Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Менталист

Channel

Менталист

@mentalroom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

22,532subscribers

+113 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001347690572
TypeChannel
Username@mentalroom
Created22 December 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 October 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/mentalroom

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

22,39022,56822,4796 August 2026 — 22,419 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,419 subscribers6 August 2026 — 22,418 subscribers8 August 2026 — 22,410 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,407 subscribers9 August 2026 — 22,409 subscribers10 August 2026 — 22,408 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22,407 subscribers12 August 2026 — 22,406 subscribers14 August 2026 — 22,400 subscribers15 August 2026 — 22,396 subscribers17 August 2026 — 22,390 subscribers18 August 2026 — 22,391 subscribers19 August 2026 — 22,406 subscribers20 August 2026 — 22,402 subscribers21 August 2026 — 22,415 subscribers22 August 2026 — 22,430 subscribers24 August 2026 — 22,436 subscribers25 August 2026 — 22,435 subscribers26 August 2026 — 22,430 subscribers27 August 2026 — 22,435 subscribers28 August 2026 — 22,443 subscribers29 August 2026 — 22,466 subscribers30 August 2026 — 22,492 subscribers31 August 2026 — 22,501 subscribers1 September 2026 — 22,488 subscribers2 September 2026 — 22,490 subscribers4 September 2026 — 22,487 subscribers6 September 2026 — 22,478 subscribers9 September 2026 — 22,468 subscribers11 September 2026 — 22,466 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,465 subscribers15 September 2026 — 22,462 subscribers17 September 2026 — 22,468 subscribers27 September 2026 — 22,440 subscribers4 October 2026 — 22,481 subscribers9 October 2026 — 22,542 subscribers13 October 2026 — 22,564 subscribers14 October 2026 — 22,565 subscribers15 October 2026 — 22,568 subscribers17 October 2026 — 22,551 subscribers18 October 2026 — 22,532 subscribers22,5326 August 202618 October 2026
42 measurements spanning 73 days, net +113. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22,363–22,595 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Oct 2026, 12:0822,532-19
17 Oct 2026, 11:2122,551-17
15 Oct 2026, 16:2822,568+3
14 Oct 2026, 18:5722,565+1
13 Oct 2026, 08:1922,564+22
9 Oct 2026, 02:5922,542+61
4 Oct 2026, 19:1622,481+41
27 Sept 2026, 03:2222,440-28
17 Sept 2026, 11:4222,468+6
15 Sept 2026, 13:0122,462-3
13 Sept 2026, 18:1922,465-1
11 Sept 2026, 20:5622,466-2
9 Sept 2026, 11:1622,468-10
6 Sept 2026, 05:1822,478-9
4 Sept 2026, 01:1922,487-3
2 Sept 2026, 12:0822,490+2
1 Sept 2026, 15:2422,488-13
31 Aug 2026, 16:4722,501+9
30 Aug 2026, 13:2422,492+26
29 Aug 2026, 10:3722,466first reading

Engagement

60 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 82 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.9%
avg views ÷ 22,532 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,580
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.46%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 60 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held60 (22 June 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total71,680
Reactions total1,048
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Oct 2026, 13:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 01s
Average length
2m 00s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,817 reactions across 59 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,22443.5%
👍52518.6%
❤‍🔥48617.3%
😁2237.92%
💯1706.03%
😍531.88%
🤔361.28%
🍾250.887%
👏210.745%
😢210.745%
🥰170.603%
💊80.284%
😱50.177%
🤯20.071%
🎉10.035%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,847 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
33
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 60 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
22
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mentalroom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 60 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 13 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Oct 2026, 17:29 UTC≈1,230 views19 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Недавно я делился новостью, что мы решили организовать выездной загородный взрослый лагерь с психологическими играми. Ребята, кто оставляют заявки часто интересуются - впервые ли мы такое проводим и будем ли проводить ещё. Отвечу сюда: да, делаем такое впервые. Будет ли ещё: не знаю, покажет опыт. Эта идея в голове у меня уже сидит давно. С моей коллегой мы как-то пробовали организовать такое года 2-3 назад, но чи…

🔥14👍4👏1

12 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,790 views14 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥8😱5👍1

12 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,720 views16 reactions1 Starread 14 October 2026

Ух, начинаем новый Воркшопчик! Возвращаюсь спустя пол года 🔥

🔥16

11 Oct 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,320 views22 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😍12🔥6👍3😢1

11 Oct 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,190 views10 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥9🥰1

11 Oct 2026, 13:26 UTC≈2,220 views38 reactions22 Starsread 14 October 2026

Новый выпуск уже на канале! https://youtu.be/RixYUj7LEZk Монтировал до 2 часов ночи, чтобы успеть к сегодняшнему дню. Надеюсь найдёте этот материал для себя полезным. Приятного просмотра!

