Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Юлия Михальчук • Адвокат

Channel

Юлия Михальчук • Адвокат

@Mikhalchuk_Yulia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,692subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001554275270
TypeChannel
Username@Mikhalchuk_Yulia
Description👩🏻‍⚖️ Адвокат. Выигрываю корпоративные, банкротные и семейные споры. 🥇 Топ-100 персон банкротства PROбанкротство. 📲 Связаться @Yulia_Mikhalchuk. С других аккаунтов пишут мошенники. Реестр https://www.gosuslugi.ru/snet/67406462c577eb7c52128ffd
Created12 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Mikhalchuk_Yulia

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

16,65616,80516,730.56 August 2026 — 16,715 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,707 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,704 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,703 subscribers11 August 2026 — 16,702 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,696 subscribers13 August 2026 — 16,695 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,690 subscribers15 August 2026 — 16,685 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,682 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,676 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,684 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,687 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,678 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,681 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,672 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,674 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,677 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,672 subscribers30 August 2026 — 16,675 subscribers31 August 2026 — 16,672 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,664 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,662 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,658 subscribers5 September 2026 — 16,656 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,675 subscribers11 September 2026 — 16,671 subscribers13 September 2026 — 16,680 subscribers14 September 2026 — 16,677 subscribers16 September 2026 — 16,687 subscribers18 September 2026 — 16,695 subscribers25 September 2026 — 16,702 subscribers4 October 2026 — 16,727 subscribers8 October 2026 — 16,771 subscribers12 October 2026 — 16,793 subscribers14 October 2026 — 16,794 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,792 subscribers16 October 2026 — 16,790 subscribers17 October 2026 — 16,794 subscribers18 October 2026 — 16,795 subscribers19 October 2026 — 16,794 subscribers20 October 2026 — 16,801 subscribers22 October 2026 — 16,805 subscribers24 October 2026 — 16,801 subscribers25 October 2026 — 16,719 subscribers26 October 2026 — 16,681 subscribers27 October 2026 — 16,679 subscribers28 October 2026 — 16,672 subscribers29 October 2026 — 16,678 subscribers30 October 2026 — 16,688 subscribers31 October 2026 — 16,689 subscribers1 November 2026 — 16,685 subscribers2 November 2026 — 16,680 subscribers3 November 2026 — 16,685 subscribers5 November 2026 — 16,694 subscribers6 November 2026 — 16,691 subscribers7 November 2026 — 16,692 subscribers16,6926 August 20267 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 93 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,634–16,827 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 04:5016,692+1
6 Nov 2026, 08:0016,691-3
5 Nov 2026, 09:1916,694+9
3 Nov 2026, 02:5616,685+5
2 Nov 2026, 04:4916,680-5
1 Nov 2026, 06:4916,685-4
31 Oct 2026, 05:2716,689+1
30 Oct 2026, 06:0016,688+10
29 Oct 2026, 04:2816,678+6
28 Oct 2026, 03:5616,672-7
27 Oct 2026, 03:3716,679-2
26 Oct 2026, 05:5516,681-38
25 Oct 2026, 06:5016,719-82
24 Oct 2026, 03:2016,801-4
22 Oct 2026, 01:0816,805+4
20 Oct 2026, 18:5116,801+7
19 Oct 2026, 19:3016,794-1
18 Oct 2026, 17:3016,795+1
17 Oct 2026, 20:1916,794+4
16 Oct 2026, 19:0816,790first reading

Engagement

84 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 66 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.86%
avg views ÷ 16,692 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,310
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 84 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held84 (27 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total32,820
Reactions total620
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 16:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,580
Videos
≈248
Links
≈2,350

