За вред от арендованной техники с экипажем должен отвечать заказчик или арендодатель? Определение от 17.09.2026 по делу А41-113927/2024 (305-ЭС26-3738) Фабула дела: Исполнитель по заказу Строительной компании предоставил для работы на объекте экскаватор-погрузчик, принадлежавший Исполнителю и обслуживаемый его персоналом. Во время выполнения работ экскаватор повредил принадлежавший третьему лицу алюминиевый профи…

Channel
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
56,204subscribers
+615 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001238460311 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vs_court |
| Created | 26 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vs_court |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 00:56 | 56,204 | +329 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:01 | 55,875 | +36 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:59 | 55,839 | +18 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:01 | 55,821 | +9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:59 | 55,812 | +34 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 17:55 | 55,778 | +4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:18 | 55,774 | +39 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:01 | 55,735 | +12 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:35 | 55,723 | +8 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:05 | 55,715 | +3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 55,712 | -2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 55,714 | -7 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 55,721 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 55,719 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 55,720 | +16 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 55,704 | +4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 55,700 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:55 | 55,694 | +7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 55,687 | -3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 55,690 | first reading |
Engagement
78 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 15.5%
- avg views ÷ 56,204 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8,710
- 41 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 41
- of 78 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 78 (15 July 2026 – 23 September 2026) |
| Views total | 357,130 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 15:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 8
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 4
- of 78 we hold a reading for · 5%
- Most on one post
- 5
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vs_court. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 78 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Можно ли занизить действительную стоимость доли из-за бесплатной передачи товарных знаков аффилированным лицам? Определение о передаче от 04.09.2026 по делу А40-58310/2024 (305-ЭС26-6383) Фабула дела: Участник с долей 46% вышел из Общества. Общество выплатило ему около 10 млн руб. действительной стоимости доли. Основными активами компании являлись нежилое помещение и два товарных знака. Бывший участник посчитал…
Нужно ли нотариально удостоверять продажу квартиры с детскими долями на банкротных торгах? Определение от 17.09.2026 по делу А13-1530/2025 (307-ЭС26-5225) Фабула дела: Квартира находилась в общей долевой собственности должника, его супруги и двух несовершеннолетних детей. На квартиру была зарегистрирована ипотека в пользу Банка. После признания одного из собственников банкротом Финансовый управляющий продал кварт…
Должен ли Фонд развития территорий оплачивать текущие расходы банкрота после получения его имущества? Определение о передаче от 04.09.2026 по делу А56-75185/2018 (307-ЭС22-12999(21) Фабула дела: Фонд развития территорий решил приобрести права застройщика-банкрота на земельный участок и объекты незавершенного строительства. До передачи имущества суд обязал Фонд перечислить должнику 1,7 млн руб. для погашения текущ…
Как считать исковую давность по субсидиарке, если не сразу узнал о схеме между должником и контрагентами Определение от 14.09.2026 по делу А19-18701/2021 (302-ЭС26-599 (1)) Фабула дела: Компания обслуживала объекты коммунальной инфраструктуры, которыми на основании концессионного соглашения и договора аренды владели две другие организации. Эти организации получали плату от потребителей и бюджетное возмещение, а к…
