Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Дикий консалтинг🔥

Channel

Дикий консалтинг🔥

@wild_consult

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,778subscribers

+299 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001748408758
TypeChannel
Username@wild_consult
DescriptionСудебный юрист Екатерина Гуленкова www.gulenkovalegal.ru ✍️: @e_gulenkova Банкротство ЮЛ, юридические байки, битва против адвокатской монополии Рекламы нет Объединение юристов: http://law-unity.ru
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/wild_consult

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,4719,7789,624.56 August 2026 — 9,479 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,474 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,471 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,657 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,682 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,657 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,650 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,659 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,656 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,661 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,657 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,652 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,660 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,690 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,691 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,714 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,716 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,709 subscribers21 October 2026 — 9,718 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,758 subscribers26 October 2026 — 9,765 subscribers29 October 2026 — 9,773 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,772 subscribers4 November 2026 — 9,778 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 91 days, net +299. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,425–9,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 18:089,778+6
2 Nov 2026, 02:089,772-1
29 Oct 2026, 17:409,773+8
26 Oct 2026, 16:319,765+7
24 Oct 2026, 03:159,758+40
21 Oct 2026, 11:489,718+9
18 Oct 2026, 11:499,709-7
15 Oct 2026, 06:309,716+2
11 Oct 2026, 23:579,714+23
5 Oct 2026, 17:169,691+1
27 Sept 2026, 19:569,690+30
18 Sept 2026, 10:579,660+8
14 Sept 2026, 09:589,652-5
10 Sept 2026, 23:209,657-4
5 Sept 2026, 17:019,661+5
1 Sept 2026, 14:269,656-3
29 Aug 2026, 20:139,659+9
23 Aug 2026, 23:069,650-7
19 Aug 2026, 21:519,657-25
16 Aug 2026, 19:149,682first reading

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.3%
avg views ÷ 9,778 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,950
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 102 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held102 (14 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total82,850
Reactions total3,395
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
559
Videos
42
Links
676

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 03s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

12,137 reactions across 99 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,69414.0%
😁1,27610.5%
👍1,0458.61%
💔1,0458.61%
🤬9347.70%
💯7746.38%
custom 60330719314087806887646.29%
🤣7466.15%
🔥6505.36%
😢6195.10%
🤯3372.78%
🕊3262.69%
😭2742.26%
👀2442.01%
🗿1941.60%
❤‍🔥1931.59%
custom 52559650044143293461331.10%
🤝1321.09%
👏1010.832%
💊940.774%
18 further kinds5624.63%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 100 of the 102 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 22 posts held from the last 30 days (31.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,820 views85 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ну вот рейв в Ленинской библиотеке уже и назвали "осквернением" и "кощунством" 🙂 (хотя судя по описанию было классное и приличное литературное мероприятие, никак, кстати, с Хэллоуином не связанное) Интересно, появится теперь статья за оскорбление чувств библиотек? Запрет электронной музыки? Или может сразу уже просто ввести уголовную ответственность за веселье, чтоб два раза не вставать? (а если и праздновать праз…

🤬46❤10💯8🤣5🤯5🔥3💊2😱2

4 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC≈2,010 views139 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ощущение скоротечности времени Новогоднее настроение Задумчивый взгляд вдаль Тревожные мысли о будущем Столько разных чувств, а всего-то назначили судебное заседание на 19.01.2027 (две тысячи ДВАДЦАТЬ СЕДЬМОЙ 🫠) Сезон #давайтеужепослепраздников официально открыт 🤝

😁87❤26custom 525596500441432934614🍾9🤣3

3 Nov 2026, 12:39 UTC≈2,460 views44 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Тем временем я напоминаю, что набор на УНИКАЛЬНЫЙ курс по ОРВ продолжается 👆 Почему уникальный: Во-первых, преподаватели курса - это те, кто буквально стоит у истоков ОРВ в России. Они не просто рассказывают о процедуре, они причастны к ее внедрению. Во-вторых, курс частично порожден нашей активностью в битве против монополии 😊 (кстати, после нашего внезапного иска о бездействии Минюста в виде непроведения ОРВ у …

