Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🏳‍⚧ Переходник 🏳‍⚧

Channel

🏳‍⚧ Переходник 🏳‍⚧

@directorcasting

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

-47,318 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001699879031
TypeChannel
Username@directorcasting
Created3 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/directorcasting

Growth

847,32623,6677 August 2026 — 47,326 subscribers7 August 2026 — 47,326 subscribers8 August 2026 — 47,322 subscribers9 August 2026 — 47,301 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47,253 subscribers11 August 2026 — 47,234 subscribers14 August 2026 — 47,199 subscribers15 August 2026 — 47,161 subscribers16 August 2026 — 47,156 subscribers17 August 2026 — 47,147 subscribers18 August 2026 — 47,142 subscribers19 August 2026 — 47,124 subscribers20 August 2026 — 47,180 subscribers22 August 2026 — 47,200 subscribers23 August 2026 — 47,237 subscribers24 August 2026 — 47,271 subscribers25 August 2026 — 47,256 subscribers26 August 2026 — 47,258 subscribers27 August 2026 — 47,237 subscribers29 August 2026 — 47,219 subscribers29 August 2026 — 47,205 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 23 days, net -47,318. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 00:548-47,197
29 Aug 2026, 21:2847,205-14
29 Aug 2026, 00:4447,219-18
27 Aug 2026, 23:3747,237-21
26 Aug 2026, 20:3247,258+2
25 Aug 2026, 20:1247,256-15
24 Aug 2026, 23:3747,271+34
23 Aug 2026, 11:5547,237+37
22 Aug 2026, 00:2447,200+20
20 Aug 2026, 17:4347,180+56
19 Aug 2026, 18:3347,124-18
18 Aug 2026, 22:0547,142-5
17 Aug 2026, 22:3347,147-9
16 Aug 2026, 20:1647,156-5
15 Aug 2026, 12:3947,161-38
14 Aug 2026, 01:5847,199-35
11 Aug 2026, 20:3647,234-19
10 Aug 2026, 17:3447,253-48
9 Aug 2026, 14:2247,301-21
8 Aug 2026, 17:4647,322first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
91277.0%
avg views ÷ 8 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,300
37 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.64%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
37
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held46 (25 July 202629 August 2026)
Views total270,180
Reactions total9,825
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 03:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 14s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

12,679 reactions across 46 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5,90646.6%
custom 53327376049598805052,83822.4%
custom 53841827404112404261,38911.0%
🤣1,1408.99%
custom 52760819268541661941,0548.31%
👎1961.55%
😢1561.23%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 46 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,679 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
25
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 46 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @directorcasting. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 46 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈3,290 views149 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня был на встрече с девчонкой первый раз. Через минут 5 встречи сует мне свою сумку, говорит: - на, держи. Спрашиваю - зачем? Ты думаешь я её буду носить? - ну да - ты ошибаешься, я не ношу женские сумки - ты умеешь удивлять В последствии выяснил, что до этого КАЖДЫЙ парень носил ее сумку 🤣 Говоря об отношениях, мужчинах и женщинах, затирала что мужчина должен ухаживать, вкладываться, проявляться и тд. На во

🔥111custom 533273760495988050524custom 527608192685416619414

28 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC≈4,080 views312 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥185custom 533273760495988050568custom 538418274041124042648custom 527608192685416619411

28 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈4,530 views219 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Прочитал каждый комментарий под постом с вашими вложениями в женщин. Ну что сказать, Кастинг Директор не самый большой каблук 🤣 Ладно , шутки в сторону, Я горжусь вами, потому что вы признали ошибки, осознали глупость. Приятно отметил, что многие пишут что осознание пришло после приватки. Хотя есть у нас один товарищ, который и после приватки не осознал, это вообще уникум пиздец. Взял в отношения девушку, которую

🤣137custom 533273760495988050552custom 527608192685416619428🔥2

28 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC≈4,470 views117 reactionsread 30 August 2026

