Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Class Action Lab

Channel

Class Action Lab

@ClassActionLab

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,386subscribers

-23 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001732842486
TypeChannel
Username@ClassActionLab
Created4 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ClassActionLab

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3862,4092,397.56 August 2026 — 2,409 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,409 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,407 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,406 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,407 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,406 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,403 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,401 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,395 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,390 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,389 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,388 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,386 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 44 days, net -23. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,383–2,412 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 00:582,386-2
11 Sept 2026, 08:372,388-1
6 Sept 2026, 03:412,389-1
1 Sept 2026, 12:542,390-5
29 Aug 2026, 05:372,395-6
26 Aug 2026, 07:252,401-2
23 Aug 2026, 04:362,403-3
19 Aug 2026, 21:152,406-1
16 Aug 2026, 15:492,407+1
13 Aug 2026, 05:082,406-1
9 Aug 2026, 18:182,407-2
6 Aug 2026, 09:182,409no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:062,409first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

75 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3344.0%
👍1520.0%
👏1418.7%
79.33%
🎉45.33%
22.67%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 09:57 UTC173 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚡️Третий сборник по групповым искам Вы же не думали, что всё? Нет, мы продолжаем создавать теоретический базис для развития групповых исков в России. Верю, что это не напрасно. Для нового издания собран основной авторский коллектив – авторитетные ученые-процессуалисты, ведущие практикующие юристы, зарубежные коллеги, молодые таланты. Если у кого-то есть предметное желание поучаствовать в качестве автора и предложи

🔥5👍2👏1

28 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC481 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Лето меня не пощадило: писать хочется все меньше, а жить – все активнее. Законы природы сильнее любого редакционного плана. Но повод вернуться нашелся – и хороший. Думаю о новом, интересном. О разном. И наблюдаю. В том числе за новыми примечательными групповыми исками, которых в последнее время немного – рынок будто взял паузу. Но один кейс я ждал, и вот он состоялся. Нет, не про пожары – не в этот раз. Речь о ново

👍5🔥4👏2

25 Jun 2026, 15:33 UTC650 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @LevelLegalServicesPhoto

📹 Photo: сессия «Групповые иски в динамике судебной практики: что нового и как с этим жить»

7👏6🔥6

24 Jun 2026, 09:27 UTC606 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Мой партнёр Алексей Дудко совместно с другими уважаемыми коллегами участвует в интересном проекте – создании Международной Арбитражной Академии БРИКС+. На полях ПМЮФ будет и презентация.

👍3🔥2🎉1

18 Jun 2026, 13:53 UTC748 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Групповые иски на ПМЮФ-2026 Второй год подряд на Петербургском международного юридическом форуме будут обсуждаться групповые иски. Это, конечно, хорошо. Вода камень точет. Среди участников сессии: ▪️Тадзио Шиллинг, модератор сессии, Генеральный директор Ассоциации европейского бизнеса (АЕБ) ▪️Екатерина Ерова, председатель юридического комитета АЕБ, старший юрист Меллинг, Войтишкин и Партнеры ▪️Владимир Ярков, завед

🔥3👏2

28 May 2026, 16:23 UTC861 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В новом постановлении Пленума ВС РФ о подготовке гражданских дел к судебному разбирательству от 21.05.26 №15 есть несколько примечательных разъяснений касательно групповых исков. Публикация истцом-представителем предложения о присоединении к групповому иску ▪️Закон указывает, что такое предложение о присоединении должно быть сделано в СМИ. Конкретное СМИ закон не называет, это отдавалось на откуп лидеру группы. В ря

👍5

18 May 2026, 06:20 UTC817 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новый номер Цивилистики – всегда маст рид. А в этом ещё и очень мощная статья А.В. Егорова на любопытную тему – о применении ст. 84.8 Закона об акционерных обществах (принудительный выкуп акций). В этой норме есть лазейка, которой сейчас пользуются. Если коротко – выкупают акции ПАО при осведомленности о принудительном выкупе и стоимости выкупа, а затем устраивают оценочный арбитраж в суде. Вложенные средства скупщи

🔥52

18 May 2026, 06:19 UTC520 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @lawegorov

А у нас новый номер! В нем интересные статьи по деликтам, важнейший вопрос неосновательного обогащения - больше статей на эту тему, хороших и разных !! -, наконец-то большой хороший материал про договор экспедиции, развернутая статья про участки недр, интереснейший вопрос про конкурсное производство и моя попытка исследовать отношения, складывающиеся при принудительном выкупе акций. Ибо выкупов-то много, а исследован

🔥1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @ClassActionLab. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Private Law Library | PLL Право
@privlawlib · 33,339
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 4 September 2026
Судебная практика СКЭС ВС РФ
@vs_court · 55,875
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 23 August 2026
Loader from SVO
@loaderfromSVO · 40,358
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Class Action Lab” (@ClassActionLab), 2,386 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ClassActionLab.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.