Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Руслан Чейз

Channel

Руслан Чейз

@RuslanChaseFM

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,605subscribers

-104 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001922443699
TypeChannel
Username@RuslanChaseFM
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live1 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 1 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/RuslanChaseFM

Growth

8,6058,7108,657.57 August 2026 — 8,709 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,710 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,693 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,685 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,666 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,655 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,626 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,619 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,623 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,605 subscribers7 August 20261 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 25 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,589–8,726 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Sept 2026, 17:358,605-18
30 Aug 2026, 03:258,623+4
26 Aug 2026, 19:288,619-7
24 Aug 2026, 05:528,626-29
20 Aug 2026, 14:148,655-11
17 Aug 2026, 13:448,666-19
14 Aug 2026, 01:478,685-8
10 Aug 2026, 12:428,693-17
7 Aug 2026, 12:228,710+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:168,709first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 18 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.0%
avg views ÷ 8,605 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,290
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held25 (18 May 202626 August 2026)
Views total9,014
Reactions total425
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,369 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54249724700231040891,22889.7%
custom 5217449524410199951523.80%
custom 5384182740411240426412.99%
custom 5373159350363764070292.12%
custom 5210777181046722111191.39%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,369 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 23 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @RuslanChaseFM. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 18 May 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC849 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

«КУДА МНЕ ЭТО СОБЛАЗНЕНИЕ, МОЙ ПОЕЗД УШЕЛ». Так же думал и Валера, когда пришел на обучение года полтора назад. 50+ лет, херова туча лет неудачного брака за плечами, убитая самооценка и коллекция неудачных попыток все изменить… Что меня в Валере восхищало, это его упорство и понимание, что второго шанса не будет, нужно использовать все сейчас и на максимум 💪 Было сложно, но он не сдавался, делал все необ

custom 542497247002310408930

25 Aug 2026, 06:58 UTC915 views13 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Вот еще небольшой отзыв от мужчины, который недавно вступил в чат с записями уроков с основной программы. Всегда есть возможность остановиться и начать делать правильно, по итогу: • меньше ошибок • больше позитивного опыта • неповторимые эмоции • буст уверенности и чувства собственной охуенности ✅ Система работает. Цена: 7 000 рублей. ✍️ @RuslanChase

custom 542497247002310408913

24 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC≈1,060 views104 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

😳 ВТОРАЯ ГЛАВНАЯ ОШИБКА ВО ФЛИРТЕ — СТРАХ СДЕЛАТЬ ЧТО-ТО НЕ ТАК. Мужчина приходит на свидание и вместо того, чтобы получать удовольствие, начинает сдавать внутренний экзамен: «А вдруг я ей не понравлюсь?» «А вдруг это слишком рано?» «А если она подумает, что я озабоченный?» «А вдруг она обидится?» «А вдруг…» Как итог, флирт умер, даже не успев начаться. Невозможно быть сексуальным и свободным, когда каждое

custom 542497247002310408991custom 53841827404112404269custom 52107771810467221114

23 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,100 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Долго молчал, но решил вернуться к вам с новым видео. Вернулся с темой про «яму» из-за которой ты теряешь интерес женщин ещё до того, как всё началось. Если давно читаешь меня и ничего не менялось - возможно, дело в том, о чём я говорю в этом видео. Смотри 👇 👍СМОТРЕТЬ

custom 542497247002310408935custom 52174495244101999512custom 53841827404112404261

23 Aug 2026, 07:54 UTC≈1,190 views110 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🚫ГЛАВНАЯ ОШИБКА ВО ФЛИРТЕ - ПОШЛОСТЬ Я выделяю две главные ошибки мужского флирта. Сегодня расскажу о первой. Пошлость почти всегда убивает флирт. Суть флирта - не в том, чтобы как можно быстрее сказать женщине, что ты хочешь с ней сделать. Флирт - это игра, напряжение, недосказанность и интрига. Как только мужчина начинает действовать слишком «в лоб», вся магия исчезает. Сильный, самодостаточны

custom 5424972470023104089105custom 53731593503637640704custom 52174495244101999511

