Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Иоанн день за днём

Channel

Иоанн день за днём

@ioann_journalier

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

379subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001461520084
TypeChannel
Username@ioann_journalier
Created4 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ioann_journalier

Growth

3793833816 August 2026 — 382 subscribers6 August 2026 — 382 subscribers13 August 2026 — 383 subscribers19 August 2026 — 382 subscribers1 September 2026 — 380 subscribers10 September 2026 — 379 subscribers6 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 35 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 378–384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 17:39379-1
1 Sept 2026, 09:05380-2
19 Aug 2026, 09:18382-1
13 Aug 2026, 06:19383+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:17382no change
6 Aug 2026, 11:45382first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

177 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9955.9%
custom 52742415763174932534022.6%
🌚1910.7%
custom 529404268122211764484.52%
custom 524674306108975789163.39%
custom 525156378821736175042.26%
custom 525585885000265184110.565%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Не будет у меня на кухне индукции, потому что в тот самый автомат на 32А оказывается идёт шнур на 16А хДДД Вот такой сюрприз от дебилов. Будет газ.

3🌚1

6 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC101 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

В который раз убеждаюсь, работяги-зумеры с профиру лучше и ТОЛКОВЕЕ, чем их более возрастные коллеги. Да даже банально более вежливые...

14

6 Aug 2026, 08:26 UTC128 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Показать бы тебе насмешнику И любителю нувель ваг Тонкоусому кино-грешнику Что родным станет личный враг Как ругал ты поделки Нолана Восхищённой толпе вразрез И словами своими чёрными Отрицал его вклад и вес Поздний вечер, глаза уставшие И четвёртый уж год войны Одиссей возвращался И больше не страшно И вернёмся когда-нибудь мы

8🌚3custom 52558588500026518411

4 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC159 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Он бросил свой щит и свой меч, швырнул в канаву наган Он понял, что некому мстить, и радостно дышит...

3

4 Aug 2026, 19:29 UTC162 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Блин, Одиссея Нолана по своему СМЫСЛУ (который Одиссей в конце проговаривает для непонятливых) это Энеида, а сам Одиссей куда ближе к Энею, что иронично. Просто Энеиду никто не читал... Сам фильм клёвый и мужественный. И оч уверенный по режиссуре

10custom 52742415763174932534

4 Aug 2026, 10:56 UTC168 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Думаю примерно так выглядели старые цивилизации на Земле, уничтоженные дочисту в атомных войнах

7🌚4

4 Aug 2026, 09:44 UTC172 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Браво, невероятное в своём изяществе решение!

custom 52742415763174932533

4 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC277 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Читаю Большие пожары. У всех писателей-южан (не только евреев) есть интересная манера бытоописания, словно предметы и даже отдельные части тела у людей обладают собственной волей. И эта воля часто идёт в перекрёст к воли людей уже настоящих. Будто мир каждую секунду конструируется, или у иных писателей биосинтетически прорастает на ходу. Получается такой пульсирующий, булькающий темпоритм. Венец этому — проза Олеши.

13

4 Aug 2026, 07:46 UTC178 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Мне нравится, что на новом витке интернета все классические жжшные споры "хохлосрач", "красные vs белые", "Ипполит vs Лукашин", "хочу сделать Х, какие подводные камни", "кто хуже Ельцин или Сталин" переехали в комментарии к рилсам к совсем уже простодушным людям. И каждая дискуссия начинается с масок вежливости (мне вас жаль), потом идёт попурри из сто лет назад протухших аргументов и баянов, и быстро заканчивается у

custom 5274241576317493253173🌚1

3 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC188 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сладким?

custom 52515637882173617504

3 Aug 2026, 08:23 UTC189 views10 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ради коммуникации с работягами раньше на телефоне приходилось держать ватсап. Щас к этому ещё и макс добавляется... ✊😵🥲 В телегу почему-то они все как один раз в месяц заходят

🌚10

2 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC182 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Ни одна вещь, про которую среднеумычи пишут, что она выглядит дорого, на самом деле не выглядит дорого...

custom 527424157631749325352

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ioann_journalier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Иоанн день за днём” (@ioann_journalier), 379 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ioann_journalier.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.