Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
31 measurements spanning 44 days, net -20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,647–16,724 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 20:41
16,695
+8
16 Sept 2026, 11:01
16,687
+10
14 Sept 2026, 18:55
16,677
-3
13 Sept 2026, 05:17
16,680
+9
11 Sept 2026, 10:16
16,671
-4
8 Sept 2026, 15:42
16,675
+19
5 Sept 2026, 06:22
16,656
-2
3 Sept 2026, 11:41
16,658
-4
2 Sept 2026, 05:08
16,662
-2
1 Sept 2026, 05:56
16,664
-8
31 Aug 2026, 04:05
16,672
-3
30 Aug 2026, 01:53
16,675
+3
29 Aug 2026, 02:11
16,672
-5
28 Aug 2026, 00:24
16,677
+3
27 Aug 2026, 03:27
16,674
+2
25 Aug 2026, 02:48
16,672
-9
23 Aug 2026, 18:26
16,681
+3
22 Aug 2026, 05:46
16,678
-9
20 Aug 2026, 18:45
16,687
+3
19 Aug 2026, 17:02
16,684
first reading
Engagement
59 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.49%
avg views ÷ 16,695 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,250
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 59 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
59 (27 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
21,256
Reactions total
421
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
43m 05s
Average length
14m 22s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,895 reactions across 58 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
766
40.4%
🔥
603
31.8%
💯
254
13.4%
👍
98
5.17%
😁
62
3.27%
🍾
20
1.06%
👏
17
0.897%
👀
13
0.686%
🙏
10
0.528%
custom 5417866532531227224
9
0.475%
👌
9
0.475%
🤩
8
0.422%
😍
4
0.211%
🙊
4
0.211%
👾
3
0.158%
💔
3
0.158%
⚡
2
0.106%
🏆
2
0.106%
👻
2
0.106%
🆒
1
0.053%
5 further kinds
5
0.264%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 58 of the 59 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,895 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 59 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 59 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Mikhalchuk_Yulia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 59 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Я не умею допрашивать свидетелей. Разбираемся, как научиться это делать
Когда мы с коллегами обсуждаем свидетельские показания, разговор обычно сводится к трем сложностям.
Первая – заранее сформулировать правильные вопросы.
Вторая – быстро сориентироваться в ответах и задать уточнения.
Третья – провести допрос так, чтобы получить факты, имеющие значение для дела.
В суде все усложняется. Часть вопросов может снять с…
Нотариус как дополнительная броня для судебного процесса
Мы часто обсуждаем с коллегами проекты, делимся профессиональными лайфхаками и своими секретиками успешных побед. И каждый раз видно, насколько сильно отличаются подходы к ведению судебных дел.
Одни юристы спокойно живут в неопределенности, быстро ориентируются по ситуации и принимают решения в зависимости от того, как развивается процесс.
Другим, тревожника…
Как нотариус помогает готовиться к судебному спору?
На этой неделе проводим одну из самых практико-ориентированных дискуссий Клуба корпоративных споров для юристов, которые занимаются судебной работой. Будем разбираться, как с помощью нотариуса собрать и обеспечить доказательства еще до обращения в суд.
Нотариальная фиксация электронной переписки уже стала привычным инструментом. Однако возможности нотариуса значит…
Тренировки
Давно не подводила свои статистические итоги для наблюдения динамики по самочувствие через физупражения. Убрала фокус в надежде, что встала на стабильные рельсы, ведь вроде через день хожу позаниматься, а значит всё должно быть ок.
И пришлось столкнуться с реальностью — откат. Просадка по дисциплине — в зал ходила не ранним утром, а случайно и на самые легкие занятия. Дифициты в анализах. Поломанный режи…
Рассказываем, чем запомнился август в Клубе корпоративных споров. В этом месяце мы обсудили:
📌 «Публичные выступления юриста — как превратить сцену в профессиональный инструмент» с Ольгой Суботой — разобрали, как определить цель выступления и выбрать подходящую площадку, выстроить понятное профессиональное позиционирование, адаптировать материал под аудиторию, подготовить презентацию и речь, работать с паузами, жест…
«Общество усталости» Бён-Чхоль Хана
#книга 34 из 52, одна из самых сложных, но важных
Почему современный человек, став формально гораздо свободнее, одновременно оказался более уставшим, тревожным, перегруженным и склонным эксплуатировать самого себя?
