Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for NASA

Channel

NASA

@nasapictures

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

25,206subscribers

-119 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001099009169
TypeChannel
Username@nasapictures
Created16 December 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/nasapictures

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

25,19925,32925,2646 August 2026 — 25,325 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,325 subscribers6 August 2026 — 25,329 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,327 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,322 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,316 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,314 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,311 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,299 subscribers13 August 2026 — 25,320 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,325 subscribers16 August 2026 — 25,329 subscribers17 August 2026 — 25,324 subscribers18 August 2026 — 25,319 subscribers19 August 2026 — 25,313 subscribers22 August 2026 — 25,304 subscribers23 August 2026 — 25,295 subscribers25 August 2026 — 25,276 subscribers26 August 2026 — 25,270 subscribers27 August 2026 — 25,279 subscribers29 August 2026 — 25,277 subscribers30 August 2026 — 25,275 subscribers31 August 2026 — 25,263 subscribers1 September 2026 — 25,258 subscribers3 September 2026 — 25,247 subscribers5 September 2026 — 25,240 subscribers9 September 2026 — 25,213 subscribers11 September 2026 — 25,206 subscribers13 September 2026 — 25,199 subscribers15 September 2026 — 25,201 subscribers17 September 2026 — 25,206 subscribers25,2066 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -119. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,180–25,349 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 06:3925,206+5
15 Sept 2026, 04:5725,201+2
13 Sept 2026, 13:5725,199-7
11 Sept 2026, 20:3925,206-7
9 Sept 2026, 07:3525,213-27
5 Sept 2026, 22:1825,240-7
3 Sept 2026, 16:3925,247-11
1 Sept 2026, 13:5225,258-5
31 Aug 2026, 10:4725,263-12
30 Aug 2026, 08:1225,275-2
29 Aug 2026, 05:3625,277-2
27 Aug 2026, 05:5225,279+9
26 Aug 2026, 05:3425,270-6
25 Aug 2026, 02:5625,276-19
23 Aug 2026, 17:1425,295-9
22 Aug 2026, 02:4525,304-9
19 Aug 2026, 20:5425,313-6
18 Aug 2026, 19:0225,319-5
17 Aug 2026, 18:4825,324-5
16 Aug 2026, 15:5225,329first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,604 reactions across 20 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
79549.6%
🔥19712.3%
❤‍🔥1187.36%
👍1006.23%
🤯754.68%
🤔493.05%
402.49%
🥰362.24%
🤩352.18%
😍342.12%
🍓271.68%
🕊241.50%
👌140.873%
👏140.873%
🤡120.748%
🍾70.436%
🏆70.436%
👎40.249%
💋30.187%
😱20.125%
8 further kinds110.686%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,604 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2025 to 21 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Nov 2025, 15:00 UTC≈21,100 views313 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 24, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250924.html

182🤯40❤‍🔥30🔥23🤔9🕊7🏆6👍6

21 Nov 2025, 13:00 UTC≈19,800 views133 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 23, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250923.html

❤‍🔥7028🔥11🍓7🤩7🤡42👌2

15 Oct 2025, 23:00 UTC≈21,200 views128 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 22, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250922.html

82👍20❤‍🔥6🤯6🍾43🤡3🔥2

15 Oct 2025, 21:00 UTC≈18,900 views63 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 21, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250921.html

47🤔6😍52👍2🌚1

15 Oct 2025, 19:00 UTC≈14,300 views57 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 20, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250920.html

45🤔4💋3🤡3🤨2

15 Oct 2025, 17:00 UTC≈12,200 views64 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 13, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250913.html

43👍5🤩5😍5🔥4💔1🤡1

15 Oct 2025, 15:00 UTC≈10,800 views59 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 12, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250912.html

44🔥6👍5🕊4

15 Oct 2025, 13:00 UTC≈8,970 views72 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 11, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250911.html

42❤‍🔥12👍11🥰4🤔2🕊1

9 Oct 2025, 23:00 UTC≈10,200 views71 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 10, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250910.html

30🔥28👍102🕊1

9 Oct 2025, 21:00 UTC≈8,150 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 09, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250909.html

36🔥1510👏5🤩5🤣2🍾1🕊1

9 Oct 2025, 19:00 UTC≈7,560 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 08, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250908.html

31😍13🔥53👏3

9 Oct 2025, 17:00 UTC≈6,950 views80 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

September 07, 2025 via @nasapictures https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap250907.html

