeChannel
Username@pwnai
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pwnai

Topic

Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,9287,2837,105.56 August 2026 — 6,928 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,930 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,952 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,969 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,988 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,012 subscribers22 August 2026 — 7,042 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,080 subscribers28 August 2026 — 7,090 subscribers31 August 2026 — 7,100 subscribers3 September 2026 — 7,145 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,181 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,240 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,283 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +355. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,875–7,336 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 03:007,283+43
12 Sept 2026, 17:577,240+59
9 Sept 2026, 00:377,181+36
3 Sept 2026, 11:377,145+45
31 Aug 2026, 02:457,100+10
28 Aug 2026, 13:247,090+10
25 Aug 2026, 05:397,080+38
22 Aug 2026, 10:567,042+30
19 Aug 2026, 05:067,012+24
16 Aug 2026, 07:136,988+19
12 Aug 2026, 07:326,969+17
9 Aug 2026, 10:326,952+22
6 Aug 2026, 09:506,930+2
6 Aug 2026, 03:516,928first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

275 reactions across 24 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 544531774298915783413649.5%
custom 54474801559434927245821.1%
custom 59384825266191797983512.7%
custom 5276417969390362800186.55%
custom 5384453284696181912103.64%
custom 580765432238467112893.27%
custom 543827447766006008182.91%
custom 547448580219916747210.364%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 275 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
187
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 26 we hold a reading for · 77%
Most on one post
38
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pwnai. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 17 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC757 views17 reactions5 Starsread 20 August 2026

Хочу вам напомнить, что есть папка замечательных, на мой взгляд, каналов по AI Security https://t.me/addlist/KQ6ZpCqAO-I1NmUy Надо добавить к себе 😒

custom 54453177429891578349custom 52764179693903628004custom 54474801559434927244

Signed Artyom Semenov

16 Aug 2026, 12:56 UTC≈6,930 views25 reactions10 Starsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Почему изолировать reasoning модели в обычном Docker уже бесполезно Кажется, что если засунуть LLM с доступом к шеллу в обычный Docker-контейнер, хост будет в полной безопасности. Однако в AI Security Institute так не считают. Авторы выкатили в марте SandboxEscapeBench на фреймворке Inspect и наглядно показали что для современных reasoning-моделей дефолтный контейнер - как простая таска для разминки, а на успешный

custom 593848252661917979811custom 54453177429891578348custom 53844532846961819126

Signed Artyom Semenov

14 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTC927 views9 reactions5 Starsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @borismlsecPhoto

Инцидент OpenAI - Hugging Face — что «забыли» объяснить? #иб_для_ml У OpenAI недавно произошел исторический инцидент - AI-агенты сбежали из компании и поломали другую компанию, HuggingFace. Получается, вот он, Скайнет? Про инцидент, конечно, всем известно. Но все про него так восторженно говорили... А может, все еще не так страшно? Я решил разобраться, какие несостыковки есть в рассказе самой открытой AI-компании

custom 54453177429891578344custom 59384825266191797983custom 54474801559434927242

Signed Boris Protoss

13 Aug 2026, 16:38 UTC≈1,020 views7 reactions10 Starsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 54453177429891578345custom 52764179693903628001custom 59384825266191797981

Signed Artyom Semenov

8 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈1,380 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @poxek_aiPhoto

Cisco Antares: SLM для локализации уязвимого кода Cisco представила Antares — семейство SLM для поиска файлов с известной уязвимостью внутри репозитория. Выпущены Antares-350M и Antares-1B; Antares-3B пока только готовится. Ставка сделана на узкую задачу, локальный запуск и меньшие вычислительные требования по сравнению с универсальными моделями. Наконец по настоящему SLM, а не вот эти 30b или даже больше, которыми

custom 54453177429891578345custom 52764179693903628001custom 54474801559434927241

Signed Artyom Semenov

7 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC≈1,100 views5 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @kokuykin

Последние два года мы много экспериментировали с доступными guardrail-моделями. Сравнивали готовые решения, обучили несколько собственных моделей, собирали и адаптировали бенчмарки, чтобы понять, как вообще правильно сравнивать качество защиты. Сравнения по одной метрике недостаточно: какая-то модель лучше ловит опасные запросы, но чаще блокирует легитимные, большие модели имеют более высокий F1-score, но дороже в ин

custom 54453177429891578345

Signed Artyom Semenov

3 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC≈5,460 views16 reactions20 Starsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 544531774298915783411custom 59384825266191797983custom 54474801559434927242

