Говорят, мужчины лучше разбираются в закупках. Давайте выясним раз и навсегда! 😅 Монтировал коллега-зумер при поддержке РТС-Ассистента, не судите строго 🙏
😁27🔥11🤔4🫡2

Channel
@rtstenderinfo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,324subscribers
-107 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001734151811 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rtstenderinfo |
| Description | Официальный канал РТС-тендер. Входит в российскую электронную торговую платформу для бизнеса и государства B2B-РТС. rts-tender.ru Служба клиентской поддержки: [email protected] Сотрудничество: [email protected] Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3GuofK |
| Created | 11 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 30 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 18 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 30 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rtstenderinfo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 25,324 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 25,326 | -8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:58 | 25,334 | +1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:26 | 25,333 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 25,338 | -6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 25,344 | -7 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 25,351 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 25,366 | -17 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 20:09 | 25,383 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:28 | 25,393 | -19 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:38 | 25,412 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 25,411 | -7 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 25,418 | -2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 25,420 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:36 | 25,425 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:01 | 25,424 | -7 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:44 | 25,431 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 25,431 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (20 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 35,490 |
| Reactions total | 290 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
468 reactions across 18 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 167 | 35.7% | |
| 🔥 | 64 | 13.7% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 12.8% | |
| 😁 | 47 | 10.0% | |
| 🤯 | 26 | 5.56% | |
| 🎉 | 22 | 4.70% | |
| 🤝 | 22 | 4.70% | |
| 🤔 | 19 | 4.06% | |
| 🍾 | 17 | 3.63% | |
| 💅 | 8 | 1.71% | |
| 🙏 | 8 | 1.71% | |
| 👌 | 4 | 0.855% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 0.641% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.214% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 468reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Говорят, мужчины лучше разбираются в закупках. Давайте выясним раз и навсегда! 😅 Монтировал коллега-зумер при поддержке РТС-Ассистента, не судите строго 🙏
😁27🔥11🤔4🫡2
О регионах многое можно узнать по их закупкам (даже не заглядывая в учебник по экономике) 👌 Взяли данные за первое полугодие по Приморью и Хабаровскому краю: вместе заказчики заключили здесь договоры почти на 230 млрд рублей – давайте посмотрим, куда конкретно стекаются финансовые потоки. ✦ Хабаровский край – 135+ млрд рублей Драйверы здесь – инфраструктура и энергетика. На строительство пришлось около 62 млрд руб…
🔥10👍2
Поставщики, вопрос на засыпку: что общего у первоклассника и транспортной накладной? Правильно, 1 сентября у обоих начинается электронный документооборот 🥁🥁🥁 Если серьезно: с 1 сентября грузоотправители по 140-ФЗ оформляют накладные только электронно. У перевозчиков формально отсрочка до 1 марта, но накладную-то подписывают ВСЕ участники перевозки. Грузоотправитель создал ЭТрН — значит, и вам ее подписывать электро…
❤6👍6🍾2
Как вам такая статистика: 🚌 Только за первое полугодие на закупки городского пассажирского транспорта пришлось более 9,7 млрд рублей. Основные сегменты здесь: крупные партии автобусов для Урала, Юга России и Дальнего Востока, а также троллейбусы для Северо-Запада. 🚑 А вот еще: почти 10 млрд рублей за тот же период – закупки спецтранспорта. За первые шесть месяцев 2026 года госзаказчики провели 506 тендеров. Почти…
❤7😁2
🚨Сработала сигнализация. На 9,75 млрд руб. Это не размер ущерба. Хотя заголовок 🔥 На такую сумму заказчики по 44-ФЗ и 223-ФЗ закупились охранными и противопожарными системами в первом полугодии. По сравнению с прошлым годом объём закупок вырос почти в 2,5 раза: с 4,16 до 9,75 млрд руб. Всего около 1,6 тыс. тендеров. Если подробнее: • почти 90% закупок в деньгах пришлось на компании по 223-ФЗ. • оборудование закупа…
👍6🔥5😁3
Большое обновление «Буст» – собрали основное в карточки, но, честно говоря, даже туда все не влезло. Для тех, кто еще не знаком: «Буст» помогает со срочными закупками и поиском поставщиков. Это один из сервисов B2B-Center (площадка входит в B2B-РТС наряду с РТС-тендер и ОТС). Нужна партия упаковки или стулья в офис? Вместо обзвонов, рассылок и бесконечного ожидания сервис за 3–5 минут найдет поставщиков, отправит з…
👍11🤝3
Печальная закупочная история, коллеги. Однако, ❤️ — если Людочка тоже имеет право на отдых!
❤32😁11💅1
Коллеги, судебная практика, которую стоит забрать в закладки ⚖️ Что случилось? Компания выиграла аукцион на рекультивацию полигона с контрактом больше чем на 840 млн. В период заключения контракта поступила жалоба, и процедуру приостановили. Заказчик посчитал, что срок подписания для победителя все это время продолжал течь, признал компанию уклонившейся, и та отправилась в РНП на два года… Компания дошла до Верхов…
❤31👍8🍾7👌2
Количество разъясняющих писем тех или иных органов по нормативке исчисляется сотнями. Количество выпусков Андрея Спирина с ответами на вопросы поставщиков тоже УВЕРЕННО приближается к этим показателям. Вот, держите четвёртый выпуск 😅
❤10👍5🤝2😁2
Коллеги, 44-ФЗ подробно описывает «правила игры». Ну вы и сами знаете. А вот судебная практика показывает: что будет, если их игнорировать. Добавить к уже заключённому контракту аванс в 30%? Нельзя. Даже если подрядчику ОООЧЕНЬ нужны эти 545 млн рублей. Всё равно нельзя ) Аннулировать конкурс по предписанию УФАС, а через пару месяцев заключить контракт с единственным поставщиком? Тоже плохая затея. Как раз в одном …
👍8
А ПОЧЕМУ ТАК?! 🤯 Скажем, вот вы ищете закупки молока, а находите ремонт электродвигателей — ну куда это годится? Целый час Андрей Спирин, руководитель отдела развития продуктов обучения на площадке РТС-тендер, отвечает на вопросы участников закупок. Уже в третий раз. И будет продолжать! Какие функции в фильтрах зачастую поставщики недооценивают, а какие следует наоборот отключить в частных случаях? Как искать заку…
❤6👍6🔥5🤝2
Коллеги, у нас хорошая новость, и она, в общем-то, про вас RAEX опубликовало ежегодные рейтинги российских ИТ-компаний, и по итогам 2025 года мы — вся платформа B2B-РТС, то есть РТС-тендер вместе с B2B-Center, ОТС, РТС-Академией и Облачной логистикой — сразу в трёх списках: ✦ 6 место среди крупнейших поставщиков ИТ-услуг (+1 строчка) ✦ 19 место среди крупнейших ИТ-компаний России ✦ 31 место среди ведущих разработчи…
🎉22❤13🍾8👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @rtstenderinfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 64,864 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РТС-тендер” (@rtstenderinfo), 25,324 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rtstenderinfo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.