На 2 года отношений айфон последний 🤡 ,потом когда через пол года расставались сказала что ей на айфоне памяти не хватает 😀 Недавно начались новые отношения, как раз вступил в прививку, из подарков раз йогурт купил , а так как показал ей свою ценность разрешаю дарить подарки мне

🔥77custom 533273760495988050521custom 527608192685416619417custom 53841827404112404262

27 Aug 2026, 12:46 UTC≈4,960 views142 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Парни, давайте поделимся своими историями в комментариях, какие вы подарки дарили женщинам, после которых вас все равно опрокидывали. Мож историю про Юлечку вы помните с отдыхом, настала ваша очередь признаваться, а то душу вам вывернул))

🔥80custom 533273760495988050533custom 538418274041124042626custom 52760819268541661943

26 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈5,540 views136 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Приватка -это золото, которого нет нигде, отвечаю на все 100 процентов. 1500 р это блять такие копейки( три кофе утром в мск бахнуть) за тот кладез, который там дается

🔥82custom 533273760495988050530custom 538418274041124042624

26 Aug 2026, 11:07 UTC≈5,810 views192 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Недавно подключил сервис заботы в приватке, узнаю у парней почему они покинули канал. Да да, из приватки отписываются, как бы там не было классно и полезно. Обычно это причина: Нет времени читать, слишком много информации, или просто забил. Иногда мотивации изменить жизнь у парней хватает только купить доступ, а вот применить то что написано и охуеть от изменений - это уже слишком сложно. Привыкли рилсы ебучие смо

🔥117custom 533273760495988050544custom 538418274041124042627custom 52760819268541661944

25 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈6,690 views169 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Каков же пидарааас… это ж каким надо быть недомужчинкой, чтобы не узнать о наличии аллергии?? Пора просыпаться, твоя слабость убьет твою жизнь, женщины будут юзать тебя, а ты будешь себя ненавидеть и взывать к справедливости. Но НЕТ справедливости в вопросах любви, и быть не может, ты должен уметь контролировать ее чувства. Сегодня в закрытом канале Я буду проводить прямой эфир на эту тему. Также будем разбирать к

🔥106custom 538418274041124042632custom 533273760495988050531

21 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈9,750 views464 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Она выставляет это исключительно для себя, а мы закомплексованные мамины корзиночки

🔥267custom 5332737604959880505127custom 538418274041124042664custom 52760819268541661946

21 Aug 2026, 18:18 UTC≈8,870 views246 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Voice message

Про девушку макана

custom 5332737604959880505143🔥59custom 538418274041124042641custom 52760819268541661943

21 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈8,740 views453 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥230🤣145custom 533273760495988050569custom 52760819268541661949

21 Aug 2026, 14:23 UTC≈9,220 views189 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

А потому что у ее бывшего была ебанутая ценность в ее глазах. Это то, о чем Я вам и говорю здесь бесконечно. Женщин бессознательно влечет к парням, которые их не ценят, потому что им они кажутся более статусными, чем они сами. И нет там никакой логики, все на ощущениях! Именно поэтому они пиздят в комментариях, что им нужен золотистый ретривер для жизни, хотя в прошлом у нее был жесткий самец — классный для секса,

🔥117custom 538418274041124042642custom 527608192685416619429custom 53327376049598805051

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @directorcasting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

