Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Simplawyer

Channel

Simplawyer

@simplawyer

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,319subscribers

-46 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001533731391
TypeChannel
Username@simplawyer
Created28 July 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/simplawyer

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,3196,3656,3426 August 2026 — 6,365 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,365 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,364 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,362 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,365 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,357 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,347 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,341 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,336 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,331 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,327 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,323 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,336 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,323 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,326 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,336 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,333 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,330 subscribers21 October 2026 — 6,325 subscribers24 October 2026 — 6,322 subscribers27 October 2026 — 6,324 subscribers30 October 2026 — 6,329 subscribers2 November 2026 — 6,328 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,319 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net -46. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,312–6,372 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 14:566,319-9
2 Nov 2026, 10:566,328-1
30 Oct 2026, 06:196,329+5
27 Oct 2026, 12:396,324+2
24 Oct 2026, 03:586,322-3
21 Oct 2026, 04:016,325-5
17 Oct 2026, 19:086,330-3
14 Oct 2026, 21:066,333-3
11 Oct 2026, 21:596,336+10
5 Oct 2026, 12:546,326+3
27 Sept 2026, 06:556,323-13
18 Sept 2026, 07:586,336+13
14 Sept 2026, 12:376,323-4
11 Sept 2026, 06:586,327-4
6 Sept 2026, 02:206,331-5
2 Sept 2026, 02:156,336-5
29 Aug 2026, 20:046,341-6
26 Aug 2026, 17:526,347-10
23 Aug 2026, 14:236,357-8
19 Aug 2026, 16:476,365first reading

Engagement

27 posts held, back to 3 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 6,319 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,400
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.53%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 27 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held27 (3 October 2025 – 5 November 2026)
Views total5,583
Reactions total197
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 13:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 36s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,805 reactions across 27 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥63435.1%
❤46625.8%
👍42323.4%
😁693.82%
🤬603.32%
🤩482.66%
🤔442.44%
🥰191.05%
🤯140.776%
👏100.554%
😢100.554%
🎉80.443%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,805 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2025 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 05:57 UTC673 views23 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Автопереговоры в Simplawyer One В октябре эксклюзивно для одного клиента презентовали новую фичу Simplawyer One — автопереговоры. Раньше Simplawyer AI умел проверять только чужую форму на соответствие вашим правилам + на общие риски, не покрытые политикой. Находил риски, писал, что не так, сам делал правки. В новой версии можно загрузить свои переговорные позиции и проверять правки контрагента в вашу форму. Прич…

🔥10❤8👍3🤩2

3 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,040 views33 reactionsread 5 November 2026

AI-First юрдепартамент В продолжение мысли об AI и бухгалтерском балансе из прошлого поста. Самая слабая стратегия, которую можно сейчас выбрать, — ждать, что случайное (хоть и продвинутое) использование AI отдельными сотрудниками, само по себе создаст какое-то ощутимое влияние на бизнес. Ещё хуже — ждать, когда бизнес сам придёт и скажет, как использовать AI. Чтобы AI как-то существенно повлиял, понадобится с ну…

🔥15❤9👍5🤬3🤩1

27 Oct 2026, 06:04 UTC≈1,770 views106 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Oi! Симплоер в Лондоне На позапрошлой неделе были на конференции Legal Geek в Лондоне. Это самое большое и качественное мероприятие по юридическим инновациям в мире. Нам важно понимать, что происходит в мире из первоисточников, реального общения и живого демо, а не стерильных постов в линктине. Среди спикеров — руководители глобальных юрдепов гигантов вроде ArcelorMittal, ASOS, Sotheby's, Vodafone, TotalEnergies…

🔥51❤30👍18👏3🤩2🤯2

14 Oct 2026, 06:06 UTC≈2,100 views35 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Итоги большого обсуждения нового договорного процесса с лидерами юрдепартаментов На прошлой неделе провели нашу закрытую стратсессию по договорному процессу для лидеров юридических команд. Специально ограничили количество участников (было всего 20 человек). Вместо односторонней лекции хотелось подробно обсуждать с участниками возникающие возражения, риски и новые идеи. Такой состав идеально сработал. Вывалили на…

❤12🔥12👍10🤩1

1 Oct 2026, 06:08 UTC≈2,540 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Следующая большая роль Если говорить о карьерной стратегии, следующая реально большая роль в компании — человек, который наконец-то приведёт в порядок весь документооборот, согласования и договорный процесс. Договорный, финансовый, кадровый и любой другой корпоративный документооборот без всякой минимально уважительной причины работает по совершенно разной логике. Как кадровики, юристы и бухгалтеры смогли в 1999 с…

