Posted without readable text

Channel
Юстиграм
@yustigram
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
30,856subscribers
-130 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001128547985 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yustigram |
| Created | 29 September 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yustigram |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:59 | 30,856 | +6 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 07:17 | 30,850 | +9 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 30,841 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:48 | 30,844 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 07:27 | 30,841 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 30,848 | -7 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 30,855 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 30,864 | -11 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 30,875 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:49 | 30,883 | +2 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 06:53 | 30,881 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 30,890 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 20:29 | 30,897 | -9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 30,906 | -14 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 30,920 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 30,929 | -4 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 30,933 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:46 | 30,938 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:26 | 30,939 | -7 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 30,946 | first reading |
Engagement
36 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.56%
- avg views ÷ 30,856 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,330
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 36 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 36 (22 June 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 35,004 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 13:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Томсинов В.А. Юриспруденция XXI века: есть ли будущее у права и профессии. Аудиолекция (2020) В лекции профессор В.А. Томсинов обращается к фундаментальным вопросам, лежащим в основе существования юридической науки и профессии в современном мире. Это размышление авторитетного учёного, находящееся на стыке философии права, истории и критического анализа современности. Лекция предлагает слушателям глубокий критический…
Уголовный процесс. Подборка материалов Подборка включает учебники, учебные пособия и научные статьи, посвящённые уголовному процессу РФ. Рассматриваются ключевые вопросы: понятие и сущность уголовного процесса, доказательства и доказывание (включая цифровые), меры процессуального принуждения, обвинительное заключение, суд присяжных, экстрадиция. Отдельное внимание уделено применению искусственного интеллекта и цифро…
Posted without readable text
Словарь юриста Представлены ключевые юридические термины с краткими определениями, пояснениями и примерами. Подборка охватывает как фундаментальные институты римского права, так и актуальные инструменты современного российского права, понимание которых необходимо для корректной квалификации правоотношений и применения в профессиональной деятельности.
Posted without readable text
Дворец правосудия (Justizpalast), Вена.
Суханов Е.А. Гражданско-правовое оформление «цифровых» отношений. Аудиовыступление (2024) Выступление посвящено критическому анализу влияния цифровизации на современную отечественную цивилистику. Евгений Алексеевич рассматривает цифровизацию как серьёзный вызов времени, оценивая целесообразность отражения технологических новаций в содержании Гражданского кодекса РФ. С позиции классической европейской правовой доктри…
Обзоры судебной практики Верховного Суда Российской Федерации за 2023–2025 гг. В представленных обзорах судебной практики за последние три года приведены правовые позиции ВС РФ по разрешению споров: • связанных с защитой права собственности и других вещных прав • возникающих из обязательственных отношений (договорных и внедоговорных) • связанных с социальными, трудовыми, пенсионными отношениями • возникающих из семе…
10 фильмов на юридическую тематику Подборка сильных юридических драм о судебных процессах, юристах и правосудии. Здесь – противостояние закону и совести, борьба за справедливость и дела, в которых одна ошибка может изменить всё. Фильмы, которые не только захватывают сюжетом, но и заставляют задуматься о природе права, цене правды и границах справедливости. Несколько хороших парней / A Few Good Men (1992) Молодой ад…
Уголовное право. Аудиолекции (2019) Базовый курс по общей и особенной частям уголовного права РФ. Рассматриваются понятие и принципы уголовного права, состав и стадии преступления, соучастие, наказание, а также отдельные виды преступлений. Курс системно формирует понимание уголовно-правовых институтов и практики их применения. Лектор: Волкова Олеся Викторовна. Лекция 1. Понятие, задачи, принципы уголовного права • …
Классические виды исков
Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @yustigram. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@a2book · 4581 postАдвокатское бюро "Величко"
@advokatVelichko · 2031 postMiss Holmes
@ExploringEng · 11 postLAW SCHOOL|ЮРИДИЧЕСАЯ ШКОЛА| HUQUQIY MAKTAB
@LAWSCHOOLHUQUQIYMAKTAB · 21 postПраво для всех!
