Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Максим Вердикт

Channel

Максим Вердикт

@verdiktt

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

67,584subscribers

-574 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001500817992
TypeChannel
Username@verdiktt
Description💰 БАЗА ВЕРДИКТА - 590₽/мес ✅ Оплата: @baza_verdikta_bot
CreatedBetween 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/verdiktt

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

67,58468,16067,8727 August 2026 — 68,158 subscribers7 August 2026 — 68,158 subscribers7 August 2026 — 68,157 subscribers9 August 2026 — 68,158 subscribers10 August 2026 — 68,160 subscribers11 August 2026 — 68,158 subscribers12 August 2026 — 68,156 subscribers13 August 2026 — 68,149 subscribers14 August 2026 — 68,084 subscribers16 August 2026 — 68,039 subscribers17 August 2026 — 67,988 subscribers18 August 2026 — 67,974 subscribers19 August 2026 — 67,928 subscribers21 August 2026 — 67,926 subscribers23 August 2026 — 67,862 subscribers24 August 2026 — 67,859 subscribers25 August 2026 — 67,862 subscribers26 August 2026 — 67,853 subscribers27 August 2026 — 67,801 subscribers28 August 2026 — 67,782 subscribers29 August 2026 — 67,761 subscribers31 August 2026 — 67,735 subscribers1 September 2026 — 67,731 subscribers2 September 2026 — 67,724 subscribers4 September 2026 — 67,716 subscribers6 September 2026 — 67,709 subscribers9 September 2026 — 67,639 subscribers12 September 2026 — 67,621 subscribers13 September 2026 — 67,613 subscribers15 September 2026 — 67,597 subscribers17 September 2026 — 67,584 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 41 days, net -574. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 67,498–68,246 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 14:5967,584-13
15 Sept 2026, 13:0067,597-16
13 Sept 2026, 21:5867,613-8
12 Sept 2026, 05:1567,621-18
9 Sept 2026, 23:5867,639-70
6 Sept 2026, 13:4167,709-7
4 Sept 2026, 05:3767,716-8
2 Sept 2026, 19:2467,724-7
1 Sept 2026, 19:0367,731-4
31 Aug 2026, 17:5567,735-26
29 Aug 2026, 17:3567,761-21
28 Aug 2026, 19:2467,782-19
27 Aug 2026, 18:5567,801-52
26 Aug 2026, 16:1467,853-9
25 Aug 2026, 16:3867,862+3
24 Aug 2026, 17:3767,859-3
23 Aug 2026, 03:1867,862-64
21 Aug 2026, 14:0667,926-2
19 Aug 2026, 15:0267,928-46
18 Aug 2026, 15:2367,974first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 20 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
36.1%
avg views ÷ 67,584 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,400
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026
Posts held34 (20 April 202618 September 2026)
Views total195,140
Reactions total5,303
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken19 Sept 2026, 00:54 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
167
Videos
17
Links
108

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
2m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

21,961 reactions across 34 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,33424.3%
🔥4,78621.8%
4,66921.3%
😁3,48715.9%
🤡1,8428.39%
🌭3971.81%
🤔2451.12%
😱2080.947%
👏2020.92%
🗿1220.556%
🥴1200.546%
🥰1080.492%
🍾590.269%
🤯590.269%
💘570.26%
🙈560.255%
🤬550.25%
🦄490.223%
💔410.187%
😐400.182%
1 further kind250.114%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,961 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Sept 2026, 07:59 UTC≈8,820 views854 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

426👍227😁91🔥53👏16🤡16🌭12🥰5

18 Sept 2026, 07:38 UTC≈9,220 views504 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

🔥268👍12952🌭21🤡8🥰6👏5😁5

18 Sept 2026, 07:05 UTC≈10,300 views604 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Poll

Что сейчас у вас с личной жизнью?

  1. Выбрал пригодную девушку. Дома тишина и порядок.18%
  2. Выбрал проблемную. Переодически возникают ссоры и конфликты.13%
  3. Выбрал непригодную. Дома творится полный треш.2%
  4. Живу без отношений67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁298🤔11056😱41🗿26🌭24🍾14🤯11

6 Sept 2026, 13:45 UTC≈26,000 views933 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Voice message

Всех задолбала тема отношений 😡

😁431👍28381🔥47🌭20👏20🤔17🤯14

31 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC≈36,800 views696 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

У меня отличная новость! Вышел один из самых содержательных курсов, которые я когда-либо снимал: КАК ЗАБЫТЬ БЫВШУЮ Раньше эти техники были доступны только на индивидуальных консультациях. Внутри 35 конкретных приёмов, которые помогут уничтожить значимость к бывшей. Никакой выдуманной дичи и пустых советов психологов в духе «отпусти и прости». Я не даю того, чего не пробовал сам. Это не книжная болтовня, а сухая вы

👍369🔥15373🤡46👏16😁14🙈9🌭6

26 Aug 2026, 17:25 UTC≈34,100 views394 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video

Вход в базу: @baza_verdikta_bot

178👍111🤡45🔥33🌭9🗿5🥴4😁4

22 Aug 2026, 07:09 UTC≈39,300 views916 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁73862🥴36🤡28🌭17🔥15😐6👏5

22 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC≈30,600 views402 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Voice message

Тема видео: Бывшая вышла замуж. Разберем ключевые сценарии. Присылайте голосовые до 90 секунд с вашими историями: 📩 Голосовые сюда: @verdikt_m

🔥232😁66👍59🌭1610🗿8🤡8🤔2

18 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC≈37,700 views973 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁731👍10341🔥22💘21🙈13🥴11🌭9

18 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈27,000 views397 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Voice message

Дополнение к свежему видео

🔥235👍8861🌭6💘4👏1🗿1😐1

18 Aug 2026, 15:47 UTC≈31,600 views759 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Photo

Уже даже друзей вербуют в няньки

😁485🤡160🔥29🥴2219🙈16👏10🌭7

16 Aug 2026, 08:41 UTC≈28,800 views859 reactionsread 19 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

423👍215😁132🔥56🤡11🌭10🤔4🤯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @verdiktt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Sept 2026, 07:05 UTCAnonymous Poll6,010 voters approx.

