Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for sacred violence

Channel

sacred violence

@sacredviolence

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,342subscribers

-37 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001278665238
TypeChannel
Username@sacredviolence
Descriptionканал о религии и насилии: обрывки науки, размышления, истории, критика насилия со всех фронтов. и еще Батай и Жирар. @Zygmont мне всегда можно писать и предлагать темы, кому что интересно рекламу не продаю и не покупаю
Created14 July 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sacredviolence

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,3427,3827,3626 August 2026 — 7,379 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,380 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,378 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,382 subscribers15 August 2026 — 7,381 subscribers18 August 2026 — 7,376 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,371 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,373 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,368 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,365 subscribers7 September 2026 — 7,359 subscribers11 September 2026 — 7,357 subscribers15 September 2026 — 7,358 subscribers6 October 2026 — 7,353 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,354 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,353 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,350 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,354 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,351 subscribers6 November 2026 — 7,342 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
20 measurements spanning 93 days, net -37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,336–7,388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 23:467,342-9
3 Nov 2026, 12:557,351-3
31 Oct 2026, 05:367,354+4
27 Oct 2026, 22:277,350-3
15 Oct 2026, 21:177,353-1
12 Oct 2026, 16:297,354+1
6 Oct 2026, 08:557,353-5
15 Sept 2026, 18:007,358+1
11 Sept 2026, 21:197,357-2
7 Sept 2026, 16:027,359-6
30 Aug 2026, 10:347,365-3
27 Aug 2026, 17:047,368-5
25 Aug 2026, 02:587,373+2
21 Aug 2026, 11:157,371-5
18 Aug 2026, 19:557,376-5
15 Aug 2026, 09:277,381-1
12 Aug 2026, 08:457,382+4
9 Aug 2026, 10:017,378-2
6 Aug 2026, 15:067,380+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:357,379first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 7,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,460
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held36 (11 May 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total9,850
Reactions total291
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 02:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
341
Videos
3
Links
368

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2,042 reactions across 36 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,042100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 36 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,042 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 36 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (75.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 17:51 UTC≈1,630 views99 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

простите, но я сейчас с ума сойду (комментарий: вероятно, это попытка перевести на английский через гугл-транслейт 50 слов для обозначения снега у эскимосов 200 слов для обозначения героев, героизма и всего героического и геройского в бенгальском языке)

❤99

2 Nov 2026, 11:43 UTC≈2,020 views58 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

– Мам, а можно мы проведем независимые исследования коллективной памяти? (в базе SAGE Journals) – У нас есть независимые исследования дома! Независимые исследования дома:

❤58

10 Oct 2026, 21:09 UTC≈3,490 views78 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ОПЫТ ЖИРАРДИАНСКОЙ СОЦИОЛОГИИ ЛАЙВОВ И Т.Д. / 2 (3) многие общаются, объявляют песни и говорят «спасибо» – видно, что они добрые парни и конфликтов обычно не возникает. Но иногда возникают: скажем, группа Anaal Nathrakh в золотые годы сама звала всех заниматься стейдждайвингом, но если кто-то задерживался, то вокалист Дэйв Хант (PhD с диссертацией по моральной философии, Ницше и т.д.) потом по 5 минут восстанавливал…

❤78

10 Oct 2026, 21:09 UTC≈2,710 views56 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ОПЫТ ЖИРАРДИАНСКОЙ СОЦИОЛОГИИ ЛАЙВОВ И Т.Д. / 1 что меня всегда немного удивляло в Жираре и особенно в его последователях – так это их склонность исследовать произведения (будь то тексты или, у молодежи, кино), где авторы чего-то там пишут или показывают и это типа «являет истину», но при этом полное презрение к наблюдаемой реальности, которая зачастую неплохо описывается в терминах того же РЖ. Сколько я не читал по…

❤56

8 Oct 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,280 views62 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @mykhology

7 октября, катастрофическое нападение ХАМАС на Израиль, было, как понятно сейчас, еще и одним из самых масштабных за последние десятилетия случаев насилия на религиозной почве, в израильской истории — уникальным. Действия ХАМАС продиктованы прежде всего религиозной повесткой, что обусловило и жестокость нападения, и то, что выглядит задним числом стратегической непродуманностью. Создав сложнейший и, увы, эффективный …

