Channel
@yabloko_press
On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
48,668subscribers
+44,645 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001092663584 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @yabloko_press |
| Description | ⚡️Только самое важное о деятельности партии "Яблоко". ❗️Основной канал партии: @yabloko_party |
| Created | 9 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/yabloko_press |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 3 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:36 | 48,668 | -380 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 49,048 | -339 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 49,387 | -404 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 49,791 | -787 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 50,578 | -704 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 51,282 | -329 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 51,611 | -212 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:46 | 51,823 | -269 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 19:24 | 52,092 | -193 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:36 | 52,285 | -362 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 52,647 | -135 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 52,782 | -178 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 52,960 | -570 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:07 | 53,530 | -282 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 03:27 | 53,812 | -234 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 54,046 | -276 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 54,322 | -186 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:38 | 54,508 | -164 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 54,672 | -291 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:54 | 54,963 | first reading |
274 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 274 (29 July 2026 – 21 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,750,400 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 07:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
❗️Официальные результаты одномандатников «Яблока» показывают: партия могла получить фракции еще в пяти региональных парламентах. Петербург еще не посчитан Кандидаты «Яблока» в одномандатных округах на выборах региональных законодательных собраний, где списки партии были сняты с выборов, получили в среднем от 6,84% до 13,65% голосов. Эти показатели подтверждают: «Яблоко» могло сформировать фракции в Калининградской, …
❗️Кандидаты «Яблока» на выборах в Госдуму заняли пять вторых и семь третьих мест, 11 кандидатов получили больше 10% голосов На сайте ЦИК опубликованы результаты 97 из 99 кандидатов «Яблока», баллотировавшихся по одномандатным округам. Пять кандидатов партии заняли вторые места, ещё семь — третьи. Средний результат кандидатов от партии составил 5,74%, а 11 кандидатов получили больше 10% голосов. В партии убеждены, чт…
Партия "Яблоко" набирает свыше 6% и сформирует фракцию в Новгородской областной Думе Партию "Яблоко" поддержали больше 12 тысяч новгородцев. Спасибо нашим кандидатам, наблюдателям, агитаторам и всем причастным к нашей победе. Спасибо председателю ФПК Григорию Явлинскому и председателю партии Николаю Рыбакову за поддержку. Мир, свобода и жизнь без страха - это ценности, которые нашли отклик в сердцах и душах людей…
По данным ЦИК, в час ночи кандидаты «Яблока» занимали вторые места в восьми одномандатных округах Москвы: — Сергей Митрохин — 23,22%; — Виктор Коган-Ясный — 20,20%; — Григорий Гришин — 17,61%; — Полина Лермант — 15,82%; — Анна Шатуновская-Бюрно — 13,53%; — Максим Макаров — 12,89%; — Герман Чунихин — 12,75%; — Артём Снеговский — 9,78%. На третьих местах находились: — Андрей Евтеев — 11,86%; — Сергей Пархоменко — 10,4…
«Яблоко» уверенно преодолевает пятипроцентный барьер на выборах в Новгородскую областную Думу После обработки 80,44% протоколов участковых комиссий партия набирает 5,52% голосов. Ранее, после обработки 27,31% протоколов, результат составлял 5,17%. Напомним, Новгородская область — единственный из восьми регионов, где выдвинутый «Яблоком» список был допущен к выборам в региональный парламент. В Петербурге и Ленобласт…
Кандидаты «Яблока» занимают вторые места в восьми одномандатных округах Москвы По предварительным результатам подсчёта голосов на выборах в Государственную Думу на сайте ЦИК, вторые места в своих округах занимают: — Сергей Митрохин — 23,22%, Центральный округ №207; — Виктор Коган-Ясный — 20,20%, Ховринский округ №206; — Григорий Гришин — 17,61%, Ленинградский округ №197; — Полина Лермант — 15,82%, Медведковский окр…
⚡️ «Яблоко» преодолевает пятипроцентный барьер на выборах в Новгородскую областную Думу По результатам обработки 27,31% протоколов участковых комиссий партия набирает 5,17% голосов. На отдельных участках в Великом Новгороде, согласно протоколам, полученным наблюдателями, «Яблоко» получает более 20% голосов. Новгородская область стала единственным из восьми регионов, где «Яблоко» выдвинуло партийные списки, в которо…
Николай Рыбаков назвал кампанию «Яблока» на этих выборах событием мирового масштаба: — Я могу сказать, что это политическое событие мирового масштаба, потому что партия, не представленная в парламенте страны 23 года, получила по опросам второе место на выборах — в таких условиях, в которых мы существуем. И власти ничего не смогли с этим сделать, кроме как снять эту партию с выборов.
Руководитель Аналитического центра «Яблока» Иван Большаков заявил, что результаты голосования по партийным спискам не отражают ни запроса россиян на мир, ни настроений граждан в целом. «Выборы и политика в России сегодня перешла в какое-то иное измерение, в иное состояние, совершенно оторванное не только от реальности, но и от российской Конституции, даже той, которую принимали в 2020 году после обнуления президентс…
«Яблоко» в ближайшее время представит план дальнейшей работы партии. Его будут разрабатывать совместно с людьми, которые присоединились к команде во время избирательной кампании. «Он станет результатом общей работы, а не указанием, спущенным руководством партии к исполнению», — подчеркнул председатель партии Николай Рыбаков. «Для многих присоединение к „Яблоку“ стало началом новой общественной и гражданской жизни, п…
❗️Николай Рыбаков о результатах «Яблока» на этих выборах: — По тем данным, которые мы сейчас получаем и с участков, и по нашим кандидатам в одномандатных округах, и по опросам, которые мы видели перед началом голосования, если бы список партии «Яблоко» не был снят с выборов, мы бы заняли второе место на выборах депутатов Государственной Думы в 2026 году. Интересы России — это была главная цель, которую мы отстаивал…
🎙 С минуты на минуту начнется брифинг председателя «Яблока» Николая Рыбакова, на котором он подведет предварительные итоги выборов. Смотрите прямую трансляцию на YouTube-канале партии.
Showing the 12 most recent of 274 posts we hold for @yabloko_press. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@yabloko_press edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 77 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 159 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пресс-служба Яблока” (@yabloko_press), 48,668 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yabloko_press.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.