Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for БКЗ 🦖 Святослав Иванов

Channel

БКЗ 🦖 Святослав Иванов

@espritdescalier

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,339subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001119331964
TypeChannel
Username@espritdescalier
DescriptionМы своё призванье не забудем: Шум и ярость мы приносим людям По всем вопросам пишите в личные сообщения канала Поддержать: https://boosty.to/sviatos https://www.patreon.com/c/SviatoslavIvanov
Created10 October 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/espritdescalier

Topic

Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,2947,3847,3396 August 2026 — 7,377 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,374 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,358 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,340 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,321 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,316 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,307 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,294 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,321 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,338 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,342 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,349 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,343 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,349 subscribers29 September 2026 — 7,369 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,370 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,378 subscribers16 October 2026 — 7,384 subscribers19 October 2026 — 7,369 subscribers22 October 2026 — 7,359 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,341 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,337 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,343 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,341 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,339 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,281–7,398 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 07:387,339-2
3 Nov 2026, 09:587,341-2
31 Oct 2026, 20:187,343+6
28 Oct 2026, 10:167,337-4
25 Oct 2026, 15:457,341-18
22 Oct 2026, 17:277,359-10
19 Oct 2026, 08:177,369-15
16 Oct 2026, 00:367,384+6
12 Oct 2026, 23:597,378+8
6 Oct 2026, 11:027,370+1
29 Sept 2026, 11:027,369+20
18 Sept 2026, 23:217,349+6
14 Sept 2026, 20:417,343-6
10 Sept 2026, 21:387,349+7
5 Sept 2026, 18:177,342+4
1 Sept 2026, 08:067,338+17
29 Aug 2026, 16:367,321+27
26 Aug 2026, 14:087,294-13
23 Aug 2026, 17:357,307-9
19 Aug 2026, 17:357,316first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.1%
avg views ÷ 7,339 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,750
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held31 (10 July 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total33,740
Reactions total682
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 14:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
432
Videos
41
Links
838

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
23s
Average length
23s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,148 reactions across 30 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1,49269.5%
🕊23110.8%
💯904.19%
✍783.63%
🫡542.51%
🗿401.86%
🎉291.35%
🤯291.35%
💅261.21%
😱261.21%
🤔231.07%
👎160.745%
💊140.652%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,148 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (44.4%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,540 views31 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Три альбома-комбобрейкера Часто звучит мысль, что в музыкальном плане 2026-й не задался — и я в целом с этим скорее согласен. Почти каждый день я слушаю новые альбомы, но даже те из них, которые я нахожу приличными, потом почти не переслушиваю. Однако кое-какой улов есть! В конце декабря я по традиции составлю свой альбомный топ, но проспойлерить хочется уже сейчас: выделились три альбома, к которым я возвращаюсь р…

🔥22✍5💯3💅1

30 Oct 2026, 09:17 UTC≈8,010 views77 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Сериал Star Trek: The Next Generation я смотрю на протяжении 25 лет. СТС начал его ежедневную трансляцию 1 января 2001 года, но обрубил её после четвёртого сезона (заменой были «Зачарованные» — красавицы, конечно, но в сюжетном плане гораздо больший палп). 11-летний я некоторое время пофанател, но посмотреть TNG целиком было технически невозможно. Лет 10 спустя я вернулся к сериалу, но опять посмотрел не полностью, …

🕊54🔥15🫡7🎉1

29 Oct 2026, 19:46 UTC≈2,960 views124 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Capt. Picard: Considering the marvelous complexity of the universe, its... clockwork perfection, its balances of this against that, matter, energy, gravitation, time, dimension — I believe that our existence must be more than either of these philosophies. That what we are goes beyond Euclidean or other practical measuring systems, and that our existence is part of a reality beyond what we understand now as reality.

