Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
54,600 average views per post against 3,409 subscribers — an engagement rate of 1603.0%. Across the 4,113 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,167–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.33% and 17.5%, with a median of 8.79%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (24 August 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Posts measured
11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
601,100
Mature posts only
1603.0% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 41 days, net -213,584. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 01:18
3,409
+3,122
9 Sept 2026, 00:36
287
+264
30 Aug 2026, 15:03
23
-219,490
29 Aug 2026, 15:48
219,513
+32
28 Aug 2026, 15:43
219,481
+435
27 Aug 2026, 16:43
219,046
+2,790
26 Aug 2026, 13:06
216,256
+1,684
25 Aug 2026, 12:22
214,572
+247
24 Aug 2026, 10:17
214,325
+284
22 Aug 2026, 19:25
214,041
+895
21 Aug 2026, 10:27
213,146
+202
20 Aug 2026, 11:33
212,944
-211
19 Aug 2026, 11:13
213,155
-473
18 Aug 2026, 10:38
213,628
-281
17 Aug 2026, 12:43
213,909
-351
16 Aug 2026, 02:17
214,260
-413
14 Aug 2026, 11:37
214,673
-462
13 Aug 2026, 04:24
215,135
-259
12 Aug 2026, 03:42
215,394
-271
11 Aug 2026, 05:58
215,665
first reading
Engagement
67 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1603.0%
avg views ÷ 3,409 subscribers
Avg views / post
54,600
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 67 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
67 (14 July 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
601,100
Reactions total
21,794
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 02:11 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 38m
Average length
31m 45s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
132,474 reactions across 66 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
67,815
51.2%
❤
15,629
11.8%
custom 5274174381554184241
12,749
9.62%
💯
9,155
6.91%
custom 5276286371592441525
8,302
6.27%
👍
6,113
4.61%
custom 5276162272807395612
5,553
4.19%
🤡
3,517
2.65%
🤮
2,278
1.72%
👎
685
0.517%
🤯
583
0.44%
🤬
61
0.046%
😢
34
0.026%
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 67 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 132,474 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 67 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
311
across the posts below
Posts paid on
54
of 66 we hold a reading for · 82%
Most on one post
31
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @nesuschiysvet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 67 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Пока читал это, то так ржал, что чуть салом не подавился. Не знаю, что журнашлюхи курят, но дурь явно забористая😁
Мне 41, а не 36. Еврей я, ребятки, причем самый махровый. Больше всего люблю, когда меня зовут Павел ибн Инак. Обожаю деньги, литературу и вышиванки. Так в своих статьях и пишите, а мы с пацанами хоть поржем от души.
И ещё не забудьте добавлять, что член у меня не больше 3 см в длину, это я заявляю офиц…
Ты не можешь требовать от женщины верности, если сам неверный.
И я говорю про общий итог, а не про конкретное действие. На словах или на деле ты вообще сможешь взять с неё клятву или подписать полноценный договор, заверить его у нотариуса. Но это не имеет смысл.
Я работаю с мужчинами уже более 10 лет и заметил, что дольше всего измену своих жен не замечали те мужчины, которые изменяли сами. И это закономерно.
Чтоб…
Братан, с тебя магарыч. Мы буквально вытащили тебя из лап свирепой медведицы, она могла тебя сожрать.
Будь здоров и впредь осторожен. Больше в такую ловкушку не попадайся.
Если ты в будущем захочешь охотиться на медведицу, то сперва пройди наш специальный курс Покоритель медведиц, чтобы быть во всеоружии и не пасть жертвой собственной авантюры.
Понимаю, что от её манящего взгляда подкашиваются ноги и порхают бабоч…
Четыре признака её большого пробега
1. Татухи. Чем больше через себя мужчин пропустила, тем больше татух.
Каждая татуха — это как метка уничтоженного врага на прикладе её двустволки.
2. Рыбьи глаза. Взгляд стеклянный, будто в её рационе только морская соль. Может улыбаться и вести себя скромно, но взгляд все равно остается холодным.
3. Вонючий рыбный пирог. Смесь разных микрофлор приводит к тому, что слизистая её…
Где счастлив один мужчина, там горит жопа минимум у пяти женщин.
Для средней травмированной курицы мужское счастье непростительно и невыносимо, она стремится мстить за него. Ведь мужская улыбка для неё хуже ножа в сердце.
Мужчины, ваша святая обязанность заключается всего в двух вещах: быть счастливым и смотреть как дур корёжит.
Женщины будут спрашивать за твой рост, доход, длину члена, машину, должность, квартиру.
И не будут в таких вопросах видеть ничего плохого. Ты по факту обязан соответствовать.
Но как только ты захочешь узнать за её прошлое, тебя сразу заклеймят неуверенным в себе, скажут, что у тебя самооценка низкая, песюн 3 см, ты вообще обиженка и неудачник.
Имея массу требований, они сами не соответствуют и половине из них.
Хо…
Спроси у женщины, кто такой настоящий мужчина и она опишет тебе куколда.
Спроси у женщины, какой должна быть идеальная девушка и она опишет тебе шлюху.
Так и получается, что куколд и шмара — это лучшая пара.
Важно ещё не только пустить свет в сердце, но удержать его внутри, выдержать проверку от мира, ведь обязательно когда вы будете вылезать из болота, рядом с вами появится человек, который хочет утащить вас обратно во тьму это может быть кто угодно мать, брат, шалава с улицы ваша задача, не дать этому человеку забрать ваш внутренний Свет
Женщина всегда отражает внутреннее состояние мужчины.
Вчера разговаривал с братом и помимо прочего он спросил чем закончилась история с мужчиной, который получил в подарок новый Айфон.
Как-то мы проводили акцию в нашем магазине добавок и за покупку можно было выиграть Айфон 17 про макс. Это было где-то в конце зимы.
Мы отправили Айфон победителю, он записал нам видео с почты, на котором было видно как он взволнова…
Showing the 12 most recent of 67 posts we hold for @nesuschiysvet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@nesuschiysvet edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
26 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
DAY’S OF MADNESS | Блог мозгоправа @daysmad · 188,927#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
DAY’S OF MADNESS | Блог мозгоправа @daysmad · 188,927 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
directorcasting @directorcasting · 23 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
Максим Вердикт @verdiktt · 67,584 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Анна Теодорович @psy_annateo · 46,923 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Арсен Маркарян Официальный @arsenmarkarian · 158,587 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НЕ СУЩИЙ СВЕТ” (@nesuschiysvet), 3,409 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nesuschiysvet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
