Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ремонтяш

Channel

Ремонтяш

@realremontyash

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

57,120subscribers

+1,613 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001925443613
TypeChannel
Username@realremontyash
DescriptionОфициальный канал меня, Ремонтяша. Буду публиковать здесь то, что происходит в моей работе. Канал со скидками: https://t.me/RMNTSH_Sale РКН: https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/6757fd1d2d90d3244c88a12b
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held32
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/realremontyash

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

41,400 average views per post against 57,120 subscribers — an engagement rate of 72.4%. Across the 8,396 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.07% and 21.1%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 24 September 2026)
Posts measured18 of 18 published in the window (0 exact, 18 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled744,900
Mature posts only77.8% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers57,120 measured 19 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,396 channels · p10 2.52% · p25 5.07% · p50 10.5% · p75 21.1% · p90 35.8%
Position in cohort99.023th percentile · 6.9× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.016% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

55,50757,12056,313.57 August 2026 — 55,507 subscribers8 August 2026 — 55,518 subscribers9 August 2026 — 55,533 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55,549 subscribers11 August 2026 — 55,568 subscribers12 August 2026 — 55,561 subscribers13 August 2026 — 55,569 subscribers14 August 2026 — 55,579 subscribers16 August 2026 — 55,738 subscribers17 August 2026 — 55,869 subscribers18 August 2026 — 55,935 subscribers19 August 2026 — 55,970 subscribers20 August 2026 — 55,992 subscribers21 August 2026 — 56,014 subscribers23 August 2026 — 56,062 subscribers24 August 2026 — 56,180 subscribers25 August 2026 — 56,248 subscribers26 August 2026 — 56,296 subscribers27 August 2026 — 56,359 subscribers28 August 2026 — 56,409 subscribers29 August 2026 — 56,504 subscribers30 August 2026 — 56,586 subscribers31 August 2026 — 56,624 subscribers1 September 2026 — 56,660 subscribers2 September 2026 — 56,674 subscribers4 September 2026 — 56,715 subscribers6 September 2026 — 56,773 subscribers9 September 2026 — 56,864 subscribers13 September 2026 — 56,914 subscribers15 September 2026 — 56,935 subscribers17 September 2026 — 57,047 subscribers19 September 2026 — 57,120 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,613. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 55,265–57,362 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 18:0157,120+73
17 Sept 2026, 09:4057,047+112
15 Sept 2026, 09:4056,935+21
13 Sept 2026, 19:5856,914+50
9 Sept 2026, 21:3856,864+91
6 Sept 2026, 16:5856,773+58
4 Sept 2026, 02:1556,715+41
2 Sept 2026, 18:0456,674+14
1 Sept 2026, 17:1356,660+36
31 Aug 2026, 19:5356,624+38
30 Aug 2026, 21:3556,586+82
29 Aug 2026, 22:5556,504+95
28 Aug 2026, 22:4556,409+50
27 Aug 2026, 19:0756,359+63
26 Aug 2026, 17:1256,296+48
25 Aug 2026, 17:2856,248+68
24 Aug 2026, 16:4256,180+118
23 Aug 2026, 00:5956,062+48
21 Aug 2026, 17:0856,014+22
20 Aug 2026, 17:2455,992first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.4%
avg views ÷ 57,120 subscribers
Avg views / post
41,400
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.66%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held53 (19 July 202623 September 2026)
Views total744,900
Reactions total27,233
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 03:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
579
Videos
199
Links
122

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

76,689 reactions across 53 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
25,15632.8%
😁16,74321.8%
🔥12,22215.9%
🤣7,86710.3%
🥰3,8024.96%
💩3,7904.94%
🫡2,4363.18%
😢1,3641.78%
🗿1,2681.65%
😱9601.25%
💊6280.819%
🤡2720.355%
😎1170.153%
🤬640.083%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76,689 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
603
across the posts below
Posts paid on
46
of 53 we hold a reading for · 87%
Most on one post
272
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @realremontyash. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 53 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
1.89%
1 of 53 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
46,400
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
43,600
over 52 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2SDnjeuCFuu110 September 202610 September 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 11:24 UTC≈16,000 views1,049 reactions5 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

У Бориса Кита сегодня днюха. С сорока с чем-то летием блять. Ездили с сыном, поздравлять нашего приемного сына😎❤️

🔥772118😁86🥰23💊19🤡17🤣14

23 Sept 2026, 08:36 UTC≈18,300 views1,019 reactions11 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Обедайте пожалуйста https://youtu.be/QA1shEJ0bfc