@pravoros · 2761 postСальникова & партнеры
@Salnikova_n_partners · 1401 poststepankova_юрист_Новосибирск
@stepankova_nsk · 3661 postЮрист Ксения Степанова
@stepanova7777777 · 1191 postЮлия Мишина | юрист для РСО и УК | основатель ООО "Юлекс"
@yurist_mishina_rso · 9021 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@library_lawyer · 25,502#1
@privlawlib · 33,072#2
@NP_Biblioteka · 12,023#3
@zanpravo · 10,039#4
@doktorprava · 20,957#5
@lexedu · 10,676#6
@anons_law · 13,085#7
@Mikhalchuk_Yulia · 16,675#8
@opros_lawyer · 13,260#9
@VideoForLawyers · 9,390#10
@aestheticsoflaw · 13,034#11
@made4lawyers · 7,582#12
@zakon_news · 15,959#13
@novice_lawyer · 15,378#14
@ilovedocs · 19,321#15
@enlawreport · 7,462#16
@joblawyer · 10,477#17
@pravoinf · 32,977#18
@damagesanatomy · 8,503#19
@pbd_nikradio · 5,717#20
@novikovalaw · 7,738#21
@publiclawlib · 4,951#22
@kondakova_marketing · 4,297#23
@lawcareers · 2,070#24
@privlaw_journal · 7,898#25
@legaldesigner · 8,644#26
@psychodebry · 451#27
@crushonlaw · 712#28
@you_lawyers · 13,788#29
@library_yustigram · 13,256#30
@sudpraktik · 49,130#31
@povorotnapravo · 50,866#32
@corplawpro · 23,587#33
@pravo_pravo · 57,566#34
@LawFirms · 21,498#35
@prosemuy · 20,374#36
@vsrf_ru · 59,948#37
@ruslaw · 25,417#38
@yrisprudencia · 23,687#39
@arbitrationpractice · 14,043#40
@sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,915#41
@sudpraktik_trud · 26,975#42
@Shokobear · 10,250#43
@legal_jobs · 35,432#44
@dihotomya · 13,857#45
@m_logos · 8,883#46
@karaulny_sud · 12,496#47
@bankrotwolf · 11,138#48
@Lgltech · 15,453#49
@lawegorov · 13,788#50
@ytc_legal · 1,760#51
@fparf · 15,068#52
@GoodDocsDesign · 11,319#53
@novikovprav · 11,221#54
@shortreadlaw · 12,683#55
@bankruptcy_law_forever · 7,158#56
@tsulofficial · 20,895#57
@educatedyoungman · 6,035#58
@CareerLaw · 6,738#59
@rapsinewsru · 15,054#60
@dnevnikyurist · 13,538#61
@arbitrium_processus · 7,924#62
@AlenaShlegel · 1,889#63
@AMolotnikov2020 · 8,995#64
@anon_prok · 38,443#65
@tserkovnikov · 5,601#66
@elenagrin_ip · 13,091#67
@sudpraktik_IPIT_demo · 23,003#68
@pravotech · 10,440#69
@opravah · 6,796#70
@mytar_rf · 27,558#71
@probankrotstvoru · 15,116#72
@zavtrasobes · 11,706#73
@nikita_ivkin · 15,614#74
@ipmir · 9,709#75
@AlexeyNikiforov_Legalmanagement · 6,294#76
@simplawyer · 6,331#77
@pravo_bez_oshibok · 5,109#78
@veta_expert · 1,762#79
@normauz · 12,788#80
@karyeratdyu · 12,806#81
@tsullibrary · 7,603#82
@tsulICD · 5,062#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@n_advices · 33,647
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 4 September 2026
@anon_prok · 38,443
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
@povorotnapravo · 50,866
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юстиграм” (@yustigram), 30,856 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yustigram.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.