DAY’S OF MADNESS | Блог мозгоправа
@daysmad · 190,834
#1
Сверхчеловек по Ницше
@uberchel · 4,527
#2
НЕ СУЩИЙ СВЕТ
@nesuschiysvet · 23
#3
Рифмы и Панчи 🤯
@rhymestg · 1,401,753
#4
Андрес в деле
@andresvdele · 40,231
#5
Инкогнито. Про знакомства и отношения
@incognitonik · 6,961
#6
Леонардо Дайвинчик
@leoday · 5,511,104
#7
Психолог в теме 18+ | Антон Чесноков
@chesnokov_psy · 6,517
#8
Мартовский Лис | Пикап | Соблазнение
@mart_lis · 3,927
#9
Триумф
@triumphstyle · 13,951
#10
РИМ 🕊
@rhymesrim · 299,173
#11
Бладсикер 2.0
@bIoodsiker · 212,523
#12
Brotherhood
@brotherhood_channels · 2,065
#13
Ростовский
@rostowskiy · 4,272
#14
КБ
@cbpub · 635,096
#15
Профессор Микаэлло | Отношения | Сексология
@professor_mikaello · 4,130
#16
MENTAL MERIDIAN
@masonsmansion · 1,791
#17
Гéнки Маэда | Социальный Капитал
@socialcapital · 1,146
#18
Malehood🗡
@malehood_channels · 778
#19
ALPHA
@alphatrue · 4,036
#20
Михаил Гребенюк
@grebenukm · 261,280
#21
Mens
@mensfirst · 13,663
#22
Очень красивый мужчина
@okmtelega · 6,166
#23
Арсен Маркарян Официальный
@arsenmarkarian · 159,826
#24
АРСЕНИЙ НА СВЯЗИ!
@arseniyslon · 644
#25
Mash
@mash · 3,106,184
#26
Двач
@dvachannel · 937,535
#27
GRAND
@q_grand · 30,717
#28
ТВОЙ ТЕСТОСТЕРОН
@einher · 5,883
#29
Dzari
@DrDzari · 268,797
#30
Alex Parker Returns
@apwagner · 311,441
#31
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,675,819
#32
Ivan Limarev / Merlin AI
@LimarevIvan · 12,279
#33
Медийка
@mediyca · 709,171
#34
Максим Вердикт
@verdiktt · 67,716
#35
4ch
@why4ch · 1,052,622
#36
Эксплойт
@exploitex · 2,027,139
#37
Ветров Консультант
@vetrovconsultant · 9,153
#38
Алекс Лесли 🤘Alex Lesley
@alexlesleynew · 20,343
#39
НМШ
@nmshhub · 723,947
#40
Банки, деньги, два офшора
@bankrollo · 453,683
#41
АРСЕНИЙ СЛОН
@arseniy_slon · 6,543
#42
Кладбище Биохакеров
@fuckbiohacking · 37,036
#43
SimpDungeon☠️
@grpzdc · 156,236
#44
Мистер Vo
@themistervo · 8,966
#45
neoteamfan79
@neoteamfan79 · 2,269
#46
Бэкдор
@whackdoor · 1,617,133
#47
Нейротипология
@misliglubzhe · 10,566
#48
BIOMACHINE
@bmchn · 176,010
#49
Говорит ТопаZ 🪖
@Love_Russia_Beauty · 115,777
#50
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,095,867
#51
Русский меч
@Rrussiansword · 167,351
#52
КБ. экономика
@cb_economics · 343,153
#53
Antipov
@antipov · 404,240
#54
Тринадцатый.
@Z13_Separ · 214,147
#55
Антонов такой Антонов
@auantonov · 321,248
#56
БИОХАКИНГ И НООТРОПЫ | АНДРЕЙ АРБЕНИН 🅰️
@andreyarbenin · 24,619
#57
Алексей Шевцов
@jolybells · 358,901
#58
ЛИТВИН
@litvintm · 1,577,369
#59
NN
@naebnet · 2,170,453
#60
MELLSTROY BONUS
@mellstroybonus · 327,896
#61
Maloletoff | Crypto-Angel
@maloletoffcrypto · 45,903
#62

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DAY’S OF MADNESS | Блог мозгоправа
@daysmad · 190,834
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
НЕ СУЩИЙ СВЕТ
@nesuschiysvet · 23
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
Максим Вердикт
@verdiktt · 67,716
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
Серго нашел,я купил
@sergonashel · 86,636
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 23 August 2026
Арсен Маркарян Официальный
@arsenmarkarian · 159,826
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🏳‍⚧ Переходник 🏳‍⚧” (@directorcasting), 8 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/directorcasting.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.