Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for vx-underground

Channel

vx-underground

@vxunderground

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

51,766subscribers

+251 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001182568527
TypeChannel
Username@vxunderground
Created30 July 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/vxunderground

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

51,51551,76651,640.56 August 2026 — 51,515 subscribers7 August 2026 — 51,519 subscribers8 August 2026 — 51,530 subscribers9 August 2026 — 51,533 subscribers10 August 2026 — 51,531 subscribers11 August 2026 — 51,559 subscribers12 August 2026 — 51,576 subscribers13 August 2026 — 51,593 subscribers14 August 2026 — 51,643 subscribers16 August 2026 — 51,625 subscribers17 August 2026 — 51,636 subscribers18 August 2026 — 51,645 subscribers19 August 2026 — 51,658 subscribers20 August 2026 — 51,672 subscribers21 August 2026 — 51,690 subscribers22 August 2026 — 51,766 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
16 measurements spanning 16 days, net +251. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,477–51,804 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 20:0251,766+76
21 Aug 2026, 12:5351,690+18
20 Aug 2026, 15:1551,672+14
19 Aug 2026, 18:0251,658+13
18 Aug 2026, 17:1251,645+9
17 Aug 2026, 19:0651,636+11
16 Aug 2026, 13:4751,625-18
14 Aug 2026, 21:3651,643+50
13 Aug 2026, 10:2651,593+17
12 Aug 2026, 06:5251,576+17
11 Aug 2026, 06:0751,559+28
10 Aug 2026, 03:1251,531-2
9 Aug 2026, 01:1151,533+3
8 Aug 2026, 00:5651,530+11
7 Aug 2026, 03:2851,519+4
6 Aug 2026, 08:2051,515first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.6%
avg views ÷ 51,766 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,530
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held80 (31 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total522,250
Reactions total16,312
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 18s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

16,034 reactions across 78 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣4,84030.2%
4,33327.0%
🥰1,0136.32%
😁9706.05%
💯8655.39%
👍7894.92%
😢7824.88%
🔥4202.62%
❤‍🔥4012.50%
🤓3552.21%
🤔2311.44%
🙏2281.42%
🫡2051.28%
🤯1490.929%
😱1350.842%
👏900.561%
🎉610.38%
😎470.293%
🤝460.287%
😇250.156%
3 further kinds490.306%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 19:04 UTC≈4,250 views240 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

What the fuck is this

🤣188🥰228🔥7👏6😁3🤝2❤‍🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈4,100 views164 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Setting up a malware stand on the side of the road. Windows Malware for ¢25 Linux Malware for ¢50 Cat picture ¢35

❤‍🔥93🤝34🥰1612🤩5💯2😢2

21 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC≈7,400 views231 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

> How can you tell it was vibe coded?

🤣177😁31💯126🤔2🤩2❤‍🔥1

21 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC≈5,160 views84 reactionsread 22 August 2026

I have lots of stuff cooking, but when I will have the opportunity to do more is difficult to determine*** Proof I don't use stupid sissy AI, I make dumb typos and look brain dead like a CHAD (please don't bully me)

60😁13🔥5💯3😇2🎉1

21 Aug 2026, 00:24 UTC≈4,850 views93 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Hi It's that time again where I push more malware analysis papers and malware payloads to VXUG. I've pushed over 200,000 malwares. I was hoping to do so over a week ago, but I was preoccupied doing family stuff. I apologize for the delays and slowness lately, it's been an eventful summer and my family makes me do something called "going outside". I have lots of stuff cooking, but when I will have the opportunity t

76🥰8🔥5🤯2😁1😢1

20 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC≈4,520 views66 reactionsread 22 August 2026

And by "Potatoe Soup on Tacos" and "Jimothy on Tuesday", I'm giving a nudge and a wink to some people, so they know that I know what's up, so they know I'm cool and badass (I actually know almost nothing still)

👍38😁149🫡4😢1

20 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC≈4,710 views86 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Chat, let me keep you up-to-date on what the STREETS are saying about the GTA leaks (by the streets I mean stinky internet nerds) Basically, over 9,000 stinky nerds are swarming the people leaking the content, for various reasons, with the primary motivating factor being to get a copy of the GTA VI image (the game itself). GTA V modders (and cheaters) have been particularly ruthless, going to great lengths to find

63🫡9🤣6💯4🎉2😢2

20 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC≈4,610 views101 reactionsread 22 August 2026

I'm not going to discuss the malware logs, pictures and stuff, others have shared. I've got 444,000+ followers on X and 50,000+ on Telegram. I don't want to be an asshole and put this particular employee on blast in front of nearly half-a-million people. I don't believe they did this on purpose and I'm sure they're aware this was a massive oopsie doopsie on the oopsie doopsie scale (they're going to get fired)

