Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Максим Дивертито

Channel

Максим Дивертито

@divertito_official

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,586subscribers

+1,889 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001432691887
TypeChannel
Username@divertito_official
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/divertito_official

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,64219,71718,679.57 August 2026 — 17,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,697 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,693 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17,692 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,698 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,682 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,657 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,642 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,644 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,656 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,676 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,721 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,758 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,770 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,909 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,997 subscribers23 August 2026 — 18,162 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,274 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,515 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,633 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,776 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,887 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,057 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,154 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,385 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,405 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,483 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,703 subscribers8 September 2026 — 19,717 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,694 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,669 subscribers14 September 2026 — 19,663 subscribers16 September 2026 — 19,636 subscribers19 September 2026 — 19,586 subscribers19,5867 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +1,889. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,331–20,028 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 07:4019,586-50
16 Sept 2026, 21:1819,636-27
14 Sept 2026, 21:0119,663-6
13 Sept 2026, 08:2019,669-25
11 Sept 2026, 10:3719,694-23
8 Sept 2026, 19:5919,717+14
5 Sept 2026, 12:0019,703+220
3 Sept 2026, 12:2019,483+78
2 Sept 2026, 02:5619,405+20
1 Sept 2026, 00:0519,385+231
30 Aug 2026, 23:2519,154+97
30 Aug 2026, 01:2819,057+170
29 Aug 2026, 04:3418,887+111
28 Aug 2026, 04:1518,776+143
27 Aug 2026, 01:3618,633+118
25 Aug 2026, 22:5818,515+241
25 Aug 2026, 02:0818,274+112
23 Aug 2026, 19:3518,162+165
22 Aug 2026, 07:1717,997+88
20 Aug 2026, 19:4317,909first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.7%
avg views ÷ 19,586 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,270
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held65 (31 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total36,000
Reactions total999
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
21s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,944 reactions across 65 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👎7,55454.2%
2,52918.1%
😁1,87113.4%
👍1,2949.28%
🔥4663.34%
👏1150.825%
🤡1150.825%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,944 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
15
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 65 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @divertito_official. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC≈2,050 views58 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026

https://youtu.be/Aq3KKQUa6tk

🔥469😁2🤡1

1 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC≈2,620 views60 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

По-перше, круто, що в твоєму віці вже є якісь історії з дівчатами. Багато хто починає отримувати такий досвід значно пізніше. По ситуації - ти проявив більш ніж достатньо ініціативи, але нормальної віддачі не отримав. Тому я б тут уже нічого не дотискав і не шукав, де саме ти «проєбався». Просто закривай цю історію. Шукай нові. Знайомся, спілкуйся, витягуй інших дівчат на зустрічі. https://donatello.to/divertito

42👍15👏2🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 10:59 UTC≈2,540 views51 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В ідеалі спроба знайомства повинна виглядати природно. Тому найкращий варіант такий: загоряється зелене - переходиш дорогу, намагаєшся дивитись їй в очі й спіймати ай-контакт. Пройшли повз одне одного - через пару секунд розвертаєшся, наздоганяєш її і починаєш знайомство. Наздоженеш ти її вже на тротуарі. https://donatello.to/divertito

45👍4👏1🔥1

1 Sept 2026, 07:43 UTC≈2,630 views70 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Тут треба просто вмикати голову і дивитися, як саме вона це сказала. Якщо «я не знайомлюся» звучить як автоматична фраза, спроба набити собі ціну або вона просто розгубилася: Залишайся позитивним і продовжуй розмову. Говори хоча б щось) Твій варіант нормальний. Ще можна: — «Я також не знайомлюся, але з тобою вирішив зробити виняток». І одразу ставиш якесь питання. Або: — «Не знайомишся і правильно. Менше конкуренті

56👍10👎1🔥1🤡1😁1

31 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC≈2,910 views287 reactions3 Starsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Однажды в горах жил старый мудрый мужчина. И был у него молодой сосед, который каждое утро переживал: какие трусы надела его женщина, не слишком ли они просвечивают, кто это увидит на работе и не забыла ли она снова его просьбу. Старик долго слушал его, потом налил вина и сказал: — Сынок, если твой день начинается не с кофе, не с работы и не с великих планов, а с проверки женских трусов на просвет - ты свернул с дор