❤62

28 Sept 2026, 13:17 UTC≈2,970 views55 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ОБ «ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛАХ МУССОЛИНИ» А. ДЖ. ГРЕГОРА / 3 (но читайте с начала) еще он настаивает, что в фашизме как бы есть доктринальная составляющая, а есть всякая наносная фигня – к ней же относится и его «роковой конец», и вот первая – очень круто, давайте оставим, а вторая – ну, можно было бы и получше. И эту же лукавую схему пересказа «доктринальной» составляющей (которая обычно игнорирует вопрос про реально совершен…

❤55

28 Sept 2026, 13:17 UTC≈2,550 views36 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ОБ «ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛАХ МУССОЛИНИ» А. ДЖ. ГРЕГОРА / 1 в общем, недавно коллеги из издательства «Владимир Даль», откликаясь за мое предложение делиться книжками про «охреневшие национализмы», любезно прислали их новую книжку из серии про фашизм – «Интеллектуалы Муссолини» американского профессора Энтони Джеймса Грегора, – с уговором про нее написать. Я когда-то немножко писал про изданную ими же книжку Э. Джентиле и на эт…

❤36

28 Sept 2026, 13:17 UTC≈2,360 views36 reactionsread 8 November 2026

ОБ «ИНТЕЛЛЕКТУАЛАХ МУССОЛИНИ» А. ДЖ. ГРЕГОРА / 2 2. уже вот в этой статье 1958 года автор принимает относительно фашизма ту самую «позу», что и в «Интеллектуалах Муссолини», и в других книгах, а их у него пятьдесят или типа того, и нужно сказать, что наблюдать за этой позой, следить за языком и руками автора – очень увлекательно. Сомневаться в том, что Грегор «таки фашист», не приходится – он тусил на торжествах в ч…

❤36

19 Sept 2026, 11:52 UTC≈3,320 views87 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

пытался найти страницу для одной конкретной цитаты насчет жертвоприношения из работы А. Юбера и М. Мосса и поисковой ИИ смешно переглючило нахрен – естественно, ничего подобного кот не пищал. Еще и про «редакции» чего-то науточнял, мразь. Будьте бдительны

❤87

7 Sept 2026, 15:55 UTC≈3,960 views31 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @krugom16

Вообще этот материал мог бы называться «Кто ж тебя „Горьким“ прозвал? Десять сладких лет о книгах и чтении». Десять лет для российских медиа — срок немалый, целая эпоха пришла и ушла, но кое-что остается постоянным. Из этих десяти лет семь я тружусь редактором «Горького», периодически вынужден погружаться в толщу сайта о книгах и чтении и потому могу сказать, что именно не изменилось. Известный драматизм интонации, …

❤31

7 Sept 2026, 15:55 UTC≈3,460 views21 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Присоединяюсь к поздравлениям с д.р. коллег и друзей из «Горького». Нежно ценю их деятельность и рад убедиться, что они тоже состоят в тайном Ордене некой таинственной руки P.S. но и орден – пустяки, на самом деле они гении просто.

❤21

3 Sept 2026, 08:16 UTC≈5,140 views86 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Забыл рассказать про ПАРООБРАЗНУЮ ГОВЯДИНУ, исправляюсь. Это к предыдущему посту. Так вот, Теренс Максуини, как мы видим по цифре в 73 дня, продержался невероятно долго и все жил и жил, и поэтому все начали подозревать, что его тайком чем-то подкармливают – например, в причастии, в лекарствах или как-то вот родственники, – и на этот счет в газетах были всякие безумные теории. Даже папа римский Бенедикт XV, которого …

❤86

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @sacredviolence. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PhilosophyToday
@Philosophytoday · 19,756
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026
Книжные Подборки
@knizhnye_podborki · 22,665
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
Горький
@gorky_media · 19,017
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
Православие и зомби
@orthozombies · 31,012
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 6 September 2026
Клинический психоанализ
@clinicalpsychoanalysis · 36,715
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 1 September 2026
Общество распространения полезных книг
@obrpk · 26,828
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sacred violence” (@sacredviolence), 7,342 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sacredviolence.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.