Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [ Cyber.Anarchy.Squad ]

Channel

[ Cyber.Anarchy.Squad ]

@cyber_anarchy_squad

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,599subscribers

+319 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692599650
TypeChannel
Username@cyber_anarchy_squad
Created16 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cyber_anarchy_squad

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,28013,61113,445.56 August 2026 — 13,280 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,280 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,306 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,323 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,331 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,359 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,375 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,390 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,395 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,391 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,388 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,382 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,380 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,382 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,386 subscribers23 August 2026 — 13,389 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,394 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,404 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,399 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,405 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,407 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,415 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,419 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,439 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,440 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,446 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,475 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,506 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,549 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,574 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,595 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,611 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,599 subscribers13,5996 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net +319. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,230–13,661 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:3813,599-12
16 Sept 2026, 21:3913,611+16
14 Sept 2026, 21:5813,595+21
13 Sept 2026, 05:1513,574+25
11 Sept 2026, 07:3913,549+43
8 Sept 2026, 12:3613,506+31
5 Sept 2026, 09:3713,475+29
3 Sept 2026, 14:3913,446+6
2 Sept 2026, 04:2913,440+1
1 Sept 2026, 02:3613,439+20
31 Aug 2026, 00:0613,419+4
30 Aug 2026, 00:5613,415+8
28 Aug 2026, 21:3613,407+2
28 Aug 2026, 00:3413,405+6
27 Aug 2026, 00:5413,399-5
25 Aug 2026, 21:3613,404+10
24 Aug 2026, 20:2513,394+5
23 Aug 2026, 07:5713,389+3
21 Aug 2026, 18:3613,386+4
20 Aug 2026, 17:0213,382first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 23 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,328 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥77958.7%
35827.0%
👍644.82%
😁523.92%
😎322.41%
👏272.03%
😍141.05%
😱20.151%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,328 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 March 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
158
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 8 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
109
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cyber_anarchy_squad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 March 2026 to 30 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 21:51 UTC≈6,750 views151 reactions109 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

We and who?

🔥114😎16👍116😁3😍1

29 Jun 2026, 12:51 UTC≈12,700 views102 reactions48 Starsread 2 September 2026
Photo

C.A.S дало інтерв'ю-подкаст агентству VAPAN. Домашня обстановка, блекджек та шльондри (гоню, я сімейна людина). Приємного перегляду: [ C.A.S x VAPAN ] vapan_tg: https://t.me/vapanco

67🔥17😎10😁4👍3😍1

16 Jun 2026, 19:26 UTC≈25,800 views293 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥223😁3614👍9😍6😎4👏1

16 Jun 2026, 19:26 UTC≈21,800 views169 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Wassup підписники. Ми давно не робили постів, проте за цей час було проведено більше 5 атак на неназвані компанії в сферах IT, держ. структур, та холдинги з різних секторів включаючи торгівлю та будівництво. Оскільки абсолютно прозоро й відкрито проводити атаки стало важче через більш прискіпливу увагу зі сторони силових структур та ЗМІ - ми не могли майже нічого висвітлювати на загал. Але в зв'язку з останніми поді

🔥13017👍8👏7😁5😱2

16 Jun 2026, 19:26 UTC≈24,700 views160 reactionsread 2 September 2026

холдингу, намаганнями підняти тимчасову інфраструктуру, спілкуванням з ахуєвшими від безпорадності грандлайну клієнтами - ми спостерігали з проламаних корпоративних та особистих аккаунтів співробітників (бухгалтери, системні адміністратори, директори. скріни будуть за лінком нижче). Власне кажучи, чому майже через місяць після атаки, ми пишемо цей пост. На неназваних руснявих ресурсах, з'явилась стаття вінегретного х

🔥12321👍9👏3😁2😎2

20 Apr 2026, 19:31 UTC≈15,100 views94 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Думаю вже всі бачили\чули, тому просто робимо репост задля підтримки: https://t.me/OsintVarta/643

60🔥19👍9😍6

28 Mar 2026, 17:11 UTC≈15,400 views97 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Як ви знаєте Хакерський кіт та CAS 23.03.2026 в'їб*ли ООО "ЗЭСКМИ". Від них я отримав трошки документів по співпраці з "АЕС". Маленьку статтю та першу частину дампу можна подивитись і завантажити на нашому сайті: https://cateyesosint.com/publications/damp-dokumentiv-ooo-zeskmy-chastyna-1

🔥81👏106

23 Mar 2026, 08:07 UTC≈13,500 views262 reactions1 Starread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @hacking_catPhoto

Сьогодні було проведено спільну атаку з C.A.S на завод ЗЭСКМИ Ми сиділи в системі цього заводу декілька місяців, та методично захопили доступи до всього, починаючи з компʼютерів адміністраторів закінчуючи серцем заводу, віртуалізацією Нашими силами було вайпнуто близько 300 терабайт данних, персональні компʼютери, робочі станції, тощо. Цей завод займався виготовленням металевих деталей та інших виробів для гіганті

167🔥72👍15👏6😁2

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @cyber_anarchy_squad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HackYourMom - мамкіни хакери України 🇺🇦
@hackyourmom · 47,787
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Molfar про OSINT
@molfar_global · 51,742
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 25 August 2026
КІБЕРБЕЗ
@cybersecurity_ua · 53,248
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 24 August 2026
Разведка в интернете
@razvedka_v_internete · 36,415
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 2 September 2026
Держспецзв’язку
@dsszzi_official · 59,264
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 22 August 2026
Утечки информации
@dataleak · 119,401
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 August 2026
vx-underground
@vxunderground · 52,032
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
OsintFlow ✙
@osintflow · 30,196
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 7 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[ Cyber.Anarchy.Squad ]” (@cyber_anarchy_squad), 13,599 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cyber_anarchy_squad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.