🙏6824🥰7❤‍🔥1🎉1

20 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC≈4,650 views87 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Yeah, so pretty much everyone and their Grandmother is still discussing this GTA VI leak and/or compromise. Unsurprisingly, the game leaks have also generated a great deal of speculation. Grand Theft Auto is a gigantic franchise, Rockstar is a multi-billion dollar company, and their newest release into their franchise will probably be another banger. My educated guess, based off of everything I've seen online, is t

66💯11🤣5🥰3🎉1😁1

20 Aug 2026, 05:11 UTC≈4,950 views95 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Maybe it's not ideal to meme post-9/11 CIA torture cinematography, but I believe this accurately conveys the extreme rage Rockstar feels

49🤣30👍8🔥3🥰3🎉1😢1

20 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC≈5,000 views129 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Rockstar Games right now trying to find out who is leaking the GTA VI footage (the secretary is terrified)

🤣103😁11🔥83🎉2😢2

19 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC≈9,250 views146 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Someone is leaking footage of GTA VI and is threatening to release more footage of GTA VI unless RockStar games makes some changes to their base game. They also have launched a cryptocurrency. I'm not particularly interested in the leaks. The game releases soon. These leaks do not hurt RockStar games, in fact I'd argue it helps them build more hype for the game. I am however very interested in the legal things hap

💯11611🤔7🔥5😁5🥰1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @vxunderground. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,827 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

/archive/
@archiveSec · 213
3 posts
your mom‘s fav channel
@milfsfavchannel · 361
3 posts
PEDO HUNTERS CHANNEL
@Pedo_Hunters_Channel · 4,157
3 posts
s1lly fridge 🏴‍☠️
@s1llyfridge · 7
3 posts
esoteric vibrations theory 🌻✝️
@esotericvibes · 9,428
2 posts
Hacking For Ramen
@HackingForRamen · 284
2 posts
НЕТОР4 ЖИВ🐉
@hetop4alive · 112
2 posts
Бухта Меотиди | #УкрICQ #смерекоNet
@meotyda · 740
2 posts
Tech & Leaks Zone
@techleakszone · 19,754
2 posts
Alexander Sangmoore
@Alexander_Sangmoore · 225
1 post
apl worship
@apl_worship · 29
1 post
Ayan rants about everything and posts roms
@ayan_rants · 110
1 post
Cash Hosting
@Cash_Hosting · 71
1 post
Canal multifacetico
@compartir_multifacetico · 108
1 post
Crypto Supremacist
@cryptosupremacist · 2
1 post
placeholder
@cumtown · 8,476
1 post
Cybred
@cybred · 10,986
1 post
Echo's channel
@echopost · 290
1 post
【emacs】
@emaccs · 1,159
1 post
fuyukihidekii | Hub
@fuyukihidekii_hub · 79
1 post
Ghost of Sheva 🇺🇦
@ghostofsheva · 767
1 post
thæ haffk :3
@howkawgew · 104
1 post
Вестник Мемов 🌈
@hubmeme · 63
1 post
📰 Indygram 🔥
@indygram · 564
1 post
Jewish Cashouts
@jewishcashout · 46
1 post
schizophrenic posts
@postowo · 140
1 post
Pseudorandom Thoughts
@prdm_thoughts · 701
1 post
Prefye (Prefired)
@prefyestock · 2
1 post
u_u
@pwnkitties · 163
1 post
Schwarz
@Schwarz_0sint · 646
1 post
Sec Note
@SecNote · 2,255
1 post
Sherlock's Hub
@SherlocksHub · 1,609
1 post
pluie的旅居日常
@taeglichpluie · 128
1 post
So far, so good
@the_high_council_of_frens · 12,787
1 post
ARMY 18+
@usarmy_18 · 1,862
1 post
W1R3L355
@v01dch4nn3l · 946
1 post
wappx ch
@w2ppx · 395
1 post
а я что хуже что ли?
@zoyagurevich · 166
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Investigations by ZachXBT
@investigations · 105,355
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 15 August 2026
Ordo Nexus
@nexus_search · 66,316
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
The Hacker News
@thehackernews · 162,161
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
Linuxgram 🐧
@linuxgram · 72,798
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 19 August 2026
OSINT mindset
@osint_mindset · 64,477
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
infosec
@it_secur · 61,139
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 125,143
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
Life-Hack - Хакер
@haccking · 63,208
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
SecurityLab.ru
@SecLabNews · 83,697
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“vx-underground” (@vxunderground), 51,766 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vxunderground.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.