Channel
VenariX
@Venari_By_BetterCyber
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
5,137subscribers
-59 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001661936184 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Venari_By_BetterCyber |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 31 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Venari_By_BetterCyber |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 19:19 | 5,137 | -10 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 5,147 | -1 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 5,148 | +4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 01:37 | 5,144 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 04:55 | 5,150 | -10 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 23:11 | 5,160 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 5,160 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 5,167 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:24 | 5,166 | -11 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 5,177 | -12 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:13 | 5,189 | +5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:13 | 5,184 | -9 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:54 | 5,193 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:24 | 5,196 | first reading |
Engagement
Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@cibsecurity · 28,261
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 10 September 2026
@vxunderground · 52,032
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 24 August 2026
@cybdetective · 27,360
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 11 September 2026
@OffensiveTwitter · 21,001
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 25 September 2026
@ctinow · 38,442
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 31 August 2026
@thehackernews · 164,155
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 13 August 2026
@PentestingNews · 26,663
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 12 September 2026
@noobtooscp · 22,787
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 19 September 2026
@BlueTeamOps · 27,531
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 11 September 2026
@Cyber_Security_Channel · 56,644
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 23 August 2026
@cloudandcybersecurity · 21,828
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 22 September 2026
@seguridadinformatic4 · 29,172
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VenariX” (@Venari_By_BetterCyber), 5,137 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Venari_By_BetterCyber.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.