Channel
@flagmantender
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,319subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001616637294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @flagmantender |
| Created | 25 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/flagmantender |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:25 | 2,319 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 2,325 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 2,324 | +10 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 19:24 | 2,314 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 2,317 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 2,316 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:07 | 2,317 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 2,321 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:51 | 2,320 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 2,321 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
97 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 33.0% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 30.9% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 20.6% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 13.4% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 97 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎥 Продолжаем делиться видео с «Ночи госзаказа» в Казани Если в прошлый раз мы показывали парусную регату, то сегодня переносимся в эпицентр бизнес-мысли. Утром за круглым столом разбирали влияние ИИ на тендеры и кадровые вопросы, а сразу после — моделировали новые стратегии в деловой игре «Закупки будущего». ➡️ Вся атмосфера этого события в одном видео
❤4👍1
🐚Новая статья от эксперта Ассоциации ФЛАГМАН: «Как использовать ИИ в работе тендерного специалиста» «ИИ заменит специалистов» — миф, который мешает видеть реальность. Искусственный интеллект не отнимает работу, а освобождает время от рутины: анализа документов, сверки контрактов, подготовки писем. Главное — знать, какие задачи можно делегировать безопасно, а где нужен человеческий контроль. Виктор Гаркуша — тендерн…
👍4💯4❤2👌2
📃 Елена Дыбова: «Сенаторы услышали голос ТПП РФ – законопроект о защите поставщиков принят в работу» На этой неделе в ведущих деловых СМИ, в том числе в «Ведомостях», появилась информация о том, что Комитет Совета Федерации по бюджету и финансовым рынкам подготовил проект поправок в Федеральный закон № 44-ФЗ, который защищает добросовестных исполнителей госконтрактов от односторонней реституции. Сенаторы предлагают …
👍4❤3🔥3
🔥 Весной после заседания Флагмана от наших участников были сформулированы и переданы в ТПП РФ опасения бизнеса по поводу односторонней реституции в госконтрактах. Другие участники рынка также подтвердили высокую актуальность проблемы - и вот эта совместная работа на базе ТПП приносит первые плоды 💪
❤3💯3🔥3
⛵️ Делимся атмосферой «Ночи госзаказа»! 4 июля на воде было не менее жарко, чем в кулуарах — состоялась наша парусная регата. Свежий ветер, командный дух, азарт и отличные эмоции! 🌊 Подготовили для вас небольшой видеоотчет о том, как проходили заплывы и кто забрал заветный кубок. Смотрите, заряжайтесь и до встречи на следующих мероприятиях! 👇 СМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО
❤2👍2🔥2
И ещё кадры с парусной регаты ⛵️
🔥6❤3💯3
Вчера состоялась наша ежегодная «Ночь госзаказа»🤩 День выдался насыщенным: утренняя сессия за круглым столом была посвящена конечно же тендерам, кадрам и возможностям искусственного интеллекта в госзакупках. Практическую часть продолжила деловая игра «Закупки будущего», где мы моделировали новые стратегии. А после отправились на парусную регату, где устроили соревнования на яхтах ⛵️ Завершили день вкусным ужином в…
❤6🔥6👍3
В ожидании участников Ночи госзаказа 🤩
🔥3❤2👍2
⚡️Место встречи профессионалов! Приглашаем на Ночь госзаказа, которая состоится уже ЗАВТРА! Это не просто конференция — это закрытая встреча профессионалов, где рождаются партнёрства и запускаются проекты. Здесь вы встретите тех, кто поможет вам расти: ✔️ Коллеги-практики — с которыми можно честно обсудить сложные кейсы и получить обратную связь ✔️ Владельцы бизнеса — которые масштабируются через госзаказ и знают…
❤3💯3🔥3
🤩 Завершилась онлайн-конференция «Цифровая трансформация в закупках и тендерах»! Это масштабное практико-ориентированное событие в сфере госзакупок организовала «Академия бизнеса, финансов и права»о при поддержке Ассоциации профессиональных участников торгов и закупок {ФЛАГМАН}. ❤️ Выражаем искреннюю благодарность всем организаторам, партнёрам и спикерам за глубокие, прикладные и своевременные выступления, а также …
❤4👍4🔥4
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @flagmantender. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 43,875 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“{Флагман} Ассоциация” (@flagmantender), 2,319 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/flagmantender.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.