Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЛОМ 🏴‍☠️

Channel

ЛОМ 🏴‍☠️

@truelom

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

15,575subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693601779
TypeChannel
Username@truelom
Descriptionникакого ебаного рычага нет
Created4 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held53
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/truelom

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

15,56915,69815,633.56 August 2026 — 15,613 subscribers6 August 2026 — 15,614 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,619 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,622 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,623 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,627 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,645 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,662 subscribers13 August 2026 — 15,673 subscribers14 August 2026 — 15,678 subscribers16 August 2026 — 15,668 subscribers18 August 2026 — 15,684 subscribers19 August 2026 — 15,678 subscribers20 August 2026 — 15,683 subscribers22 August 2026 — 15,694 subscribers23 August 2026 — 15,698 subscribers25 August 2026 — 15,691 subscribers26 August 2026 — 15,697 subscribers27 August 2026 — 15,692 subscribers28 August 2026 — 15,686 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,678 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,675 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,649 subscribers2 September 2026 — 15,642 subscribers3 September 2026 — 15,637 subscribers5 September 2026 — 15,629 subscribers8 September 2026 — 15,617 subscribers11 September 2026 — 15,604 subscribers13 September 2026 — 15,595 subscribers14 September 2026 — 15,582 subscribers16 September 2026 — 15,581 subscribers19 September 2026 — 15,569 subscribers25 September 2026 — 15,570 subscribers8 October 2026 — 15,582 subscribers12 October 2026 — 15,596 subscribers14 October 2026 — 15,587 subscribers15 October 2026 — 15,580 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,585 subscribers17 October 2026 — 15,590 subscribers19 October 2026 — 15,587 subscribers20 October 2026 — 15,597 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,600 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,596 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,600 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,602 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,601 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,592 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,594 subscribers1 November 2026 — 15,588 subscribers2 November 2026 — 15,580 subscribers3 November 2026 — 15,584 subscribers4 November 2026 — 15,581 subscribers5 November 2026 — 15,575 subscribers15,5756 August 20265 November 2026
53 measurements spanning 92 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,550–15,717 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 53
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 18:0815,575-6
4 Nov 2026, 20:2015,581-3
3 Nov 2026, 18:2615,584+4
2 Nov 2026, 15:5615,580-8
1 Nov 2026, 13:0915,588-6
31 Oct 2026, 13:3915,594+2
30 Oct 2026, 10:5415,592-9
29 Oct 2026, 07:4015,601-1
27 Oct 2026, 00:2715,602+2
26 Oct 2026, 03:1715,600+4
25 Oct 2026, 02:1915,596-4
22 Oct 2026, 00:3115,600+3
20 Oct 2026, 19:3015,597+10
19 Oct 2026, 15:5015,587-3
17 Oct 2026, 10:1515,590+5
16 Oct 2026, 12:2715,585+5
15 Oct 2026, 11:5515,580-7
14 Oct 2026, 11:3515,587-9
12 Oct 2026, 22:1915,596+14
8 Oct 2026, 13:5615,582first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.3%
avg views ÷ 15,575 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,900
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held66 (23 July 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total35,640
Reactions total1,107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 05:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈4,060
Videos
≈190
Links
≈420

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 58s
Average length
2m 58s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

23,224 reactions across 64 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 527410493193297107510,67145.9%
😁8,86938.2%
❤‍🔥1,2085.20%
🤓1,1154.80%
🤡5962.57%
👏3861.66%
🤬3011.30%
🥱780.336%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24,030 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 66 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @truelom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 14 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Oct 2026, 20:49 UTC≈8,760 views467 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

могли бы приколоться и вместа блюра сделать пикселизацию. бестолочи

😁354custom 527410493193297107577🤓23🤡7🤬5❤‍🔥1

14 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTC≈9,080 views211 reactionsread 6 November 2026

«ну мы э, епта, попутали, эти индийцы все на одно лицо епт» — объяснился источник из МИД РФ

😁158custom 527410493193297107547❤‍🔥6

9 Oct 2026, 22:11 UTC≈17,800 views429 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁287custom 527410493193297107591❤‍🔥45🤡4🤓2

3 Oct 2026, 16:13 UTC≈16,100 views267 reactionsread 6 November 2026

напоминаю синопсис фильма: майор гром пытается забрать ключи шифрования у павла дурова, альтер эго которого устраивает самосуд над коррупционерами, а киевстонер (ныне террорист), играющий гопника вместе с братками помогает полиции разгонять протестующих, по призыву в соцсетях устроивших насильственные беспорядки. в 2021 году предполагалось что это эдакий ответ на хай-тир пропаганду западных ценностей в американских …

❤‍🔥133custom 5274104931932971075108🤓22👏2🤡2

3 Oct 2026, 16:02 UTC≈13,700 views126 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Чё там тоже Киевстонер раздал пизды протестующим?

custom 5274104931932971075125😁1

3 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC≈13,300 views253 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

форшедовинг ебанутый кста

custom 5274104931932971075202😁32🤓15🤡4

3 Oct 2026, 15:33 UTC≈11,300 views218 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Объясните против чего (прямо щас) протестуют во франции пожалуйста

custom 5274104931932971075181😁27🥱10

1 Oct 2026, 17:45 UTC≈12,600 views216 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

кому вы скорее доверите решать как окончится СВО

  1. Администрация президента8%
  2. ГигаЧат от сбера92%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁115custom 527410493193297107591🥱5🤓4❤‍🔥1

