Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SpaceX

Channel

SpaceX

@spacex_rus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

17,163subscribers

+339 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001248496854
TypeChannel
Username@spacex_rus
DescriptionСтарейший фан-клуб SpaceX и New Space. Смотрим, как дела у Starship. Следим за освоением и исследованием Космоса. Пишем интересно! 🇺🇸 e-mail: [email protected] 🇺🇸 сотрудничество: @neuradrink 📺 https://www.youtube.com/@space_weex
Created26 February 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/spacex_rus

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,81617,17716,996.56 August 2026 — 16,824 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,819 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,816 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,832 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,837 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,830 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,832 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,831 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,829 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,844 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,846 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,847 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,849 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,845 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,841 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,834 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,831 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,837 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,852 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,851 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,857 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,865 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,868 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,863 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,855 subscribers4 September 2026 — 16,862 subscribers7 September 2026 — 16,860 subscribers10 September 2026 — 16,865 subscribers12 September 2026 — 16,877 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,886 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,879 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,909 subscribers24 September 2026 — 16,952 subscribers3 October 2026 — 17,095 subscribers8 October 2026 — 17,088 subscribers12 October 2026 — 17,112 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,119 subscribers15 October 2026 — 17,114 subscribers16 October 2026 — 17,122 subscribers17 October 2026 — 17,132 subscribers18 October 2026 — 17,133 subscribers19 October 2026 — 17,134 subscribers21 October 2026 — 17,164 subscribers22 October 2026 — 17,166 subscribers23 October 2026 — 17,170 subscribers24 October 2026 — 17,169 subscribers25 October 2026 — 17,171 subscribers26 October 2026 — 17,176 subscribers27 October 2026 — 17,177 subscribers28 October 2026 — 17,171 subscribers29 October 2026 — 17,164 subscribers30 October 2026 — 17,173 subscribers31 October 2026 — 17,172 subscribers1 November 2026 — 17,169 subscribers3 November 2026 — 17,163 subscribers17,1636 August 20263 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 89 days, net +339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,762–17,231 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 08:0617,163-6
1 Nov 2026, 11:4017,169-3
31 Oct 2026, 11:1017,172-1
30 Oct 2026, 13:4917,173+9
29 Oct 2026, 12:5717,164-7
28 Oct 2026, 14:3017,171-6
27 Oct 2026, 13:4517,177+1
26 Oct 2026, 15:1517,176+5
25 Oct 2026, 14:3417,171+2
24 Oct 2026, 14:5417,169-1
23 Oct 2026, 13:0617,170+4
22 Oct 2026, 13:0417,166+2
21 Oct 2026, 10:0917,164+30
19 Oct 2026, 10:3817,134+1
18 Oct 2026, 10:1817,133+1
17 Oct 2026, 08:5017,132+10
16 Oct 2026, 08:3817,122+8
15 Oct 2026, 09:1917,114-5
14 Oct 2026, 09:3017,119+7
12 Oct 2026, 17:1917,112first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.2%
avg views ÷ 17,163 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,470
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held92 (3 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total48,590
Reactions total975
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 15:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈54,400
Videos
≈5,640
Links
≈10,200

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
20m 41s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,489 reactions across 89 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,23926.4%
❤2,13725.2%
custom 54678528393908368671,86021.9%
👍1,17313.8%
custom 54024318545885007073724.38%
😢1952.30%
🤔1361.60%
🤯760.895%
💩600.707%
😁430.507%
🤣380.448%
😍350.412%
😱320.377%
🫡320.377%
☃170.2%
🥱160.188%
🌚110.13%
🕊80.094%
🎉50.059%
🏆40.047%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 92 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,664 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
27
across the posts below
Posts paid on
22
of 92 we hold a reading for · 24%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @spacex_rus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 92 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (7.14%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈2,550 views37 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Отчет о запуске 🇨🇳 CAS Space — SpaceSail Polar Group #17 Статус: Успех Тип: связь Старт: 3 ноября (вт), 03:15 МСК (00:15 UTC) Ракета: Kinetica 2 Космодром: Launch Area 140, Jiuquan Satellite Launch Center, Китай (3 ноя, 08:15 CST) Орбита: полярная Полезная нагрузка: 18 низкоорбитальных спутников связи с полезной нагрузкой в диапазонах Ku, Q и V для мегасозвездия «Тысяча парусов», управляемого компанией Shanghai Spac…