Что сейчас у вас с личной жизнью?

  1. Выбрал пригодную девушку. Дома тишина и порядок.18%
  2. Выбрал проблемную. Переодически возникают ссоры и конфликты.13%
  3. Выбрал непригодную. Дома творится полный треш.2%
  4. Живу без отношений67%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 20 April 2026 to 18 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Вердиктология
@balance4men · 2,802
#1
GRAND
@q_grand · 30,424
#2
Арсен Маркарян Официальный
@arsenmarkarian · 158,587
#3
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,672,095
#4
Mash
@mash · 3,096,804
#5
Dzari
@DrDzari · 267,705
#6
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#7
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,518,691
#8
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,413,959
#9
Мистер Vo
@themistervo · 8,943
#10
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 650,396
#11
DAY’S OF MADNESS | Блог мозгоправа
@daysmad · 189,204
#12
Ateo Breaking
@ateobreaking · 690,420
#13
СТАС БОМБИТ
@ikakprosto · 326,616
#14
Прямой Эфир • Новости
@novosti_efir · 3,956,254
#15
directorcasting
@directorcasting · 23
#16
Ivan Limarev / Merlin AI
@LimarevIvan · 12,204
#17
КБ
@cbpub · 644,640
#18
НЕ СУЩИЙ СВЕТ
@nesuschiysvet · 3,409
#19
BIOMACHINE
@bmchn · 175,924
#20
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 113,064
#21
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,245
#22
НМШ
@nmshhub · 727,604
#23
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны
@rvvoenkor · 1,459,285
#24
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,012,262
#25
Alex Parker Returns
@apwagner · 317,462
#26
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 494,224
#27
Москва Live
@msk_live · 1,808,438
#28
Rozetked
@rozetked · 656,361
#29
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ
@slezisatoshi · 124,064
#30
Анна Теодорович
@psy_annateo · 46,931
#31
Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 258,153
#32
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,603,481
#33
Кладбище Биохакеров
@fuckbiohacking · 37,177
#34
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,039,984
#35
Дудь
@yurydud · 864,661
#36
Ваня Роялти
@vanya_royalty · 8,250
#37
Кирилл Фёдоров / Война История Оружие
@warhistoryalconafter · 482,355
#38
Нейротипология
@misliglubzhe · 10,578
#39
Roman Ovcharóv
@ovcharovblog · 29,879
#40
MDK
@mudak · 533,284
#41
Дмитрий Никотин
@dmitrynikotin · 681,176
#42
Михаил Фёдорович Маваши
@mikhailmavashi · 238,356
#43
Путь к прозрению
@prozreniepsixol · 7,288
#44
Oleg Torbosov
@TorbosovLife · 107,553
#45
INSTARDING
@INSTARDING · 96,137
#46
Триумф
@triumphstyle · 13,905
#47
ОСНОВАНИЕ.LIFE
@osnovanie_life · 16,082
#48
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,700,170
#49
Двач
@dvachannel · 938,773
#50
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,951
#51
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,535,630
#52
Varlamov News
@varlamov_news · 1,061,005
#53
ВИЛСАКОМ РЕД / WYLSACOM RED
@wylsared · 1,094,211
#54
NN
@naebnet · 2,172,222
#55
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,041,128
#56
НЕВЗОРОВ
@nevzorovtv · 1,019,614
#57
Новости Кошелька
@cryptowallet_news_cis · 1,128,418
#58
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,690
#59
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 747,495
#60
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 937,082
#61
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,700,869
#62
Вестник Шевцова
@jolynews · 208,388
#63
Банкста
@banksta · 438,152
#64
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 336,496
#65
Arestovich / Official
@O_Arestovich_official · 241,702
#66
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 649,498
#67
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 454,915
#68
Алекс Лесли 🤘Alex Lesley
@alexlesleynew · 20,206
#69
4ch
@why4ch · 1,045,447
#70
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,091,300
#71
КБ. экономика
@cb_economics · 342,330
#72
Crypto Headlines
@crypto_hd · 132,434
#73
Antipov
@antipov · 402,395
#74
MELLSTROY BONUS
@mellstroybonus · 327,063
#75
"Maddyson" развлекательный телеграм канал!
@maddysontg · 203,807
#76
Быть Или
@ToBeOr_Official · 303,514
#77
Код.ру
@d_code · 404,952
#78
Романцев768 | Romancev768
@Romancev768 · 764,394
#79
Maloletoff | Crypto-Angel
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,665
#80
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart · 129,572
#81

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Анна Теодорович
@psy_annateo · 46,931
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Тёмная комната | Эриксон
@erik_hard · 44,585
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Просвещенный
@prosveshenniychannel · 26,552
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 12 September 2026
directorcasting
@directorcasting · 23
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
Андрес в деле
@andresvdele · 39,829
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 30 August 2026
НЕ СУЩИЙ СВЕТ
@nesuschiysvet · 3,409
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
Бизнес-жилка
@JilkaB · 46,437
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 30 August 2026
Денис Борисов
@sila · 103,720
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Александр Добромиль your fit
@Dobromil_yourfit · 36,086
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
Игорь Войтенко
@realingvarvoitenko · 29,647
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 8 September 2026
Денис Семенихин
@DenisSemenikhin · 34,420
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Максим Вердикт” (@verdiktt), 67,584 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/verdiktt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.