Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sergey Vakulenko

Channel

Sergey Vakulenko

@sergeyvakulenko

On this record: Observations · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,570subscribers

+287 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001810581605
TypeChannel
Username@sergeyvakulenko
Created5 October 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sergeyvakulenko

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

12,700 average views per post against 12,570 subscribers — an engagement rate of 101.0%. Across the 23,970 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,620 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.47% and 21.7%, with a median of 11.1%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (11 August 2026 10 September 2026)
Posts measured9 of 9 published in the window (0 exact, 9 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled114,230
Mature posts only101.0% over 9 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers12,570 measured 8 September 2026
Cohortb10000:rus · 23,970 channels · p10 2.81% · p25 5.47% · p50 11.1% · p75 21.7% · p90 39.0%
Position in cohort99.416th percentile · 9.1× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.233% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 10 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

12,24712,57012,408.55 August 2026 — 12,283 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,283 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,284 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,279 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,278 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,274 subscribers11 August 2026 — 12,272 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,266 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,257 subscribers15 August 2026 — 12,253 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,247 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,256 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,252 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,309 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,363 subscribers22 August 2026 — 12,367 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,362 subscribers25 August 2026 — 12,333 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,426 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,430 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,437 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,462 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,492 subscribers31 August 2026 — 12,497 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,501 subscribers2 September 2026 — 12,500 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,533 subscribers5 September 2026 — 12,549 subscribers8 September 2026 — 12,570 subscribers5 August 20268 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 34 days, net +287. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,199–12,618 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Sept 2026, 15:5712,570+21
5 Sept 2026, 09:1812,549+16
3 Sept 2026, 10:2312,533+33
2 Sept 2026, 05:1312,500-1
1 Sept 2026, 07:0712,501+4
31 Aug 2026, 03:5512,497+5
30 Aug 2026, 05:3612,492+30
29 Aug 2026, 04:1312,462+25
28 Aug 2026, 06:0712,437+7
27 Aug 2026, 08:2812,430+4
26 Aug 2026, 08:5412,426+93
25 Aug 2026, 05:3412,333-29
24 Aug 2026, 06:4312,362-5
22 Aug 2026, 11:5712,367+4
20 Aug 2026, 22:5312,363+54
19 Aug 2026, 21:3612,309+57
18 Aug 2026, 23:1612,252-4
17 Aug 2026, 21:2412,256+9
16 Aug 2026, 21:0412,247-6
15 Aug 2026, 11:0912,253first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
101.0%
avg views ÷ 12,570 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,700
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held24 (1 June 202628 August 2026)
Views total114,230
Reactions total3,000
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

6,695 reactions across 24 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,97059.3%
🔥85312.7%
82012.2%
😁2934.38%
🤔2764.12%
👏2573.84%
😢1161.73%
👎871.30%
😨160.239%
🤬70.105%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,695 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 20:04 UTC≈6,930 views769 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Если мне приставляют нож к горлу или сулят банку варенья и корзину печенья и предлагают прокричать лозунг, я не стану кричать лозунг. Совершенно не важно, какой именно лозунг, горячо согласен я с содержанием или жестко против, мне все равно. Если ко мне приходят с "проверочным вопросом", я не стану на него отвечать, не важно, соответствует ли ответ, который хочет вытащить вопрошающий моим представлениям о мире или не

👍492164🔥66👏29👎9😁4🤬3🤔2

28 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈6,980 views197 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Через полчаса https://www.youtube.com/live/MR9GmIvK-0w?is=V1lMnqzmMwnfxKb3

👍120🔥43👏18😨151

28 Aug 2026, 06:37 UTC≈7,540 views283 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Анатомия бензинового кризиса Насколько очереди за бензином являются хорошим хорошим мерилом объема недостатка бензина? Бензиновые кризисы случаются чаще, чем можно было бы подумать, и там, где их трудно было бы ожидать. В Великобритании они были в 2012 и в 2021 годах, в США – в 2021-м. В Великобритании они не были связаны с дефицитом бензина как таковым – там случились кратковременные перебои в цепи поставок. В США

👍18248🔥21👏13🤔13😁5👎1

27 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC≈6,290 views196 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Откуда берутся данные об объеме переработки, выпуске тех или иных топлив, работе заводов? Часть 1. Удобно говорить, что данные от российских властей, они врут, поэтому не считается. На практике это утверждение ложно. Способов получить данные об объемах переработки несколько. Первичные данные – это формы отчетности, которые собирает ЦДУ ТЭК, организация при Минэнерго. Они публикуют множество справочных бюллетеней,

