Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for DeezLab

Channel

DeezLab

@DesigningLaaab

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

23,736subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001361421290
TypeChannel
Username@DesigningLaaab
DescriptionКастомные компьютерные сборки. Обзоры и тесты. 定制电脑装机 · 硬件测评与测试 Boosty : https://boosty.to/designing_lab 微信 wxid_1v7cpdw8fhvc12 По вопросам рекламы: 商务合作请联系: [email protected] РКН https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67b59e729a7d4b3de1902bb2
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 October 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/DesigningLaaab

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

23,66823,76823,7187 August 2026 — 23,719 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,716 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,709 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,705 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,692 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,687 subscribers14 August 2026 — 23,683 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,691 subscribers17 August 2026 — 23,690 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,682 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,677 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23,674 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,673 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,668 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,674 subscribers26 August 2026 — 23,677 subscribers27 August 2026 — 23,670 subscribers29 August 2026 — 23,672 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,685 subscribers30 August 2026 — 23,700 subscribers31 August 2026 — 23,709 subscribers1 September 2026 — 23,715 subscribers2 September 2026 — 23,718 subscribers4 September 2026 — 23,720 subscribers6 September 2026 — 23,730 subscribers12 September 2026 — 23,728 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,722 subscribers15 September 2026 — 23,716 subscribers25 September 2026 — 23,727 subscribers3 October 2026 — 23,736 subscribers8 October 2026 — 23,768 subscribers12 October 2026 — 23,763 subscribers14 October 2026 — 23,755 subscribers15 October 2026 — 23,750 subscribers16 October 2026 — 23,748 subscribers17 October 2026 — 23,756 subscribers18 October 2026 — 23,758 subscribers19 October 2026 — 23,756 subscribers20 October 2026 — 23,747 subscribers21 October 2026 — 23,745 subscribers22 October 2026 — 23,738 subscribers23 October 2026 — 23,736 subscribers23,7367 August 202623 October 2026
42 measurements spanning 77 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,653–23,783 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Oct 2026, 16:0823,736-2
22 Oct 2026, 18:1123,738-7
21 Oct 2026, 15:2123,745-2
20 Oct 2026, 09:4423,747-9
19 Oct 2026, 08:4023,756-2
18 Oct 2026, 10:2823,758+2
17 Oct 2026, 11:1823,756+8
16 Oct 2026, 11:0023,748-2
15 Oct 2026, 09:4023,750-5
14 Oct 2026, 10:4023,755-8
12 Oct 2026, 20:4123,763-5
8 Oct 2026, 07:4123,768+32
3 Oct 2026, 17:0023,736+9
25 Sept 2026, 00:5723,727+11
15 Sept 2026, 10:2223,716-6
13 Sept 2026, 21:3823,722-6
12 Sept 2026, 02:1723,728-2
6 Sept 2026, 15:4023,730+10
4 Sept 2026, 08:1823,720+2
2 Sept 2026, 20:1423,718first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.6%
avg views ÷ 23,736 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,220
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.28%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 October 2026
Posts held61 (1 August 2026 – 22 October 2026)
Views total279,440
Reactions total6,367
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Oct 2026, 22:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,330
Videos
≈509
Links
≈1,260

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
18m 41s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

11,479 reactions across 59 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,97325.9%
👍2,43621.2%
😁2,26119.7%
❤1,70714.9%
❤‍🔥5154.49%
🍌4874.24%
🤣1501.31%
🤯1421.24%
💩1401.22%
👀1020.889%
🍓880.767%
🤡600.523%
👌450.392%
🗿440.383%
🌚430.375%
🤩360.314%
🫡310.27%
😱270.235%
🤷‍♂230.2%
👎220.192%
17 further kinds1471.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 59 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,479 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 22 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
156
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 59 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
100
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @DesigningLaaab. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 61 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 22 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Oct 2026, 09:14 UTC≈5,250 views131 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Video

cat_add

❤81👍30😁8🌚4👀4🍌3❤‍🔥1

22 Oct 2026, 04:51 UTC≈6,050 views120 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Какой то баг в текстурах , такого не может быть в Китае 😬

🤣87🍌15😁8❤3🤡3🔥2🤔2

20 Oct 2026, 09:25 UTC≈7,020 views201 reactions5 Starsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Китайская Татарская архитектура прекрасна🪶

🔥142❤27😁18🍌4🤡4🌚3🙏3

20 Oct 2026, 05:55 UTC≈7,260 views188 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁140🍌27❤10👍5🤡5🤣1

19 Oct 2026, 12:16 UTC≈7,880 views245 reactionsread 23 October 2026
Photo

Когда включил Армянский VPN

😁180❤25🔥23🤡9🍓5🤣2❤‍🔥1

19 Oct 2026, 09:45 UTC≈7,800 views243 reactions5 Starsread 23 October 2026
Video

Кормлю отписчиков🦷🦷

😁190🍌15🔥14🤣10❤9👍3🤯2

18 Oct 2026, 13:56 UTC≈7,980 views307 reactions5 Starsread 23 October 2026
Photo

😬Наконец то добрались до Урала! Все видео кому интересно в инсте

❤170😁86👍33🍌7🤡6🙈3❤‍🔥2

17 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC≈6,630 views100 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Вчера забегали ненадолго на контонскую выставку , часа 3-4 , успели посмотреть наверно %5 от всего что там было . Интересного немного , но посмотреть есть на что. Из необычного это наушники Havit E306P которые можно слушать не засовывая их в ухо , ты слышишь звук за счет вибрации, актуально для плавания. Куча разных роботов , дронов , бытовой электроники , заводского оборудования и т.п. Все ок если бы не такой количе…