❤20❤‍🔥10custom 52559650044143293465💊3👍2👎2😐2

2 Nov 2026, 07:43 UTC≈2,670 views175 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Представляете такой судебный фарт: Подаешь апелляцию на отказ в оспаривании сделки. В процессе все идет не очень, судья уже почти отказала тебе, но решила отложиться, чтобы проверить кое-что по судебным актам. На следующее заседание, говорит, приходить необязательно (считай все понятно). А потом хоба - изменение состава суда и назначение нового заседания еще через месяц, жалоба рассматривается заново. Считай две ап…

custom 603307193140878068889😁50❤16custom 525596500441432934612😢4🤣3💯1

31 Oct 2026, 20:50 UTC≈3,570 views185 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤86🕊42🙏15💔14😢12👍9👎4💊2

30 Oct 2026, 14:50 UTC≈2,990 views230 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @artoflaw89File

Я на этом канале крайне редко пишу серьезные сообщения, это пожалуй самое серьезное за всю историю его существования. Последние 3 недели суды массово отказывают в проведении онлайн-заседаний из-за ударов по дата-центрам. Проблема не только в затягивании, но и в том, что обеспечение очного участия в заседаниях в другом регионе может быть по стоимости сопоставимо с оплатой услуг адвоката, особенно если в деле будет не…

👍136🤝32❤25✍19🔥16😢2

30 Oct 2026, 12:19 UTC≈3,370 views109 reactionsread 5 November 2026

«Арбитражный суд участвовал в этой преступной схеме?» Казалось бы, чем нас уже может удивить история про очередной деприватизационный иск? А вот поди ж ты, может!) Например, у суда апелляционной инстанции может (внезапно!) возникнуть справедливый вопрос: если покупатель такой злодей злодейски приобрел имущество на торгах в банкротстве, а суд утвердил отчет КУ, то это что же получается… арбитражный суд, рассматрива…

😁58❤23🔥18❤‍🔥5custom 52559650044143293465

29 Oct 2026, 09:22 UTC≈3,530 views47 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Внимание, Студенческая конференция в Римке! Срок отправки эссе - до 30.11.2026 Центральное событие в самой Римке - 05.12.2026 Всем участникам призы-подарки, сертификаты участников и незабываемый опыт виртуальной-реальной юриспруденции)) Тема для эссе на первом этапе, конечно, заковыристая – «Исполнение договора в цифровую эпоху» Давайте хитро поможем студентам-подпищикам Дикого консалтинга: о чем можно было бы на…

❤‍🔥18❤14👍10😁5

28 Oct 2026, 11:31 UTC≈3,660 views287 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

С таким лицом в эру ИИ читаю идеальный, беспримесный и на 100% человеческий бред в заключении специалиста (за 500 тыс рублей из конкурсной массы) Буквально глоток свежего воздуха в мире ии слопа, дух прошедших времен, скоро таких моментов совсем не останется🥲

😁162🤣77custom 525596500441432934627custom 60330719314087806889❤4😢3🌚2🔥1

27 Oct 2026, 15:28 UTC≈3,650 views100 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @AMolotnikov2020Photo

❗️🥀🥀Прощание с Сергеем Васильевичем Сарбашом состоится 28 октября в 12.30 в Большом ритуальном зале Боткинской больницы Адрес: Москва, 2й Боткинский проезд, д.5 корпус 33. Время прощания ограничено 30 минут. Обязательно взять ПАСПОРТ (на территории больницы действует пропускной режим) Похороны состоятся на Волковском кладбище (Волково-1, сектор 9Н), без трансфера. Анонимный Молотников🎓 Читайте нас в MAX

💔84❤10😢6

26 Oct 2026, 08:12 UTC≈4,350 views185 reactionsread 5 November 2026

На днях в комментариях был чувак, который к посту про тихушные изменения Кодекса этики написал что-то вроде: «К чему этот пост? Вы думаете там вез вас не разберутся?» И я начала злиться, что-то объяснять, почему это неправильно и как должно быть на самом деле, а сейчас думаю ВООБЩЕ-ТО ДА Да, блин, я думаю, что без меня не разберутся. Да, мне больше всех надо. И возможно стоит признать, что да, я в каждой бочке зат…

🔥84❤46❤‍🔥22👏15👍10✍4💯3custom 52559650044143293461

24 Oct 2026, 11:37 UTC≈4,390 views290 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @bankruptcy_law_foreverPhoto

В моей памяти он останется таким.

💔201😭66❤22👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @wild_consult. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@wild_consult edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 November 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTCFinal Results531 voters

Кто выиграет в финале ЧМ?

  1. 🇦🇷43%
  2. 🇪🇦35%
  3. Я не смотрю футбол и отрицаю всё веселье, которое с ним связано22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Jul 2026, 18:14 UTCAnonymous Poll1,400 voters approx.

Кредитор продал свое требование. В процедуре банкротства подано заявление о субсидиарной ответственности по основаниям, имевшим место до уступки. Продавец на момент уступки о них не знал. В чью пользу присудить субсидиарную ответственность?

  1. Продавца10%
  2. Покупателя54%
  3. Напишу свой вариант в комментарии1%
  4. Не знаю, но хочу посмотреть ответы21%
  5. Нормальные люди требования не покупают14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 102 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Дикий консалтинг🔥” (@wild_consult), 9,778 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wild_consult.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.