О дивный новый цифровой мир: конституционность замедления Telegram ⚖️ В своем канале Роман Сергеевич пишет о потенциальном групповом иске против РКН с прицелом на КС. Тем временем наш старший юрист, Милана Даова, подготовила заметку на сайте по поводу конституционности замедления Telegram. Смотрите кратко в наших карточках и переходите на сайт, чтобы ознакомиться с полной версией материала. ➡️ Заметка на сайте: ht…

Channel
КС РФ. Центр Конституционного Правосудия (ЦКП)
@KS_RF_law
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,301subscribers
+123 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001631277411 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @KS_RF_law |
| Created | 12 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/KS_RF_law |
Topic
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:20 | 7,301 | +15 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 13:38 | 7,286 | +2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 7,284 | +6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:41 | 7,278 | +24 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 00:45 | 7,254 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 7,259 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 7,263 | +4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 7,259 | +13 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 7,246 | +13 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 7,233 | +25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 7,208 | +23 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:51 | 7,185 | +8 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 7,177 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:19 | 7,178 | first reading |
Engagement
52 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 52 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
220 reactions across 28 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 60 | 27.3% | |
| 🤬 | 47 | 21.4% | |
| 😁 | 19 | 8.64% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 7.27% | |
| 💯 | 12 | 5.45% | |
| ⚡ | 10 | 4.55% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 3.64% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 3.64% | |
| 👀 | 6 | 2.73% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 2.27% | |
| 🌚 | 5 | 2.27% | |
| 🍌 | 5 | 2.27% | |
| 😢 | 5 | 2.27% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 1.82% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 1.36% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 0.909% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.455% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.455% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.455% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.455% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.455% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 52 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 295 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
В апелляционном определении Верховного Суда РФ по «Яблоку» обратили внимание на интересный момент: Предвыборная агитация размещается Партией «Яблоко» как на официальном сайте партии в сети «Интернет», так и в социальных сетях «ВКонтакте», «Одноклассники», Instagram (признана экстремистской и запрещена), Twitter (X) (доступ ограничен по требованию Федеральной службы по надзору в сфере связи, информационных технологий…
❤2
Привет, на связи команда Центра конституционного правосудия! Этот пост — регулярное напоминание о том, что чем мы регулярно занимаемся — пишем жалобы в КС РФ, оцениваем перспективы дела для обращения в Суд, исполняем решения КС, работаем с инструментами КС в ординарных судах. Прислать своё дело можно сюда 👉 [email protected] Что такое жалобы в КС РФ и как с ними работать? Какие ещё есть инструменты КС РФ и как они могут…
❤2
⚡️КПРФ внесли законопроект о запрете «сноса» кандидатов за «интеллектуальную собственность» Сегодня вечером депутаты Госдумы от КПРФ внесли законопроект, который предлагает 👉 убрать из избирательного закона норму о сносе за нарушение законодательства об интеллектуальной собственности: Исключить такую формулировку из статьи 56 (пункт 1.1.) ФЗ67: "Запрещается агитация, нарушающая законодательство Российской собствен…
❤19😁4🔥3
Как понять, что у людей отпуск? 👉👈 Раздел Новости КС РФ не обновлялся с 24 июля, чуть меньше месяца пока никаких новостей от КС РФ. К тому же, не обновлялись принятые к рассмотрению жалобы (обычно это 10-е числа каждого месяца). 📱 https://vk.com/ks_rf_law 🖇 https://constitutional-center.ru/ ☎️ +7 (495) 545-49-19 📩 e-mail: [email protected]
😁7
Хорошее повтори и еще раз повтори. А если столкнулся — напиши Центр конституционного правосудия. 📱 https://vk.com/ks_rf_law 🖇 https://constitutional-center.ru/ ☎️ +7 (495) 545-49-19 📩 e-mail: [email protected]
❤4
Буквально, получил землю от советской власти / купил у другого человека, получил разрешение на строительство , заплатил государству. #буревестник #туапсе #краснодар Теперь по иску требуют обратно.
😢5🤯2🤬1
Самое ужасное в этой истории — у людей не просто отнимают землю и дома, а обязывают снести самостоятельно. Отрезают свет, воду. #буревестник #туапсе #краснодар На минуточку, снос стоит порядка 3 млн рублей. Для туапсинских садоводов — неподъемная история.
🤬8
Одно из самых быстрых заседаний в моей жизни. Как пугать неисполнением КС РФ судей кассационной инстанции.
❤4😁2
⚡️Кассационный суд, выслушав аргументы ходатайства о запросе в КС РФ,отложил дело. Необходимо ознакомиться, учитывая сложность и связь с двумя Постановлениями КС РФ — 49-П и садоводов⚡️ #краснодар #буревестник #туапсе
🙏3
Причина — правовой дефект статьи 217 ГК РФ, поправки которой были внесены по мотивам двух постановлений КС РФ — антикоррупционные иски 49-П и Сочинских садоводов. #туапсе #буревестник #краснодар Буквально, «спастись от деприватизации» можно только в том случае, если ваше решение еще не вступило в законную силу. Буквально, кому-то повезет — за два-три дня
💯8
#туапсе #буревестник #краснодар Судебное заседание объявлено открытым. ⚡️ Мы заявляем ходатайство о запросе суда в КС РФ ⚡️
🔥9
Showing the 12 most recent of 52 posts we hold for @KS_RF_law. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 7 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
С какой категорией дел Вы чаще всего сталкиваетесь?
- Деприватизация31%
- Антикоррупционные иски28%
- Иная категория51%
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Есть ли на вашем рабочем месте Регламент об использовании ИИ в работе?
- Нет, и не нужен: не отследишь74%
- Нет, у нас запрещается использовать ИИ14%
- Да, есть, это помогает держать использование ИИ в рамках13%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Как вы относитесь к тому, что ваши подчиненные или коллеги используют ИИ в работе?
- Негативно: юрист привыкает и отключает свой мозг, это деградация профессии17%
- Нейтрально: ответственность каждого, лишь бы качество работы не страдало48%
- Положительно: если это улучшит качество, ускорит работу, то почему нет?42%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Конституционно ли увольнять за использование ИИ в работе? 😉
- Да, независимо от оснований3%
- Да, но только если это затрагивает важную информацию, коммерческую тайну, ПД52%
- Нет, ИИ — такой же инструмент как печатная машинка или компьютер48%
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Подозреваете ли Вы своих коллег, в том числе юристов, в том, что они используют ИИ?
- Да, почти уверен в этом94%
- Нет, уверен в их честности7%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Убираете ли персональные данные клиентов при загрузке файле в ИИ? 😁
- Да, всегда убираю при использовании ИИ62%
- Нет, это же никуда не попадёт16%
- Всегда по-разному16%
- У меня стоят в ИИ настройки не использовать загружаемые перс данные12%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 52 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@voronapublichnik · 8,0289 postsСвобода переписки
@tvestnik_svoboda · 5612 postsАКЦ
@anticrisis_law · 1691 postВладислав Асадуллин | Гамбургские счёты
@hamburgscore · 2891 postЖивая Конституция
@livingconst · 9881 postПослезавтра // Турция
@lyubovidumy · 5601 postOlga Kryazhkova
@okryazhkova · 9661 postПетрановский Илья
@petranovskiy · 1051 postКлуб публичного права
@publiclaw_hse · 1331 posttheoria naturans | теория творящая
@theoryimpossible · 1791 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@furinlaw · 48,439
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КС РФ. Центр Конституционного Правосудия (ЦКП)” (@KS_RF_law), 7,301 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/KS_RF_law.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.