Все самое интересное для работающих по 44-ФЗ/223-ФЗ в сфере госзакупок со стороны заказчика или поставщика.
Чат канала: @zakupkiChat
Для связи: @zakupkiAdmin
Реклама: https://telega.in/c/zakupki44fz
Регистрация в РКН: https://bit.ly/4eEVvV5
Created
4 March 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 3 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (3 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 32 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @progoszakaz. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
32 measurements spanning 43 days, net -203. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,858–49,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 10:38
48,891
-13
16 Sept 2026, 05:00
48,904
-20
14 Sept 2026, 13:21
48,924
-3
13 Sept 2026, 00:41
48,927
-7
11 Sept 2026, 03:38
48,934
-33
8 Sept 2026, 07:39
48,967
-12
5 Sept 2026, 05:57
48,979
-6
3 Sept 2026, 14:01
48,985
-17
2 Sept 2026, 08:34
49,002
-5
1 Sept 2026, 06:02
49,007
-15
31 Aug 2026, 08:05
49,022
-1
30 Aug 2026, 07:46
49,023
-3
29 Aug 2026, 05:46
49,026
-14
28 Aug 2026, 04:27
49,040
-7
27 Aug 2026, 02:38
49,047
-2
26 Aug 2026, 03:52
49,049
-9
25 Aug 2026, 01:38
49,058
-10
23 Aug 2026, 16:46
49,068
-9
20 Aug 2026, 20:06
49,077
-7
19 Aug 2026, 16:46
49,084
first reading
Engagement
209 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 120 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
4.36%
avg views ÷ 48,891 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
110 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
110
of 209 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
209 (31 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
234,630
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 02:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈134
Videos
≈1
Links
≈9,490
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Advertising
Ad load
1.44%
3 of 209 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,970
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
2,110
over 206 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFGcEQd7
1
4 August 2026
4 August 2026
2W5zFH1fmuT
1
7 September 2026
7 September 2026
2W5zFHHoFJ1
1
25 September 2026
25 September 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 209 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Минфин и Минстрой России разъяснили нюансы определения цены новых видов работ по благоустройству территорий в случае внесения изменений в контракт по п. 1.3 ч. 1 ст. 95 Закона № 44-ФЗ
🔻В ответе на обращение Минфин указал:
● по п. 1.3 ч. 1 ст. 95 Закона № 44-ФЗ по соглашению сторон допускается изменение объёма и (или) видов работ по контракту, предметом которого в т.ч. является выполнение работ по благоустройству те…
⚖️ Минпромторг отказывает в выдаче разрешения на закупку иностранного товара, если в ЕРПТ включен товар, соответствующий потребности заказчика
Заказчик в рамках Закона № 223-ФЗ закупал точильно-шлифовальный станок с кодом ОКПД2 28.41.2 «Станки токарные, расточные и фрезерные металлорежущие», что соответствует позиции 64 Приложения № 1 к Постановлению № 1875, в связи с чем заказчиком установлен запрет на допуск иност…
Списывается ли неустойка, начисленная при исполнении контрактов, заключенных лицами, не относящимися к числу заказчиков по Закону № 44-ФЗ?
При осуществлении юридическими лицами закупок за счет бюджетных средств, условия предоставления которых предусматривают соблюдение положений Закона № 44-ФЗ, применяются положения этого Закона, регулирующие лишь отдельные отношения, указанные в ч. 4 ст. 15 Закона № 44-ФЗ. Вместе с…
Красивый рендер привлекает внимание, но он не всегда отвечает на главные вопросы. Какой статус у проекта? Какие параметры утверждены? Какие работы запланированы?
Если вам недостаточно красивого рендера, читайте канал Москомэкспертизы. Здесь публикуем официальную информация о проектах, получивших положительное заключение государственной экспертизы. В фокусе: новое строительство, реновация, капитальный ремонт и реста…
⚖️ Некорректный расчёт индекса прогнозной инфляции привёл к увеличению начальной (максимальной) цены договора на выполнение строительных работ. Чьи это риски?
