Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дихотомия права

Channel

Дихотомия права

@dihotomya

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,854subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001412355862
TypeChannel
Username@dihotomya
Created20 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dihotomya

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

13,84813,88713,867.56 August 2026 — 13,880 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,880 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,881 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,875 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,870 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,879 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,878 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,880 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,882 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,878 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,877 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,876 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,874 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,876 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,872 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,887 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,881 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,878 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,873 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,874 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,871 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,869 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,863 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,857 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,858 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,855 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,854 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,857 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,856 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,850 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,855 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,848 subscribers18 September 2026 — 13,854 subscribers13,8546 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,842–13,893 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:0013,854+6
16 Sept 2026, 12:5713,848-7
14 Sept 2026, 17:5913,855+5
13 Sept 2026, 07:3713,850-6
11 Sept 2026, 07:1713,856-1
8 Sept 2026, 09:1513,857+3
5 Sept 2026, 01:5513,854-1
3 Sept 2026, 10:0313,855-3
2 Sept 2026, 05:4213,858+1
1 Sept 2026, 05:4513,857-6
31 Aug 2026, 07:3413,863-6
29 Aug 2026, 06:5813,869-2
28 Aug 2026, 08:1713,871-3
27 Aug 2026, 10:2413,874+1
26 Aug 2026, 08:1713,873-5
25 Aug 2026, 09:1413,878-3
24 Aug 2026, 07:5713,881-6
22 Aug 2026, 13:2413,887+15
21 Aug 2026, 04:2413,872-4
20 Aug 2026, 02:4813,876first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 51 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.66%
avg views ÷ 13,854 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,340
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held42 (26 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total17,391
Reactions total422
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 19:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 04s
Average length
4m 04s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,330 reactions across 41 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
59845.0%
👍26820.2%
🔥20315.3%
🗿846.32%
😁705.26%
👏241.80%
🕊231.73%
😍120.902%
😢110.827%
🤔100.752%
🫡90.677%
🤝80.602%
🙏50.376%
😱30.226%
🤯20.15%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,330 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
7.14%
3 of 42 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,360
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,570
over 38 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJNWZqj131 August 202631 August 2026
2W5zFK1H82D124 August 202624 August 2026
CQH36pWzJqDgH9TenVjfmjvdUx571MHSJNKNP99KaeMfi2127 August 202627 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 21:06 UTC971 views52 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Мое первое сентября в РУДН в этот раз началось примерно так: Здравствуйте, уважаемые студенты. Меня зовут Петкилёв Пётр Игоревич. Сегодня мы начинаем курс «Гражданское и торговое право зарубежных стран». Знания этого предмета помогут вам в… А вот селфи я сделал на кафедре на фоне портрета одного видного советского правоведа. Узнаете, кто это?

34👍10👏7🔥1

31 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,180 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJNWZqj

Искусственный интеллект в юриспруденции — скоро мы все останемся без работы? Среди коллег есть страшилка, что ИИ когда-то заменит и юристов, как большинство продавцов в супермаркете и младших специалистов многих профессий. Мол, в нейрочатах можно уже писать человеческим языком, объяснил, что надо, и все алгоритм нашел бесплатно. Зачем же платить сотни тысяч рублей представителю? ИИ не заменяет, а усиляет юриста. Ка

23🗿5👍2

31 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC≈1,120 views46 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @tass_agencyPhoto

Центральный банк РФ представил логотип цифрового рубля. Фото: Банк России

🗿337😁6

30 Aug 2026, 11:57 UTC≈1,150 views34 reactionsread 2 September 2026

А еще сегодня последнее воскресенье лета. Желаю всем хорошо его провести.

31👍3

30 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,160 views5 reactionsread 2 September 2026

💭 Из важного на прошлой неделе: - Принят Указ Президента Российской Федерации от 24.08.2026 № 604 "О мерах по обеспечению безопасности объектов критической инфраструктуры Российской Федерации" 👨🏻‍⚖️ Позиции Верховного Суда: - Последующее предъявление претензий к получателю субсидии по основаниям, которые могли и должны были быть выявлены на этапе отбора, ставит под сомнение предсказуемость и стабильность правового

4👍1

27 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC≈1,360 views22 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Advertisementerid CQH36pWzJqDgH9TenVjfmjvdUx571MHSJNKNP99KaeMfi2Photo