1 Oct 2026, 17:44 UTC≈11,200 views174 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 5274104931932971075153😁19👏2

30 Sept 2026, 21:06 UTC≈11,400 views354 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

«Пентагон оказался впечатлен достижениями Илона в тактических играх типа Diablo 4» — уточнили в министерстве войны

custom 5274104931932971075318❤‍🔥14👏13😁8🤡1

30 Sept 2026, 16:20 UTC≈10,800 views421 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁286custom 527410493193297107591❤‍🔥35🤡9

29 Sept 2026, 12:25 UTC≈10,100 views384 reactionsread 6 November 2026

в одной книге про тюрьму писалось что единственное место ссср в которое нет очередей это тюрьма, но это можно исправит если будет создана программа обмена заключенными между совком и сша

custom 5274104931932971075270❤‍🔥113😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @truelom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Oct 2026, 17:45 UTCAnonymous Poll3,540 voters approx.

кому вы скорее доверите решать как окончится СВО

  1. Администрация президента8%
  2. ГигаЧат от сбера92%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Sept 2026, 11:26 UTCAnonymous Poll3,210 voters approx.

Думая о настроениях, имейте ввиду среднего американца. Отвечая, не подглядывайте в интернет, чуть позже запощу реальную социологию. В идеале, в комментариях напишите почему именно это поколение по-вашему должно больше всего ссаться от ии

  1. Зумеры (до 29)41%
  2. Миллениалы (30-44)45%
  3. Иксеры (45-64)18%
  4. Бумерье (65+)19%

The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 14 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

На пути в ПРБ | Метаирония
@prb_blg · 23
4 posts
Аполитизм головного мозга
@warsCost · 30
3 posts
СЛАВА БОГУ У НАС ЕСТЬ МЕМЫ
@SBUNEM · 25,746
2 posts
зубы венедиктова
@aavteeth · 4
2 posts
i stand with Migraine
@libertarianresistance · 4
2 posts
Тупа кволити контент
@skazochnoebalie · 22,739
2 posts
так-то блэд
@taktoblad · 1,552
2 posts
Судья при анкапе за добитие выживших
@AncapJudge · 2,168
1 post
Repostegral
@Repostegral · 4
1 post
Хотят ли русские войны?☢
@bitchsitonmyface · 5
1 post
BreezeMe
@breezeme · 35
1 post
Клуб любителей Schwarze Mond 🌑 🇮🇱 🇷🇺 ✠ 🟦🟥🟩🍎
@clubmarginalow · 86
1 post
Jffrsn
@etojefferson · 83
1 post
Дубовый Соратник
@kameraddubok · 6
1 post
Неопознанное тело
@killaknight14228 · 15,136
1 post
Mémétique
@lamemetique · 3,362
1 post
на Youtube уже больше 17ти лет!
@meme17k · 72,706
1 post
Money and Rounds
@mnr_icls · 5,579
1 post
Notícias Do Brasil
@mrimrs · 95
1 post
xd is (not) dead
@neteringonewild · 31
1 post
Безмемов
@nomemes · 652
1 post
Дневник Сайберии
@notesiberia · 7,173
1 post
Заебавшийся новостник
@nwssht · 230
1 post
Последний проктофантасмист
@parvissimus_emotionalista · 28
1 post
resort
@resortagain · 5,477
1 post
Смемс🐅🦏🦮
@sms_0chka · 1
1 post
женя решорд*
@sosillyandfun · 47
1 post
dumbass recherche
@ssenichev · 146
1 post
Свидетели и Егоры
@swideteli · 24,091
1 post
Пиздим мемы с двача
@tatarifo · 147
1 post
🌾 Вятская интернет-аристократія | ВИъА
@viatka_aristocrat · 11,078
1 post
Всратые thumbnails
@vsratyethumbnails · 3
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Позже всех. Ну прости
@latenewz · 59,737
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
на Youtube уже больше 17ти лет!
@meme17k · 72,706
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 21 August 2026
Леонардо Ди Ванче
@skvir · 20,919
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 24 September 2026
Киты плывут на вписку с ЛСД
@whalesgohigh · 61,520
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 112,482
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 August 2026
Sota VPN — Канал
@sotavpn · 1,148,365
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 38 here — alongside 37 others — read 25 August 2026
Neural Meduza
@neuralmeduza · 20,390
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
ИА Панорама
@ia_panorama · 76,111
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 August 2026
Евгений Понасенков
@evgenii_ponasenkov · 78,657
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 August 2026
Redroom Text
@redroomtext · 75,868
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Мои любимые юморески
@myfavoritejumoreski · 79,337
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 August 2026
мемы про котов (по ржать)
@memyprokotow · 21,511
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
Суеверная Демократия
@sueverdem · 51,470
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 25 August 2026
Василий Тополев
@vasil_topolev · 44,528
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026
Минута в минуту
@pominutno · 68,616
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 20 August 2026
Позже всех. Уже точно
@livefrom2007 · 72,670
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
ОНА РАЗВАЛИЛАСЬ
@ussrchaosss1 · 20,430
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 September 2026
КАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,124
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 19 August 2026
Александр Штефанов
@alexandrshtefanov · 204,954
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Стальной шлем
@stahlhelm · 20,658
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
Бэбэй
@bebeychick · 95,530
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 17 August 2026
Надеждин@
@BorisNadezhdin · 91,561
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 August 2026
Минута в минуту
@minutavminutu · 167,194
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
Легалайз
@legalayz_live · 22,195
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026

This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЛОМ 🏴‍☠️” (@truelom), 15,575 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/truelom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.