🔥33👍4😢1

5 Oct 2026, 13:05 UTC≈5,030 views56 reactionsread 14 October 2026

Лучший способ привлечь внимание — попытаться его избежать Представьте: вы идёте на важную встречу и чувствуете, что недостаточно подготовились. И в самом начале — сами не знаете почему — говорите: «Я, честно говоря, не очень готов к этому разговору». И теперь все замечают именно это. Хотя если бы вы просто начали без этого комментария, возможно, никто бы ничего и не заметил. Мы часто привлекаем внимание к тому, что…

👍36🔥12👏5❤‍🔥2😢1

1 Oct 2026, 15:05 UTC≈5,790 views46 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Три часа ночи. Вы лежите и думаете о том, что сказали на встрече неделю назад. Прокручиваете момент, где надо было ответить иначе. Придумываете лучшую версию себя с нужными словами, правильной интонацией, убедительным аргументом. И так по кругу, одно и то же, без движения вперед. Это называется руминация — навязчивое мысленное пережёвывание одной и той же ситуации по кругу. Не анализ, а именно прокрутка: одно и то ж…

👍30🔥6👏5❤‍🔥2🤯2😢1

30 Sept 2026, 13:41 UTC≈4,650 views27 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Photo

Хочу проверить одну идею, которая висит в голове уже несколько лет. 16–18 октября планирую сделать взрослый лагерь под Санкт-Петербургом! Это будет смесь отдыха, общения и живых психологических и переговорных игр. Собираемся небольшой компанией в загородном клубе, живём в двух домах с раздельными кроватями, отдыхаем, общаемся, а между этим участвуем в игровых ситуациях, где нужно договариваться, объединяться, прини…

😍19🔥5🥰2😁1

28 Sept 2026, 14:32 UTC≈3,910 views37 reactionsread 14 October 2026
Video

Вдогонку к ролику про провокации, которые нельзя игнорировать, хочу разобрать еще одну ситуацию. На этот раз из ток-шоу Андрея Малахова, где столкнулись Татьяна Тарасова и Марат Башаров. Немного контекста Башаров в начале разговора явно чувствует себя уверенно, говорит о наградах, о своих заслугах. И вдруг Тарасова переводит разговор в другое русло и ставит условие: либо он извиняется за прошлые поступки, либо она …

🔥28👍6❤‍🔥1👏1💊1

26 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC≈3,980 views61 reactionsread 13 October 2026
Video

Некоторое время назад листая рилсы наткнулся на просто бешенную природную харизму от Кости Загузина, фокусника и менталиста. Причём я сначала даже не мог нормально понять, из чего она складывается. Он не выглядит человеком, который специально пытается быть "харизматичным". Нет этой тяжёлой уверенности, поставленного взгляда, демонстративной доминантности. Все его выступления построены вокруг управления вниманием, к…

