Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Андрес в деле

Channel

Андрес в деле

@andresvdele

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

39,829subscribers

-593 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001779532301
TypeChannel
Username@andresvdele
DescriptionКанал для мужчин (18+), кто не согласен на меньшее. Здесь ты научишься соблазнять, влюблять и подсаживать девушек на себя. По всем вопросам к менеджеру @maksim_8g
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/andresvdele

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

39,82940,49340,1617 August 2026 — 40,422 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,422 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,493 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,459 subscribers9 August 2026 — 40,405 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,368 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,311 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,272 subscribers13 August 2026 — 40,182 subscribers15 August 2026 — 40,123 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,112 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,137 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,120 subscribers19 August 2026 — 40,098 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,147 subscribers22 August 2026 — 40,216 subscribers24 August 2026 — 40,201 subscribers25 August 2026 — 40,221 subscribers26 August 2026 — 40,233 subscribers27 August 2026 — 40,162 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40,128 subscribers30 August 2026 — 40,110 subscribers31 August 2026 — 40,198 subscribers1 September 2026 — 40,163 subscribers2 September 2026 — 40,189 subscribers3 September 2026 — 40,231 subscribers5 September 2026 — 40,261 subscribers8 September 2026 — 40,174 subscribers11 September 2026 — 40,077 subscribers13 September 2026 — 40,063 subscribers14 September 2026 — 40,014 subscribers16 September 2026 — 39,997 subscribers18 September 2026 — 39,829 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -593. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,729–40,593 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:0239,829-168
16 Sept 2026, 11:5539,997-17
14 Sept 2026, 18:3740,014-49
13 Sept 2026, 07:5640,063-14
11 Sept 2026, 12:1940,077-97
8 Sept 2026, 18:3540,174-87
5 Sept 2026, 15:1640,261+30
3 Sept 2026, 18:2040,231+42
2 Sept 2026, 09:2240,189+26
1 Sept 2026, 06:2940,163-35
31 Aug 2026, 05:2540,198+88
30 Aug 2026, 04:0740,110-18
28 Aug 2026, 05:3440,128-34
27 Aug 2026, 05:4240,162-71
26 Aug 2026, 09:0440,233+12
25 Aug 2026, 08:3640,221+20
24 Aug 2026, 06:4240,201-15
22 Aug 2026, 12:0440,216+69
21 Aug 2026, 00:2440,147+49
19 Aug 2026, 21:5140,098first reading

Engagement

132 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.8%
avg views ÷ 39,829 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,320
84 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
84
of 132 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 82 of 84 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 September 2026
Posts held132 (22 July 202620 September 2026)
Views total362,950
Reactions total3,965
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Sept 2026, 23:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
587
Videos
243
Links
118

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17m 23s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

8,555 reactions across 129 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥4,02147.0%
👍2,49929.2%
😱1,02111.9%
👏1,01411.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 129 of the 132 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,555 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 132 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 20 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 132 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @andresvdele. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 132 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 20 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Sept 2026, 18:30 UTC≈1,100 views12 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Топ причин, чтобы не идти на тренинг: 🍎Пойду на следующий поток На эфире я рассказывал, что это крайний раз, когда я провожу тренинг по этой программе. Когда я придумаю, протестирую новую — неизвестно. Но процесс этот не быстрый. 🍎Дорого С этим я абсолютно не согласен, поэтому и повышаю каждый поток цену. Этот тренинг НАВСЕГДА закрывает сексуальный вопрос. Мужчина тратит миллионы на то, чтобы присунуть. Я даю си

😱9🔥3

20 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈2,280 views9 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Как проходит тренинг по быстрому сближению и подсадке на секс❓ На первой неделе я разбираю две стратегии сближения: Классическая стратегия сближения — объясняю как за час - два перейти от общения к сближению. Быстрая стратегия сближения — рассказываю как перейти к сближению сразу с помощью практик расслабления и возбуждения. Среднее время от двери квартиры до кровати 30 минут. На второй неделе я разбираю базовую

😱9

19 Sept 2026, 17:02 UTC≈3,140 views17 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥10👏5😱2

19 Sept 2026, 17:02 UTC≈3,050 views10 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😱6🔥4

19 Sept 2026, 17:01 UTC≈2,770 views20 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Как я соблазняю на секс? Конечно, платить за секс — это слишком низко для меня. Заказать такси тоже. Даже вспомнил забавный случай. Была свиданка, девушка не особо зашла, да и вела себя некорректно. Попросила такси назад — конечно, я отказал. Она предложила минет в обмен на такси. Цена такси была около 600₽. От такого «щедрого» предложения я отказался. Ведь зачем мне платить за то, что я и так получаю бесплатно?

😱12👍3🔥3👏2

19 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC≈2,610 views6 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Video

Обратная связь после Я сам пользуюсь теорией, которую даю на тренинге

😱4👍2

19 Sept 2026, 13:35 UTC≈2,530 views6 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Voice message

Делаю практику быстрого сближения после практики

😱4👍2

19 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC≈2,720 views8 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Уже четвертый пройденный тренинг Андреса – и все равно узнал очень много нового . До этого Я думал, что многое знаю, но оказалось, что делал кучу ошибок. В этом курсе дается абсолютно прямая информация без воды, прямая инструкция к действию 🔥🔥🔥 Трансляции – это отдельный кайф, Андрес разбирает все вопросы, даёт конкретные шаги и реальные техники. Если что-то не успеваешь, всегда есть записи и конспекты. После тренин

🔥7😱1

19 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC≈2,730 views6 reactionsread 20 September 2026

Проблемы на этапе сближения ⚠️ Этот этап всегда вызывал у меня непонимание. Вот вы пришли домой, остались вдвоём. А делать то что? В некоторых школах соблазнения учат тому, чтобы в этот момент полностью раздеться. Я пробовал, не сработало. Девушки просто считали меня странным и уходили 👋 Поэтому мне пришлось с нуля придумать свою технику сближения. Благодаря ей я начал получать регулярный секс на первой встрече.