Signed Artyom Semenov

2 Aug 2026, 18:55 UTC≈2,790 views21 reactions5 Starsread 20 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 544748015594349272416custom 58076543223846711283custom 52764179693903628002

Signed Artyom Semenov

31 Jul 2026, 15:47 UTC≈1,700 views9 reactions12 Starsread 20 August 2026

Количество инцидентов с AI-агентами растет лавинообразно. И вот я обнаружил интересный репозитории awesome-ai-agent-attacks, в котором собрана хронология реальных взломов ИИ и уязвимостей AI-агентов за 2024–2026 годы. Только факты, даты, первопричины и ссылки на источники. Такие репозитории и раньше были, но тут словно полная коллекция, очень много знакомо для меня и так или иначе мелькало перед глазами. А вот нес

custom 54453177429891578347custom 54474801559434927241custom 58076543223846711281

Signed Artyom Semenov

29 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC≈1,400 views7 reactions10 Starsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @okmlai

Математика категорий и ИИ Любишь читать академичные лонгриды с сомнительной практической пользой? Тогда этот пост для тебя! О теории категорий обычно говорят как об одной из самых абстрактных областей математики. Довелось прочитать популярную книгу «Восторг абстрактной математики» Юджении Ченг (вслух тебе её прочитают на ютубе, можешь купить на озоне за 4к и в целом за год достаточно прочитать только ее, чтоб собой

custom 54453177429891578344custom 53844532846961819121custom 54474801559434927241custom 54744858021991674721

Signed Artyom Semenov

27 Jul 2026, 18:10 UTC≈1,540 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @b0tleg

Не зря я вёл канал про безопасность агентных платежей практически год, ведь недавно вышла отличная статья о безопасности платёжных агентов. Самые критичные риски кроются в протоколах связи между агентом и сервисом. В чем суть? Успех семантической атаки зависит от того, поддастся ли модель манипуляции. Структурная же атака срабатывает всегда (вероятность успеха - 100%), независимо от того, что под капотом: легкая и д

custom 54453177429891578346

Signed Artyom Semenov

26 Jul 2026, 15:12 UTC≈1,660 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

А ещё давно я не просил у вас бустов в канал https://t.me/boost/pwnai 😒

custom 54474801559434927245custom 53844532846961819121

Signed Artyom Semenov

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @pwnai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 14:51 UTCAnonymous Poll281 voters

Если отбросить всякие OWASP, статьи научные и т.д то какой вектор атаки на AI-системы вы считаете наиболее недооцененным и опасным в реальных прод-средах прямо сейчас?

  1. Indirect Prompt Injection (через RAG, парсинг сайтов или документы)32%
  2. Отравление данных на этапе файнтюнинга или RAG-базы14%
  3. Злоупотребление инструментами агента (Agent Tool Misuse: SSRF, RCE, доступ к API)47%
  4. Supply Chain атаки (модели с бэкдорами, уязвимые зависимости в MlOps пайплайне)32%
  5. Социотехническая атака на оператора/администратора Ml-системы15%
  6. посмотреть21%

The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Investigation & Forensic TOOLS
@forensictools · 22,368
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 37,862
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 31 August 2026
Хакер — Xakep.RU
@xakep_ru · 39,506
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 30 August 2026
Интернет-Розыск
@irozysk · 46,000
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Пакет Безопасности
@package_security · 33,106
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 4 September 2026
OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,564
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Codeby
@codeby_sec · 36,985
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 1 September 2026
IT и безопасность
@tg_security · 26,613
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 September 2026
S.E.Reborn
@S_E_Reborn · 22,374
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 September 2026
Russian OSINT
@Russian_OSINT · 47,701
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 26 August 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 84,459
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
Positive Technologies
@Positive_Technologies · 28,968
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Positive Hack Days Media
@positivehackmedia · 30,694
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 6 September 2026
infosec
@it_secur · 61,761
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер
@haccking · 63,203
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Cyber Detective
@cybdetective · 27,264
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
infosecurity
@tg_infosec · 26,786
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 11 September 2026
Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 125,008
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
SecAtor
@true_secator · 41,700
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
CyberYozh
@cyberyozh_official · 62,701
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PWN AI” (@pwnai), 7,283 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pwnai.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.