Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Толще твиттера

Channel

Толще твиттера

@biggakniga

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

26,244subscribers

-86 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001054039150
TypeChannel
Username@biggakniga
DescriptionАнастасия Завозова, главный едактор. «Щегол», Storytel, «Книжный базар», «Дом историй», «Смысловая 226». Рекламу не размещаю. Для связи: [email protected] РКН: https://clck.ru/3PYRut
Created21 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/biggakniga

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

26,24026,33726,288.55 August 2026 — 26,330 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,330 subscribers6 August 2026 — 26,333 subscribers7 August 2026 — 26,332 subscribers8 August 2026 — 26,327 subscribers9 August 2026 — 26,334 subscribers11 August 2026 — 26,333 subscribers12 August 2026 — 26,334 subscribers13 August 2026 — 26,337 subscribers14 August 2026 — 26,335 subscribers16 August 2026 — 26,317 subscribers17 August 2026 — 26,315 subscribers19 August 2026 — 26,313 subscribers20 August 2026 — 26,312 subscribers22 August 2026 — 26,297 subscribers24 August 2026 — 26,296 subscribers25 August 2026 — 26,295 subscribers26 August 2026 — 26,293 subscribers27 August 2026 — 26,294 subscribers28 August 2026 — 26,301 subscribers29 August 2026 — 26,303 subscribers30 August 2026 — 26,298 subscribers31 August 2026 — 26,294 subscribers1 September 2026 — 26,288 subscribers2 September 2026 — 26,291 subscribers3 September 2026 — 26,289 subscribers5 September 2026 — 26,279 subscribers8 September 2026 — 26,265 subscribers11 September 2026 — 26,278 subscribers13 September 2026 — 26,271 subscribers14 September 2026 — 26,268 subscribers16 September 2026 — 26,266 subscribers19 September 2026 — 26,267 subscribers25 September 2026 — 26,307 subscribers4 October 2026 — 26,287 subscribers8 October 2026 — 26,277 subscribers13 October 2026 — 26,276 subscribers14 October 2026 — 26,279 subscribers15 October 2026 — 26,276 subscribers16 October 2026 — 26,281 subscribers17 October 2026 — 26,280 subscribers18 October 2026 — 26,277 subscribers19 October 2026 — 26,278 subscribers20 October 2026 — 26,282 subscribers21 October 2026 — 26,281 subscribers22 October 2026 — 26,286 subscribers23 October 2026 — 26,275 subscribers24 October 2026 — 26,276 subscribers25 October 2026 — 26,279 subscribers26 October 2026 — 26,282 subscribers27 October 2026 — 26,279 subscribers28 October 2026 — 26,273 subscribers29 October 2026 — 26,271 subscribers30 October 2026 — 26,253 subscribers31 October 2026 — 26,245 subscribers1 November 2026 — 26,243 subscribers2 November 2026 — 26,240 subscribers3 November 2026 — 26,242 subscribers4 November 2026 — 26,240 subscribers6 November 2026 — 26,244 subscribers26,2445 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 92 days, net -86. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,225–26,352 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 07:3026,244+4
4 Nov 2026, 08:4426,240-2
3 Nov 2026, 05:4926,242+2
2 Nov 2026, 05:4126,240-3
1 Nov 2026, 07:1726,243-2
31 Oct 2026, 07:0726,245-8
30 Oct 2026, 06:0726,253-18
29 Oct 2026, 05:1126,271-2
28 Oct 2026, 03:2626,273-6
27 Oct 2026, 03:5826,279-3
26 Oct 2026, 05:4626,282+3
25 Oct 2026, 08:4626,279+3
24 Oct 2026, 10:4526,276+1
23 Oct 2026, 11:3926,275-11
22 Oct 2026, 11:1526,286+5
21 Oct 2026, 07:2826,281-1
20 Oct 2026, 08:2926,282+4
19 Oct 2026, 09:4026,278+1
18 Oct 2026, 13:0826,277-3
17 Oct 2026, 10:5426,280first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 136 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
43.9%
avg views ÷ 26,244 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,500
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 28 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026
Posts held28 (21 May 2026 – 29 October 2026)
Views total46,060
Reactions total2,262
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 17:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
176
Videos
4
Links
402

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

15,855 reactions across 28 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7,66648.4%
😁4,94831.2%
🔥1,65510.4%
👍6444.06%
💔2561.61%
🍾1751.10%
👏1420.896%
🥰1250.788%
🎉970.612%
😱790.498%
💯530.334%
🙏150.095%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15,855 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
38
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 28 we hold a reading for · 39%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @biggakniga. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 May 2026 to 29 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

