Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Андрес в деле

Channel

Андрес в деле

@andresvdele

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

40,911subscribers

+489 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001779532301
TypeChannel
Username@andresvdele
DescriptionКанал для мужчин (18+), кто не согласен на меньшее. Здесь ты научишься соблазнять, влюблять и подсаживать девушек на себя. По всем вопросам к менеджеру @maksim_8g. Это единственный аккаунт. Рекламу не продаём.
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/andresvdele

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

39,82941,54040,684.57 August 2026 — 40,422 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,422 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,493 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,459 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,405 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,368 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,311 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,272 subscribers13 August 2026 — 40,182 subscribers15 August 2026 — 40,123 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,112 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,137 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,120 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,098 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,147 subscribers22 August 2026 — 40,216 subscribers24 August 2026 — 40,201 subscribers25 August 2026 — 40,221 subscribers26 August 2026 — 40,233 subscribers27 August 2026 — 40,162 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40,128 subscribers30 August 2026 — 40,110 subscribers31 August 2026 — 40,198 subscribers1 September 2026 — 40,163 subscribers2 September 2026 — 40,189 subscribers3 September 2026 — 40,231 subscribers5 September 2026 — 40,261 subscribers8 September 2026 — 40,174 subscribers11 September 2026 — 40,077 subscribers13 September 2026 — 40,063 subscribers14 September 2026 — 40,014 subscribers16 September 2026 — 39,997 subscribers18 September 2026 — 39,829 subscribers24 September 2026 — 40,058 subscribers3 October 2026 — 40,247 subscribers8 October 2026 — 40,726 subscribers12 October 2026 — 41,082 subscribers14 October 2026 — 41,074 subscribers15 October 2026 — 41,067 subscribers16 October 2026 — 41,126 subscribers17 October 2026 — 41,117 subscribers18 October 2026 — 41,070 subscribers19 October 2026 — 41,102 subscribers20 October 2026 — 41,148 subscribers21 October 2026 — 41,209 subscribers22 October 2026 — 41,305 subscribers23 October 2026 — 41,509 subscribers24 October 2026 — 41,540 subscribers25 October 2026 — 41,469 subscribers26 October 2026 — 41,372 subscribers27 October 2026 — 41,302 subscribers28 October 2026 — 41,247 subscribers29 October 2026 — 41,195 subscribers30 October 2026 — 41,150 subscribers31 October 2026 — 41,092 subscribers1 November 2026 — 41,035 subscribers2 November 2026 — 40,991 subscribers3 November 2026 — 40,952 subscribers4 November 2026 — 40,911 subscribers40,9117 August 20264 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 89 days, net +489. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,572–41,797 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 18:1740,911-41
3 Nov 2026, 18:5740,952-39
2 Nov 2026, 16:0640,991-44
1 Nov 2026, 16:2841,035-57
31 Oct 2026, 13:2841,092-58
30 Oct 2026, 12:3641,150-45
29 Oct 2026, 15:4041,195-52
28 Oct 2026, 14:5041,247-55
27 Oct 2026, 13:0641,302-70
26 Oct 2026, 10:3141,372-97
25 Oct 2026, 08:2641,469-71
24 Oct 2026, 11:0641,540+31
23 Oct 2026, 14:1641,509+204
22 Oct 2026, 11:5541,305+96
21 Oct 2026, 07:0641,209+61
20 Oct 2026, 01:3041,148+46
19 Oct 2026, 04:2741,102+32
18 Oct 2026, 07:1641,070-47
17 Oct 2026, 06:5741,117-9
16 Oct 2026, 06:1941,126first reading

Engagement

216 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 176 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.1%
avg views ÷ 40,911 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,350
63 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
63
of 216 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 60 of 63 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held216 (22 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total337,179
Reactions total4,357
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 09:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
573
Videos
249
Links
109

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
58m 38s
Average length
1m 50s

Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

16,120 reactions across 209 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7,74548.0%
👍4,64228.8%
👏2,00512.4%
😱1,72810.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 210 of the 216 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,120 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 216 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 216 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @andresvdele. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 216 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 63 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 09:05 UTC≈2,370 views116 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Либо ты выбираешь, либо тебя Большинство мужчин пытаются понравиться, чтобы женщина их выбрала. Поэтому и пытаются задобрить, подкупить, подлизать. Соблазнитель действует противоположно. Он может выбирать, так как у него поток девушек. Поэтому он оценивает, ставит границы и отказывается от женщин, которые не соответствуют его стандартам. И если ты хочешь быть во второй категории, то нужно две вещи: образ и умение…

🔥85👍23👏8

2 Nov 2026, 15:01 UTC≈3,630 views134 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Все девушки хотят игру 👾 Девушки 🟰 эмоции Во время обычного логического общения им становится скучно 🥱 Сколько у обычной девушки было скучных однообразных свиданий? 100, 1000? Они устали от этого. Поэтому они и отказываются, когда в очередной раз мужчина предлагает посидеть в кафе, попить кофе или прогуляться 🙅‍♀️ Девушки знают заранее что будет дальше: Сначала он расскажет о себе, потом будет спрашивать меня, д…

🔥105👍19👏9😱1

31 Oct 2026, 18:07 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 1 November 2026

Этот эфир длится более 2х часов. Все самые жесткие способы дальше, так как сюда не могу их выложить. 5 из 20 мест уже разобрали. Снова ждёшь, пока закончатся? Если есть сомнения, читай что пишут те, кто уже вступил.

31 Oct 2026, 17:28 UTC≈1,820 views12 reactionsread 1 November 2026

Уже завтра начинается недрочабрь Многие пытаются избавиться от онанизма, но 99% возвращаются к этой зависимости. У меня есть эфир, где я рассказал жёсткие, но рабочие методы отказа и разобрал, как не сорваться. Сегодня и завтра ты можешь навсегда бросить этот якорь, который мешает жить. До конца завтрашнего дня я открываю вход в закрытый канал, но только для 20 человек.

🔥12

31 Oct 2026, 08:03 UTC379 viewsread 31 October 2026
Photo

Осталось 2 места. Уже сегодня в 15:00 начинаем

30 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,720 views7 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

Цена действительно копеечная. В этом тренинги знания, которые спасают любые отношения и учат строить реально здоровые отношения прям с первого свидания. Уже завтра в 15:00 начинаем

👍7

30 Oct 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,680 views11 reactionsread 31 October 2026

Тренинг по воспитанию и личным границам — это не дрессировка Это жёсткий, но адекватный способ показать, как с тобой можно себя вести, а как нельзя. Проблема многих мужчин в том, что они уходят в крайности: либо принимают неуважительно отношение к себе и роль обслуги, либо сразу посылают на три буквы. Это неэффективно. В первом случае мужчина под каблуком. Во втором случае девушка просто уйдёт. На тренинге я расс…

🔥11

29 Oct 2026, 15:07 UTC≈2,410 views9 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Photo

Тренинг по воспитанию и личным границам — это шаг в реально здоровые отношения. Ведь здоровые отношения начитаются, когда мужчина и женщина на своих природных ролях. Этот тренинг я провожу раз в год.

👍9

29 Oct 2026, 15:07 UTC≈2,290 views37 reactionsread 31 October 2026
Video

Мышцы тоже не спасут Стоит ли говорить о том, что есть девушка пытается залезть пальцем мужчине в анал, то это уже конец здоровым отношениям?

😱33👍4

28 Oct 2026, 16:04 UTC≈6,910 views68 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Если тебя не уважают девушки — это только твоя вина Сейчас стало модно перекладывать ответственность друг на друга. Женщины винят мужчин в их проблемах, мужчины обвиняют женщин. Но где личная ответственность? Если девушки тебя обзывают, повышают тон, говорят «ты не прав», то это твой выбор. Моя позиция другая. Я выбираю исключительно позитивное общение, но просто так его не получить. Соцсети, кино, сериалы норм…