😱4🔥2

18 Sept 2026, 18:25 UTC≈3,630 views15 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Voice message

Спросил про сквирт

🔥7👍3👏3😱2

18 Sept 2026, 18:25 UTC≈3,660 views21 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Voice message

Трахнул её 2 раза. Первый раз 15 минут, второй раз 5 минут. Даже этого ей достаточно, чтобы насытиться. Ведь секс измеряется в качестве, а не в минутах

👍9🔥5😱4👏3

18 Sept 2026, 18:24 UTC≈3,720 views12 reactionsread 20 September 2026
Voice message

Ещё обратная связь о сексе за 20 минут

🔥6👍2👏2😱2

Showing the 12 most recent of 132 posts we hold for @andresvdele. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@andresvdele edited 9 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

DAY’S OF MADNESS | Блог мозгоправа
@daysmad · 188,927
#1
Арсен Маркарян Официальный
@arsenmarkarian · 158,587
#2
Мартовский Лис | Пикап | Соблазнение
@mart_lis · 3,936
#3
GAMZAEV CLUB
@gamzaevclub · 4,041 (as read 30 August 2026)
#4
Инкогнито. Про знакомства и отношения
@incognitonik · 6,898
#5
Профессор Микаэлло | Отношения | Сексология
@professor_mikaello · 4,113
#6
Психолог в теме 18+ | Антон Чесноков
@chesnokov_psy · 6,646
#7
Гéнки Маэда | Социальный Капитал
@socialcapital · 1,141
#8
🔞 Алекс Феномен 🔞
@aleks_fenomen · 1,552
#9
RaduToday
@radutg · 7,204
#10
RSD Real Social Dynamics • Пикап • Соблазнение
@rsdrussia · 2,557
#11
Ваня Роялти
@vanya_royalty · 8,250
#12
Виктор едет в Китай 🍓
@viktorupohuy · 1,443
#13
Канал Башира
@social_dynamics · 2,579
#14
Sepa
@gamebysepa · 783
#15
LoveLead|Изобилие в личной жизни
@loveleadcoaching · 1,070
#16
Men's Error l Психология отношений
@MensError · 13,666
#17
Нейротипология
@misliglubzhe · 10,578
#18
Сверхчеловек по Ницше
@uberchel · 4,502
#19
ALPHA
@alphatrue · 4,014
#20
Руслан Чейз
@RuslanChaseFM · 8,639
#21
Триумф
@triumphstyle · 13,905
#22
Зевс⚡️Знакомство и Обольщение
@Trener_ZeusTG · 818
#23
Socrates
@kazbeksocrates · 3,798
#24
Mens
@mensfirst · 13,639
#25
Buysell 1win market
@dnevniksverhcheloveka · 3,810
#26
Brotherhood
@brotherhood_channels · 2,048
#27
Никита Мурин про любовь
@nikmurin · 3,262
#28
Эльдар Сейд
@seydpodcast · 2,129
#29
Александр Степаненко
@mylifeandsport · 2,627
#30
Instinct X
@instix · 814
#31
Тёмная комната | Эриксон
@erik_hard · 44,585
#32
ВВШ ВЕЩАЕТ 🧩
@strong_mvp · 4,893
#33
Алекс Лесли 🤘Alex Lesley
@alexlesleynew · 20,206
#34
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,518,691
#35
ТВОЙ ТЕСТОСТЕРОН
@einher · 5,878
#36
Панфер
@Panfer_pua · 5,798
#37
GRAND
@q_grand · 30,424
#38
Злой Фрейд | Психология без ванили
@zloifreud · 2,469
#39
Ростовский
@rostowskiy · 4,258
#40
Ivan Limarev / Merlin AI
@LimarevIvan · 12,204
#41
Ветров Консультант
@vetrovconsultant · 9,136
#42
ЕСАКОВ | Искусство убеждать
@esakovconsulting · 1,256
#43
Мистер Vo
@themistervo · 8,943
#44
♛ Влад Рыжков
@rryzhkov1 · 1,138
#45
Мемы для пикаперов
@mdpickup · 383
#46
Никакой Армии 💀
@egor_godd · 7,499
#47
Конструктор будущего
@X_svoboda · 260
#48
Матросов Без Вопросов
@matrosovonline · 336
#49
Dzari
@DrDzari · 267,375
#50
Максим Вердикт
@verdiktt · 67,584
#51
Andrew Tate На Русском
@andrewtateinrussian · 9,145
#52
ЭНДРЮ ТЕЙТ | БЕЙТМАН
@matrixtaterus · 6,980
#53
Митрохин | Фотография & Личный бренд
@mitroxxin · 581
#54

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 30 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DAY’S OF MADNESS | Блог мозгоправа
@daysmad · 188,927
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
directorcasting
@directorcasting · 23
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
Тёмная комната | Эриксон
@erik_hard · 44,585
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
НЕ СУЩИЙ СВЕТ
@nesuschiysvet · 3,409
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
Анна Теодорович
@psy_annateo · 46,923
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Андрес в деле” (@andresvdele), 39,829 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/andresvdele.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.