Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for prometa.pro книжки

Channel

prometa.pro книжки

@prometa

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,020subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001070951509
TypeChannel
Username@prometa
DescriptionПро нон-фикшн, в первую очередь, мировые премьеры, которые еще не издавались на русском, отличные отечественные научно-популярные книги, беллетристику. Контакты [email protected], в телеграме AksenovaEkaterina
Created29 August 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held47
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/prometa

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,98210,03610,0095 August 2026 — 10,000 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,000 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,997 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,002 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,998 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,997 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,999 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,010 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,009 subscribers24 August 2026 — 10,002 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,004 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,006 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,010 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,002 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,999 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,000 subscribers4 September 2026 — 10,001 subscribers6 September 2026 — 9,995 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,997 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,982 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,992 subscribers29 September 2026 — 10,001 subscribers5 October 2026 — 10,003 subscribers9 October 2026 — 9,997 subscribers14 October 2026 — 10,011 subscribers15 October 2026 — 10,012 subscribers16 October 2026 — 10,023 subscribers17 October 2026 — 10,026 subscribers18 October 2026 — 10,029 subscribers19 October 2026 — 10,031 subscribers20 October 2026 — 10,032 subscribers21 October 2026 — 10,030 subscribers22 October 2026 — 10,029 subscribers23 October 2026 — 10,027 subscribers24 October 2026 — 10,026 subscribers25 October 2026 — 10,024 subscribers26 October 2026 — 10,022 subscribers27 October 2026 — 10,024 subscribers28 October 2026 — 10,026 subscribers29 October 2026 — 10,028 subscribers30 October 2026 — 10,031 subscribers31 October 2026 — 10,030 subscribers1 November 2026 — 10,025 subscribers2 November 2026 — 10,030 subscribers3 November 2026 — 10,036 subscribers4 November 2026 — 10,015 subscribers5 November 2026 — 10,020 subscribers10,0205 August 20265 November 2026
47 measurements spanning 92 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,974–10,044 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 47
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 16:2710,020+5
4 Nov 2026, 16:0610,015-21
3 Nov 2026, 14:0610,036+6
2 Nov 2026, 11:3610,030+5
1 Nov 2026, 10:4610,025-5
31 Oct 2026, 12:3910,030-1
30 Oct 2026, 13:4110,031+3
29 Oct 2026, 13:3110,028+2
28 Oct 2026, 13:1610,026+2
27 Oct 2026, 10:0710,024+2
26 Oct 2026, 13:3710,022-2
25 Oct 2026, 16:4710,024-2
24 Oct 2026, 16:0410,026-1
23 Oct 2026, 13:0610,027-2
22 Oct 2026, 16:3510,029-1
21 Oct 2026, 13:5910,030-2
20 Oct 2026, 10:3610,032+1
19 Oct 2026, 10:0610,031+2
18 Oct 2026, 06:4610,029+3
17 Oct 2026, 07:4610,026first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.2%
avg views ÷ 10,020 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,820
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
21
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held61 (23 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total38,306
Reactions total1,289
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 21:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈629
Videos
≈10
Links
≈2,140

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,393 reactions across 61 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥3,27396.5%
🤔1203.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 61 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,393 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
3.28%
2 of 61 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,110
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,870
over 59 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqwY4pAP124 August 202624 August 2026
2Vtzqx3VQSX112 August 202612 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 7 of 21 posts held from the last 30 days (33.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 07:43 UTC906 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Как же раздроблена, сегментирована культура. Почитала ознакомительный фрагмент книги Адама Коэна «Ужин капитана», в котором рассказывается об знаменитом процессе Корона против Дадли и Стивенса: одно из самых известных судебных дел в истории западного права. Его неизменно изучают на юридических факультетах: оно входит в учебники по уголовному праву для первокурсников, разбирается на лекциях и произвело глубокое впеча…

🔥36🤔2

4 Nov 2026, 17:25 UTC≈1,070 views38 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ездила караванами-пароходами, прочитала бОльшую часть нового романа про реалти-шоу Escape! Автор сам дважды участвовал в Survivor, причем, в первый подход стал вторым номером. Есть байка, что на больших чемпионатах спортсмен, занявший первое место в эйфории, бронзовый призер тоже радуется, а вот серебро расстраивает. Видимо, да. Хотя у него нормальная карьера, был вице-президентом MTV, много разных проектов. Я сама …

🔥38

1 Nov 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,830 views67 reactionsread 5 November 2026

В книге о рынке велнесса автор интересно рассказывает о феномене Enhanced Games, олимпиаде, где спортсмены могут разгоняться любыми препаратами, которые в принципе разрешены для применения на людях. То есть тестостерон, анаболики, стимуляторы - да, а, скажем, стрихнин, от которого бегуны до запрета допинга умирали прямо на дистанции, уже нет. Идея очень либертарианская: человек должен сам выбирать способы достижения…

🔥63🤔4

31 Oct 2026, 06:35 UTC≈1,660 views71 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Вчера была участником книжного клуба по «Франкенштейну или современному Прометею» Мэри Шелли, на который пришли, в основном, очень молодые люди. Ходить в чужие книжные клубы полезно, всем модераторам настоятельно рекомендую. Главное, при этом, быть хорошим участником. Перед встречей посмотрела роман и еще раз поразилась, как же он хитро наверчен с точки зрения системы голосов. В нем нет нулевой фокализации, когда вс…

