Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cat_Cat 🐈‍⬛

Channel

Cat_Cat 🐈‍⬛

@catx2

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

16,664subscribers

+123 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001267075953
TypeChannel
Username@catx2
DescriptionСборник авторских статей, мемов и постов на историческую и научную тематику. «Познавательно, информативно и с юмором» — таков наш девиз. Связь: @Shyhartskoi Предложка: https://t.me/catx2?direct РКН: № 5289235146.
Created17 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/catx2

Growth

16,51816,66416,5916 August 2026 — 16,541 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,541 subscribers6 August 2026 — 16,537 subscribers7 August 2026 — 16,534 subscribers8 August 2026 — 16,548 subscribers9 August 2026 — 16,550 subscribers10 August 2026 — 16,541 subscribers12 August 2026 — 16,538 subscribers14 August 2026 — 16,527 subscribers16 August 2026 — 16,523 subscribers17 August 2026 — 16,518 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,523 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,520 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,577 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,594 subscribers23 August 2026 — 16,603 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,612 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,628 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,642 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,649 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,657 subscribers29 August 2026 — 16,664 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
22 measurements spanning 24 days, net +123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,496–16,686 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 19:5416,664+7
28 Aug 2026, 20:5516,657+8
27 Aug 2026, 22:1916,649+7
26 Aug 2026, 22:0716,642+14
26 Aug 2026, 01:2816,628+16
24 Aug 2026, 23:4916,612+9
23 Aug 2026, 14:2516,603+9
22 Aug 2026, 00:3716,594+17
20 Aug 2026, 22:0416,577+57
19 Aug 2026, 19:5216,520-3
18 Aug 2026, 18:2216,523+5
17 Aug 2026, 19:1316,518-5
16 Aug 2026, 16:0816,523-4
14 Aug 2026, 22:2516,527-11
12 Aug 2026, 15:0716,538-3
10 Aug 2026, 14:2516,541-9
9 Aug 2026, 12:5116,550+2
8 Aug 2026, 16:0516,548+14
7 Aug 2026, 12:5616,534-3
6 Aug 2026, 12:2116,537first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.3%
avg views ÷ 16,664 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,880
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
47
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held55 (30 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total135,530
Reactions total2,613
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 02:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2,900
Videos
28
Links
4,030

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2,291 reactions across 43 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍77934.0%
67929.6%
🔥27812.1%
❤‍🔥1777.73%
😁1084.71%
custom 5208795006394997187733.19%
🤔502.18%
🤣441.92%
321.40%
💯170.742%
🤡160.698%
👏150.655%
👎50.218%
😱50.218%
👌40.175%
😐40.175%
🌚30.131%
🌭20.087%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 55 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,089reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 55 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @catx2. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 08:19 UTC≈1,490 views12 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Приветствуем, дорогие подписчики! По старой доброй традиции мы подготовили для вас подборку интересных каналов — и в ней вы наверняка найдете что-то для себя: Подкасты, лонгриды, саркастические заметки, интересные факты и просто гуманитарные мемы. Самые интересные каналы на гуманитарную тематику — именно так их можно описать! Для вашего удобства всех их мы собрали в одну папку, которую достаточно добавить к себе, ч

👍7🔥32

26 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,870 views71 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🤣42🤔166😁43

25 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈2,000 views63 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Posted without readable text

33🔥20👍7😐3

24 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈2,170 views11 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @catlegatusPhoto

Уважаемые читатели! 5 сентября в Москве состоится очередная сходка Cat_Cat с интереснейшими историческими лекциями и активностями. Так как нашего дорогого #Леонов@catx2 сожрала работа и он не сможет выступить с лекцией, то мне придется подменить его. Хотя в основном я все же больше всего люблю крутую Италию (римскую), но нравится мне и период Италии послевоенной. Почему? А потому что по накалу страстей и числу вот-э

92

23 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈2,650 views71 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍3919🔥9👌3😐1

22 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,760 views89 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Forwarded from @wehistoryPhoto

Афанасий Никитин – русский Марко Поло, один из первых европейцев проникших в Индию. В 1466 году тверской торговый человек Афанасий Никитин собрался с торговой экспедицией в Персию. Профинансировать такую операцию одному было не под силу, большая часть товара была приобретена на заёмные средства. Дальняя торговля в эти времена была крайне рискованным, но очень прибыльным делом. Волжским маршрутом пользовались более

❤‍🔥52👍1814🔥4🤔1

21 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈3,320 views19 reactionsread 30 August 2026

В прошлой части речь шла о том, «откуда есть пошла земля индейская», что собой представляла страна ольмеков и как они контактировали с Африкой (спойлер: никак). В этой части речь пойдёт о том, почему, собственно, ольмеки были самыми крутыми индейцами своего времени: о культурных и технических достижениях. Прошлая часть #Дробенков #Лонг 📱 Подписаться: @catx2 Предложить пост — сюда 📥 🪙 Поддержать

👍14💯32

20 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC≈3,570 views9 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Провожайте это лето с классной подборкой увлекательных исторических и культурологических каналов. Вас ждет полезная информация: ✅ От Древней Руси до величественного Рима. ✅ Актуальные археологические находки и оригинальные факты. ✅ Увлекательный контент без скучной зубрежки — для ума и души. Добавляйте папку за секунду, отключайте уведомления и погружайтесь в значимые вехи ушедших столетий.

👍54

20 Aug 2026, 05:05 UTC≈3,740 views26 reactionsread 30 August 2026

И снова здравствуй! После горячих песков Иордании, мы переносимся в новый регион — Восточная Азия. Для некоторых из вас это новинка, поэтому не стоит откладывать знакомство с такой замечательной областью. #Зуянов #Лонг 📱 Подписаться: @catx2 Предложить пост — сюда 📥 🪙 Поддержать

👍1511

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @catx2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 84,161 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cat_Cat 🐈‍⬛” (@catx2), 16,664 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/catx2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.