Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ева Карицкая

Channel

Ева Карицкая

@evakaritskaua

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

230,304subscribers

-19,728 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002261836192
TypeChannel
Username@evakaritskaua
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/evakaritskaua

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

230,304250,032240,1686 August 2026 — 250,032 subscribers6 August 2026 — 250,032 subscribers6 August 2026 — 249,708 subscribers7 August 2026 — 249,480 subscribers8 August 2026 — 249,313 subscribers10 August 2026 — 249,072 subscribers11 August 2026 — 248,846 subscribers12 August 2026 — 248,512 subscribers13 August 2026 — 248,167 subscribers14 August 2026 — 247,870 subscribers15 August 2026 — 247,550 subscribers17 August 2026 — 247,260 subscribers18 August 2026 — 247,030 subscribers19 August 2026 — 246,825 subscribers20 August 2026 — 246,654 subscribers21 August 2026 — 246,442 subscribers22 August 2026 — 246,120 subscribers24 August 2026 — 245,651 subscribers25 August 2026 — 245,420 subscribers26 August 2026 — 245,103 subscribers27 August 2026 — 244,851 subscribers28 August 2026 — 244,634 subscribers29 August 2026 — 244,508 subscribers30 August 2026 — 244,246 subscribers31 August 2026 — 244,034 subscribers1 September 2026 — 243,889 subscribers2 September 2026 — 243,649 subscribers4 September 2026 — 243,417 subscribers6 September 2026 — 242,959 subscribers9 September 2026 — 242,055 subscribers12 September 2026 — 241,565 subscribers13 September 2026 — 241,267 subscribers15 September 2026 — 240,944 subscribers17 September 2026 — 240,390 subscribers26 September 2026 — 238,631 subscribers4 October 2026 — 236,790 subscribers9 October 2026 — 235,756 subscribers13 October 2026 — 234,714 subscribers14 October 2026 — 234,460 subscribers15 October 2026 — 234,188 subscribers16 October 2026 — 234,010 subscribers17 October 2026 — 233,737 subscribers18 October 2026 — 233,525 subscribers19 October 2026 — 233,320 subscribers20 October 2026 — 233,173 subscribers21 October 2026 — 233,039 subscribers22 October 2026 — 232,816 subscribers23 October 2026 — 232,664 subscribers24 October 2026 — 232,566 subscribers25 October 2026 — 232,367 subscribers26 October 2026 — 232,215 subscribers28 October 2026 — 232,051 subscribers28 October 2026 — 231,879 subscribers30 October 2026 — 231,686 subscribers31 October 2026 — 231,536 subscribers1 November 2026 — 231,305 subscribers2 November 2026 — 230,962 subscribers3 November 2026 — 230,763 subscribers4 November 2026 — 230,588 subscribers5 November 2026 — 230,304 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -19,728. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 227,345–252,991 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 11:19230,304-284
4 Nov 2026, 10:47230,588-175
3 Nov 2026, 09:06230,763-199
2 Nov 2026, 06:29230,962-343
1 Nov 2026, 06:37231,305-231
31 Oct 2026, 03:48231,536-150
30 Oct 2026, 00:55231,686-193
28 Oct 2026, 22:49231,879-172
28 Oct 2026, 00:59232,051-164
26 Oct 2026, 21:16232,215-152
25 Oct 2026, 22:06232,367-199
24 Oct 2026, 19:20232,566-98
23 Oct 2026, 22:29232,664-152
22 Oct 2026, 18:59232,816-223
21 Oct 2026, 12:49233,039-134
20 Oct 2026, 12:56233,173-147
19 Oct 2026, 14:26233,320-205
18 Oct 2026, 16:16233,525-212
17 Oct 2026, 17:41233,737-273
16 Oct 2026, 14:10234,010first reading

Engagement

134 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 77 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 134 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 22m
Average length
3m 45s

Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

51,498 reactions across 120 posts, in 52 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24,00846.6%
💔5,46210.6%
❤‍🔥4,6218.97%
😁3,0455.91%
🔥1,9773.84%
😭1,9243.74%
👍1,0672.07%
💘9701.88%
🥰9081.76%
🕊8291.61%
😢7901.53%
🙏6481.26%
💋5421.05%
🍓5411.05%
😍4330.841%
🤯3870.751%
🙈3500.68%
💯3400.66%
🍌3370.654%
🤪3250.631%
32 further kinds1,9943.87%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 134 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54,275 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 134 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
220
across the posts below
Posts paid on
56
of 130 we hold a reading for · 43%
Most on one post
41
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @evakaritskaua. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 134 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 9 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2026, 13:20 UTC≈6,440 views148 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤87🔥31💋17😇8❤‍🔥3💘1🤪1

9 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC≈9,910 views147 reactions2 Starsread 9 September 2026
Video

❤️

❤89💘27🔥20😁8🎃3

9 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈8,440 views67 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @start_showsVideo

Теперь их истории услышат все 💔 START и MAER подводят итоги масштабного социального проекта #НасНеСломаешь, на который нас вдохновила история главной герони сериала «Холод». Про свои переломные моменты рассказали актриса Линда Лапиньш, телеведущая Елена Ханга, певица МакSим, блогер Катя Мезенова и много других сильных и несгибаемых женщин. Теперь их лица можно увидеть на гигантских медиафасадах в центре Москвы. По…

👍32❤25😁9🦄1

8 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC≈18,300 views231 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

Люблю этих девчонок! Вайб 🩵

❤164🥰27🙏21🤪5❤‍🔥3👻3☃2🍌2

8 Sept 2026, 15:11 UTC≈20,100 views239 reactions1 Starread 9 September 2026
Photo

Ну мамуля же с серьезными людьми 🩵

❤158🔥32😁22👍8💅5💘5😎3🙈3

8 Sept 2026, 14:25 UTC≈18,200 views202 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤117🥰31🤪22🔥8😁8😢5💘3⚡2

8 Sept 2026, 10:07 UTC≈26,900 views466 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

Вчера 🖤

❤330🔥66😍31🍓10🤩8💘7👍6💋4

8 Sept 2026, 00:52 UTC≈29,300 views441 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Отдельное спасибо людям которые проявили инициативу сфотографироваться и получить автограф это большой вклад в память Паши! Спасибо за соболезнования и пожелания успехов и меньше слез на моих глазах и пустоты которая во мне. Благодарю 🙏 родные

❤326😘43❤‍🔥40💘20😇4🙉3🔥2🤗2

8 Sept 2026, 00:52 UTC≈27,100 views204 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Было весело сегодня когда над лошадью поржали, и даже выперли из гримерки) мероприятие было прекрасным, всем спикерам огромное спасибо

💘124❤40🔥27❤‍🔥9😁3💋1

7 Sept 2026, 18:25 UTC≈28,700 views212 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤112😁42💘22👍12❤‍🔥11😴8🙈4🔥1

7 Sept 2026, 17:57 UTC≈31,500 views153 reactions3 Starsread 9 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

❤109❤‍🔥23💘14😴6🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 134 posts we hold for @evakaritskaua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@evakaritskaua edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
27 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 9 posts on @evakaritskaua as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
18 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ева Карицкая” (@evakaritskaua), 230,304 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/evakaritskaua.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.