👍12629🔥24👏17

27 Aug 2026, 07:12 UTC≈6,350 views279 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Откуда берутся данные об объеме переработки, выпуске тех или иных топлив, работе заводов? Часть 2. Есть еще один метод, заработавший недавно – это данные предложения на SPIMEX, Санкт-Петербургской Товарно-Сырьевой Бирже. По закону, все заводы, участвующие в государственных схемах субсидирования нефти для переработки, обязаны выставлять не менее определенной доли своего производства бензинов, дизтоплива и авиакеросин

👍184🔥4429👏21😁1

24 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC≈9,840 views154 reactionsread 2 September 2026

В Новой Газете Европа опубликованы письменные ответы обоих участников грядущих дебатов. Мои вы уже видели, я их с утра выложил в Сабстеке. Теперь можно ознакомиться и с позицией Вячеслава Ширяева. https://novayagazeta.eu/articles/2026/08/24/udary-dronov-vsu-po-npz-smertonosny-dlia-rossiiskoi-ekonomiki Сначала в статье идет предыстория, потом воспроизведена моя позиция, и примерно на 2/3 текста начинаются ответы Вяч

👍94😁33🔥15🤔5👏4🤬3

24 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC≈9,200 views152 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Кстати, тем временем, вышло новое видео на нашем канале https://youtu.be/CY534XMCO6Y

🔥79👍58👏75🤔3

24 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC≈19,500 views370 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Ровно неделю назад я выступал на The Breakfast Show, обсуждая положение дел на топливном рынке России. Два дня спустя там выступил Вячеслав Ширяев, предложивший задать мне острые вопросы, чтобы я на них ответил. Я этот вызов принял. Мои ответы ниже. Текст получился развернутый и с картинками, так что, в Сабстеке. https://sergvakulenkor.substack.com/p/174 Если интересно, вот транскрипт фрагмента эфира, в котором Вяче

👍212🔥7261👏12😁12👎1

19 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC≈41,600 views600 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Третьего дня я выступал на The Breakfast Show у Александр Плющев c разговором о ситуации с бензином. А нонеча там же выступал Viacheslav Shiryaev (ссылки на оба выступления будут в комментариях), вызывавший меня на дебаты, причем, прозвучало это так, что я и такие, как я, этого боятся и на дискуссию не выйдут. Я ответил Александру Плющеву, процитирую этот ответ и здесь. ------- ...я дебатов не боюсь, если надо - деба

👍397🔥11260👏22😁8👎1

28 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTC≈17,400 views216 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Экспорт нефтепродуктов из Индии в Россию за 18 месяцев с января 2025 года по данным индийской таможни. Это, заметим, по отправкам, а не по приходу в Россию. Картинка красноречивее многих слов. Оно, конечно, в июне 2026-го есть заметный рост, но прямо скажем, все эти объемы - это околонуля, так что, я поленился смотреть детальнее, сколько это в тоннах и каких именно продуктов - все равно не материально. Если что, Ки

👍123🤔5918🔥14😁2

23 Jul 2026, 16:24 UTC≈19,000 views270 reactionsread 2 September 2026

В канале есть свежее видео, смотрите. https://youtu.be/zhG2DOVgpD0 Хейтеры в комментарии в ютубе уже набежали, правда, пока ни одного сравнения с Шольцем, Гомером Симпсоном и Пеннивайзом, прямо не знаю, что я в этот раз сделал не так :) (нет, не надо оставлять там таких комментариев). Ну и пусть им, алгоритмы ютуба не различают, хейтерские комментарии, или льстивые. Но ваше мнение мне всегда интересно. В подписи

👍156😁6432🔥11🤔4👏3

21 Jul 2026, 11:41 UTC≈18,000 views164 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Коллеги, грядет новый регулярный эфир на нашем канале, задавайте, пожалуйста, вопросы.

👍10037🔥25👏1😨1

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @sergeyvakulenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sergeyvakulenko edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
28 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Григорий Баженов
@furydrops · 28,379
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
Василий Тополев
@vasil_topolev · 44,443
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sergey Vakulenko” (@sergeyvakulenko), 12,570 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sergeyvakulenko.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.