💯34🔥18👍7🥰2

25 Sept 2026, 12:10 UTC≈3,850 views74 reactionsread 12 October 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥52😁11😍7💯3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @mentalroom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 970,196
#1
ХарчевниковИлита
@kharchevnikov · 121,955
#2
Евгений Понасенков
@evgenii_ponasenkov · 77,005
#3
GRAND
@q_grand · 29,916
#4
Antipov
@antipov · 397,994
#5
Sokolovskiy
@sokolay · 109,323
#6
Михаил Дементьев. Кинетический интеллект
@kintellect · 36,099
#7
Академия исследования лжи (StudyLie)
@studylie · 4,973
#8
Ваня Роялти
@vanya_royalty · 8,165
#9
Ветров Консультант
@vetrovconsultant · 9,133
#10
Нейротипология
@misliglubzhe · 10,586
#11
Психология Маркетинга
@marketpsy · 173,084
#12
Триумф
@triumphstyle · 15,319
#13
Бесплатное образование
@free_edu · 307,895
#14
NN
@naebnet · 2,194,124
#15
Вестник Шевцова
@jolynews · 207,478
#16
Дудь
@yurydud · 856,700
#17
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 605,841
#18
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,840
#19
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,566,099
#20
Dzari
@DrDzari · 265,002
#21
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 304,584
#22
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 324,491
#23
Rozetked
@rozetked · 657,425
#24
MyGap
@MyGapTelegram · 88,667
#25
ТОПЛЕС
@toplesofficial · 504,275
#26
[netstalkers]
@netstalkers · 64,589
#27
BIOMACHINE
@bmchn · 175,114
#28
ЧД
@che_d_e · 37,396
#29
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,443
#30
Ivan Limarev / Merlin AI
@LimarevIvan · 12,175
#31
Utopia Show
@topapopa · 365,618
#32
Arestovich / Official
@O_Arestovich_official · 238,485
#33
Простая экономика
@prostoecon · 300,817
#34
Social Engineering
@Social_engineering · 124,966
#35
Это Файб
@etofaib · 202,759
#36
Хулиномика
@hoolinomics · 99,074
#37
Соболев LIVE
@sobolevtam · 121,026
#38
ЧЁРНЫЙ КАБИНЕТ
@cabinetblack1 · 22,595
#39
Roman Ovcharóv
@ovcharovblog · 29,698
#40
Максим Вердикт
@verdiktt · 67,515
#41
Глеб Соломин 🚀 24.05.2025
@gleb_solomin · 60,437
#42
Александр Штефанов
@alexandrshtefanov · 204,699
#43
Dagon
@dagon_official · 25,586
#44
Рестарт
@remedia · 681,648
#45
Профайлинг, нейротехнологии и детекции лжи
@ProProfiIing · 23,131
#46
GEO
@GEOSHOW · 77,750
#47
Theory of Deduction | Теория Дедукции | Sherlock Holmes | Шерлок Холмс
@theoryofdeduction · 2,038
#48
CryptoScamm
@crypt0scamm · 60,668
#49
Печень Ховы
@pechova · 101,297
#50
Просвещенный
@prosveshenniychannel · 26,938
#51
Oxxxymiron
@norimyxxxo · 153,881
#52
Котокраб
@Kotokrabs · 35,959
#53
Букич (психология, бизнес)
@bykich · 9,078
#54
ОСНОВАНИЕ.LIFE
@osnovanie_life · 16,020
#55
PunkMonk
@punkmonkprod · 20,928
#56
Альберт Сафин
@safin4 · 68,921
#57
Чёрный Треугольник
@black_triangle_tg · 63,840
#58
Bafoмёд OSINT
@osint_san_framework · 9,307
#59
LAMERLAND - overbafer1
@overlamer1 · 81,188
#60
overbafer1
@overbafer1 · 63,399
#61
Алекс Лесли
@alexlesleynew · 19,867
#62
Obraz
@obrazpublic · 8,196
#63
PRNRP
@trap_critics · 29,726
#64
Грег
@gregjgeek · 23,174
#65
На пенсию в 35 лет
@pensiya35 · 123,548
#66
РЫНДЫЧ
@R_4an · 57,670
#67
Second Brain 🗃
@second_brain_ru · 4,374
#68
valentin later
@LaterWeShallSee · 14,345
#69
Лекториум
@lektorium20 · 114,772
#70
Советы и мотивация
@advice_motivation · 1,830
#71
George Biomechanic
@george_biomechanic · 4,672
#72
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 357,987
#73
Двач
@dvachannel · 973,175
#74
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,017,304
#75
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,124,546
#76
GreenGrass
@greengrassreal · 30,636
#77
Диего Симеонович | Кирилл Хаит о футболе
@cholo_football · 45,470
#78
ЭПИЗОДЫ
@episodesfilm · 10,419
#79
Соляноторий
@PathOfMisanthrope · 196,647
#80
CyberYozh Academy
@cyberyozh_academy · 15,332
#81
ChessMaster ♞ Шахматы
@ChessMaestro · 44,564
#82
Журнал НОЖ
@knifemedia · 101,857
#83
N
@iamdilettante · 912
#84

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Михаил Дементьев. Кинетический интеллект
@kintellect · 36,099
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 1 September 2026
Просвещенный
@prosveshenniychannel · 26,938
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 September 2026
ЧД
@che_d_e · 37,396
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 31 August 2026
Профайлинг, нейротехнологии и детекции лжи
@ProProfiIing · 23,131
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Менталист” (@mentalroom), 22,532 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mentalroom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.