🔥27👍3💩3❤1🫡1😁1custom 54678528393908368671

3 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC≈2,540 views61 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍27custom 546785283939083686716❤11🔥6🤔1

3 Nov 2026, 09:34 UTC≈2,620 views26 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

👋🏻 Итоги 44-й космонедели | News Week #2026.44 ИТОГИ НЕДЕЛИ! Настал понедельник, а значит, время собирать метеориты и составить подборку новостей наших новостей за прошедшую неделю. I: 🚀 Не дождавшись спасателей, гибнет телескоп NASA Космическая обсерватория NASA Swift официально завершила свою научную работу. II: 🚀 🚀 «Замуровывание» модуля МКС: как, почему, и всё ли так плохо? NASA и Роскосмос приняли решение зак…

❤17🔥8🕊1

3 Nov 2026, 08:01 UTC≈2,740 views29 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Отчет о запуске 🇺🇸 Rocket Lab — The Sea God Surveys (iQPS Launch 9) Статус: Успех Тип: науки о Земле Старт: 2 ноября (пн), 19:41 МСК (16:41 UTC) Ракета: Electron Космодром: Rocket Lab Launch Complex 1A, Rocket Lab Launch Complex 1, Mahia Peninsula, New Zealand (3 ноя, 05:41 NZDT) Орбита: НОО Полезная нагрузка: Коммерческий спутник дистанционного зондирования Земли (ДЗЗ). Он пополнил развертываемую группировку iQPS, …

❤19🔥8👍2

3 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC≈3,020 views89 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔥Борьба за надёжность Raptor 3 Помните историю со снятием всех 6 установленных Рапторов с корабля S42 через пару дней после установки? Тогда мы предположили, что причина может быть в необходимости внесения исправлений и улучшений в двигатели по итогам четырнадцатого полёта. Предположение оказалось верным — это подтвердили на недавней конференции NASA Acceleration. Но сначала немного контекста. Аномалии с работой дв…

custom 546785283939083686752🔥22❤9🫡4👍2

2 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC≈6,280 views124 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Photo

🚀 Спасти «Хаббл», пока не поздно! Помните недавнюю историю про попытку спасения космического телескопа Swift? Несмотря на то, что она окончилась неудачей — NASA начинает обсуждение намного более амбициозной миссии по подъёму орбиты и обслуживанию космической обсерватории Hubble, чтобы продлить срок её службы. Несколько лет назад «некий» миллиардер Джаред Айзекман, ныне администратор NASA, уже предлагал полностью пр…

🔥80❤30👍13🥱1

2 Nov 2026, 10:31 UTC≈3,800 views99 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Photo

🚀 Затраты на Starship — «копейки». Даешь вычислительную «базу»! SpaceX привлекает рекордные $40 млрд на покупку новейших графических процессоров (GPU) NVIDIA Vera Rubin через лизинговую схему с участием крупных фондов. Это самая крупная сделка связанная с GPU в истории. 💸 Суть сделки Специальная компания, управляемая Apollo Global Management, покупает чипы и связанное оборудование, затем сдаёт его SpaceX в лизинг …

🔥43❤20🤔13🤯13👍4💩4🌚1🥱1

1 Nov 2026, 13:34 UTC≈4,130 views122 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Photo

❌ SpaceX отказывает заказчикам По мере разработки Starship SpaceX всё меньше заинтересована в ракетах Falcon и кораблях Dragon в долгосрочной перспективе. Появляются всё новые признаки: • SpaceX уже сообщила NASA, что намерена прекратить полёты Crew Dragon по завершении существующих контрактов, к 2030 году или раньше. Гвин Шотвелл, президент SpaceX, в сентябре заявляла, что NASA следует в будущем полагаться на Boei…

🤔67❤32👍8🌚6🔥5💩4

1 Nov 2026, 12:30 UTC≈3,090 views30 reactions1 Starread 3 November 2026

Posted without readable text

👍22❤6🔥2

1 Nov 2026, 12:02 UTC≈2,730 views36 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥29❤7

1 Nov 2026, 11:07 UTC≈3,080 views84 reactions1 Starread 3 November 2026
Photo

🚀 + 🚗 Синергия двух компаний Tesla временно выставила новый летающий Roadster в Хоторне (Лос-Анджелес, Калифорния). Он стоит прямо под ступенью Falcon 9 B1019 — той самой, которая в 2015 году впервые успешно совершила вертикальную посадку. Сейчас эта ступень выставлена как экспонат рядом с бывшей штаб-квартирой SpaceX, с которой делит общую территорию дизайнерская студия Tesla, проектировавшая Roadster. Это особен…