29 Oct 2026, 16:14 UTC≈6,660 views525 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

Сносив, в лучших (нет) традициях нового мира, семь пар железных сапог, добрались до Франкфуртской книжной ярмарки. Рассказываю о том, что мы там увидели, в том числе — о мурдоку, полусуперах, цветных обрезах, жирной с золотом классике и ACOTAR. «Но ковид прошел, а осадочек остался. Точнее, усадочек. Если до пандемии количество участников выставки достигало 7000 (участник — это тот, у кого есть хоть какой-то мало-ма…

❤283😁146🔥60💔35🙏1

22 Oct 2026, 19:17 UTC≈12,100 views1,029 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Думаю я, дорогой дневник, о романе Джейн Остен «Чувства и чувствительность», который я тут для одного хорошего дела взялась перечитывать, и о том, насколько это роман про деньги, а не про любовь. Любовные ходы Остен делает быстро и как бы невзначай — о том, что Элинор нравится Эдвард мы узнаем без предварительного томления, страсть Марианны выходит на первый план мгновенно, вместе со смехом, как яйцо в крутой кипято…

❤708😁142💔88👍59🔥32

8 Oct 2026, 15:27 UTC≈13,700 views325 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026

В промежутке между забегом по Франкфуртской ярмарке рассказала, почему нам всем надо читать Энн Карсон. «Действительно, недели Древней Греции в мировом культурном пространстве 2026 года завершились вручением Нобелевской премии по литературе одному из самых известных филологов-классиков в мире. Огненное око поп-культуры обратило свой взгляд на античность и увидело, что это долголетие по степени сохранности может посп…

❤232🍾48😁33🥰12

8 Oct 2026, 15:27 UTC≈13,600 views383 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @memedia226Photo

Обещали? Выполняем! 💫 Сегодня Нобелевский комитет вручил премию по литературе канадской поэтессе, эссеистке и филологу Энн Карсон. Главный редактор журнала Анастасия Завозова объясняет, почему Энн Карсон такая классная и почему ее стоит читать именно сейчас 💚

❤294🍾48🥰25👍16

30 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTC≈14,300 views812 reactions8 Starsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @memedia226

Posted without readable text

❤490😁191🔥80🎉39💔12

30 Sept 2026, 14:41 UTC≈13,400 views417 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Однажды ИИ решил отнять работу у переводчика художественной литературы и стал ААААААА! С днем переводчика, друзья.

😁272❤80🍾58🔥5👍2

18 Sept 2026, 15:13 UTC≈22,100 views1,109 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Для нашего журнала написала о том, почему мы до сих пор читаем и смотрим «Сумерки». Получилось почему-то про миллениальскую тоску по сверкающему прошлому. «Главные герои, Белла и Эдвард, встречаются ровно в тот момент своих жизней, когда у нее еще нет никаких реальных проблем, а у него их нет уже давно. Она — школьница, которой не надо готовиться к ЕГЭ, он — дед, которому не надо в поликлинику. Они встречаются на за…

😁639❤294🔥135💯24👍17

5 Sept 2026, 12:23 UTC≈17,200 views781 reactions5 Starsread 6 November 2026

Ну и #5книг Whistler, Ann Patchett Пэтчетт пишет какие-то ужасно славные книжки, как будто к ней приходят, не знаю, воображаемые читатели и говорят: «Здрасте, а вы можете написать такую книгу, чтобы там все люди были хорошие, ну и чтобы им жилось как-то нормально, и проблемы бы у них были бы такие, понятные, а не так чтобы мать в детстве на меня холодно посмотрела, и теперь я отморозок, а еще бы лучше, чтоб вообще …

❤446😁223🔥72👍34🍾6

5 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈13,200 views402 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Сняли и записали очень красивый и очень умный разговор Дарьи Бобылёвой с Настасьей Реньжиной — о грибах, леших, природе тьмы, подслушанных сюжетах, снах, писательстве как психотерапии, убийствах героев, писательском процессе и том, как писатели пробалтываются в своих книгах. Бонусом — советы от Насти как перевезти домового в новую квартиру, и от Даши — как вернуться из леса с грибочками (и в принципе вернуться). Воо…

