Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bomber Harris DID NOTHING WRONG

Channel

Bomber Harris DID NOTHING WRONG

@bomber_harris_did_nothing_wrong

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4,249subscribers

+269 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001871047826
TypeChannel
Username@bomber_harris_did_nothing_wrong
Created10 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held16
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/bomber_harris_did_nothing_wrong

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,9804,3174,148.56 August 2026 — 3,980 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,980 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,981 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,232 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,253 subscribers15 August 2026 — 4,251 subscribers18 August 2026 — 4,255 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,259 subscribers24 August 2026 — 4,268 subscribers27 August 2026 — 4,314 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,317 subscribers2 September 2026 — 4,294 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,277 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,264 subscribers15 September 2026 — 4,306 subscribers19 September 2026 — 4,249 subscribers4,2496 August 202619 September 2026
16 measurements spanning 44 days, net +269. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,929–4,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:354,249-57
15 Sept 2026, 01:204,306+42
11 Sept 2026, 19:374,264-13
6 Sept 2026, 22:384,277-17
2 Sept 2026, 06:344,294-23
29 Aug 2026, 23:544,317+3
27 Aug 2026, 06:454,314+46
24 Aug 2026, 11:334,268+9
20 Aug 2026, 23:144,259+4
18 Aug 2026, 09:524,255+4
15 Aug 2026, 15:224,251-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:344,253+21
9 Aug 2026, 05:514,232+251
6 Aug 2026, 11:243,981+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:203,980no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:503,980first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 36 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,038 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍63060.7%
🔥11210.8%
😡827.90%
😭636.07%
🤷413.95%
😱353.37%
👏212.02%
👎191.83%
🎃131.25%
🎉70.674%
🤷‍♂50.482%
🥰40.385%
30.289%
🍌20.193%
😈10.096%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,006 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 00:27 UTC790 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @moneyandpolarfox

Я бы подписался под каждым словом ув. Александра Фокина - но прежде, вот на что я обратил бы внимание Да, как говорил товарищ Ленин, открывать будущее коммунистического проекта не брался и сам Карл Маркс. Но сейчас мы живем в обществе, которое управляется людьми made in USSR в полном смысле этого слова, советскими «отличниками боевой и политической подготовки» Среди современного РФ-начальства и близко нет никаких «

👍8👎63🔥1

7 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,470 views62 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @dshrg2

Для тех, кто хочет поступить на службу в Африканский Корпус или немного об интересных событиях, происходящих там. Не хотели поднимать этот вопрос, но с нашими знакомыми интересная ситуация, которую необходимо осветить, дабы у каждого было понимание, с чем возможно столкнуться после подписания контракта. Есть в Африканском Корпусе один майор (позывной «Гадюка») в должности зампотыла отряда, ранее осужденный за хищен

🔥29👍17😱12😡4

7 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈1,990 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну. "Люди" требуют отмены ЕГЭ, а что такое ИК излучение и как оно работает - не знают.

🔥12😈1

7 Aug 2026, 10:57 UTC≈2,090 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1m2PMbp4Pg

👍4🔥1🥰1

7 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC≈12,300 views63 reactionsread 8 August 2026

По поводу атаки Ялты БЭКами. Как я понял - они там сразу телепортировались ? Или что у нас с наблюдением и контролем водного пространства возле берега ? Флот там где ? Вопросы риторические, на 5й год войны.

👍30😡15🔥12🎃3🎉2🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC≈10,700 views129 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тк проблемой занимаются те-же люди, которые и перевели своим нихуянеделанием проблему борьбы с хохлодронами в национальную катастрофу с огромным ущербом в людях, финансах, репутации - то "решение" проблемы будет самым всратым и для ИБД. По поводу формирующихся МОГ. Они будут формироваться из БАРСиков на базовом ( не СВО контракте БАРСов). Что это значит. Контракт на 3 года. Не на сборах - платят около 3к/месяц. "Сбор

👍56😭38😡18🤷9👎4🔥2🎉1🥰1

6 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC≈6,030 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=geljbqJz1ro https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KUZjxxrvsLQ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PCSgXkGCRdI&

👍6

6 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC≈1,120 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @soldat_pravPhoto

Интернет - штука злопамятная. Он не страдает охранительской амнезией и не умеет переписывать вчерашний день задним числом. Первый скрин – публикации Бориса Якеменко. Пока ВСУ уже заходили в Курскую область, он старательно изображал пожарного, который смеётся над теми, кто кричит: «Горим!». Никакого вторжения, дескать, нет. Военблогеры истерят, хайпуют, собирают донаты. «Боевые мопеды», «тысячи пленных», «срочносбор

👍63👏6

6 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC≈2,130 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @RostislavDDDPhoto

Минутка предсказаний, злобы и необоснованной конспирологии. Если недавние эксперименты с массированным, беспрецедентным за все пять лет применением для прикрытия штурмовых действий и дымовых снарядов и мин некий никчемный интернетный болтун ещё может связать с своим переводом "Батальонной тактической группы" Джима Сторра , то не менее внезапный переход на околосистемность в боевом применении авиации (как беспило

🔥19😡1

6 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC≈2,500 views111 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @larkin_docPhoto

Да кому ж вы врете-то, бля. Колхозанам, которые загранпаспорт не оформляют за ненадобностью? 🙂 Уже второй год проблемы с загранпаспортами. Их не выдают быстро. Их постоянно заворачивают. Про них сочиняют байки мол «кончилася бумага, ждите». Выдача загранпаспортов системно саботируется с 2025 года, её намеренно усложнили. Это знают все, кто оформляли документы в последнее время. Такая же история с другими аспектами

👍79😭18👏5🤷‍♂5🎃2🍌1😡1

6 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC≈2,710 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @signalman_diary

Полезное: Частоты радио в машине по оповещению о пролётах БПЛА на участках трассы Р-280 "Новороссия" от Ростовской области до Крыма (пунктов пропуска Чонгар и Армянск): Весело-Вознесенка - 90,4 FM Новоазовск - 90,4 FM Мариуполь - 94,3 FM Бердянск - 95,5 FM Инзовка - 95,5 FM Мелитополь - 95,1 FM Новогригорьевка - 95,5 FM Геническ - 95,1 FM Чонгар - 95,1 FM Новотроицкое - 95,1 FM Новотроицкое/Чаплинка - 95,1 FM Чапл

👍16👏3👎2🤷1

6 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC≈7,560 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ну что. В Рунете "предывобрные" проверки начались ?

🤷17😱3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @bomber_harris_did_nothing_wrong. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bomber Harris DID NOTHING WRONG” (@bomber_harris_did_nothing_wrong), 4,249 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bomber_harris_did_nothing_wrong.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.