🔥742🥰127🫡8348😁8💊6🗿5

18 Sept 2026, 07:44 UTC≈36,100 views908 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Есть вещи, которые приятно собирать с нуля. Компьютер - да. А вот например презентацию к завтрашнему дню - как-нибудь без меня🥲 Для второго есть Slidy.ai. Схема простая: тема или DOCX/PDF на вход, а нейронка сама собирает структуру, текст и оформление. На выходе уже готовая презентация, которую можно допилить в редакторе и скачать в PPTX или PDF. Без потраченного на передвигание квадратиков на три пикселя вечера в к

💩434325😢41🗿36🤣36🤡21🔥15

17 Sept 2026, 04:51 UTC≈33,600 views2,276 reactions8 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Догнал легенду по просмотрам. Жаль легенда не в прайме, сравнение нелегитимное. Но если закрыть глаза на это, то можно имаджинировать что я популярный, как Илон Маск(но пока из Тюмени🥲)

😁1,800🔥274130🫡38💩13🥰13🤡8

16 Sept 2026, 12:12 UTC≈30,400 views829 reactions6 Starsread 24 September 2026

Фух, ну вроде готово🥈 https://youtu.be/g7AtOsslRSs

🔥62293🫡76😱13🥰10💩8🤬7

16 Sept 2026, 09:48 UTC≈29,700 views1,512 reactions1 Starread 24 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

817😁459💊104😢58💩30🤡26🥰18

16 Sept 2026, 09:12 UTC≈30,600 views1,305 reactions3 Starsread 24 September 2026

Обедайте теребятки через 10 минут, видос я дам. Только ссылки пока нет, простите, ссылку я не дам

863🤣202🔥128🫡47😁30😢22🤡13

13 Sept 2026, 17:43 UTC≈40,300 views2,371 reactions8 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Здравствуй теребятки. В этом канале 50к человек. Тех кто смотрит посты - около половины. Тех кто активно учавствует в обсуждении того какой я тупой мудак - несколько десятков. По сути вы ылита, активно следящая за каждым моим действием. Вот ваше мнение мне интересно. Логотип нужен для заведения увеселительного типа. Этот сделал очень талантливый нейровед. Красиво, но понятна ли куда отсылка? Или вы не заметили отсылк

🔥1,560💩362171🤣142🗿88🤡33🥰15

12 Sept 2026, 07:00 UTC≈38,300 views2,638 reactions11 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Вчера впервые в жизни позвали на свадьбу. Навалил кринжа на три поколения, но мне понравилось🥰

😁1,840473🔥246🫡37🥰20💩13🤡9

10 Sept 2026, 18:24 UTC≈46,400 views1,635 reactions2 Starsread 24 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2SDnjeuCFuuPhoto

Apple вчера выкатила очередную сентябрьскую презентацию с новым iPhone 18. И сейчас начнется классика: дикий ажиотаж, перекупы звереют, накручивают x2 за первые коробки, а самые нетерпеливые ищут, где взять девайс без переплат. Но внезапно подсуетился Wildberries - предзаказ на новое поколениеу них открыли буквально сразу после конфы. Некоторым всё ещё кажется, что покупать дорогой гаджет на ВБ - это дико. Но по фак

💩1,090252🤣175😁51💊31🗿24😱12

8 Sept 2026, 04:49 UTC≈42,000 views996 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Мне нравится что буквы «И» и «Т» находятся рядом, поднимает настроение (Серёга если что не иуда, норм чел)

596😁251🤣90🫡30💩11🤡10😢8

1 Sept 2026, 19:38 UTC≈70,600 views1,840 reactions272 Starsread 24 September 2026
Photo

Ну всё, я теперь популярный блогер. Жаль что это по новой системе подсчета просмотров🥲 Картонный миллионник👹👹👹 Но буду выёбываться как настоящий. Дудь*, тут звезда засияла, ты почему мне всё ещё не написал? *Признан иноагентом в РФ

🥰1,230🫡301🔥175😎5447💊21🗿12

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @realremontyash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 11:32 UTCAnonymous Poll13,200 voters approx.

Как вам новый цвет фона?