❤296👍54😁28💯23🥰1

5 Sept 2026, 08:05 UTC≈11,100 views253 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @memedia226Photo

В одном черном-черном городе... ...встретились две писательницы хорроров и записали большое красивущее интервью! 😍 Мы собрали в одном помещении мастериц жанра ужасов — Дарью Бобылёву и Настасью Реньжину — фотографа Олимпию Орлову, художника по костюму Полину Гречко, команду Vivienne Sabó и «Смысловой 226», чтобы провести атмосферную (жутко-прекрасную!) съемку и записать разговор писательниц, не понаслышке знающих, …

❤184🔥47👍19😁2💔1

21 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈15,800 views355 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Друзья, на фестивале «Красная строка» в моем самом после Москвы любимом городе Екатеринбурге я участвую в двух мероприятиях и буду очень рада всех увидеть и обнять. В субботу 22 августа расскажу о том, почему перевод художественной литературы занятие далеко не художественное. Модератор — тот самый Максим Мамлыга. 14.00, Лекторий №1. Ветер В воскресенье 23 августа буду задавать вопросы Марии Нырковой про ее сборник…

❤248🔥64🥰27👍12💔4

15 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC≈15,800 views296 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @memedia226Video

Сегодня в «Медленном чтении» рассказ датского писателя Германа Банга, написанный более 120 лет назад. Перевод Насти Завозовой ждал своего часа почти столько же четыре года — тогда он так нигде и не вышел. Видимо, для того, чтобы появиться в Журнале сейчас 🙌 В начале XX века Банг был очень популярен в России: его работы практически сразу выходили в переводах на русский язык, а сам Банг часто посещал страну и не раз …

