Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Записки пана Smertch’a

Channel

Записки пана Smertch’a

@smertchnotes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,904subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001940765705
TypeChannel
Username@smertchnotes
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/smertchnotes

Growth

2,8892,9042,896.56 August 2026 — 2,894 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,894 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,892 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,896 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,895 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,896 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,890 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,889 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,900 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,902 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,904 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 28 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,887–2,906 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 10:162,904+2
31 Aug 2026, 10:452,902+2
28 Aug 2026, 21:142,900+11
25 Aug 2026, 18:572,889-1
22 Aug 2026, 09:122,890-6
19 Aug 2026, 08:232,896+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:462,895-1
12 Aug 2026, 15:532,896+4
6 Aug 2026, 15:222,892-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:042,894no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:202,894first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

271 reactions across 15 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9936.5%
😁6724.7%
👍4315.9%
🤣269.59%
🔥248.86%
👌51.85%
👏20.738%
💩20.738%
🎉10.369%
🤝10.369%
🥰10.369%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:53 UTC497 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @rumka_ipp

«Если быть точным» описали замечательный пример того, как настройки системы влияют на наблюдаемый уровень преступности. Особенно красиво, что видна работа передаточного механизма: зампред Верховного суда пишет письмо судьям — и меняет практику полиции. Прямого запрета работать как раньше нет, но судьи понимают, что в апелляции приговор по делу, в рамках которого каждая закладка рассматривается как отдельное преступле

4 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC589 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawyersreadingPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁246👏2

2 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC725 viewsread 7 August 2026

Увидел в рассылке любопытное дело 👇 и, есть такое ощущение, что разрешенное неправильно. Хотя 100% уверенности нет 🧐

2 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC909 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @third_inst_property

Прекращение аренды без согласия залогодержателя при обращении взыскания на имущество исключает взыскание платы по условиям такого договора Постановление АС Восточно-Сибирского округа от 31.07.2026 по делу А74-1692/2024 [карточка дела] ——— [судебный акт] 📖 Фабула дела Акционерное общество «Российский сельскохозяйственный банк» обратилось в суд с иском к обществу с ограниченной ответственностью «Свент» о взыскании 9

31 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC757 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

О! Егор про нашего брата вспомнил)

🔥4🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC917 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @redroomtextPhoto

Откуда в Средние века взялись юристы? Около 1088 года группа любознательных студентов сформировала кружок по интересам — "Студию", миссией которой стало возрождение и применения римского права. Вскоре новости об инициативной группе, которая изучает древний кодекс Юстиниана, разошлась сначала по окрестностями, потом по всей Италии, а потом и по всей Европе. Студентов, которые вскоре станут первыми юристами, стали наз

👍9🔥83

31 Jul 2026, 06:28 UTC880 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @quotes_law

Редакция на связи! Одним юрфаком решили не ограничиваться — запускаем сразу четыре новых канала с цитатами преподавателей: 🏛 Цитаты преподавателей истфака 📚 Цитаты преподавателей филологического факультета 🎙 Цитаты преподавателей журфака и медиакомма 🩺 Цитаты преподавателей медвузов Сейчас новичкам особенно нужна поддержка первых читателей. Поэтому будем рады, если вы подпишетесь и отправите этот пост друзьям, знак

3🔥2🤝1

29 Jul 2026, 10:10 UTC≈2,790 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026

По мотивам проверки студенческих работ: Каждая сноска - это отдельное предложение (или несколько предложений). Она должна начинаться, как всякое предложение, с заглавной буквы и заканчиваться так же, как закачивается любое предложение - точкой, вопросительным или восклицательным знаком (или их комбинацией), либо многоточием.

13👌5

29 Jul 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,130 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @RAA25officialPhoto

🔥 Уважаемые друзья и коллеги! 🚩 В соответствии с Регламентом проведена жеребьевка отборочных раундов устных слушаний XI Конкурса РАА! 🧷 С видеозаписью жеребьевки можно ознакомиться на платформах VK Видео и YouTube 🧷 С результатами жеребьёвки можно ознакомиться по ссылке 🌟 Устные слушания пройдут на базе офисов юридических фирм АЛРУД и Меллинг Войтишкин и Партнеры! 💜 Желаем всем командам успехов и надеемся на ско

🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,070 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как простыми словами объяснить, что такое вызывное производство? Так 😆

😁16🔥86

29 Jul 2026, 04:27 UTC≈1,050 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Вот интересно, в контексте ст.15 ГК РФ, можно ли считать расходы, понесенные казённым учреждением, расходами, которые должен будет понести его учредитель? Иначе говоря, можно ли без обиняков утверждать, что убытки казённого учреждения всегда = убытки его учредителя? В пользу утвердительного ответа свидетельствует то, что деятельность казённого учреждения финансируется его учредителем. А против можно сказать, что тако

👍7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @smertchnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,319
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026
Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 33,072
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 55,774
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Записки пана Smertch’a” (@smertchnotes), 2,904 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smertchnotes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.