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
43m 05s
Average length
14m 22s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,515 reactions across 82 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤96538.4%
🔥79631.7%
💯38815.4%
👍1285.09%
😁692.74%
🙏341.35%
🍾200.795%
👏190.755%
💔170.676%
custom 5417866532531227224150.596%
👀130.517%
🤩120.477%
👌100.398%
🙊50.199%
😍40.159%
😴40.159%
👾30.119%
⚡20.08%
🏆20.08%
👻20.08%
6 further kinds70.278%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 82 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,515 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 84 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Mikhalchuk_Yulia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 84 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 25 posts held from the last 30 days (28.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 08:08 UTC373 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Можно ли оспорить вознаграждение генерального директора ООО? Участник становится генеральным директором, увеличивает себе оклад и премии. Большинство поддерживает. Остальным предлагают смириться. Участник ООО вправе оспорить такое решение. Одного несогласия с размером выплат недостаточно. Значение имеют процедура, экономическое обоснование вознаграждения и последствия для общества. 1️⃣ Участники одобрили выплаты р…

❤5🔥1🙏1

6 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,330 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Может ли участник ООО голосовать за собственное избрание директором? У одного участника 60%, у другого – 40%. Первый предлагает себя на должность генерального директора и голосует за. Второй возражает и требует исключить голос кандидата из подсчёта. Ведь тот очевидно заинтересован в собственном назначении. Такое требование само по себе необоснованно. Участник вправе голосовать за себя, и его голоса учитываются. За…

👍6❤1

5 Nov 2026, 15:33 UTC612 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @subsidiarka_kdlPhoto

Как продвигаться, если пока нет громких дел и известного имени? — расскажем на бесплатной дискуссии Чтобы предложить себя в качестве спикера, хочется сначала накопить больше опыта. Чтобы дать комментарий СМИ — стать известным экспертом. Чтобы познакомиться с потенциальным клиентом — иметь за плечами дело, о котором все слышали. Так продвижение легко отложить на неопределённый срок. Хотя в повседневной работе юриста…

5 Nov 2026, 07:34 UTC662 views8 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Кто выбирает директора в вашем бизнесе? Избрание директора – один из важнейших вопросов в отношениях бизнес-партнёров. Тот, кто стоит у руля, управляет компанией, распоряжается её деньгами и имуществом, заключает сделки и принимает кадровые решения. Поэтому от порядка избрания директора зависит, в чьих руках окажется реальное управление бизнесом. В уставе ООО можно распределить это влияние. У каждой модели есть рис…

❤8

4 Nov 2026, 07:02 UTC≈1,520 views9 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Участник не согласен с избранием нового директора и оспаривает решение собрания. Какие обеспечительные меры можно просить на период рассмотрения спора? Судебный спор может длиться год и больше. За это время новый директор успеет заключить сделки, распорядиться активами и изменить управление дочерними обществами. Подача иска сама по себе его не останавливает. Поэтому вместе с оспариванием решения об избрании директо…

👍6❤3

3 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC803 views7 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Клиенты приходят по рекомендациям. Зачем тогда вести блог и выступать? «У меня всё по сарафанному радио» — знакомый аргумент в разговоре о юридическом маркетинге. Если клиенты и так обращаются, тратить время на публикации, выступления и профессиональные сообщества кажется лишним. Но полезно разобраться, кто вас рекомендует и откуда эти люди знают о вашей работе. Бывший клиент может посоветовать вас, потому что вы п…

👍4🔥2😴1

3 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC836 views5 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Когда можно отменить решение о смене директора? Участник узнал о новом генеральном директоре из ЕГРЮЛ. Собрание прошло без него. Хотя, если верить протоколу, он мог оказаться среди голосовавших. Какие нарушения позволяют оспорить решение? Разбираю несколько оснований из практики ВС РФ. 1️⃣ Участника лишили возможности участвовать в собрании Существенное нарушение порядка созыва может повлечь недействительность реш…

❤4👍1

2 Nov 2026, 06:32 UTC≈1,790 views18 reactionsread 7 November 2026

В компании поменяли директора, а участник с этим не согласен. Что делать? Представим ситуацию — в ЕГРЮЛ появился новый ген.директор. Он заключает договоры, распоряжается деньгами и управляет компанией. Как участнику защитить свои интересы и имущество общества? Законность избрания директора и конкретные основания для отмены корп.решения сейчас оставим за рамками. Разберём возможный список действий для защиты на прим…

