🌱 Tundra Treasure #Arctic #Arctic_pictures
❤9❤🔥2👍2👎1

Channel
@Arctic_Century
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,038subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001832831067 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Arctic_Century |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Arctic_Century |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 1,038 | -3 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:41 | 1,041 | -4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 1,045 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 1,046 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:32 | 1,048 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 1,050 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 1,053 | -1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 1,054 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:35 | 1,056 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:18 | 1,057 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:14 | 1,057 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
221 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 34.8% | |
| 🤔 | 41 | 18.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 39 | 17.6% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 10.4% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 9.05% | |
| 🐳 | 10 | 4.52% | |
| custom 5280924618444514633 | 8 | 3.62% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.36% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Arctic_Century. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🌱 Tundra Treasure #Arctic #Arctic_pictures
❤9❤🔥2👍2👎1
🌿 Life, finding a way #Arctic #Arctic_pictures
❤6custom 52809246184445146333❤🔥2🔥1
🪞The Nordic Mirror Behind the postcard image of the Nordic countries, 2026 revealed cracks that our readers examined closely. Four publications that looked past the facade. 📌 Neo-Nazism Is Thriving in Finland An uncomfortable look at extremism in a country better known for its quality of life. https://arcticcentury.org/posts/neo-nazism-finland/ 📌 Iceland's Dysfunctional Political and Social Systems What's really g…
🤔4❤🔥2👍2
🧭 Asia Looks North Seoul, Beijing, and beyond: 2026 was the year Asian ambitions in the Arctic moved from rhetoric to routes. Your most-read publications on the subject. 📌 Republic of Korea to Use Northern Sea Route for Commercial Shipping One of the year's most-read publications: Seoul's decision to send commercial cargo along Russia's Arctic coast. https://arcticcentury.org/posts/republic-of-korea-nsr/ 📌 Korea: …
❤🔥3❤2👍2🤔2
⛰ Nordic serenity #Arctic #Arctic_pictures
❤7❤🔥3👍3🐳1🤔1custom 52809246184445146331
🕊 The bird knows no borders #Arctic #Arctic_pictures
❤7🔥5❤🔥2
⚔️ The Battle for Greenland No place generated more headlines—or more reader attention—in 2026 than Greenland. Four publications that traced the tug-of-war over the world's largest island. 📌 The Franco-Greenlandic Agreement of March 3, 2026: Between Economic Sovereignty and Strategic Projection in a Transforming Arctic What Paris and Nuuk actually signed, and what it signals for the wider Arctic. https://arcticcent…
❤2🤔2👍1
⚠️ Energy in a Turbulent Year The Middle East crisis redrew the global energy map in 2026—and the Arctic felt every tremor. These were your most-read energy publications of the year. 📌 Russia–China LNG Cooperation in the Arctic in Light of the Middle East Crisis One of the year's most-read analyses: what the crisis means for the Arctic LNG partnership between Moscow and Beijing. https://arcticcentury.org/posts/russ…
👍3❤🔥2🔥2🤔2
🧊 A floating fortress #Arctic #Arctic_pictures
❤8❤🔥3🤔1
⏳ History Beneath the Ice While we're on summer hiatus, we're revisiting the publications which were read the most in 2026—twice a week, right here. We begin with the historical deep dives you couldn't stop reading 📌 Abandoned US WWII and Cold War Military Bases Still Pollute the Arctic Dozens of American installations were left behind across the North decades ago—and their environmental legacy is still very much p…
❤🔥3👍3❤2🤔2
🏖 The Arctic Century Is Going on Summer Hiatus Dear readers, we’re taking a short pause for the summer. New publications on arcticcentury.org will resume on Monday, August 3. But the North never sleeps—and neither does our Telegram channel. While we’re away, we’ll be posting twice a week with recaps of the most popular publications of 2026: the stories you read, shared, and debated the most. Meanwhile, we’ve refre…
🔥6❤3❤🔥2🤔1
🖇 Between Internal Market Governance and the Arctic Strategic Turn of the European Union by Lisa Bousba 📋 The 62nd EEA Council barely mentions the Arctic in its conclusions, yet its agenda—security, resilience, energy, critical infrastructure, and fisheries—shows how Arctic concerns are becoming embedded in wider European policy structures. 🌐 Read more #Arctic #Arctic_article
❤4🤔4🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Arctic_Century. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧊 The Arctic Century” (@Arctic_Century), 1,038 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Arctic_Century.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.