National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 92 days, net +873. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,503–53,674 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 11:54
53,523
-2
4 Nov 2026, 08:35
53,525
+12
3 Nov 2026, 07:01
53,513
-7
1 Nov 2026, 06:36
53,520
-19
31 Oct 2026, 05:19
53,539
+7
30 Oct 2026, 01:56
53,532
+23
29 Oct 2026, 03:40
53,509
+48
28 Oct 2026, 04:55
53,461
+60
27 Oct 2026, 04:15
53,401
-2
26 Oct 2026, 05:39
53,403
+4
25 Oct 2026, 03:00
53,399
-14
24 Oct 2026, 01:27
53,413
-5
23 Oct 2026, 00:06
53,418
-1
22 Oct 2026, 01:19
53,419
-5
20 Oct 2026, 21:37
53,424
+10
19 Oct 2026, 21:31
53,414
+2
18 Oct 2026, 23:26
53,412
+3
16 Oct 2026, 21:55
53,409
+4
15 Oct 2026, 21:06
53,405
-11
14 Oct 2026, 21:19
53,416
first reading
Engagement
197 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 183 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.8%
avg views ÷ 53,523 subscribers
Avg views / post
13,300
58 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
58
of 197 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
197 (28 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
769,890
Reactions total
8,884
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 11:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 17s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
38,363 reactions across 193 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
8,979
23.4%
❤
7,925
20.7%
🤬
4,492
11.7%
😁
4,315
11.2%
🔥
3,177
8.28%
😱
2,584
6.74%
💯
2,131
5.55%
👀
1,892
4.93%
🕊
1,212
3.16%
👏
699
1.82%
🤝
664
1.73%
👎
293
0.764%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 197 of the 197 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39,483 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
51
across the posts below
Posts paid on
33
of 197 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @akaloy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 197 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.508%
1 of 197 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
11,900
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
12,900
over 196 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGc5QMF
1
15 October 2026
15 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 197 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 15 of 58 posts held from the last 30 days (25.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Моим расписанием занимается ассистент. Но некоторое время назад я подключил к нему клод, чтобы он анализировал эффективность затраченного времени и закладывал точное время до минут на те или иные задачи.
Несколько недель назад я попросил Клод забронировать мне отель в командировку, что он успешно сделал, уточнив пару вопросов.
И вчера перед полетом я увидел, что в моем календаре дублировалась информация о поездке. …
Парадокс российской судебной системы: закон разрешает защищаться, но за самооборону можно получить срок.
В ментальности нашего следствия действует формула: “есть труп - должен быть обвиняемый”. Верно ли это утверждение?
Женщина защищалась от мужа, который её душил. Суд дал ей 6 лет за убийство. И только Верховный суд признал её право на самооборону.
В новом выпуске уникальный состав гостей: бывший следователь и быв…
Иностранцев будут выдворять чаще
Вчера вступил в силу закон № 294-ФЗ, которым перечень статей КоАП, по которым иностранца выдворяют из России, расширили с 22 до 45.
Раньше выдворение было в основном «миграционной» мерой: нарушил режим пребывания, работал без патента, не встал на учёт. Теперь оно привязано к обычным, бытовым составам, с которыми может столкнуться любой человек.
Теперь выдворять будут гораздо чаще:
ме…
Решение подписала судья, которой не было на заседании
В июне 2025 года Яйский районный суд Кемеровской области с участием присяжных признал женщину виновной в покушении на убийство и назначил ей 7 лет колонии общего режима. В ноябре областной суд оставил приговор без изменения, а в апреле 2026 года его законность подтвердила кассация.
Защита продолжила обжалование и дошла до Верховного суда. В материалах дела нашло…
Тяжело больных осужденных хотят освобождать быстрее
23 октября Правительство внесло в Госдуму два законопроекта, касающиеся освобождения тяжело больных осуждённых.
Сейчас суд рассматривает ходатайство об освобождении по ч. 2 ст. 81 УК без конкретного сока рассмотрения. Для человека с четвёртой стадией из перечня к Постановлению № 54 это может быть критически важно.