👏42👍17🔥9

Showing the 12 most recent of 216 posts we hold for @andresvdele. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@andresvdele edited 17 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
31 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @andresvdele as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
15 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
20 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Madness переходник
@daysmad · 82
#1
Арсен Маркарян Официальный
@arsenmarkarian · 154,178
#2
Мартовский Лис | Пикап | Соблазнение
@mart_lis · 3,919
#3
GAMZAEV CLUB
@gamzaevclub · 4,041 (as read 30 August 2026)
#4
Инкогнито. Про знакомства и отношения
@incognitonik · 6,827
#5
Профессор Микаэлло | Отношения | Сексология
@professor_mikaello · 4,270
#6
Психолог в теме 18+ | Антон Чесноков
@chesnokov_psy · 7,091
#7
Гéнки Маэда | Социальный Капитал
@socialcapital · 1,132
#8
🔞 Алекс Феномен 🔞
@aleks_fenomen · 1,556
#9
RaduToday
@radutg · 7,114
#10
RSD Real Social Dynamics • Пикап • Соблазнение
@rsdrussia · 2,580
#11
Ваня Роялти
@vanya_royalty · 8,101
#12
Виктор едет в Китай 🍓
@viktorupohuy · 1,414
#13
Канал Башира
@social_dynamics · 2,552
#14
Sepa
@gamebysepa · 784 (as read 30 August 2026)
#15
LoveLead|Изобилие в личной жизни
@loveleadcoaching · 1,124
#16
Men's Error l Психология отношений
@MensError · 13,228
#17
Нейротипология
@misliglubzhe · 10,560
#18
Сверхчеловек по Ницше
@uberchel · 4,449
#19
ALPHA
@alphatrue · 3,980
#20
Руслан Чейз
@RuslanChaseFM · 8,446
#21
Триумф
@triumphstyle · 15,757
#22
Зевс⚡️Знакомство и Обольщение
@Trener_ZeusTG · 823
#23
Казбек Вороков
@kazbeksocrates · 3,831
#24
Mens
@mensfirst · 13,520
#25
Buysell 1win market
@dnevniksverhcheloveka · 3,425
#26
Brotherhood
@brotherhood_channels · 2,018
#27
Никита Мурин про любовь
@nikmurin · 3,310
#28
Эльдар Сейд
@seydpodcast · 2,096
#29
Александр Степаненко
@mylifeandsport · 2,649
#30
Instinct X
@instix · 811
#31
Тёмная комната | Эриксон
@erik_hard · 44,245
#32
ВВШ ВЕЩАЕТ 🧩
@strong_mvp · 4,860
#33
Алекс Лесли
@alexlesleynew · 19,766
#34
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,541,630
#35
ТВОЙ ТЕСТОСТЕРОН
@einher · 5,833
#36
Панфер
@Panfer_pua · 5,828
#37
GRAND
@q_grand · 29,380
#38
Злой Фрейд | Психология без ванили
@zloifreud · 2,544
#39
Ростовский
@rostowskiy · 4,179
#40
Ivan Limarev / Merlin AI
@LimarevIvan · 12,115
#41
Ветров Консультант
@vetrovconsultant · 9,037
#42
ЕСАКОВ | Искусство убеждать
@esakovconsulting · 1,272
#43
Мистер Vo
@themistervo · 8,902
#44
♛ Влад Рыжков
@rryzhkov1 · 1,131
#45
Мемы для пикаперов
@mdpickup · 378
#46
Никакой Армии 💀
@egor_godd · 7,220
#47
Клуб Свободы
@X_svoboda · 258
#48
Матросов Без Вопросов
@matrosovonline · 343
#49
Dzari
@DrDzari · 263,497
#50
Максим Вердикт
@verdiktt · 67,418
#51
Andrew Tate На Русском
@andrewtateinrussian · 8,889
#52
ЭНДРЮ ТЕЙТ | БЕЙТМАН
@matrixtaterus · 6,804
#53
Митрохин | Фотография & Личный бренд
@mitroxxin · 575
#54

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Madness переходник
@daysmad · 82
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
directorcasting
@directorcasting · 68
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
Алекс Лесли
@alexlesleynew · 19,766
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 29 September 2026
Тёмная комната | Эриксон
@erik_hard · 44,245
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
НЕ СУЩИЙ СВЕТ
@nesuschiysvet · 4,712
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
Анна Теодорович
@psy_annateo · 47,194
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андрес в деле” (@andresvdele), 40,911 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andresvdele.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.