Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Campaign Insider | Павел Дубравский

Channel

Campaign Insider | Павел Дубравский

@electionsquad

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,007subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001327713511
TypeChannel
Username@electionsquad
DescriptionИзбирательные кампании – это люди, говорящие с людьми. Канал политконсультанта Павла Дубравского. Для связи с автором: @campaignwarrior (менеджер) https://dubravskiy.consulting
Created30 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/electionsquad

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Campaign Insider — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

12,00612,02612,0166 August 2026 — 12,026 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,026 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,018 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,017 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,012 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,016 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,018 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,006 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,016 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,012 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,013 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,007 subscribers12,0076 August 202620 August 2026
12 measurements spanning 14 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,003–12,029 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 10:4712,007-6
19 Aug 2026, 11:3412,013+1
18 Aug 2026, 13:5412,012-4
17 Aug 2026, 13:1412,016+10
16 Aug 2026, 08:1612,006-12
14 Aug 2026, 16:4412,018+2
12 Aug 2026, 03:0212,016+4
9 Aug 2026, 04:2112,012-5
8 Aug 2026, 02:3012,017-1
7 Aug 2026, 04:5012,018-8
6 Aug 2026, 02:3412,026no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:4412,026first reading

Engagement

49 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.1%
avg views ÷ 12,007 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,650
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 49 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held49 (29 July 202621 August 2026)
Views total129,789
Reactions total2,312
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,950
Videos
304
Links
2,120

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
12m 58s
Average length
1m 11s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,193 reactions across 46 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁67730.9%
👍33715.4%
🙈25511.6%
1798.16%
custom 52357011081936333541165.29%
🤬1135.15%
custom 5303098357772735242904.10%
💯803.65%
🤔763.47%
🔥733.33%
😢673.06%
🫡542.46%
🤯291.32%
🌚231.05%
custom 5305438367624746114140.638%
🙏100.456%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 49 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,312reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
28
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 49 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
28
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @electionsquad. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 49 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC819 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @copacabanaLAVideo

🇧🇷Одна из ярких черт бразильской предвыборной кампании — жинглесы. Традиционные песни о кандидате, отражающие его самого, его политику и предлагаемую программу. Часто оставляют место для размышления. 🇧🇷 У Лулы да Силвы в жингле показан весь его политический путь. И вложено немало смысла в песне. Его образ в лице «своего парня» отражен не только в представленных кадрах, но и в строчках «у него есть душа людей, и у не

👍3🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC≈1,140 views42 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @sterngangPhoto

От одиночества к политике: как формируется новый мужской электорат Если смотреть не на всех одиноких мужчин, а именно на молодую часть этой группы, картина становится ещё выразительнее. В США число никогда не состоявших в браке мужчин 20–39 лет выросло с 20.7 млн в 2000 году до 30.4 млн в 2025-м — почти на 47%. За то же время количество женатых мужчин этого возраста сократилось с 18,1 до 15,4 млн. Молодое мужское од

👍21🤔10💯62custom 53030983577727352422🤯1

19 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈1,340 views27 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

А вот так проигравший в праймериз Фишбек прощался с избирателями.

😢16🫡6👍4🤬1

19 Aug 2026, 13:13 UTC≈3,850 views50 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Коммуникационное агентство "Фабрика смыслов" выпустила аналитический доклад, где эксперты анализируют предвыборные стратегии парламентских партий на выборах в Госдуму. Всего 5 критериев: 1. Качество съездов; 2. Качество программ; 3. Конструкция списков; 4. Региональная активность; 5. Способность работать с электоратом конкурентов. Каждая категория — 20% от общей оценки, по каждому критерию эксперты поставили от 1

🙈30😁10👍4🤔2🤬2custom 52357011081936333542

19 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈1,070 views14 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @thegraschenkov

Неоднозначный плебисцит. Спасибо коллеге иноагенту Александру Кыневу, за работу по подтверждению цифрами некоторых политологический гипотез. Например, о плебисцитарном характере губернаторских выборов я уже говорил. Но в сложные времена у этой конструкции появляется двойное дно. Одно дело, когда жители выбирают губернатора как ставленника федерального центра. Голосование превращается в подтверждение доверия всей вер

🤔7👍2😁21💯1🙈1

19 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC≈10,600 views55 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Мамдани теперь катается на велосипеде в шлеме. Безопасность превыше всего. Кандидат от народа.