🤯29🤔1714👍9🕊32🍓2🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @nasapictures. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day
@apod_telegram · 35,174
#1
NASA Breaking News
@nasabreakingnews · 2,141
#2
SpaceX Feed
@SpaceXFeed · 4,429
#3
Astro Wonders
@thewonderofspace · 7,663
#4
Astronomy
@Astrofenomen · 5,326
#5
Astronomy Picture Of the Day
@apodChannel · 4,313
#6
Outer Space 🚀
@thespace_tg · 10,329
#7
NASA News
@Nasa_News · 2,680
#8
Wonderful World
@tgwondworld · 3,861
#9
Kosmo [ENG]
@kosmo_eng · 6,260
#10
Earth, Galaxy, Universe
@ourearthgalaxy · 11,622
#11
Space
@space_en · 6,493
#12
Space Times
@Space_Timess · 3,252
#13
Physics
@physics · 33,219
#14
Infinity-Science
@InfinityScienceX · 2,956
#15
🚀 Astronomy Picture of the Day
@apodhub · 560
#16
Astronomy/Physics Books
@AstroPhysicsBookss · 14,269
#17
Astrophotography
@astrophoto · 1,087
#18
Interesting facts
@intfactsen · 22,596
#19
Now I Know 👌
@inowknow · 17,152
#20
Daily Science to all
@sciencetoall · 11,029
#21
Quanta Magazine
@quantamag · 3,077
#22
Cosmos Astronomia® 🔭
@cosmosastronomia · 12,813
#23
Location of the Day
@golocation · 1,185
#24
Science in telegram
@science · 120,288
#25
Discovery 🌍
@tg_discovery · 18,464
#26
National Geographic
@NatGeoSociety · 37,533
#27
Physics
@physics_tg · 12,083
#28
Geography and History Facts
@geographyandhistorfacts · 7,218
#29
Dark Space
@darkspace · 7,604
#30
The New York Times
@nytimes · 181,877
#31
Buzz 📚 History
@buzzhistory · 51,202
#32
Index of
@indexofchannel · 2,217
#33
Katya’s space news
@katline_grey · 670
#34
A moment before...
@a_moment_before · 53,511
#35
Planet Earth
@Planet_Earth · 23,652
#36
Real Nature
@tgrealnature · 30,360
#37
@tourism
@journeys · 25,159
#38
Traveller
@yourtraveller · 11,657
#39
Science and facts
@tgscience_facts · 34,353
#40
Why?
@why_eng · 19,064
#41
Real ⚡️News | USA, EUROPE, WORLD WAR
@waitfornewses · 6,365
#42
Science4all - Best Scientific Channel
@scientific · 10,615
#43
Mysteries of our planet
@Mysteriesofourplanet · 5,497
#44
Interesting Engineering
@ieofficial · 65,952
#45
Breathtaking Technologies
@softwareninja · 13,146
#46
Living Ocean
@livingocean · 3,693
#47
Amazing Facts Chest
@yorserialls · 10,149
#48
Nature 🌎
@Nature · 74,778
#49
Science Strangeries
@Sci_Strangeries · 1,218
#50
Wow!
@wowwvd · 35,049
#51
Hi-Tech Daily News
@hitechdailynews · 16,542
#52
AstroSpace.it
@AstroSpace_it · 10,656
#53
GENERAL KNOWLEDGE ™ 💡
@General_KnowledgeTM · 69,173
#54
Science News
@Science_News_Facts_Updates_daily · 13,296
#55
World History
@history_en · 10,927
#56
🧊 The Arctic Century
@Arctic_Century · 1,038
#57
Gadget and device News 🗞️
@gadget · 10,274
#58
Astronomía y Ciencia 🚀🌌
@AstronomiayCiencia · 15,250
#59
Sick Science!
@sick_science · 14,455
#60
Señales del espacio
@SenalesDelEspacio · 18,280
#61
Did you know?
@did_you_know_mystery · 28,041
#62
Tips&Tricks👌
@tipsforgood · 20,065
#63
Travel ✈️
@travelpics · 10,827
#64
Tomorrow Technology
@TheTomorrowTechnology · 9,417
#65
the Facts
@mind_tg · 11,246
#66
Viral Today
@viral_today · 12,432
#67
Top Disasters
@top_disasters · 17,358
#68
James Webb Space Telescope
@JamesWebbTelescope · 11,630
#69
SpaceX
@spacex_rus · 16,909
#70
NASA Italian Channel
@NasaITA · 969
#71
International Geographic
@internationalgeographic · 39,800
#72
Technology Review
@technology_tg · 8,225
#73
E =mc² / Albert Einstein
@MilkyWayAlbertEinstein · 3,351
#74
Time Machine
@whichtimes · 18,179
#75
Xataka
@xataka · 49,293
#76
Photo Shot
@photo_shots · 8,750
#77
Роскосмос
@roscosmos_gk · 119,395
#78
SpaceX | Starship News
@StarshipNewsLive · 18,183
#79
New York City
@new_york · 7,876
#80
Wildlife
@wildlifen · 16,010
#81

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

NASA's Astronomy Picture of the Day
@apod_telegram · 35,174
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
Physics
@physics · 33,219
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 4 September 2026
Science in telegram
@science · 120,288
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 August 2026
@tourism
@journeys · 25,159
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 14 September 2026
vajiram ravi Current Affairs Gk
@vajiram_ravi_Current_Gk · 27,488
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 11 September 2026
Elon Musk
@elon_musk · 75,183
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 8 September 2026
NEET Chemistry Physics Biology
@NEET_Chemistry_Physics_Biology · 110,983
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 14 August 2026
Interesting Engineering
@ieofficial · 65,952
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NASA” (@nasapictures), 25,206 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nasapictures.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.