🔥161😁98👏176👍5

28 Aug 2026, 07:47 UTC≈4,150 views72 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Есть сомнения, что ты настолько уж косячишь именно в переписке. И с чего ты вообще взял, что «всё запорол»? Вы сегодня гуляли, всё было хорошо, она сама вечером тебе написала. Она тебя после этого заблокировала или сказала, что больше не хочет видеться? Есть подозрение, что ты просто неправильно оцениваешь ситуацию и любой неидеальный ответ воспринимаешь как провал. Замажь имена и аватарки и скинь мне переписки в

48👍17🔥2😁2👎1👏1🤡1

27 Aug 2026, 16:52 UTC≈3,950 views111 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Если бы проблема была только в этом друге - я бы сказал, что всё может быть. Например, он может внезапно умереть - и сразу минус проблема.🤭 Но проблема не только в нём. Она знает твою позицию и всё равно говорит, что общение прекращать не будет. То есть она не хочет отношений на твоих условиях. Точнее - не хочет тех отношений, которые хочешь ты. А значит, по сути, не хочет отношений с тобой. При таких вводных ничег

71👍32😁7👏1

27 Aug 2026, 10:27 UTC≈3,930 views75 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Та і я не знаю😁 Мені здаються дивними люди, які можуть регулярно спілкуватись з ШІ. А ще й дрочити на це... мда... Але, з іншого боку, розповіла б вона тобі, що вже кілька років користується вібратором - навряд чи ти так сильно переймався б. Тому продовжуй історію. Рожеві окуляри не надягай, просто дивись, які ще приколи будуть вилізати. Сам по собі цей факт я б причиною все закінчувати не вважав. https://donatell

51👍14😁7👎1👏1🤡1

26 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC≈3,550 views53 reactions1 Starread 3 September 2026
Photo

Запрошуй просто в якийсь заклад і там уже дій по обстановці. Якщо вона почала ігнорувати твої повідомлення, то ймовірність того, що зараз одразу поїде до тебе на вечерю, досить низька. Та й чесно, тут ще питання, чи вона взагалі погоджувалась на вечерю в тебе. Якщо під час флірту вона написала щось на кшталт «та можна буде якось» — це не «так, я згодна». Це скоріше вона грається з тобою і трохи дає надію. Хлопці та

👍4111👏1

25 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC≈3,790 views57 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

По ситуації: якийсь інтерес і симпатія з її боку є, але вони плаваючі. Тут хочу, тут уже не хочу. Або хочу, але сьогодні з кимось іншим. Сильно голову цим не забивай. Не завжди можна зрозуміти, чому людина поводиться саме так. Краще став собі інше питання: «Що робити далі?» Доки немає явного негативу - проявляй ініціативу. Якщо в тебе є купа інших варіантів - можеш забити. Якщо варіантів мало, а дівчина тобі подоба

37👍13🔥5👏2

24 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈3,880 views105 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

классическая дилемма: быть честным или ещё какое-то время счастливым 😁 Что ж ты там такое о ней узнал?😁 Если вы обсуждаете будущее, строите какие-то планы, есть все остальные атрибуты отношений - разговоры по душам, знакомство с родителями, подарки, слова любви и т.д., а внутри ты уже понимаешь, что скоро всё это точно закончишь - да, это нечестно. Если с ней для тебя уже что-то фундаментально не так - может, хоро

75👍29👏1

23 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈3,670 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

По перших двох випадках - ти зайобістий тіп на всі 100%. Тут щось додатково коментувати - тільки псувати. По третьому - твою негативну реакцію тут уже можна зрозуміти. Особливо враховуючи, що ви цю ситуацію раніше обговорювали і вона сама казала, що в такому випадку просто розвернеться й піде. Але конфлікт має закінчитися на тому, що в майбутньому в подібній ситуації вона принципово відмовляється від сеансу. А ще кр

49😁9👍6🤡2👎1👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @divertito_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Денис Борисов
@sila · 103,720
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Максим Дивертито” (@divertito_official), 19,586 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/divertito_official.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.