😁19🌚186👍6🙈4🤬2

19 Aug 2026, 09:45 UTC≈1,320 views16 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @ISKRANnewsPhoto

Президент США Д. Трамп опубликовал карту с обозначением Ормузского пролива как «новой территории США» и заявил об установлении американского контроля над акваторией после истечения 60-дневного срока действия меморандума о перемирии с Ираном. Тегеран отверг претензии Вашингтона и подтвердил сохранение ограничений на судоходство через пролив. На фоне срыва переговоров мировые цены на нефть марки Brent превысили 90 долл

👍73🔥3custom 52357011081936333542🤔1

19 Aug 2026, 06:24 UTC≈1,500 views46 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Джеймс Фишбек проиграл праймериз Республиканской партии Он занял третье место и получил чуть больше 10% голосов. На втором месте Джей Коллинз с 25%, а на первом фаворит гонки Байрон Дональдс с 47,8% и поддержкой Дональда Трампа. Ни в одном из 67 округов Фишбек не взял большинства. У Дональдса 48, Коллинза 19. Яркая, но спорная кампания Фишбека не принесла ему победы на выборах, но дала федеральную узнаваемость. Бо

😢18👍12custom 5303098357772735242123🔥1

18 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC≈1,620 views21 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Немного бразильской агитации и пример слома 4 стены.

👍135🔥3

18 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC≈1,590 views21 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @mashkomnata

На прошлой неделе внутри американского правого лагеря случилось редкое событие: консервативная звезда Кэндис Оуэнс и профессиональный дебатёр Эндрю Уилсон больше трёх часов публично спорили об убийстве активиста Чарли Кёрка. Только на канале Оуэнс трансляция собрала 4,5 млн просмотров, а ради встречи команда Уилсона привлекла $300 тысяч через краудфандинг. Поводом стали заявления Оуэнс о том, что за гибелью Кёрка як

8👍6custom 53030983577727352424custom 52357011081936333542😁1

18 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈3,420 views83 reactionsread 22 August 2026

ЛДПР представила фильм «Я тоже русский». Фильм подготовлен совместно с университетом «Синергия». Основная идея фильма — высказывание на тему, кто такой русский и что значит быть русским. Сам фильм я комментировать не буду, но подробнее остановлюсь на высказываниях и предложениях лидера ЛДПР. Чем ближе ко дню голосования — тем активнее партии задействуют свой электорат, тем чётче становится их повестка. Из выступлен

🙈49😁129🤬7custom 52357011081936333544🌚1👍1

18 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈1,710 views22 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @expedition_digoriyaPhoto

Регистрация на экспедицию «Дигория» открыта Этой осенью социально-гуманитарная мысль впервые выйдет в открытое плавание, взяв курс на будущее России! «Дигория» меняет свой вектор: форум перерождается в новом формате — интеллектуальном путешествии, где философия соединяется с практикой. ⛴ 28 сентября мы соберем на борту теплохода лучшие умы, чтобы за пять дней совместной работы перевести инновационные смыслы в решен

🙈7👍6🔥3🤔32custom 52357011081936333541

Showing the 12 most recent of 49 posts we hold for @electionsquad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 Aug 2026, 07:30 UTCAnonymous Poll263 voters

Этот агит-ролик

  1. Великолепен14%
  2. Ужасен45%
  3. Норм41%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 49 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 21 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 89,226 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 35 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Joe Biden - выборы 🇺🇸
@biden · 108
18 posts
Губернаторы в сети
@gubnet · 6,866
3 posts
Kynev
@alexander_kynev · 19,150
2 posts
Деловая репутация
@delrepru · 421
2 posts
Авторские блоги | Kiss My Ads
@kissmyads_authors · 1
2 posts
Те самые англосаксы
@omganglos · 4,946
2 posts
One Big Union
@one_big_union · 19,782
2 posts
ТолмачёV наZтоящий
@realtolmachev · 1,300
2 posts
Белов из Бибирево
@belov_iz_bibirevo · 344
1 post
Филатова | Digital Projects
@digital_workaholic · 60
1 post
Неудаща
@dirtytatarstan · 40,264
1 post
Доктрина Америки | Олег Краев
@docam_ok · 1,382
1 post
El consultor
@elconsultor · 262
1 post
Kingmaker
@elusivekingmaker · 25
1 post
ОЛЬГА 🇷🇺
@grabovets1 · 975
1 post
Информация о политике, выборах и общественной жизни России с точки зрения политического юриста.
@molchanovinfo · 177
1 post
Авторский канал Никиты Сетова
@nsetov · 1,510
1 post
Как римляне
@republican_papers · 496
1 post
Rotten Kepken, синоптик
@RottenKepkenChannel · 7,453
1 post
ВАРИАНТ
@variantnews · 132,531
1 post
Арифметика победы | Зиновьев Дмитрий
@victorithm · 915
1 post
Интеллектуальная ярмарка им. Бугрова
@yarmorkann · 294
1 post
YouRule
@yourule_polit · 626
1 post
Заббаров о (не)политике
@zabbarov_nepolitika · 647
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Малек Дудаков
@malekdudakov · 82,942
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Campaign Insider | Павел Дубравский” (@electionsquad), 12,007 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/electionsquad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.