Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ακαδημία

Channel

Ακαδημία

@akademia_space

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,278subscribers

-53 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001373920702
TypeChannel
Username@akademia_space
DescriptionВечные вопросы. Современные вызовы. Античный масштаб. Обратная связь через личные сообщения канала.
Created1 September 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/akademia_space

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (2 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@akademia_space/3680 · this entry21 Jul 2026, 23:01 UTC@digitalcapitalism/130721 Jul 2026, 23:01 UTC1.00under a minute
@akademia_space/3683 · this entry26 Jul 2026, 20:52 UTC@digitalcapitalism/131026 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC1.002 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@digitalcapitalism6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (5–1)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 21 comparable posts for this entry, running 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @akademia_space — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

7,2757,3317,3036 August 2026 — 7,331 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,326 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,312 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,309 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,306 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,304 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,296 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,294 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,290 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,289 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,290 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,294 subscribers24 September 2026 — 7,300 subscribers4 October 2026 — 7,288 subscribers11 October 2026 — 7,291 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,293 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,291 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,289 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,284 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,276 subscribers1 November 2026 — 7,275 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,278 subscribers7,2786 August 20264 November 2026
22 measurements spanning 90 days, net -53. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,267–7,339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 07:577,278+3
1 Nov 2026, 11:567,275-1
26 Oct 2026, 23:057,276-8
23 Oct 2026, 20:267,284-5
21 Oct 2026, 06:497,289-2
17 Oct 2026, 22:167,291-2
15 Oct 2026, 00:067,293+2
11 Oct 2026, 12:557,291+3
4 Oct 2026, 17:387,288-12
24 Sept 2026, 21:417,300+6
13 Sept 2026, 01:387,294+4
9 Sept 2026, 11:017,290+1
4 Sept 2026, 10:427,289-1
1 Sept 2026, 00:577,290-4
29 Aug 2026, 03:577,294-2
26 Aug 2026, 00:547,296-8
23 Aug 2026, 04:257,304-2
19 Aug 2026, 11:357,306-3
13 Aug 2026, 08:487,309-3
10 Aug 2026, 05:587,312first reading

Engagement

59 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 7,278 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,590
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
24
of 59 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held59 (18 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total38,220
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 01:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈370
Videos
≈47
Links
≈1,910

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 24 posts held from the last 30 days (4.17%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 16:17 UTC513 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @moneyandpolarfoxPhoto

Почему разговор об отношениях мужчин и женщин - это не «личное дело», а вопрос экономики и будущего Обсуждение отношений между мужчинами и женщинами часто воспринимают в стиле , «каждый сам разберётся». Но данные показывают обратное. За фасадом частных решений стоят структурные механизмы, которые определяют, кто работает, кто ухаживает за детьми, кто платит за жилье и кто остается без страховки при потере кормильца.…

5 Nov 2026, 06:47 UTC776 viewsread 7 November 2026

Res privata, res publica, часть 13 Окончательное закрепление нового прочтения республики связано с именем другого известного флорентийца – Николо Макиавелли. Именно от него идёт деление всех государств на республики и монархии. Тут надо сделать важную терминологическую оговорку: для описания второй категории сам Макиавелли использует слово principati – т.е. принципаты. А его государь – это principe т.е. этимологи…

4 Nov 2026, 16:36 UTC941 viewsread 7 November 2026

А вот Вэнс явно не теряет надежды стать следующим президентом США. В принципе после той свиньи которую подложил республиканцам вообще и МАГА-крылу в частности Трамп шансы выглядят небольшими, скорее всего ближайшая победа за демами. Но у Вэнса явно есть шанс консолидировать МАГА-изоляционистов, а это может быть долгосрочным вложением которое окупится например через срок когда демократы снова всех достанут со своим …

4 Nov 2026, 13:48 UTC923 viewsread 7 November 2026

Res privata, res publica, часть 12 Семантический сдвиг происходит в начале XIV века и связан с краткосрочным появлением Республики Модена (Respublica Mutinensis) – государства просуществовавшего всего два года с 1306 по 1307 в перерыве между правлением дома Эсте. Моденцы впервые (после казуса Папской области в VIII веке) включили слово respublica в официальное название государства зафиксированное в документах того …