Цена договора на выполнение строительно-монтажных работ по реконструкции и строительству водопроводных сетей (Закон № 223-ФЗ) была рассчитана с учётом индекса прогнозной инфляции на период выполнения работ (1,029). При расчёте начальной цены заказчик руководст…
Минпромторг хочет изменить правила применения национального режима для светотехнической продукции
В перечень товаров с защитной мерой в виде запрета планируют включить новые позиции:
● 27.40.25.120 – устройства осветительные электрические подвесные, потолочные, встраиваемые и настенные, не имеющие встроенную аккумуляторную батарею и режим работы от нее;
● 27.40.25.130 – устройства осветительные электрические подвес…
⚖️ Подрядчик приостановил работы из-за плохой погоды. Освобождается ли он от ответственности за просрочку исполнения?
Подрядчик должен был выполнить ремонт крыши и фасада нескольких зданий, но к работам в срок не приступил.
Заказчик потребовал неустойку за нарушение сроков исполнения.
Подрядчик возражал, ссылаясь на неблагоприятные погодные условия, которые помешали ему вовремя выполнить обязательства.
Суды его не…
⚖️ Участнику не удалось взыскать с ФАС расходы, понесенные в связи с получением независимой гарантии
Победитель закупки заплатил комиссию банку в размере 868 тыс. руб. за получение банковской гарантии.
Результаты закупки были обжалованы. По результатам рассмотрения жалобы комиссия антимонопольного органа посчитала, что заявка участника подлежала отклонению, а контракт был направлен иному лицу.
Обжаловав решение ан…
✅ Практика ФАС по Закону N 223-ФЗ: на что контролеры обратили внимание в обзорах за май 2026 года
Заказчики устанавливали неверный порядок оценки заявок и противоречивые условия закупочной документации. Также они определяли неоднозначный порядок выплаты аванса. Подробнее в обзоре КонсультантПлюс.
📍Неверный порядок оценки заявок
По условиям закупки максимальное количество баллов получала заявка с предложением ориги…
Изменен перечень региональных гарантийных организаций, удовлетворяющих требованиям Закона № 44‑ФЗ
15.09.2026 Минфином России размещен обновленный перечень региональных гарантийных организаций, удовлетворяющих требованиям, установленным пунктом 3 части 1 статьи 45 Закона № 44‑ФЗ, которые вправе выдавать независимые гарантии для обеспечения заявок, исполнения контрактов, гарантийных обязательств по закупкам.
Из указа…
Минфин рассказал о порядке исполнения контрактов, заключаемых с единственным контрагентом в особых случаях
Специалисты Минфина России разъяснили, что установление в акте Правительства РФ требования об исполнении единственным контрагентом своих обязательств по контракту лично предполагает исполнение обязательства силами соответствующей организации и от своего имени. В то же время при рассмотрении вопроса об исполнени…
⚖️ Строительная организация не смогла взыскать со школы 11 млн за ремонт асфальта
https://www.garant.ru/news/2248833/
Школа обратилась в администрацию города с письмом о необходимости благоустройства территории из-за износа асфальтового покрытия. По версии общества-истца, администрация через свое должностное лицо устно обратилась к нему как к строительной организации, с которой она ранее работала по муниципальным ко…
Showing the 12 most recent of 209 posts we hold for @zakupki44fz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@zakupki44fz edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 56 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ГИС ЕИС ЗАКУПКИ @gis_eiszakupki · 89,769 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
РТС-тендер @rtstenderinfo · 25,176 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 14 September 2026
ГИС ТОРГИ ПРОДАЖИ @gis_torgi_prodaji · 24,533 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 September 2026
ГАРАНТ. Новости законодательства @garantnews · 24,625 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
Новости ВС РФ @vsrf_ru · 59,883 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Кадровику @kadroviku · 45,141 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 27 August 2026
Дмитрий Мирончук | Закон и право @ruslaw · 25,373 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 14 September 2026
Время госзакупок @zakupki_time · 24,685 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
КонсультантПлюс @consultant_plus · 45,275 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
Казначейство России @TreasuryofRussia · 21,493 Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Закупки и тендеры по 44-ФЗ, 223-ФЗ” (@zakupki44fz), 48,891 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/zakupki44fz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.