Коллеги, решили немного скрасить вам ожидание судебных заседаний — и сделали Forum Games Это мини-приложение прямо в Telegram, где можно сыграть в: 1) Шахматы 2) Шашки 3) Морской бой Главная идея очень простая: никаких регистраций, отдельных приложений и долгих настроек. Зашел, добавил друга и играете. Отправляете другу приглашение в Telegram — и буквально через несколько секунд уже играете друг с другом. Сейчас…
⚡️Зампред ВС РФ Юрий Глазов подал в отставку. ВККС рассмотрит его заявление 21 сентября. В конце мая на эту должность ВККС уже одобрила кандидатуру Олега Нефедова. Судебная практика СКГД ВС РФ
Еще несколько слов о CasusLegal. Первый пост был о базе и способах доступа, здесь — о скиллах, которые команда сервиса выложила для работы поверх коннектора. Скилл — это папка с инструкцией для Claude; для ChatGPT и Codex четыре скилла собраны в один пакет-навык. Устанавливается один раз, дальше модель сама подхватывает его, когда задача совпадает с описанием. Без коннектора скилл бесполезен: доступа к базе он не…
Можно ли требовать индексацию присужденного долга, если СОЮ ранее рассмотрел аналогичное требование Определение о передаче от 04.09.2026 по делу А53-9858/2021 (308-ЭС24-8288(3) Фабула дела: С гражданина ранее было взыскано около 2,9 млн руб. После частичного погашения задолженности ее остаток составил 910 811 руб. Уже после введения в отношении должника процедуры банкротства кредитор потребовал проиндексировать п…
Связь второго дела о банкротстве с первым делом через 4 года Определение от 14.09.2026 по делу А13-5681/2023 (307-ЭС26-936 (1)) Фабула дела: Сетевая организация произвела зачеты со своим потребителем — подшипниковым заводом — на сумму 8 млн. рублей. В результате требования Сетевой организации по оплате услуг по передаче электроэнергии были зачтены против требований завода по договорам аренды и управления многоква…
Можно ли утвердить мировое соглашение, если требование потенциально крупнейшего кредитора еще не рассмотрено? Определение о передаче от 04.09.2026 по делу А40-82947/2020 (305-ЭС23-4351 (4) Фабула дела: В деле о банкротстве Гражданина суды утвердили мировое соглашение. По его условиям третье лицо — ООО «Динамика» — обязалось за собственный счет погасить требования кредиторов, включенных в реестр, включая мораторны…
Можно ли включиться в реестр наравне со всеми, если сам участвовал в выводе 23,6 млрд рублей? Определение от 14.09.2026 по делу А40-145500/2017 (305-ЭС18-17474 (99)) Фабула дела: АСВ в деле о банкротстве банка «Югра» потребовало изменить очередность удовлетворения требований трех Обществ на сумму 49,8 млн руб., основанных на остатках денежных средств на банковских счетах. По мнению Агентства, Общества вместе с ко…
Showing the 12 most recent of 78 posts we hold for @vs_court. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@vs_court edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 11 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 10 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@civilcourt · 39,1835 postsApraus Online
@apraus · 83 postsЮрист ДА
@slovoprava · 22 postsСуд инфо
@sudinfo · 42 postsITCUBE
@PROITCUBE · 971 postПрактика ВС РФ по госзакупкам (44, 223-фз)
@VS_RF_zakupki · 1,7061 postО несостоятельности и налогах
@advokatdavydovmikhail · 1681 post223 и все-все-все
@all_more_223 · 4061 postБанкротный Волк
@bankrotwolf · 11,1071 postЦентр Списания Долгов
@bfl_svoboda · 141 postИз процесса с любовью
@civilprocess · 3,3081 postКорпоративный дайджест 📥
@corp_law_news · 61 postУважаемый суд
@finkee · 151 postАвторский канал Юриста Кондратова
@kondratovde · 1751 postСергей Кузнецов - Долговой Консультант
@kyznetsovser · 4371 postПраво1520 - жд юристы
@legal1520 · 2501 postМедиатор Елена Зарубина
@mediator_krsk · 461 postАдвокат Петр Кочергин
@petr_kochergin · 3581 postПобедим долги|МФО|Банки|Коллекторы|Кредиторы
@pobedimdolgi · 4591 postПроцессуальные чтения
@procedural_reading · 4521 postМарущак на проводе
@stpaulonline · 2751 postЮЛИЯ АРМИНА | STATUS SVOBODY
@zakon_127 · 1,0771 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 30 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@civilcourt · 39,1838 postsСуд инфо
@sudinfo · 45 postsApraus Online
@apraus · 84 postsБанкротный Волк
@bankrotwolf · 11,1074 postsИз процесса с любовью
@civilprocess · 3,3083 postsЮрист ДА
@slovoprava · 22 postsО несостоятельности и налогах
@advokatdavydovmikhail · 1681 post223 и все-все-все
@all_more_223 · 4061 postДнем таксист, вечером юрист.
