The Basque Coast of Spain is rugged in the best possible way. @tourism ✈️

Channel
@tourism
@journeys
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,362subscribers
-582 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001689907832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @journeys @tourism |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 55 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/journeys |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 10:20 | 25,362 | -41 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:57 | 25,403 | -47 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 25,450 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 25,454 | -17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 07:07 | 25,471 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:38 | 25,474 | -15 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:36 | 25,489 | -10 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 21:45 | 25,499 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 21:35 | 25,511 | no change |
| 31 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 25,511 | -17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 25,528 | no change |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 25,528 | -26 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 00:05 | 25,554 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:38 | 25,554 | -19 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:44 | 25,573 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 25,573 | -21 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:08 | 25,594 | no change |
| 28 Aug 2026, 00:03 | 25,594 | -19 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 25,613 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:14 | 25,613 | first reading |
Engagement
71 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.13%
- avg views ÷ 25,362 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 286
- 56 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.47%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 56
- of 71 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 55 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 71 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 16,032 |
| Reactions total | 235 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 10:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 59s
- Average length
- 20s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
284 reactions across 66 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 242 | 85.2% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 13.7% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 296 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 6
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 2
- of 71 we hold a reading for · 3%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @journeys. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
The Red City of Marrakech surely earned its name. @tourism ✈️
❤1
Rome, Italy where the past is everywhere. @tourism ✈️
👍4
Saint Émilion keeps stone and vineyard in balance. @tourism ✈️
👍4
Malmö looks modern without forgetting the castle. @tourism ✈️
👍2
Most cities change over time. Siena decided that perfection required no updates. @tourism ✈️
👍1
Sibiu keeps its medieval order without raising its voice. @tourism ✈️
❤4
Lake Como is the most popular lake in Italy. The Romans started that trend. Everyone since has just agreed. @tourism ✈️
❤3
Imagine the tranquility of living in an Alpine village. @tourism ✈️
❤4
✈️ TRAVELLING THIS SUMMER? ☀️🌍 Take advantage of our NEW PRICES and new TRAVELLER PASSES to enjoy airport VIP lounges for much less! 💺✨ 🔥 Access for solo travellers, couples & groups 🎟️ New TRAVELLER PASSES for even better prices if you have several trips planned. 🍽️ Food & drinks 🛋️ Comfortable lounge areas 📶 WiFi ✈️ Start your journey differently 🔥 NEW PRICES 🎟️ 1 PERSON → €15 👥 2 PEOPLE → €27 → €13.50 p…
❤3
The Maldives is 1,192 islands. None of them rise more than 1.8 meters from the sea. @tourism ✈️
❤4👍1
Porto at dusk. The azulejos hold the warmth long after the sun has moved on. @tourism ✈️
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @journeys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@discovery_nature_earth_world · 2,4704 postsJapan Aesthetic
@japan_japanese_anime_movies_lang · 10,8474 postsTravel for Crypto
@travelforcrypto · 84 postsTourism
@turist_20000 · 14 postsUnit Kebolehpasaran Graduan UiTM
@kebolehpasarangraduanuitm · 21,6012 postsجهان گردانی
@jahangardani · 3,8131 post☎️ Phoneword
@phoneword · 1,4581 postAnex Tour
@uletaimoskva · 41 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@painting · 41,686
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 August 2026
@Nature · 74,875
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 August 2026
@internationalgeographic · 39,929
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 August 2026
@dailystats · 31,061
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
@apod_telegram · 35,073
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
@englishlanguage · 92,524
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
@NatGeoSociety · 37,574
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
@korean_language_kpop_dorama · 64,227
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 August 2026
@images024 · 56,713
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
@cutecats · 37,045
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 31 August 2026
@ACCHI_BAATEIN_MOTIVATION · 56,238
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
@Tech_Science_Innovation · 38,558
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 31 August 2026
@GPT_ChatGPT_AI_Tools · 60,852
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 22 August 2026
@Quotes · 82,949
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 August 2026
@funny_videos_memes_clips_kaotic · 86,356
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 August 2026
@Himanshi_singh_lets_learn_squad · 243,615
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 16 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@tourism” (@journeys), 25,362 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/journeys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.