  1. Прекрасно😎36%
  2. Говно ☠️26%
  3. Какой фон? Ты что ебанутый?🤔🤬55%

The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Мой Компьютер
@mknewsru · 209,518
#1
В гостях у Булыча
@bulkin_live · 912,561
#2
DeezLab
@DesigningLaaab · 23,716
#3
Rozetked
@rozetked · 656,361
#4
PRO Hi-Tech
@prohitec · 69,701
#5
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 650,396
#6
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,091,300
#7
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 326,616
#8
VG/Двач
@ru2chvg · 182,024
#9
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,951
#10
"Maddyson" развлекательный телеграм канал!
@maddysontg · 203,807
#11
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,041,128
#12
SimpDungeon☠️
@grpzdc · 166,370
#13
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,094,211
#14
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#15
DeadP47
@deadp47gaymer · 151,336
#16
КБ
@cbpub · 644,640
#17
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 600,761
#18
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,603,481
#19
AcademeG
@academeg_true_original · 268,579
#20
Rozetked Plus
@rozetkedplus · 72,808
#21
Том Хэнсон🍌
@hansontom · 87,887
#22
ТРУСЫ РАЙЗА
@raiznews · 520,462
#23
Вестник Шевцова
@jolynews · 208,388
#24
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,245
#25
4ch
@why4ch · 1,045,447
#26
РАЙЗ ЛАВ Ю
@raiz · 310,523
#27
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,690
#28
Big Geek
@biggeekru · 575,464
#29
Крупнокалиберный Переполох
@bolshiepushki · 325,501
#30
Коммандер
@ilya_commander · 48,347
#31
Гуфовский
@GGufen · 37,095
#32
Игорь Линк
@IgorLinkChannel · 73,289
#33
Рестарт
@remedia · 703,568
#34
Бладсикер 2.0
@bIoodsiker · 212,500
#35
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,088
#36
r/ретранслятор
@retra · 165,509
#37
КБ. экономика
@cb_economics · 346,318
#38
808
@rbtshki · 200,980
#39
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 494,419
#40
StopGame.ru
@stopgameru · 82,727
#41
КБ. Игры
@cb_games · 379,956
#42
Сегодня в тренде
@trends · 1,149,945
#43
Дудь
@yurydud · 864,661
#44
NN
@naebnet · 2,172,222
#45
Злой Крастер
@angrycrust · 123,987
#46
Код.ру
@d_code · 404,952
#47
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 264,826
#48
Лепра
@Lepragram · 341,206
#49
Каргас
@kargacc · 99,307
#50
TheDRZJ
@TheDRZJ · 29,032
#51
Романцев768 | Romancev768
@Romancev768 · 764,394
#52
Reddit
@Reddit · 162,484
#53
MDK
@mudak · 533,284
#54
Пикабу
@pikabu · 256,113
#55
Двач
@dvachannel · 938,773
#56
Mash
@mash · 3,096,804
#57
Абу
@abuwtf · 209,837
#58
IXBT Games | Короче
@ixbtgames · 68,371
#59
DTF
@dtfbest · 57,722
#60
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 913,893
#61
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 494,224
#62
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,535,150
#63
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 747,495
#64
Лентач
@lentachold · 392,921
#65
nerds
@nerds · 415,438
#66
CherevatBlog
@cherevatstreams · 149,625
#67
Лентач
@oldlentach · 261,296
#68
Военач
@voen2ch · 35,515
#69
Recrent
@recrent · 232,677
#70
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,024
#71
CS2NEWS | Counter-Strike 2
@newcsgo · 585,785
#72
Gabe Follower
@gabefollower · 52,252
#73
Макаренков об играх
@makarenkoff_games · 28,589
#74
Свежая Булдка
@buldj · 86,022
#75
Ебейший Чилзон
@melhagram · 30,092
#76
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,305
#77

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Даниил Герасимов
@gerasimovlive · 29,754
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 23 September 2026
DeezLab
@DesigningLaaab · 23,716
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 17 September 2026
ТехноМакс: Максим Багаев
@Tehnomaks · 40,252
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 September 2026
Мой Компьютер
@mknewsru · 209,518
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
spline
@spl1nee · 50,498
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 August 2026
ЖЕЛЕЗНЫЙ
@ironmanexpress · 58,520
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 August 2026
ИТОГО:ШНАЯ
@ratingfood · 88,388
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 22 August 2026
PRO Hi-Tech
@prohitec · 69,701
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
MartyFiles
@martyfiles · 22,519
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
Swich Games
@swichgames · 24,521
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 September 2026
ЗЕМСТАНДАРТ
@zems · 48,770
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ремонтяш” (@realremontyash), 57,120 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/realremontyash.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.