Поэтому предлагают обязать суд разрешить такое хода…
Выиграл в арбитраже – получи четыре года за мошенничество
Юрист компании подал встречный иск в арбитраж, выиграл, получил исполнительный лист. Но по итогу получил не деньги, а уголовное дело по ч. 4 ст. 159 УК и четыре года условно.
То ли, потому что дело было в Краснодаре, то ли, по каким-то иным причинам, но логика следствия заслуживает отдельной главы в учебнике: он знал, что долга нет – умолчал о соглашении о за…
Ищу тех, кто покритикует нашу ИИ
В Advocall приходит много обращений, где адвокату не нужно никуда ехать. Более того, есть много шаблонной работы: составить претензию, жалобу, заявление и прочее.
Что делает иишка в Advocall: консультирует, составляет любые документы и делает всё остальное, что не требует выезда адвоката.
Чего не делает и не будет: ехать на обыск, стоять у КПП, сидеть рядом на допросе, приносить ко…
Говорят, что нынче модное выражение «я тебя могну» было известно задолго до того, как оно стало известным. По легенде, произошло оно от аббревиатуры МОГ (мобильные огневые группы). Правда, новыми красками заиграло выражение?😉
КС защитил приобретателей земель от необоснованных исков муниципалитетов
Представьте, что вы купили участок под дом. Договор, регистрация, запись в ЕГРН, границы в кадастре. Прошло несколько лет. И тут администрация подаёт иск о признании вашего права на участок отсутствующим – мол, права на этот участок у вас как бы никогда не было. Так делают муниципалитеты, когда мудрят с земельными участками, которые хотят подат…
Девять миллионов за три поплавка
Весной 2024 года мурманский траулер ловил рыбу в Баренцевом море. Трал был с сортирующей решёткой – она отсеивает молодь, чтобы та уходила обратно в море. Решётку держат на плаву кухтыли, поплавки-шары. По правилам их должно быть не больше 16. На решётке было 19.
Октябрьский суд Мурманска оштрафовал капитана по ч. 2 ст. 8.17 КоАП – нарушение правил рыболовства в исключительной эконо…
Штраф 300 млн за взятки. ВС: взятки не было
Директора муниципальной транспортной компании в Южно-Сахалинске осудили за две взятки по ч. 6 ст. 290 УК. Схема, по версии обвинения, такая: двое предпринимателей-перевозчиков расписывались в получении компенсаций, но наличные оставляли в кассе, а главный бухгалтер передавала их директору – за возможность работать на муниципальных маршрутах. Суд назначил штраф 300 млн рубл…
👀49😁27❤19😱17👍8🤝3👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 197 posts we hold for @akaloy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@akaloy edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
22 October 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 57 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Гаец @nomerok777 · 25,774 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 13 September 2026
Человек | Закон | Право @chelzakon · 43,819 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 29 August 2026
Поворот на Право @povorotnapravo · 50,649 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Loader from SVO @loaderfromSVO · 40,405 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Право.ru @pravo_pravo · 57,910 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Бывший прокурор @anon_prok · 38,160 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
ШЕРГИНА Юрист Финансовый советник @LawAndFinance · 69,019 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Юридические Тонкости @sivakovairina · 109,219 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
Доктор Права @doktorprava · 20,850 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право @ruslaw · 25,218 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
ЛИЧНЫЕ НАЛОГИ @persontaxes · 31,375 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026
PRO Семейные права @prosemuy · 20,288 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
ilovedocs @ilovedocs · 19,313 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
Законодатель @zaconodatel · 21,504 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
Мы́тарь @mytar_rf · 27,372 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ @vs_court · 56,523 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Налоги, законы и бизнес. Марат Самитов @oooavirta · 55,939 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
МИРОНОВ ДЕ-ФАКТО @mironov_de_facto · 18,804 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 5 October 2026
Конституционный Суд @ksrf_ru · 28,076 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
Новости ВС РФ @vsrf_ru · 59,727 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KALOY.RU” (@akaloy), 53,523 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akaloy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