🔥61❤14👍6custom 54678528393908368672💩1

1 Nov 2026, 08:51 UTC≈3,430 views89 reactions2 Starsread 3 November 2026
Photo

⏰ Starship Flight 15: Сутки на орбите? Кент Хойнацки, заместитель руководителя программы NASA HLS, рассказывая о вехах, которых Starship предстоит достигнуть перед посадкой на Луну, упомянул, что в следующем, 15-м полёте вторая ступень — S42, при благоприятном сценарии проведёт до 24 часов на орбите. После этого она вернётся в Starbase и попытается совершить посадку на башню обслуживания, как и первая ступень — Supe…

🔥49custom 546785283939083686722❤10👍6🤯2

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @spacex_rus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@spacex_rus edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Техасский Вестник
@starbasepost · 19,243
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 October 2026
Астрофизика с Тим
@kosmos_int · 54,333
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 23 August 2026
Илон Маск | Физика | Астрономия
@IlonMaskRus · 20,216
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 28 September 2026
Alpha Centauri | Космос
@alphacentaurichannel · 34,384
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 2 September 2026
NASA | Физика | Астрономия
@kosmos149 · 86,574
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 17 August 2026
AstroAlert | Наблюдательная астрономия
@astroalert · 46,752
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Неземной телеграм / Астроном Сурдин
@nezemnoy_telegram · 96,737
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 August 2026
Илон Маск | Elon Musk
@elonmusk_ru · 60,036
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 20 August 2026
Kosmo
@kosmo_off · 90,208
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 17 August 2026
NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day
@apod_telegram · 35,555
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Космонавт Константин Борисов
@borisov_cosmonaut · 21,427
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
Космос просто
@cosmosprosto · 62,222
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Мир Космоса
@kosmos_go · 36,690
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
NASA
@nasapictures · 24,971
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Роскосмос
@roscosmos_gk · 118,421
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 August 2026
QWERTY
@qwerty_live · 21,531
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
Вселенная Плюс
@vselennayaplus · 83,712
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Улица Шкловского - Астрономия и Космонавтика
@ShklovskyStr · 19,226
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 3 October 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

8 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Boe-CFT (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…случае чрезвычайной ситуации на станции{{cite web |author= |url=https://t.me/spacex_rus/64466 |title=SpaceX вернут экипаж корабля Starliner c МКС на Crew…”
read 1 November 2026
SpaceX CRS-31 (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…около месяца[https://t.me/spacex_rus/65587 Запуск миссии CRS-31] {{Wayback|url=https://t.me/spacex_rus/65587 |date=20241219143854 }}…”
read 1 November 2026
SpaceX Crew-9 (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…штаб-квартире SpaceX в [[Хоторн (Калифорния)|Хоторне]]{{cite web|url= https://t.me/spacex_rus/62900|title= Экипаж миссии Crew-9 прошёл тренировки на тренажёре…”
read 25 October 2026
Горбунов, Александр Владимирович (космонавт) (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…|date=2024-09-29|access-date=2024-09-29}}{{cite web |author= |url=https://t.me/spacex_rus/65006 |title=Запуск миссии Crew-9 |lang= |website= |publisher=…”
read 1 November 2026
Доминик, Мэттью (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…[[Пенсакола|Пенсаколы]] (Флорида){{cite web|author=|url=https://t.me/spacex_rus/65457|title=Корабль Crew Dragon Endeavour приводнился в Мексиканском…”
read 1 November 2026
Кардман, Зена (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…штаб-квартире SpaceX в [[Хоторн (Калифорния)|Хоторне]]{{cite web|url= https://t.me/spacex_rus/62900|title= Экипаж миссии Crew-9 прошёл тренировки на тренажёре…”
read 1 November 2026
Хейг, Ник (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…штаб-квартире SpaceX в [[Хоторн (Калифорния)|Хоторне]]{{cite web|url= https://t.me/spacex_rus/62900|title= Экипаж миссии Crew-9 прошёл тренировки на тренажёре…”
read 1 November 2026
Эппс, Джанетт (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…[[Пенсакола|Пенсаколы]] (Флорида){{cite web|author=|url=https://t.me/spacex_rus/65457|title=Корабль Crew Dragon Endeavour приводнился в Мексиканском…”
read 1 November 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SpaceX” (@spacex_rus), 17,163 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/spacex_rus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.