❤260👍31🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @biggakniga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Рыба Лоцман
@ryba_lotsman · 52,211
#1
Мистер Дарси и бал
@mrdarcyandballs · 11,169
#2
Издательство «Дом историй»
@domistorii · 19,720
#3
Lady Libra
@ladylibra_1410 · 8,097
#4
Издательство "Фантом Пресс"
@phantombooks · 13,611
#5
prometa.pro книжки
@prometa · 10,021
#6
Книгижарь
@bookngrill · 11,484
#7
Заметки панк-редактора
@UmiGame · 7,189
#8
Bookeanarium
@bookeanarium · 3,235
#9
Книгочервивость
@knigochervivost · 2,838
#10
Не перевелись ещё
@read_original · 2,608
#11
Издательство Corpus
@Corpusbooks · 14,077
#12
Books in my hands | Книги в моих руках
@booksinmyhands · 4,142
#13
РЕШаю, что читать // Редакция Елены Шубиной
@shubinabooks · 14,757
#14
Bookовски
@bookovski · 5,176
#15
Gärten und Straßen
@GartenundStrassen · 2,521
#16
книжный странник | дина озерова
@bookranger · 5,601
#17
Drinkcoffee.Readbooks | Книги и некниги
@drinkread · 4,380
#18
Монологи книготорговки
@kakieknigi · 4,214
#19
Интеллигентка Гадова
@intelligentka_gadova · 3,162
#20
Книжная жизнь Катрин П.
@kniga_katrin · 5,607
#21
Парс и фоны
@parslivres · 25,482
#22
что читает леночка
@lenaisreading · 5,176
#23
Книжная среда Куплевацкой
@BeAwitness · 3,024
#24
Литагенты существуют
@litagents · 12,762
#25
Женщина пишет
@readwomanread · 7,793
#26
Госпожа главный редактор
@omikla · 8,895
#27
pobuchteam
@pobuchteam · 5,393
#28
из сердца тьмы
@byakavasyaka · 6,080
#29
120 дней соломы
@manoylo_ekaterina · 3,345
#30
Госпожа главред
@vasha_literaturnaya_gospozha · 2,199
#31
Lukupäiväkirja
@rakas_lukupaivakirja · 1,176
#32
Dramedy
@dramedy · 4,944
#33
Pal o' Me Heart
@palomeheart · 4,202
#34
Книжная субмарина
@book_submarine · 1,535
#35
Старый пёс, канарейка и ужин
@knigi_melicenta · 3,524
#36
книжки, кофе и винил
@hardrockandeasyreading · 2,118
#37
Read_teach_crossstitch
@read_teach_crossstitch · 1,811
#38
Литература и жизнь
@bookninja · 18,089
#39
Вредный издатель
@angrypublisher · 9,106
#40
Мамлыга WB
@landscapewithbooks · 7,468
#41
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,117,673
#42
Рембодлер
@rembodlery · 6,561
#43
Canal du Midi
@milchin · 6,550
#44
Поляринов пишет
@Polyarinov · 11,271
#45
Богданова и прочие речные твари
@wordsnletters · 4,306
#46
Настоящий детектив
@detectivetrue · 5,915
#47
Приключения Кати и её Киндла
@williwaw_reads · 1,474
#48
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 299,917
#49
Страдающее Средневековье
@pophistory · 140,198
#50
Издательства «Поляндрия» и NoAge
@polyandria · 13,879
#51
Делаем книги
@delaemknigi · 12,988
#52
speculative_fiction | Василий Владимирский
@SpeculativeFiction · 4,740
#53
Зинаида Пронченко
@ZinaidaPronchenko · 74,393
#54
птица и книжки
@blackbirdandbooks · 1,491
#55
Порез бумагой
@individuumbooks · 13,680
#56
Слова и деньги
@words_and_money · 4,297
#57
зельвенский
@ubobra · 10,747
#58
Мартышка
@knigkamartishka · 4,564
#59
pandemonium of the sun
@pandemoniumofthesun · 3,523
#60
Постоянная читательница
@dochitalatut · 5,417
#61
magie bizarre | Наталия Осояну
@magie_bizarre · 3,520
#62
Жизнь Птиц | Ольга Птицева
@pticeva · 4,849
#63
Рыдакторы
@boksttttttt · 6,748
#64
Яндекс Книги
@booksyandex · 141,154
#65
Канал Вики Лебедевой
@vilebedeva · 3,074
#66
Подписные издания
@izdaniya · 53,067
#67
Все Свободны
@vsesvobodny · 17,160
#68
еврейка у микрофона
@urfavjewishgirl · 44,348
#69
Звездные маяки капитана Норта
@starlighthousekeeping · 4,545
#70
разговор чужими словами
@chuzieslova · 3,349
#71
Запасаемся попкорном
@zapasaemsyapopkornom · 40,901
#72
Опыты чтения
@experience_reading · 2,094
#73
Горький
@gorky_media · 19,011
#74
БИЛЛИ •
@billybookmedia · 5,387
#75
устойчивые призраки вещей
@suchstuff · 9,594
#76
по краям
@admarginem · 33,659
#77
Heresy Hub
@heresy_hub · 2,416
#78
Yashernet
@yashernet · 5,335
#79
Армен и Фёдор
@armenifedor · 41,810
#80
Books & Reviews
@books_reviews · 12,940
#81
Idiatullin
@idiatullin · 2,250
#82
Книгусеница
@yolka_books · 2,346
#83
Письма династии Минь
@alina_perlova · 4,313
#84
На словах
@na_slovah · 6,823
#85
Издательство Ивана Лимбаха
@ilimbakh · 6,350
#86
кириенков
@slowlearner · 2,342
#87
Полка
@polka_academy · 22,133
#88
Сапрыкин - ст.
@forevernotes · 13,646
#89
Внутренняя Ирландия. Нуль-родина
@inner_ireland · 2,670
#90
Mcpublisher
@mc_publisher · 1,655
#91
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 74,919
#92
don't touch my face
@donttouchmyface · 54,762
#93
Дудь
@yurydud · 850,752
#94
Вся Володина
@ne_turgenevskaya · 1,375
#95
baunovhaus
@baunovhaus · 35,668
#96

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Рыба Лоцман
@ryba_lotsman · 52,211
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Армен и Фёдор
@armenifedor · 41,810
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Парс и фоны
@parslivres · 25,482
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 14 September 2026
Яндекс Книги
@booksyandex · 141,154
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
Запасаемся попкорном
@zapasaemsyapopkornom · 40,901
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Полка
@polka_academy · 22,133
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
еврейка у микрофона
@urfavjewishgirl · 44,348
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Страдариум
@stradarium1 · 36,348
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026
Горький
@gorky_media · 19,011
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
Намочи манту
@namochimanturu · 56,228
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
The Content is The Queen
@thecontentisthequeen · 21,461
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 23 September 2026
Антон Долин
@anton_dolin · 51,206
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 24 August 2026
Arzamas
@ArzamasLive · 59,776
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 August 2026
по краям
@admarginem · 33,659
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Лингвошутки
@lingvojokes · 21,369
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Грамотность на «Меле»
@gramota_mel · 20,092
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 September 2026
Hopkins English
@hopkinsenglish · 32,876
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
(Не)занимательная антропология
@anthro_fun · 74,919
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 August 2026
Федиатрия
@fediatrix · 53,910
Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Толще твиттера” (@biggakniga), 26,244 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/biggakniga.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.