🕊96🫡28

29 Oct 2026, 07:39 UTC≈2,550 views38 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @normalindierockPhoto

Текилоктобер Святослав Иванов недавно написал хороший текст про Tequilajazzz тоже написать что-нибудь про эту группу до конца октября. Коля Грунин воскресил своё мощное интервью с Фёдоровым. И я тоже рад поучаствовать: для меня Текила — это самая октябрьская музыка в мире, при всём уважении к Type O Negative и Тейлор Свифт. Так что самое время для текильных мемуаров-меамуров. Моё знакомство с Текилой вышло нескольк…

🔥33🗿3👎1🤔1

29 Oct 2026, 07:39 UTC≈2,400 views8 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Прелестная история в продолжение (завершение?) текилоктября ↓

🔥7👎1

23 Oct 2026, 09:12 UTC≈3,700 views130 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Как же не хватает* группы Tequilajazzz! *Громкое начало, затем уточнения: 1) коллектив живёт и здравствует в новом составе, играет в Европе неплохие концерты, с большой вероятностью ещё что-то запишет и выпустит; 2) лично мне группы вполне хватает — и 4–5 переслушиваемых альбомов, и 4–5 посещённых концертов. Как пел сам автор: обригадо и ещё аригато! Нехватка Tequilajazzz — в относительных показателях: концентрация…

🔥88🕊20💯18🫡4

21 Oct 2026, 08:35 UTC≈3,650 views86 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Понимаю, что эпичность в полной мере оценят только пользователи Rate Your Music, но за почти 20 лет на сайте я никогда не видел ни в музыкальном, ни в киношном чарте, чтобы новинка взяла да и подскочила на первое место overall. Из новых фильмов близко к верхушке быстро взлетали «Паразиты» и Nirvanna the Band the Show the Movie (где-то между 15-м и 30-м местами), но ТАКОГО не было никогда. Так что очень ждём возможнос…

🔥61🤯22💅2😱1

19 Oct 2026, 07:36 UTC≈4,310 views49 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Телеграм-блогеры часто предлагают читателям подписаться на какую-нибудь папку с каналами; и да, сейчас я предъявлю вам именно это, но всё-таки надеюсь, что моё предложение — особенное. В папке с нехитрым названием «БКЗавры», я буду собирать каналы с тремя свойствами: • Культурная тематика: прежде всего, наши родные буквы-кадры-звуки, но подойдут и насыщенные каналы хоть об архитектуре, хоть о кулинарии; • Медленный…

✍27🔥15🫡4🕊3

16 Oct 2026, 08:51 UTC≈4,620 views139 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Вернулся из отпуска, скоро возьмусь за новые видео и тексты, короткие и длинные. И чтобы как-то взбодриться, хочу задать вам вопрос с оттенком тщеславия: Какие ваши три любимых выпуска «Букв•Кадров•Звуков» — и почему именно?

🔥121🎉13🫡5

7 Oct 2026, 06:53 UTC≈6,060 views33 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Не без удовольствия посмотрел «Диггера» на большом экране — как нельзя кстати оказался старый кинотеатр с лепниной и раздвигающимися перед сеансом кулисами — и совершенно не захотел присоединяться к единодушному осуждению критиков. Но объяснить этот негатив попробовал. Вроде бы начав говорить со зрителем на популярные темы (прогнившая элита, всемирные катаклизмы), «Диггер» вдруг переходит на беседу сам с собой. Сатир…

🔥25🤯5🕊3

4 Oct 2026, 08:49 UTC≈5,490 views72 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Внушительное смотрилово на выходной день — 40 минут об истории готик-рока, первая серия трёхчасового эпоса. Вадик @dotmus около двух лет систематизировал вообще всё, что можно на эту тему узнать, и подготовил мощнейшую видео-энциклопедию буквально о сотнях артистов и десятках поджанров. Врубаем!

🔥50😱12💅8🤯2

2 Oct 2026, 09:20 UTC≈5,290 views86 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Всем, кто сейчас в Москве или будет там до 15 ноября, хочу прорекламировать выставку художника Бориса Федотова. С его сыном Саней мы близко подружились через годы после ухода Б.Ф. из жизни, и познакомиться с ним у меня не было шансов. Но всегда казалось, что немножко я его всё-таки знал — яхтсмена и трубкокурителя, джазомана и акварелиста. Отчасти с его лёгкой руки в свои 20 с небольшим я провёл много времени где-то…

🔥57✍15💯7🕊7

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @espritdescalier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

МЕЛОДИЯ
@firmamelodiya · 36,142
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“БКЗ 🦖 Святослав Иванов” (@espritdescalier), 7,339 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/espritdescalier.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.