🔥15👍12❤10🤩1

25 Sept 2026, 06:09 UTC≈2,650 views67 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Бирюзовое будущее юристов К слову о юристах будущего. Пора перестать считать нормой нейрослоповые иллюстрации постов о будущем юристов и юристах будущего. Потому что если хотя бы на миллисекунду задуматься о том, что ж там всё-таки нарисовано, цунами вопросов сбивает с ног. Во-первых, откуда взялся этот монохромный бирюзовый интерфейс? Почему в будущем запрещено использовать цветные экраны? Почему на фоне основ…

😁43❤10🔥9👍2👏2🤩1

24 Sept 2026, 05:57 UTC≈2,250 views68 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Умение доводить начатое до конца — главный софт скилл юридического лидера Каждые несколько лет меняется стартер-пак прогрессивного юриста. В 2017 — блокчейн, смарт-контракты, криптовалюты и чатботы. (Надеемся, никто не забыл о важности форка в эфириуме?) Потом — лигал-дизайн, лигал-опс, бизнес-партнёрство, рекламное право и софт-скилы. В 2026 — агенты, раг и вайбкодинг. В 2027 — как эффективнее прятаться от роб…

👍28❤21🔥15😁2🤔1🤩1

14 Sept 2026, 06:26 UTC≈2,520 views27 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Закрытая стратсессия о договорном процессе Мы хотим собрать 10–20 руководителей юридических функций и поделиться нашими закрытыми наблюдениями о состоянии договорного процесса. Добавить 5 новых зелёных коридоров, поудалять пару согласующих из 3 типов договоров, увеличить порог согласования без юристов на 500 000 RUB. Всё это даёт эффект, но не чувствительный в масштабах всей компании. Сейчас на рынке много инстру…

👍10🔥9❤6👏1🤩1

10 Sept 2026, 06:05 UTC≈2,820 views41 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Теперь делаем так Главная причина, почему у некоторых компаний получилось сделать что-то хорошее — в какой-то момент нашёлся человек, который сказал: «теперь делаем так, а по-старому не делаем». (Это, конечно, не единственная причина, но точно главная.) Часто внедрение нового начинают с попытки добиться готовности пользователей: убеждают, запускают пилот, расширяют его на одну команду, потом чуть-чуть ещё на одну.…

🔥20👍10❤7🤩2🤯2

3 Sept 2026, 06:03 UTC≈2,830 views64 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Длина и глубина На мастер-классах по лигал-дизайну есть пример, который внезапно в 100% случаев вызывает возмущение публики. Текст после переработки стал длиннее. Было: Заказчик несёт ответственность за полноту и достоверность исходных данных, предоставленных Исполнителю. Стало: Исполнитель выполняет работы, исходя из данных заказчика, и не проверяет их достоверность. Если ошибка в исходных данных повлияет на …

👍26🔥18❤14🤔4🤩2

7 May 2026, 06:05 UTC≈3,270 views85 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Договор без банковских реквизитов Делимся одним из свежих приёмов, который используют наши клиенты. Не писать банковские реквизиты в договоре (и где-либо в принципе, кроме счёта). Сейчас банковские реквизиты по инерции штампуют из шаблона в шаблон (мы сами долгое время так делали). Интуиция подсказывает, что это нужно, чтобы стороны знали, куда платить. Поэтому реквизиты они будут брать из этого самого договора.…

🔥47👍20❤13👏4🤩1

29 Apr 2026, 05:49 UTC≈3,170 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Парадокс идеального незаключённого договора Последние 2 месяца в огнях. На прошлой неделе выдохнули после большой (и пока что) секретной презентации наших новых AI-продуктов. Параллельно ведём несколько проектов по реинжинирингу договорных процессов промышленных масштабов. По этому поводу идей накопилось на целую книгу, но сегодня поделимся только одним наблюдением. Мы назвали это «парадоксом идеального незаключ…

❤28🔥17👍10🤩3

Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @simplawyer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ilovedocs
@ilovedocs · 19,313
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 2 October 2026
Клуб правообладателей
@bchlaw · 27,129
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 34,304
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Корпоративные споры • Case by Case
@corplawpro · 23,636
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
Юридические вакансии
@legal_jobs · 36,206
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Privacy Advocates
@prv_adv · 21,876
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,411
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Библиотека юриста
@library_lawyer · 25,754
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Право.ru
@pravo_pravo · 57,910
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА IP и IT
@sudpraktik_IPIT_demo · 23,005
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 56,525
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Юстиграм
@yustigram · 30,783
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
Доктор Права
@doktorprava · 20,850
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
РУЛЬФЫ, ИЛЬФЫ И ИНХАУСЫ
@LawFirms · 21,672
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 23 September 2026

This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Simplawyer” (@simplawyer), 6,319 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/simplawyer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.