Channel
@moscowcourts
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
34,837subscribers
-119 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001263776525 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @moscowcourts |
| Description | Добро пожаловать на официальный телеграм-канал судов общей юрисдикции города Москвы На канале публикуется информация о судебных делах, рассматриваемых в Московском городском суде, районных судах города Москвы |
| Created | 28 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/moscowcourts |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 11:16 | 34,837 | +2 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 08:34 | 34,835 | -8 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:57 | 34,843 | -7 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 10:29 | 34,850 | -9 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 13:37 | 34,859 | -10 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 11:38 | 34,869 | -3 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:06 | 34,872 | -10 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:17 | 34,882 | -12 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 34,894 | -8 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 09:41 | 34,902 | -4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 08:16 | 34,906 | +4 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:55 | 34,902 | -7 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 02:28 | 34,909 | +1 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 23:10 | 34,908 | -3 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:36 | 34,911 | -12 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 14:08 | 34,923 | +31 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 07:56 | 34,892 | -3 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:57 | 34,895 | -6 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:01 | 34,901 | -2 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 04:49 | 34,903 | first reading |
325 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 170 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 325 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026) |
| Views total | 473,810 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Nov 2026, 05:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 45 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 51 of 83 posts held from the last 30 days (61.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Измайловский районный суд города Москвы рассмотрел и удовлетворил административное исковое заявление о признании информации, размещенной в сети «Интернет», запрещенной к распространению в Российской Федерации. Суд установил, что в открытом доступе размещены материалы порнографического характера с использованием религиозной и национальной атрибутики, оскорбляющие чувства верующих, а также угрожающие здоровью и психич…
Московский городской суд рассмотрел гражданское дело по иску ООО «Окко» к компании МЕДИАБРИДЖ ЮНАЙТЕД ЛТД. (MEDIABRIDGE UNITED LTD.) о защите исключительных прав на аудиовизуальное произведение – «Тень Чикатило», размещенное в сети «Интернет» с доменным именем: w1.zona. im Суд установил, что истец является обладателем исключительного права на использование аудиовизуального произведения, а ответчик, будучи провайдеро…
Мосгорсуд подтвердил законность решения по спору к Алле Пугачевой о защите чести и достоинства Бородин Виталий Николаевич обратился в Пресненский районный суд города Москвы с исковым заявлением к Пугачевой Алле Борисовне о защите чести, достоинства и деловой репутации, указывая на то, что на информационном ресурсе YouTube ответчик распространила ложные сведения, порочащие честь, достоинство и деловую репутацию истца…
Суды общей юрисдикции города Москвы pinned «Московский городской суд в честь Дня работника суда объявляет конкурс для будущих юристов «Фемида зовет». Участие в конкурсе – это уникальная возможность: ближе познакомиться с особенностями профессии и открыть для себя перспективы гражданской службы; узнать…»
Московский городской суд в честь Дня работника суда объявляет конкурс для будущих юристов «Фемида зовет». Участие в конкурсе – это уникальная возможность: ближе познакомиться с особенностями профессии и открыть для себя перспективы гражданской службы; узнать, как работает городской суд изнутри, и познакомиться с потенциальным работодателем; увеличить свои шансы при поступлении на целевое обучение в ВУЗ. Ваша карьера …
Photo, posted without a caption
Хамовнический районный суд города Москвы 3 ноября 2026 года завершил рассмотрение гражданского дела по иску ФНС России и взыскал солидарно с Чекменева А.Н., Чекменева М.А., Чекменева К.А., Чекменевой И.А., Чекменевой Е.А., Семикашева А.М., Лымарь М.А., АО «Объединенная промышленная компания», ООО «Техпромлит», ООО «РГМ-Центр», АО «РГМ-Центр» ущерб в размере 2 827 406 979,89 рублей, причиненный бюджету Российской Феде…
Столичный суд привлек к административной ответственности актёра Артура Смольянинова** Постановлением Черёмушкинского районного суда города Москвы 2 ноября 2026 года Смольянинов Артур Сергеевич** признан виновным в совершении правонарушения, предусмотренного ч. 2 ст. 19.34 КоАП РФ, с назначением наказания в виде административного штрафа в размере 40 тыс. рублей. *включен Министерством юстиции в реестр иностранных аг…
Суд избрал меру пресечения жителю столицы, обвиняемому в убийстве Постановлением Чертановского районного суда города Москвы избрана мера пресечения в виде заключения под стражу сроком до 29 декабря 2026 года в отношении Рожкова Виталия Викторовича, обвиняемого в совершении преступления, предусмотренного ч. 1 ст. 105 УК РФ. По версии следствия Рожков В.В., находясь в состоянии алкогольного опьянения в квартире на Во…
Мосгорсуд вынес приговор за убийство матери и ее ребенка, сопряженного с разбоем Московский городской суд 2 ноября 2026 года завершил рассмотрение уголовного дела в отношении гражданина Молдовы Мельничука Алексея и признал его виновным в совершении преступлений, предусмотренных п.п. «а, в, д, з» ч. 2 ст. 105 УК РФ, п. «в» ч. 4 ст. 162 УК РФ, назначив наказание в виде пожизненного лишения свободы в исправительной …
Суд приостановил деятельность хостела на севере столицы В ходе проверки ООО «ТРИ ЗВЕЗДЫ» по факту регистрации 13 случаев заболевания корью установлено, что вопреки предписанию Роспотребнадзора, в хостел было заселено 234 новых жильца, а также допущены грубые нарушения санитарно-эпидемиологических требований: не выделены помещения для сушки белья, дезинфекционный режим не соблюдается, рабочие растворы готовятся «на г…
Столичный суд продлил арест обвиняемым по делу о покушении на генерала ГРУ Постановлением Замоскворецкого районного суда города Москвы от 2 ноября 2026 года продлен срок содержания под стражей до 6 февраля 2027 года в отношении Корбы Любомира Михайловича, Васина Виктора Павловича и Васина Павла Викторовича. Читайте в МАХ: https://max.ru/id7718123097_gos #замоскворецкий2026
Showing the 12 most recent of 325 posts we hold for @moscowcourts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@moscowcourts edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 114 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 3 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 43 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
2 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Суды общей юрисдикции города Москвы” (@moscowcourts), 34,837 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/moscowcourts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.