Власть просто изменила форму. Она всё меньше через другого говорит человеку «ты должен» и всё чаще говорит изнутри него самого «ты можешь». Ты можешь больше работать,…
Негативная обратная связь от наших доверителей
Время от времени я прошу наших доверителей дать обратную связь о работе команды. Особенно ценю ответы о том, что было неудобно, непонятно, медленно или просто раздражало.
Комплименты поддерживают. Негативная обратная связь помогает исправлять наши косяки.
В последних ответах регулярно повторяются два комментария.
Чаще всего нас хвалят за то, что мы не оставляем довер…
Нейрональное насилие
Этот (новый для меня, а может и для вас тоже) термин описывает одну из особенностей современной жизни – значительную часть давления человек способен создавать себе сам.
Внутри головы формируется представление, каким ты должен быть, сколько должен успевать, сколько зарабатывать, как выглядеть, сколько читать, чему учиться, куда расти и с какой скоростью.
При этом эти нормативы часто вообще никт…
Брачный договор в банкротстве: что сегодня проверяют суды
В Клубе корпоративных споров провели дискуссию об оспаривании брачных договоров в банкротстве вместе с адвокатом Екатериной Аличеевой.
Один из главных ориентиров для таких споров – пункты 41–42 Обзора судебной практики по делам о банкротстве граждан от 18 июня 2025 года. Практика 2025–2026 годов показывает: судьбу брачного договора во многом определяют его э…
Чёрная папка директора — мы начали внедрение!
Недавно я рассказывала, что в журнале «Акционерное общество» вышла моя статья с кодовым названием «Чёрная папка». Эту метафору я использую много лет. Я рекомендую директорам создавать личный рабочий архив и складывать туда документы, записи и комментарии по существенным бизнес-решениям.
Ценность такой папки становится очевидной спустя несколько лет, когда директору прих…
Продолжаю пост про кейс Бриша
Вред кредиторам зависит и от правового режима самой доли. По материалам дела с 2014 по 2024 год другой недвижимости у Бриша не было. Если спорная квартира являлась его единственным пригодным для проживания жильем, доля была защищена исполнительским иммунитетом и кредиторы изначально не могли рассчитывать на ее реализацию. В такой ситуации выбытие доли не уменьшает объем имущества, досту…
🔥11💯3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @Mikhalchuk_Yulia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Mikhalchuk_Yulia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Корпоративные споры • Case by Case @corplawpro · 23,600 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Юрист объясняет l Евгений Фурин @furinlaw · 48,439 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
Юстиграм @yustigram · 30,882 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
Loader from SVO @loaderfromSVO · 40,358 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Право.ru @pravo_pravo · 57,605 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право @ruslaw · 25,373 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Поворот на Право @povorotnapravo · 50,806 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Законодатель @zaconodatel · 21,777 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
KALOY.RU @akaloy · 53,269 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Библиотека юриста @library_lawyer · 25,605 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Юристы31/Online @yurist_group31 · 35,713 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право @privlawlib · 33,339 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Судебная практика по банкротству @sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,868 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ @vs_court · 55,875 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Налоговые споры @nalogi_sud · 23,385 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Новости ВС РФ @vsrf_ru · 59,916 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Privacy Advocates @prv_adv · 21,945 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Народный Юрист @PeopleIsLawyer · 23,793 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
Ольга Абрамова про переговоры @HRD_mediator · 28,633 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 9 September 2026
Юридические вакансии @legal_jobs · 35,621 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Конституционный Суд @ksrf_ru · 28,083 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
ШЕРГИНА Юрист Финансовый советник @LawAndFinance · 69,528 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ @yrisprudencia · 23,696 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 September 2026
ТРУДОВЫЕ СПОРЫ @sudpraktik_trud · 26,918 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 29 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юлия Михальчук • Адвокат” (@Mikhalchuk_Yulia), 16,695 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mikhalchuk_Yulia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.