Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for astronomy

Channel

astronomy

@tirsky

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,414subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001086763989
TypeChannel
Username@tirsky
Created23 November 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tirsky

Growth

8,4148,4648,4396 August 2026 — 8,464 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,464 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,463 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,461 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,451 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,457 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,460 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,456 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,448 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,442 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,439 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,430 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,414 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 35 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,407–8,472 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 12:028,414-16
5 Sept 2026, 04:388,430-9
1 Sept 2026, 03:188,439-3
28 Aug 2026, 16:288,442-6
25 Aug 2026, 15:258,448-8
22 Aug 2026, 07:378,456-4
19 Aug 2026, 02:578,460+3
15 Aug 2026, 18:238,457+6
12 Aug 2026, 06:228,451-10
9 Aug 2026, 11:028,461-2
6 Aug 2026, 12:408,463-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:028,464no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:228,464first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 9 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

733 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
52571.6%
🔥11515.7%
👍8912.1%
😁40.546%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 733 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:47 UTC≈2,160 views68 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Ночь 12 августа - пожалуй, одна из лучших астрономических ночей 2026 года. Сразу несколько событий практически совпадут во времени: Полное солнечное затмение - максимум в 20:46 мск. Полная фаза будет видна в Гренландии, Исландии и Испании, а из части Европы - частные фазы. Новолуние (затмение же). Засветки от Луны ночью не будет, а значит небо будет максимально тёмным для наблюдения. Пик метеорного потока Персеид

56👍8🔥4

Signed Igor Tirsky

3 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC≈1,800 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Венера Македонская. Снято в городе Охрид, Северная Македония. 03 августа 2026 20:30. Автор: И. Тирский.

34👍13

Signed Igor Tirsky

17 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC≈2,470 views60 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Луны и Венеры много не бывает)

37👍16🔥7

Signed Igor Tirsky

17 Jul 2026, 16:26 UTC≈2,060 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Луна и Венера в Дубае прямо сейчас!

🔥2917👍7

Signed Igor Tirsky

18 Jun 2026, 13:44 UTC≈2,960 views78 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Все успели понаблюдать? Погода хорошая сейчас, и Луна с Венерой тоже хороши! Снято вчера в Европе.

52🔥15👍8😁3

Signed Igor Tirsky

11 Jun 2026, 16:16 UTC≈2,680 views79 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Не мог же я вас оставить без этой парочки! Снято вчера вечером. Венера и Юпитер! Сегодня тоже будет хорошо видно после заката, а ниже там ещё и Меркурий притаился).

67👍9🔥3

Signed Igor Tirsky

29 May 2026, 12:10 UTC≈2,700 views77 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Луна на фоне холмов Монголии Снято только что. Автор: И. Тирский.

57👍16🔥4

Signed Igor Tirsky

24 May 2026, 11:09 UTC≈3,190 views57 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Так, а вот это фото уже для премиум-подписчиков канала! Кастор и Поллукс - самые яркие звёзды созвездия Близнецов. Снято на iPhone с выдержкой 3 секунды. Япония, город Фудзи.

46👍7🔥4

Signed Igor Tirsky

24 May 2026, 10:45 UTC≈2,120 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Планеты и Старбакс. Снято в Японии. Только что). Бегите смотреть! Старбакс тут неплохо вписался), так как начинается со Star.

42👍4🔥3

Signed Igor Tirsky

18 May 2026, 11:13 UTC≈2,270 views49 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Месяц, Венера и Юпитер среди городских огней Мацуямы. Япония. Автор: И. Тирский

🔥3117👍1

Signed Igor Tirsky

18 May 2026, 10:42 UTC≈2,080 views53 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Месяц в Мацуяме. Снято только что, Япония. Автор: @miladyfairy

53

Signed Igor Tirsky

9 May 2026, 05:54 UTC≈2,690 views63 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Станция МИР в Японии! Оригинал, резервный базовый блок с модулем Квант, на случай, если запуск основного не удастся, то запускали бы этот. Так как основной экземпляр запустили успешно, то резервный остался на Земле и теперь он совершенно бесплатно доступен для всех в Tomakomai City Science Museum на острове Хоккайдо, в часе езды от Саппоро. В России тоже есть макеты и тренажёры станции “Мир”, например в Звёздном г

47🔥15😁1

Signed Igor Tirsky

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @tirsky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AstroAlert | Наблюдательная астрономия
@astroalert · 46,517
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 60,801
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Астрофизика с Тим
@kosmos_int · 56,363
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Fun Science
@funscience · 34,381
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“astronomy” (@tirsky), 8,414 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tirsky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.