Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Per astra ad aspera

Channel

Per astra ad aspera

@ad_aspera_017

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

543subscribers

+126 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001125661792
TypeChannel
Username@ad_aspera_017
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ad_aspera_017

Growth

4175434806 August 2026 — 417 subscribers6 August 2026 — 417 subscribers12 August 2026 — 520 subscribers20 August 2026 — 534 subscribers2 September 2026 — 543 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 27 days, net +126. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 398–562 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 13:04543+9
20 Aug 2026, 06:36534+14
12 Aug 2026, 19:13520+103
6 Aug 2026, 19:32417no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:37417first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

90 reactions across 15 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53575799534979838892426.7%
custom 58461328699650246221112.2%
custom 5330468934514646919910.0%
👍910.0%
🕊910.0%
custom 542253873539476635277.78%
👏66.67%
custom 584619738037381071155.56%
🤡44.44%
💊33.33%
custom 584574001789639408111.11%
🤣11.11%
🤯11.11%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 90 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC68 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

В комментарии вот к этому посту Брикульского произошёл мэм.

🤯1

5 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC113 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Если хотите быть таким же умным, красивым, смелым, умелым, как главред, и сражать бразильских профессоров своими компаративными обзорами — поступайте на годичный курс договорного и обязательственного права Артёма Георгиевича и Ко в М-Логосе. Во-первых, там можно оказаться в окружении умных людей с хорошей памятью и почувствовать себя очень глупым (я в свое время впервые пошёл к психологу именно на фоне этого). Во-в

custom 53575799534979838892

5 Aug 2026, 21:11 UTC84 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @m_logosPhoto

Осталось 10 дней до окончания приема портфолио на бесплатное обучение в VI потоке углубленного годичного онлайн-курса повышения квалификации «ДОГОВОРНОЕ И ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬСТВЕННОЕ ПРАВО» ❗️Подать портфолио для участия в конкурсе необходимо до 14 августа 2026 года включительно представить в Институт свое портфолио, направив его по адресу [email protected] Требования к портфолио, условия бесплатного и платного обучения читайте

custom 53575799534979838892

4 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC131 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @yabloko_partyVideo

Идею мира нельзя признать иноагентом Один из лидеров списка «Яблока» в Госдуму Дмитрий Анисимов напоминает о миссии «Яблока» – представлять на выборах людей, которые хотят мира. «Эту идею нельзя объявить "иноагентом" и нельзя записать в "экстремисты". В России её разделяют уже десятки миллионов людей». 🟢Дмитрий Анисимов – зампред Петербургского «Яблока», депутат Законодательного Собрания Санкт-Петербурга ➡️ Смотри

🕊9🤡2custom 53575799534979838892

4 Aug 2026, 22:18 UTC135 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Удивительное дело: на пятом году президентской "движухи", посреди ровнёхонького асфальтового плаца, в который было закатано политическое поле страны, на Думских выборах вдруг можно протестно проголосовать за старое-доброе Яблоко. Я не буду повторять традиционную мантру российского либерализма про "да, к ним много вопросов, но зато...". И даже мантру про "да, это ни к чему не приведёт, но зато..." я тоже повторять не

custom 535757995349798388917🤡2💊1

31 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC216 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @zakon_newsPhoto

Михаил Шварц считает, что институт преюдиции находится в кризисе. В своей статье он раскрывает основные противоречия в нормативном регулировании и излагает концептуальные подходы (идеологемы), в центре столкновения которых находится этот институт и выбор между которыми необходимо сделать, чтобы практика перестала расходиться с законом. Читайте в июльском номере #журналЗакон.

👏4

31 Jul 2026, 08:27 UTC228 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Тоталитаризм жара июль Власть в руках диктаторааааааа

custom 584613286996502462211💊2

29 Jul 2026, 20:37 UTC245 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Качественный трансфер для русской академии.

🤣1

29 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC239 viewsread 6 August 2026

Если верить новостям то типа завтра

29 Jul 2026, 20:35 UTC238 viewsread 6 August 2026

Если бы можно было посетить один великий (или не очень) концерт прошлого по вашему выбору, какой бы вы выбрали? Тот самый Вудсток? Битлз на крыше в 1969? "Stop making sense" от Talking Heads? Live Aid? Oasis на каком-нибудь фесте в девяностых? "Валентин Стрыкало" в последнем туре до развала? Тот первый рок-фест с западными артистами на излёте СССР? "Alive 2007" Daft Punk? "Кино"? Или всё-таки Кадышева в девяностые?

29 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC265 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Уголовка за тг-премиум когда?

custom 58461973803738107115custom 54225387353947663523

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ad_aspera_017. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Per astra ad aspera” (@ad_aspera_017), 543 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ad_aspera_017.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.