@dnemurist · 1691 post#fairbankruptcy / #банкротствопочестному
@fairbankruptcy · 1,4291 postАвторский канал Юриста Кондратова
@kondratovde · 1751 postСергей Кузнецов - Долговой Консультант
@kyznetsovser · 4371 postПраво для недвижимости
@lawforrealestate · 1321 postПраво1520 - жд юристы
@legal1520 · 2501 postМедиатор Елена Зарубина
@mediator_krsk · 461 postАдвокат Петр Кочергин
@petr_kochergin · 3581 postПобедим долги|МФО|Банки|Коллекторы|Кредиторы
@pobedimdolgi · 4591 postТелеграм потребителя V
@potrebgram · 1341 postПроцессуальные чтения
@procedural_reading · 4521 postITCUBE
@PROITCUBE · 971 postРОСАНТИ - Российский антикризисный союз
@sroau · 1401 postМарущак на проводе
@stpaulonline · 2751 post⚖️ВАШ ЮРИСТ 24⚖️
@VashYurist24 · 51 postПрактика ВС РФ по госзакупкам (44, 223-фз)
@VS_RF_zakupki · 1,7061 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@pravo_pravo · 57,605#1
@probankrotstvoru · 15,130#2
@educatedyoungman · 6,038#3
@subsidiarka_kdl · 21,000#4
@orpauradio · 7,532#5
@privlawlib · 33,339#6
@zakon_news · 16,002#7
@vsrf_ru · 59,916#8
@sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,868#9
@shortreadlaw · 12,663#10
@privlaw_journal · 7,921#11
@a_d_v_o_k_a_t_RUSSIA · 8,292#12
@damagesanatomy · 8,483#13
@arbitrationpractice · 14,072#14
@BankruptcyClub · 4,866#15
@m_logos · 8,913#16
@insolvencylaw · 3,389#17
@bankrotnews · 8,557#18
@bankrotorg2 · 6,308#19
@zakon_vsrf · 5,084#20
@societas_AK · 6,886#21
@ipmir · 9,706#22
@legally_bald · 3,843#23
@pravotech · 10,424#24
@PostGloss · 5,022#25
@denuolaw · 4,837#26
@bankrotwolf · 11,107#27
@orpau · 2,377#28
@ksrf_ru · 28,083#29
@vefremovonline · 1,222#30
@AlenaShlegel · 1,892#31
@advgazeta · 10,469#32
@corp_practice · 8,279#33
@loaderfromSVO · 40,358#34
@Shokobear · 10,298#35
@LawFirms · 21,544#36
@legal_jobs · 35,621#37
@tserkovnikov · 5,591#38
@ilovedocs · 19,300#39
@sudpraktik · 49,083#40
@corplawpro · 23,600#41
@Mikhalchuk_Yulia · 16,695#42
@zarbitrazhy · 4,219#43
@povorotnapravo · 50,806#44
@VseCivilno · 7,293#45
@ruslaw · 25,373#46
@zavtrasobes · 11,698#47
@fedresurs_insolvency · 4,375#48
@tohuntalawyer · 8,612#49
@vZone1413 · 4,073#50
@AlexeyNikiforov_Legalmanagement · 6,325#51
@dihotomya · 13,869#52
@runetlex · 8,631#53
@domnin_sa · 2,969#54
@legaltalents · 9,522#55
@pbd_nikradio · 5,704#56
@doktorprava · 20,949#57
@the4opinions · 9,576#58
@disputesandsanctions · 2,720#59
@tomashevskaya_zhanna · 4,041#60
@arbitrium_processus · 7,914#61
@smertchnotes · 2,922#62
@akaloy · 53,269#63
@GoodDocsDesign · 11,285#64
@MKATheBest · 3,674#65
@novikovalaw · 7,738#66
@fparf · 15,149#67
@DeoAuctore · 2,681#68
@pgp_official · 5,332#69
@sudpraktik_IPIT_demo · 22,966#70
@i_zharskiy · 2,938#71
@legalreport · 4,460#72
@legaldesigner · 8,629#73
@audamage · 2,697#74
@ClassActionLab · 2,386#75
@simplawyer · 6,336#76
@kommersant · 294,027#77
@Lgltech · 15,440#78
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693#79
@AMolotnikov2020 · 9,043#80
@banksta · 438,140#81
@bloodysx · 1,158,879#82
@ejdailyru · 649,498#83
@rbc_news · 905,528#84
@aestheticsoflawjob · 16,488#85
@you_lawyers · 13,755#86
@library_lawyer · 25,605#87
@LueSkyLegalRecruitment · 7,942#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,868
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
@pravo_pravo · 57,605
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
@vsrf_ru · 59,916
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
@ksrf_ru · 28,083
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
@consultant_plus · 45,302
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
@corplawpro · 23,600
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
@nalogi_sud · 23,385
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
@yrisprudencia · 23,696
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 September 2026
@povorotnapravo · 50,806
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
@zakupki44fz · 48,891
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 26 August 2026
@ruslaw · 25,373
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
@sudpraktik_trud · 26,918
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
@akaloy · 53,269
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
@mytar_rf · 27,508
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
@library_lawyer · 25,605
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
@PeopleIsLawyer · 23,756
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
@garantnews · 24,625
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
@oooavirta · 56,312
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ” (@vs_court), 56,204 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vs_court.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.