4 Nov 2026, 11:24 UTC901 viewsread 7 November 2026
Forwarded from @russianidea

Вчера в США прошли промежуточные выборы (Конгресс, Сенат, губернаторы, местные органы власти), и теперь можно посмотреть на промежуточные итоги деятельности Трампа. Американское общество уже вынесло свой вердикт, респы разгромно проиграли эти выборы, рейтинг одобрения Трампа низкий. Но интересно сравнить ситуацию с исходными позициями. 1. Социокультурная сфера. Нормализация гендерных ролей в законодательстве в как…

3 Nov 2026, 18:47 UTC946 viewsread 7 November 2026

Res privata, res publica, часть 11 В XIII веке Европа заново открывает для себя наследие Аристотеля и в частости его политическую теорию включая классификацию форм государственного устройства. При этом для четырёх из них в латинких переводах использовалась простая транскрипция: aristocratia, oligarchia, democratia, tyrannis – так они без изменений попали и в современные языки. Греческая βασιλεία была вполне ожидае…

2 Nov 2026, 15:17 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 7 November 2026

Res privata, res publica, часть 10 Характерно что в раннее средневековье единственным государством в официальном именоваии которого использовалось слово Respublica была... Папская область называвшаяся Sanctae Dei ecclesiae respublica Romanorum (Республика римлян святой Божьей церкви) А что же знаменитые итальянски республики – Венецианская, Флорентийская, Генуэзская? Ни одна из них исходно не носила такого названи…

30 Oct 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,520 viewsread 7 November 2026

К предыдущему. Кстати дайте кто-нибудь Дугину почитать Августина. https://t.me/Agdchan/23624

30 Oct 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 7 November 2026

Res privata, res publica, отступление: христианская республика Августина Важная и почти всегда игнорируемая веха в истории развития республиканизма – теология Аврелия Августина. Августин, воспитанный на латинской литературе и философии, глубоко воспринял и цицероновскую концепцию республики, адаптировав её к христианскому богословию. Впервые он апеллирует к этой идее в своём не самом известном трактате О труде мон…

28 Oct 2026, 12:56 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 7 November 2026

Res privata, res publica, часть 9 В средневековье республика продолжала быть эквивалентом государства или широкого сообщества людей, что строго говоря соответствовало исходному римскому пониманию. Например термин res publica Christiana, идущий от Августина, мог использоваться папством для обозначения сообщества всех христиан вообще и в таком значении периодически становился синонимом крупных христианских империй – …

27 Oct 2026, 18:40 UTC≈1,400 viewsread 7 November 2026

Res privata, res publica, часть 8 При всём сказанном выше надо хорошо понимать, что республиканская теория как таковая не успела до конца оформиться непосредствено на родине республиканизма — в Риме. Причиной тому стало изменение политического ландшафта: главный идеолог Римской республики Цицерон по недоброй иронии судьбы жил ровно в эпоху её заката и был в итоге убит её могильщиками. Впрочем самими римлянами пере…

25 Oct 2026, 20:56 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 7 November 2026

В закрытом блоге на Гапи – начало цикла заметок о пиоритетных направлениях внешней политики США Во внешней политике США можно выделить четыре приоритетных региона — это Европа и постсоветское пространство (которые идут в комплекте, поскольку Европа для США является в том числе и плацдармом для сдерживания России), Ближний Восток, Латинская Америка (и шире — Западное полушарие) и, наконец, Индо-Тихоокеанская область.…

Showing the 12 most recent of 59 posts we hold for @akademia_space. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Karfagen
@karfagen_official_te · 35,316
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 September 2026
Proeconomics
@proeconomics · 68,730
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 20 August 2026
Деньги и песец
@moneyandpolarfox · 50,930
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 August 2026
Толкователь
@tolk_tolk · 126,363
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
Седьмая печать
@sevseal · 23,753
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 17 September 2026
Стальной шлем
@stahlhelm · 20,654
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 28 September 2026
Data distributor
@sterngang · 21,123
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 2 October 2026
Глебсмит
@glebsmith77 · 28,320
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ακαδημία” (@akademia_space), 7,278 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akademia_space.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.