20 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,630 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

😋ОТ ЗНАКОМСТВА ДО СЕКСА - ПОШАГОВО (Вверху отзыв одного из участников) Можно годами собирать советы по кускам: как знакомиться, что писать, как вести себя на свидании, как флиртовать, как не попадать во френдзону и как переводить общение в секс… … а можно взять всю систему целиком. Есть возможность получить доступ к чату с записями моих уроков - от первого знакомства с женщиной до начала сексуальных отн

custom 542497247002310408911

17 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC≈2,270 views119 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

💪 Дожим женщины. Некоторые ученики сейчас приходят на консультации с проблемой, что часто не получается дожать женщину на секс. 1️⃣ Всех дожать невозможно. 2️⃣ Чаще всего мужчины все еще очкуют идти до конца. Женщины всегда говорят одно, а хотят другого. Это обусловлено желанием казаться призом, не казаться шлюхой. Каждая хочет, чтобы секс с ней не был легким для тебя квестом, поэтому она и ломается.

custom 5424972470023104089107custom 52107771810467221114custom 52174495244101999514custom 53841827404112404264

27 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC≈3,410 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

🎫 Билет в лучшую жизнь. Я думаю, что многие заметили, что именно до блогинга последнее время у меня руки не доходят… Но занялся я этим всем изначально, чтобы помогать мужчинам менять жизнь к лучшему. Так что я по прежнему продолжаю это делать, причем сейчас по феноменальным ценам 👇 👇 👇 Есть мужчины, которые годами читают книги, смотрят ролики на YouTube и продолжают совершать одни и те же ошибки с женщинами.

custom 542497247002310408927custom 52174495244101999511custom 53731593503637640701

3 Jul 2026, 11:22 UTC≈4,380 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

С женщинами все просто, если делать правильно 😉 Если кто-то хочет прокачать какой-то аспект или конкретный этап коммуникации с женщиной, то записывайтесь на консультацию, говорят, что оно того стоит. Консультация - 7 000 рублей (или в вашей валюте). Запись @RuslanChase

custom 542497247002310408935custom 52174495244101999514custom 53731593503637640703

1 Jul 2026, 04:20 UTC≈3,930 views134 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🙋‍♂️ КТО ПОСЛЕДНИЙ? Многие мужчины по выученному с детства сценарию занимают место в очереди и пытаются заслужить женское внимание, выбирая для этого самые неэффективные методы. 🚫 Цветы 🚫 Подарки 🚫 Лебезящие комплементы И другие виды ухаживаний, через которые ты просишь «Ну, пожалуйста, заметь меня». Она обязательно заметит, но лучшее, что ты получишь это умиление, а в некоторых случаях даже отвра

custom 5424972470023104089129custom 52174495244101999514custom 53731593503637640701

24 Jun 2026, 05:37 UTC≈3,830 views165 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

🎯 Какое у мужчины предназначение? К сожалению, массовая культура пропагандирует обретение «той единственной» для мужчины, как чуть ли не единственный источник счастья. Многие просто заражены тем, что нужно найти ту одну, завоевать ее, заслужить ее любовь всеми возможными способами и не отпускать несмотря ни на что. А по итогу, когда отношения с той самой единственной заканчиваются по ее инициативе, он разд

custom 5424972470023104089146custom 521744952441019995113custom 52107771810467221113custom 53841827404112404263

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @RuslanChaseFM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@RuslanChaseFM edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 May 2026, 04:52 UTCAnonymous Poll362 voters

Есть идея снять на ютуб видео на тему шизы Максима Диагноза. Там у типа фляга знатно свистит на фоне падения просмотров. Будете смотреть такой видос?

  1. Да.82%
  2. Нет.18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 26 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тёмная комната | Эриксон
@erik_hard · 44,488
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
Анна Теодорович
@psy_annateo · 46,956
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 27 August 2026
Андрес в деле
@andresvdele · 40,231
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 30 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Руслан Чейз” (@RuslanChaseFM), 8,605 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RuslanChaseFM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.