🔗 Нейросети для юристов: запустили бесплатный курс с Яндекс Практикумом Вы научитесь использовать ИИ, чтобы анализировать договоры, составлять документы и качественно подбирать судебную практику. Вы разберётесь: • Как работают языковые модели и чем они полезны в юридической практике • Как ставить задачу нейросетям с помощью готовых шаблонов промптов • Как использовать ИИ, не рискуя конфиденциальными данными • К

10🕊5🗿4👍3

27 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈1,290 views43 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

💭 В начале лета получил официальное письмо с подписью уважаемого Б.М. Гонгало. Меня пригласили в Екатеринбург выступить официальным оппонентом Н.А. Кастерина по его кандидатской диссертации "Относительные и секундарные авторские права". Тема работы мне показалась интересной. А еще я давно хотел побывать на уральской земле, которая подарила нам столько замечательных юристов. С большим удовольствием согласился и 2 о

31🔥9👍3

26 Aug 2026, 12:09 UTC≈1,410 views53 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Недавно смотрел на медаль в честь коронации Николая I. На ней традиционная для такой медали надпись: Закон - залог блаженства всех и каждого. Хорошо звучит! Пусть закон всегда будет только таким!)

30🔥14👏6🤔2😱1

25 Aug 2026, 12:23 UTC≈2,300 views49 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

📚 В новом выпуске журнала Цивилист опубликована моя новая статья. Она подготовлена по мотивам моего выступления на конференции у коллег в МГУ в прошлом году. Традиционно право и государство смотрит на игры и пари как на человеческий порок. Если это порок, значит судебной защиты из этих требований нет. Судебная защита существует только для требований, когда организатор азартных игр не выплатил выигрыш. Анализ судеб

🔥25👍1310🗿1

24 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,360 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFK1H82DPhoto

🤖 Как юрист вы знаете: ошибка ИИ может обойтись дорого. Но в этот раз она принесет 4 000 ₽. Проверьте ПравоКонсультант на реальной юридической задаче. Если найдете неточность в правовом ответе и подтвердите ее судебной практикой — получите вознаграждение. 💰 Принять вызов → https://pravo.click/FtounQ Реклама. АО "ПРАВОТЕХ". ИНН: 7708095468. ERID: 2W5zFK1H82D

5🗿1

24 Aug 2026, 12:55 UTC≈1,440 views30 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

А еще у Верховного Суда обновление дизайна сайта - www.vsrf.ru Как вам?

👍12🗿8🤔8🔥1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @dihotomya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

20 Aug 2026, 10:44 UTCAnonymous Poll244 voters

Сгенерированные посты/заметки в блогах

  1. Мне они нравятся4%
  2. Мне они не нравятся61%
  3. Отношусь нейтрально30%
  4. Не могу их отличить5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTCAnonymous Poll230 voters

Какой аватар лучше?

  1. 150%
  2. 214%
  3. 313%
  4. 417%
  5. 58%
  6. 612%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 1 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 24 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 33,339
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Библиотека юриста
@library_lawyer · 25,605
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 September 2026
Народный Юрист
@PeopleIsLawyer · 23,793
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 September 2026
Поворот на Право
@povorotnapravo · 50,806
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
КонсультантПлюс
@consultant_plus · 45,302
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Право.ru
@pravo_pravo · 57,605
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
Юрист объясняет l Евгений Фурин
@furinlaw · 48,439
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,358
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Конституционный Суд
@ksrf_ru · 28,083
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 September 2026
Юстиграм
@yustigram · 30,882
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 6 September 2026
ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ
@yrisprudencia · 23,696
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 17 September 2026
Новости ВС РФ
@vsrf_ru · 59,916
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 55,875
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Корпоративные споры • Case by Case
@corplawpro · 23,600
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 September 2026
СУДЕБНАЯ ПРАКТИКА IP и IT
@sudpraktik_IPIT_demo · 22,966
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 September 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право
@ruslaw · 25,373
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Полезное для Кадровика
@trud_krut · 23,539
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
ГАРАНТ. Новости законодательства
@garantnews · 24,626
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
ТРУДОВЫЕ СПОРЫ
@sudpraktik_trud · 26,918
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 September 2026
Мы́тарь
@mytar_rf · 27,508
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 10 September 2026
Юридические вакансии
@legal_jobs · 35,621
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
Бывший прокурор
@anon_prok · 38,384
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 31 August 2026
Судебная практика по банкротству
@sudpraktik_bankrot_demo · 26,868
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 September 2026
ЛИЧНЫЕ НАЛОГИ
@persontaxes · 31,528
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 6 September 2026

This channel appears in 26 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дихотомия права” (@dihotomya), 13,854 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dihotomya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.