10 measurements spanning 31 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,640–8,675 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Sept 2026, 07:55
8,644
-8
2 Sept 2026, 00:34
8,652
-5
30 Aug 2026, 08:57
8,657
-1
27 Aug 2026, 11:46
8,658
-4
24 Aug 2026, 06:54
8,662
-5
17 Aug 2026, 10:09
8,667
+4
13 Aug 2026, 08:27
8,663
+4
10 Aug 2026, 12:11
8,659
-12
7 Aug 2026, 06:26
8,671
no change
6 Aug 2026, 15:49
8,671
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 14 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 8,644 subscribers
Avg views / post
898
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
13 (14 June 2026 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
1,795
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 17:47 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
16m 47s
Average length
8m 24s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Advertising
Ad load
7.69%
1 of 13 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
505
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
1,560
over 12 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
CQH36pWzJqDgH9TeiMoGoqpoCiHKdtBYHPzgTeiz2tfKFS
1
27 August 2026
27 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 27 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Нейроюрист теперь работает прямо в Microsoft Word
Больше не нужно переключаться между вкладками, переносить фрагменты текста туда-обратно и вручную вносить правки из чата в файл.
Нейроюрист поможет работать над документом там, где вы его уже редактируете — внутри файла.
Что можно делать, не выходя из Word:
• Задавать вопросы по файлу— например, попросить кратко объяснить суть соглашения или собрать все сроки и ш…
Мой друг Владимир сделал очень забавную игру: если вы когда-нибудь играли в «правление», где надо держать баланс между показателями, то это именно этот формат.
Игра про жизнь арбитражного управляющего, мне кажется, отличный способ увлечь аудиторию.
Очень здорово, что нейросети позволяют юридическим командам делать более интересные маркетинговые события быстро и креативно.
Обещанный обзор и попытка поймать ПравоКонсультант на каверзных вопросах!
Рекомендую смотреть на х 1,5, потому что это длинный ролик, но я уверена, вам понравится.
Спросила, можно ли все таки устно отозвать заявление об увольнении.
Каверза вопроса в том, что обращаясь к судебной практике получить ответ «да, можно» достаточно непросто.
🔗6 КСОЮ в определении от 22.08.2024 по делу №88-20785/2024
«…Трудовой кодекс Рос…
ПравоТех смельчаки 😏
Когда Кирилл Кондратенко мне рассказал об этой их акции, я сказала, что это прием камикадзе для продвижения.
А я сегодня взяла и нашла спорный ответ! Выложу обзор ответа на днях.
💼 Справится ли ИИ с вашей юридической задачей?
ПравоКонсультант готовит заключение с выводами, аргументами и судебной практикой. Но финальное решение все равно остается за юристом.
Запустили конкурс: передайте ПравоКонсультант реальную задачу и проверьте ответ. Если найдете существенную ошибку и подтвердите ее судебной практикой — получите 4 000 ₽ за каждый засчитанный кейс.
Как участвовать — рассказали в карточк…
Муки выбора обложки к нашему новому руководству... что ж делать, что ж делать...
P.S. Это отсылка к "волчарам", кто в рекрутерском сообществе крутится, тот знает, о чем речь
Сейчас работаем над важным мероприятием для наших клиентов из ИТ-сегмента.
Тема очень болезненная: трудовой экстремизм, ИТ-работники (и не только они), которые нашли новый способ топить и без того страдающий в 2026 году бизнес.
Они называют себя «волками». Мы называем их «волками в овечьих шкурах».
Это ИТ-специалисты, которые покупают популярные на рынке услуги по поддержке работника в трудоустройстве.
Но поддерж…
Продолжаю следить за «отечественным производством». Это я снова про Нейроюриста.
Сейчас на ПМЮФ прошла дискуссия с пикантным названием «7 грехов искусственного интеллекта для юристов». На дискуссии выступала Юлия Попелышева, директор по правовым вопросам Яндекса.
Она сделала обзор причин некачественного внедрения нейросетей в юрдепы:
— сопротивление юристов,
— закупка лигал-тех продуктов, несовместимых с общей ИТ-а…
Коллеги, как поживают ваши понятные договоры? Кажется, к пункту про разрешение споров "на ножах" можно добавить вот такой: будут гармонично смотреться.
Эта прелесть из наших материалов дела.
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @legaldesigner. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Loader from SVO @loaderfromSVO · 40,332 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
KALOY.RU @akaloy · 53,290 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 24 August 2026
Юстиграм @yustigram · 30,856 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право @privlawlib · 33,154 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Право.ru @pravo_pravo · 57,566 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ @vs_court · 55,778 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Юридические вакансии @legal_jobs · 35,475 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Поворот на Право @povorotnapravo · 50,842 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
Новости ВС РФ @vsrf_ru · 59,961 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Азиза хейтит AI” (@legaldesigner), 8,644 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/legaldesigner.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
