Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for РАУТ

Channel

РАУТ

@rautexpert

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,728subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001798914664
TypeChannel
Username@rautexpert
CreatedBetween 1 February 2022 and 31 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rautexpert

Growth

2,7282,7422,7356 August 2026 — 2,740 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,740 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,742 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,741 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,740 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,736 subscribers25 August 2026 — 2,740 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,742 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,734 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,731 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,728 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 34 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,726–2,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 16:412,728-3
4 Sept 2026, 09:402,731-3
31 Aug 2026, 23:462,734-8
28 Aug 2026, 19:052,742+2
25 Aug 2026, 16:232,740+4
23 Aug 2026, 01:132,736-4
20 Aug 2026, 00:262,740-1
16 Aug 2026, 17:132,741-1
12 Aug 2026, 19:452,742+2
7 Aug 2026, 10:082,740no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:032,740first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 18 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1932.2%
1728.8%
👍1728.8%
👌23.39%
💯23.39%
👏11.69%
🤩11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC164 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Digital-находки: инструменты, которые экономят время и нервы В нашей рубрике — подборка сервисов, которые помогут вам работать быстрее, не забивать голову рутиной и не пропускать важное. Сохраняйте. 🔗 NotebookLM — ИИ-помощник от Google для работы с документами. Скачиваете файлы, статьи, интервью или презентации — сервис анализирует их и выдаёт ответы строго по вашему материалу. Идеально для подготовки стратегий, а

🔥2👍1

3 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC224 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Дайджест закупок за июль: новый закон, рискованные практики и позиции ФАС Июль выдался насыщенным на события в сфере закупок. Собрали главное за месяц — от законодательных новаций до судебных решений, которые стоит взять на заметку. 📌 Главное: Совет Федерации одобрил масштабные послабления в 44-ФЗ Закон, инициированный председателями обеих палат , вступает в силу с 1 октября 2026 года (по ряду норм — с 1 января 20

👍32👏1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC239 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Через 2 часа: вебинар с адвокатом по картелям Юлией Лещук Напоминаем: уже сегодня, в 15:00, состоится вебинар с Юлией Лещук, адвокатом по картелям и антиконкурентным соглашениям. Тема: «Картельная аналитика для заказчика и поставщика: виды, задачи и практическое применение» Коротко о чём поговорим: 🔵почему отдельный индикатор (IP, снижение цены) не доказывает сговор; 🔵как анализировать весь закупочный процесс:

🔥32👍1

1 Aug 2026, 11:03 UTC267 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

📚 РАУТ выходные: что общего у Intel, Microsoft и компании, которая никогда не меняла курс Представьте: две компании работают в одной отрасли, в одних и тех же условиях. Одна выживает и растёт, а вторая — в 10 раз превосходит первую по всем показателям. И так 15 лет подряд. Почему? Им просто повезло? Они рисковали больше всех? У них были гениальные инновации? Авторы книги «Великие по собственному выбору» (Great by

👍32🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 14:03 UTC281 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🔍 Оценка опыта по 223-ФЗ: свежие разъяснения судов и УФАС За последние полтора года накопилось несколько важных решений по оценке опыта участников закупок по 223-ФЗ. Разбираем ключевые кейсы, чтобы понимать, что законно, а что рискованно. 1. Заказчик вправе не принимать обычные ГПД для оценки опыта Ситуация: заказчик при оценке квалификации учитывал только сведения из реестра госконтрактов или реестра договоров по

👍21

30 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTC289 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

А вы состоите в ассоциации РАУТ?

  1. да, давно47%
  2. нет, но сейчас вступлю12%
  3. нет41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 08:06 UTC382 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎉 Первый закрытый бизнес-завтрак РАУТ: эксклюзивная встреча для участников ассоциации 25 августа состоится офлайн-встреча РАУТ на тему «Бизнес и внутренние ресурсы: как управлять собой, командой и рисками». ❗️Мероприятие пройдет в закрытом формате — только для участников ассоциации, которые заполнили анкету на сайте и предоставили свои данные. Им будут отправлены приглашения на электронную почту. Важно: участие в

🔥1🤩1

29 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC527 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🎓 Вебинар с Юлией Лещук: Картельная аналитика для заказчика и поставщика Коллеги, 3 августа приглашаем вас на вебинар с Юлией Лещук — адвокатом по картелям и антиконкурентным соглашениям, специалистом по защите бизнеса при антимонопольных проверках. О чем поговорим? 🔵Картельная аналитика не сводится к проверке IP-адресов, размера снижения цены или последовательности подачи заявок. Отдельный индикатор не подтвержд

🔥31

13 Jul 2026, 08:29 UTC485 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👩‍⚖️ Топ-3 ошибки заказчиков по 44-ФЗ: разбор свежей практики УФАС УФАС по Московской области опубликовало обзор практики за I квартал 2026 года. Разбираем три показательные ошибки заказчиков, на которые стоит обратить внимание и поставщикам. 1. Отказ от контракта из-за отзыва ЛБО — незаконен Заказчик отказался заключать контракт и отменил закупку, сославшись на отзыв лимитов бюджетных обязательств (ЛБО). Позиция

🔥41

8 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC524 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Самое удобное время для онлайн-встреч

  1. 11:0022%
  2. 13:0031%
  3. 15:0031%
  4. 17:0028%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

8 Jul 2026, 11:40 UTC499 viewsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги, хотим сделать наши встречи еще более продуктивными 👉 Расскажите, в какое время вам удобно смотреть наши вебинары

7 Jul 2026, 13:09 UTC511 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Собрали для вас ключевые новости и разъяснения за последнее время. В центре внимания — судебные споры, изменения в национальном режиме и важные позиции регуляторов. 📄 1. Суд: ограничение мобильного интернета — не оправдание для пропуска срока подписания контракта Победитель запроса котировок не подписал контракт в срок, сославшись на ограничение мобильного интернета, введённое для обеспечения безопасности. В подтве

1👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @rautexpert. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Jul 2026, 08:07 UTCAnonymous Poll17 voters

А вы состоите в ассоциации РАУТ?

  1. да, давно47%
  2. нет, но сейчас вступлю12%
  3. нет41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTCAnonymous Poll36 voters

Самое удобное время для онлайн-встреч

  1. 11:0022%
  2. 13:0031%
  3. 15:0031%
  4. 17:0028%

The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Jun 2026, 14:40 UTCAnonymous Poll25 voters

Какие темы со стороны поставщика важно вынести на открытый диалог с заказчиками?

  1. Избыточные или неясные требования в документации52%
  2. Техническое задание, которое выглядит «заточенным»56%
  3. Непрозрачные критерии оценки и выбора победителя28%
  4. Слишком короткие сроки подготовки заявки или исполнения договора28%
  5. Демпинг конкурентов36%
  6. Обеспечение заявки / договора и финансовая нагрузка24%
  7. Приёмка, акты, замечания и спорные ситуации20%
  8. Сроки оплаты и кассовые разрывы20%
  9. Другое — напишите в комментариях4%

The shares total 268%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ГИС ЕИС ЗАКУПКИ
@gis_eiszakupki · 89,937
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“РАУТ” (@rautexpert), 2,728 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rautexpert.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.