Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DC8044 F33d

Channel

DC8044 F33d

@DC8044_Info

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,876subscribers

-39 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001154822644
TypeChannel
Username@DC8044_Info
Created11 October 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held28
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/DC8044_Info

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,86913,91513,8926 August 2026 — 13,915 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,915 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,914 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,912 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,902 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,895 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,896 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,894 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,892 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,889 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,887 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,888 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,887 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,886 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,872 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,877 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,879 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,880 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,882 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,880 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,876 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,875 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,874 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,875 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,869 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,870 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,872 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,876 subscribers13,8766 August 202618 September 2026
28 measurements spanning 44 days, net -39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,862–13,922 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 28
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 23:3913,876+4
16 Sept 2026, 16:0013,872+2
11 Sept 2026, 04:5813,870+1
8 Sept 2026, 08:1913,869-6
5 Sept 2026, 02:5613,875+1
3 Sept 2026, 09:4813,874-1
2 Sept 2026, 02:2313,875-1
1 Sept 2026, 00:4813,876-4
30 Aug 2026, 00:0513,880-2
28 Aug 2026, 22:0713,882+2
28 Aug 2026, 01:3413,880+1
26 Aug 2026, 23:1213,879+2
25 Aug 2026, 20:2313,877+5
23 Aug 2026, 01:2913,872-14
21 Aug 2026, 17:3713,886-1
20 Aug 2026, 18:1413,887-1
18 Aug 2026, 16:4213,888+1
17 Aug 2026, 16:4713,887-2
16 Aug 2026, 14:2213,889-3
14 Aug 2026, 22:3613,892first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 1 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
44.2%
avg views ÷ 13,876 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,140
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held21 (1 May 202631 August 2026)
Views total30,680
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 15:21 UTC≈3,160 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Ну і на шо це схоже, ця екібана?

24 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈7,470 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

студенти з кіберкорпусу за моральної підтримки амбасадорів дісішки наїбнули базу военсбыт.рф З Днем незалежності України! 🙂

24 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTC≈6,170 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

З святом всіх! На честь цього дня пропонуємо добити ту банку.

22 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC≈6,230 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Великий збір DC8044 Зібрано вже більше половини досить значної суми. Нам обов'язково треба дозбирати, це надважливо для наших воюючих амбасадорів та їх побратимів. Це важливо задля укріплення їхніх фортифікацій, забезпечення безпеки і збереження життів. Долучайся просто зараз! Вказуй свій нікнейм в ТГ для участі у розіграшах крутих вайбових речей серед донатерів, у дісішці вони завжди були топ! https://send.monoban

8 Aug 2026, 19:38 UTC≈7,520 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

С днём, безо всяких оговорок. Все классно и во многих местах мы охуенные пацаны и девчата. Но пока у нас не будет качественного аналога Пегасуса или Предатора, то в некоторых моментах мы будем посасывать. Русня вовсю хуярит монокли и другую поеботу на основе коммерческого спайваре, так вот в этом направлении мы буксуем. Наступательная кибер-шмибер (если очень обобщенно) у нас прям огонь, но гэпы в других местах прив

31 Jul 2026, 10:46 UTC≈9,680 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

DC8044 вітає з Днем системного адміністратора!

29 Jul 2026, 21:41 UTC≈8,960 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

21.07. Зємлянє, дивитися всім.

27 Jul 2026, 18:03 UTC≈13,700 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

DC8044 оголошує великий збір. У військовий підрозділ, де з початку війни проходять службу два відомі амбасадори нашої спільноти, критично потрібна інженерна техніка. Мова йде про закупівлю невеликого екскаватора для того, щоб побудувати фортифікації для підрозділу на одному з горячих напрямків фронту: це Запоріжжя. Ми обов'язково зробимо кілька цікавих розіграшів за ці донати. Але зараз просто немає часу для того,

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @DC8044_Info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HackYourMom - мамкіни хакери України 🇺🇦
@hackyourmom · 47,787
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
IT ARMY of Ukraine
@itarmyofukraine2022 · 106,210
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 15 August 2026
КІБЕРБЕЗ
@cybersecurity_ua · 53,248
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Molfar про OSINT
@molfar_global · 51,742
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
Разведка в интернете
@razvedka_v_internete · 36,415
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
vx-underground
@vxunderground · 52,032
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
OsintFlow ✙
@osintflow · 30,196
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026
Investigation & Forensic TOOLS
@forensictools · 22,368
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DC8044 F33d” (@DC8044_Info), 13,876 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DC8044_Info.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.