❤8👍7🔥3

1 Nov 2026, 15:42 UTC≈1,050 views23 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Слабая позиция требует сильных нервов Делюсь мыслями и выводами после переговоров за прошедшие несколько месяцев. Чем сильнее вам нужна сделка, тем слабее может стать ваша переговорная позиция. Если партнёр понимает, что отказ обойдётся вам слишком дорого, у него появляется возможность требовать больше и уступать меньше. Зависимость возникает по разным причинам. Поджимают сроки, уже вложены деньги, на будущую сдел…

🔥13💯5❤4😴1

31 Oct 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,050 views33 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

«SHIVA-мир. Как жить и вести бизнес в эпоху перемен» Марка Розина #книга 43 из 52 Прочитала книгу Марка Розина. Нет, даже проглотила, пока ехала в поезде. Интересное размышление о мироустройстве и глобальных изменениях, которые люди зачастую даже не могут представить заранее. При этом с последствиями этих изменений приходится жить, работать, воспитывать детей и строить новые планы. Марк Розин – психолог, кандидат …

❤15🔥10🙏7👍1

31 Oct 2026, 09:31 UTC918 views16 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Рассказываем, чем запомнился октябрь в Клубе корпоративных споров. В этом месяце мы обсудили 📌 «Системный нетворкинг и экспертное позиционирование юриста» с Цереном Савгуровым — разобрали, как готовиться к профессиональным мероприятиям, выбирать собеседников и продолжать общение после знакомства. Обсудили, как связать выступления, публикации и личные встречи с формированием экспертной репутации, использовать интервь…

❤6💯5🔥5

30 Oct 2026, 17:00 UTC926 views23 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Семья и бизнес. Как риски переходят от одного к другому Оформили долю на родственника, сына назначили директором, помещение купили на компанию. Пока отношения хорошие, такая конструкция кажется удобной. Но личная судьба каждого связана с судьбой бизнеса. В Клубе корпоративных споров с Виктором Вяткиным обсудили эти риски⁠. Алексей Васятин разобрал наш кейс о размывании супружеской доли. 1️⃣ Должность родственника …

❤11💯5🔥5👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @Mikhalchuk_Yulia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Mikhalchuk_Yulia edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @Mikhalchuk_Yulia as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
21 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
38 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Корпоративные споры • Case by Case
@corplawpro · 23,636
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Субсидиарная ответственность • Case by Case
@subsidiarka_kdl · 21,090
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
Юрист объясняет l Евгений Фурин
@furinlaw · 47,980
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
Доктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,842
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Юстиграм
@yustigram · 30,764
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,425
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Право.ru
@pravo_pravo · 57,912
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право
@ruslaw · 25,210
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
ilovedocs
@ilovedocs · 19,320
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,640
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Законодатель
@zaconodatel · 21,496
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 22 September 2026
KALOY.RU
@akaloy · 53,516
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
PRO Семейные права
@prosemuy · 20,271
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 28 September 2026
РУЛЬФЫ, ИЛЬФЫ И ИНХАУСЫ
@LawFirms · 21,678
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026
Библиотека юриста
@library_lawyer · 25,745
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Юристы31/Online
@yurist_group31 · 35,761
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 2 September 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 34,314
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Судебная практика по банкротству
@sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,813
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 56,522
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Налоговые споры
@nalogi_sud · 23,364
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Новости ВС РФ
@vsrf_ru · 59,723
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Прокурорские будни
@anon_prok_press · 20,589
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 September 2026
Privacy Advocates
@prv_adv · 21,855
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Народный Юрист
@PeopleIsLawyer · 23,542
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 36 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Юлия Михальчук • Адвокат” (@Mikhalchuk_Yulia), 16,692 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Mikhalchuk_Yulia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.