🔥71

30 Oct 2026, 10:57 UTC≈1,950 views66 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Переходим к датчикам, умным часам, кольцам и прочему хайтеку. В Make Me Well: The Truth About the Wellness Industry, Supplements, and Personalised Health им отведены две главы. У большинства моих знакомых есть умные часы или кольцо Oura, которое следит за сном. Я пару месяцев носила датчики непрерывного мониторинга глюкозы и собралась в микрогруппу, где мы были сами себе лабораторными мышами. Смотрю на шагомер в тел…

🔥57🤔9

29 Oct 2026, 13:14 UTC≈1,560 views94 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Слушаю новую книгу про устройство wellness индустрии. Автор – врач и научный журналист Ксанд ван Туллекен, у него есть брат-близнец Крис ван Туллекен, тоже врач и автор книги про рынок ультра-переработанной еды. Make Me Well: The Truth About the Wellness Industry, Supplements, and Personalised Health Про коллаген хорошая глава в начале. По большому счету, коллаген – это продукт из отходов переработки мяса и рыбы: ш…

🔥79🤔15

28 Oct 2026, 05:23 UTC≈1,820 views85 reactionsread 5 November 2026

И о попытках понять правду о дочитывании книг. Одно время у Амазона прямо на странице книги публиковались 5 самых популярных цитаты, которые люди подчеркивали у себя в Kindle. Наиболее цитируемые фрагменты выделяются и сейчас, но их видно только в купленной книге. Математик Джордан Элленберг написал в 2014 году шуточную заметку, основанную на понятной идее: в абстрактном среднем случае эти 5 фрагментов должны распр…

🔥76🤔9

27 Oct 2026, 13:25 UTC≈1,520 views46 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Еще одна влиятельная книга, которую мало, кто читал: Эстес «Бегущая с волками». Обсуждали ее в субботу на специальном треке клуба Просветитель. Это пример книги, которая, одновременно • широко известна на уровне названия • регулярно рекомендуется к прочтению терапевтами, тренерами, коучами • и очень мало читается/дочитывается. Огромный текст для массовой культуры сузился до метафоры про дикую женщину, прием с анал…

🔥41🤔5

23 Oct 2026, 18:19 UTC≈2,030 views34 reactionsread 5 November 2026

В бесконечном поиске хороших клубных книг прочитала полтора романа о беспросветности жизни маленького офисного человека – «Перфоманс» Беатрис Серано и «Совершенство» Винченцо Латронико. «Совершенство» не дочитала, потому что в своей первой трети это слишком уж инфодамп. Много думала, почему на мне эти тексты не срабатывают. Там про относительно легкую жизнь людей из креативной сферы, которые отыгрывают все подростк…

🔥34

22 Oct 2026, 05:20 UTC≈2,130 views46 reactionsread 5 November 2026

В угаре охоты на ведьм может быть полезным создать ковен. Во Франции внезапно учредили Prix Pascal (Паскалевскую премию?) для текстов, написанных с ИИ. Это частная инициатива трех предпринимателей: крипто-бро, медийщика и создателя успешной платформы для электронных выборов. Заметно, что премию собрали очень быстро, как MVP. Толком положения о премии нет, жюри будет представлено в начале ноября, номинаций и наград т…

🔥38🤔8

21 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC≈2,010 views115 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Немного о статусе книжного клуба. Дарья Кузнецова, основательница книжного клуба в Хамовниках, сейчас в чате курса рассказала, как в месяц, когда они читали «Почему у зебр не бывает инфаркта. Психология стресса» Роберта Сапольски, она написала автору письмо с вопросами, а он очень мило и развернуто ответил. Сапольски написал о том, что бы сейчас, двадцать лет спустя, стоило обновить в книге, о том, как продвинулась…

🔥115

20 Oct 2026, 10:26 UTC≈2,220 views45 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Мир, очевидно, ищет следующий модный эпос. Индийцы выпустят в ноябре Рамаяну, британский поэт-лауреат Саймон Армитидж сделал новый перевод Гильгамеша. Армитидж не специалист по аккадскому, переводил по подстрочнику Якоба Даля и слушал транслитерацию, чтобы уловить поэзию текста. За что, конечно, оправдывается: All translation is an illusion. All translation is a compromise. There is no original poem… Mine is a furt…

🔥45

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @prometa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@prometa edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Толще твиттера
@biggakniga · 26,240
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
The Content is The Queen
@thecontentisthequeen · 21,464
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
еврейка у микрофона
@urfavjewishgirl · 44,361
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Армен и Фёдор
@armenifedor · 41,803
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Горький
@gorky_media · 19,001
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
Полка
@polka_academy · 22,114
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
Рыба Лоцман
@ryba_lotsman · 52,222
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Книжный импорт
@importknig · 35,469
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026
Парс и фоны
@parslivres · 25,481
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“prometa.pro книжки” (@prometa), 10,020 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prometa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.