❤55🔥26😁11🍌3🤡3❤‍🔥1👍1

16 Oct 2026, 14:09 UTC≈6,180 views103 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

Я припас для вас закладку https://youtu.be/jU-755OKLuc?si=SieDrjCHn50-llqx

👍70❤15🍌8❤‍🔥3💊3💩2🔥2

16 Oct 2026, 06:14 UTC≈6,800 views257 reactionsread 19 October 2026
Photo

🙂

❤153🔥45👍33🍌10🎃8🌚7❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @DesigningLaaab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ЖУРНАЛ ЖЕЛЕЗНОГО
@ironmaninfo · 16,606
#1
Ремонтяш
@realremontyash · 58,029
#2
PRO Hi-Tech
@prohitec · 69,571
#3
Мой Компьютер
@mknewsru · 215,329
#4
Rozetked
@rozetked · 654,364
#5
Техно-Грааль 🍀
@dakarTG · 12,830
#6
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,560,723
#7
Rozetked Plus
@rozetkedplus · 72,613
#8
Будни горесборщика
@budni_goresborshika · 796
#9
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 969,179
#10
Асафьев Стас
@asafevstas · 234,497
#11
i2HARD
@i2hard · 3,321
#12
Рестарт
@remedia · 677,840
#13
НедоNews
@ned0news · 12,062
#14
Бладсикер 2.0
@bIoodsiker · 211,724
#15
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,439
#16
HOMISH
@HomishTG · 9,031
#17
NitroXsenys
@T_Nitroxsenys · 3,672
#18
4pc.by | Сборка ПК | Подбор конфигураций
@gamepcby · 3,800
#19
Не баг, а фича
@bugfeature · 559,624
#20
Yaplakal.com
@yaplakal · 420,386
#21
AlexGyver 🛠 Channel
@alexgyvershow · 78,081
#22
КБ. Игры
@cb_games · 377,292
#23
808
@rbtshki · 200,846
#24
MG │ Про звук и не только
@MGrekovAudio · 7,504
#25
Макаренков об играх
@makarenkoff_games · 28,480
#26
CodeCamp
@codecamp · 178,603
#27
Не баг, а фича
@bugnotfeature · 1,127,118
#28
Коммандер
@ilya_commander · 48,386
#29
Двач
@dvachannel · 972,279
#30
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 712,445
#31
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,122,111
#32
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,098,717
#33
SimpDungeon☠️
@grpzdc · 176,612
#34
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 324,251
#35
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,009,487
#36
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 181,562
#37
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,819
#38
Абу
@abuwtf · 277,944
#39
Big Geek
@biggeekru · 599,802
#40
IXBT Games | Короче
@ixbtgames · 68,168
#41
КБ
@cbpub · 669,732
#42
Крупнокалиберный Переполох
@bolshiepushki · 323,877
#43
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 754,919
#44
Fighterbomber
@bomber_fighter · 527,052
#45
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,666
#46
DTF
@dtfbest · 57,862
#47
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 491,731
#48
Сегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,099,004
#49
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие
@warhistoryalconafter · 480,211
#50
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,500
#51
"Maddyson" развлекательный телеграм канал!
@maddysontg · 204,567
#52
РАЙЗ ЛАВ Ю
@raiz · 306,981
#53
Lemán McLíme
@lemanmclime · 3,728
#54
nerds
@nerds · 413,882
#55
НАКЕД БУТС
@nakedboots · 33,149
#56
Пикабу
@pikabu · 255,003
#57
Говорит ТопаZ 🪖
@Love_Russia_Beauty · 115,234
#58
Recrent
@recrent · 231,738
#59
3DNews
@ru3dnews · 17,357
#60
CherevatBlog
@cherevatstreams · 151,691
#61
StopGame.ru
@stopgameru · 82,608
#62
Perfect WP Обои
@perfectwpvk · 8,945
#63

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 17 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ремонтяш
@realremontyash · 58,029
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
Даниил Герасимов
@gerasimovlive · 27,802
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 September 2026
ТехноМакс: Максим Багаев
@Tehnomaks · 40,445
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
PRO Hi-Tech
@prohitec · 69,571
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
Device
@device24 · 21,355
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 23 September 2026
NatashkaPLUS
@NatashkaPLUS · 57,512
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 23 August 2026
Мой Компьютер
@mknewsru · 215,329
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“DeezLab” (@DesigningLaaab), 23,736 subscribers as measured 23 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DesigningLaaab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.